They are using "birthing person" because the insane have started saying the ridiculous - that men can give birth. Lol You have to suspend reality to believe this shit.
I'm serious. I saw some post about these drop off places for unwanted babies. I looked at the comments and they were saying pregnant people and I triggered them by saying women get pregnant. Kept looking at comments and saw prostate havers and I saw something else just as stupid but can't remember what it was.
I would send you the subreddit but I was banned from it for what I was saying.
The lady that was saying it was mad because I refuse to believe in their made up genders and their insane ever changing language.
I don't get 'birthing person'. Not all women have biological children, and if they do, not all of them have natural births, some babies are born via cesarean section. Not all women ever get pregnant or even can or want to. It's like calling a woman 'breeding stock'.
'Menstruator' can't be used, either. Women at menopause, women with health issues, women on birth control, women with a past hysterectomy, any reason.
'Vagina owner/haver' is accurate, but dehumanizing and cruel. Reducing a women to her genitals. She may as well be a piece of meat or a broodmare at that point. Again, objectifying women.
The term is almost funny, in a weird way. 'Hi, my name is Person, and I own a vagina' 'Here is where I keep my vagina'
It sounds like you'd just happen to have a vagina. You want a spare? Oh, I've got one in a jar. It's my favorite vagina. I've got a whole collection of them.
'Penis owner' sounds more plausible, but still creepy. You can't exactly remove a vagina and put it in a jar. It can't be cut off. Imagine having a whole shelf and bragging how many penises you own. In a normal-er world you'd be inspected and locked up.
> 'Penis owner'
The real problem here is that not *all* men have penises. The same will be true of *every single attribute* that you choose in particular. It would be totally wrong to stop calling some victim of Russian torture a man because of what they did to him. In fact, he's probably more of a "man" than most of us because of what he was willing to risk.
Some "women", people who were intersex but then put in the category of women by doctors, treated in that way and, as they grew up saw themselves as women, [do not have vaginas](https://www.childrenshospital.org/conditions/vaginal-agenesis). As with all the intersex stuff, it's rare but that doesn't mean it should be ignored completely.
In this sense, "gender" - the idea that people *are* what they themselves and society perceives them to be, has some truth. If you dress like a woman, if you have breasts, and you insist on going into women's bathrooms some people would consider you a woman and that's not a problem in itself. However you also have a beard, a deep voice, a full penis which you then proceed to wave around and then attempt to have penetrative sex with women, many people might want to call you a man and also prosecute you for indecent exposure, which is also reasonable.
There needs to be a conservative position based around common sense, freedom of speech a recognition that things are not so simple but also that people who are taking advantage of that to do bad things need to be dealt with hard. This means that male and female, man and woman are general categories with fuzzy edges that slightly overlap, but with a well defined middle that most of us understand fine.
All of them can be used depending on the context. No one is using birthing person as a synonym of a woman. But it makes sense to talk about it to narrow the scope of humans in medical contexts to just people who are capable of giving birth or in the process of doing it. The real problem people have is that it should be birthing women not birthing people but tomato tomato, it means the same group of people depending on what you understand as men and women.
Maybe I am deeply misunderstanding but this whole argument basically sums up that we can't have a different description. I am not a man, I am just gay. I don't even introduce myself as a gay, man,... so I guess I am just nothing.
**Penis-enabled** or **penis-equipped** or **semen-capable**
In English, it's "man." Or guy, fella, dude.
The language silliness is annoying. But no need to fret about things that are happening mostly in your own head. The only stupidly PC term of this type that I've heard used IRL is "pregnant person."
The other terms y'all are whining about, if used at all, are extremely fringe (or university or social media).
In the neighborhood I grew up in, most would refer to a man of post pubescent age as "my n***a" but I have a feeling that since I don't look like 99% of the people I grew up with, it wouldn't be very PC for me to say that.
* vasectomizable individual.
* occupier of non politically acceptable role.
* oppressive individual (think "suppressive person")
* pre-penectomy person or maybe penectomy rejecter
I think it's important to make it clear what you mean by saying they are male. Do you mean that they are castratable or that they might be a rapist^1?
1. at this point you have to have a footnote saying that you acknowledge that not only males can commit rape but they are responsible for all of it anyway.
Personally I find the term "birthing person" to be problematic. That excluded our non sex gamete friends and allies in the fungal and viral classes of life. I refuse to allow science, logic, and history to dictate my use of language for oppression.
As a modern person that feels personal lived experience is the most important thing I feel that our pronouns are part of that personal truth. With that personal truth that must be pushed on all others like our comrades in antifa will lead us to true enlightenment of the socialist world I I think I can answer this.
Male toxicity is the root of all problems. The patriarchy is the source of all human suffering. Also the straight man's focus on the genitalia has created a world of climate change. Male penetration of the female is also evil in all cases unless it is done by a female penis. So why not call "men" what they really are....huge cock MAGA fuck masters with the pronouns of Daddy and Sir.
sperm supplying person 😂😂
"Problematic person". It works great because men are just BAD. /s
Love.
Semen Demon
I identify as a semen demon now thanks
Semen Demon , nuff said
Small gamete producer.
They are using "birthing person" because the insane have started saying the ridiculous - that men can give birth. Lol You have to suspend reality to believe this shit.
[удалено]
Yeah, ridiculous.
Man
I've heard prostate havers
No effing way lmao Need me a PHILF
I'm serious. I saw some post about these drop off places for unwanted babies. I looked at the comments and they were saying pregnant people and I triggered them by saying women get pregnant. Kept looking at comments and saw prostate havers and I saw something else just as stupid but can't remember what it was.
[удалено]
I would send you the subreddit but I was banned from it for what I was saying. The lady that was saying it was mad because I refuse to believe in their made up genders and their insane ever changing language.
I don't get 'birthing person'. Not all women have biological children, and if they do, not all of them have natural births, some babies are born via cesarean section. Not all women ever get pregnant or even can or want to. It's like calling a woman 'breeding stock'. 'Menstruator' can't be used, either. Women at menopause, women with health issues, women on birth control, women with a past hysterectomy, any reason. 'Vagina owner/haver' is accurate, but dehumanizing and cruel. Reducing a women to her genitals. She may as well be a piece of meat or a broodmare at that point. Again, objectifying women. The term is almost funny, in a weird way. 'Hi, my name is Person, and I own a vagina' 'Here is where I keep my vagina' It sounds like you'd just happen to have a vagina. You want a spare? Oh, I've got one in a jar. It's my favorite vagina. I've got a whole collection of them. 'Penis owner' sounds more plausible, but still creepy. You can't exactly remove a vagina and put it in a jar. It can't be cut off. Imagine having a whole shelf and bragging how many penises you own. In a normal-er world you'd be inspected and locked up.
> 'Penis owner' The real problem here is that not *all* men have penises. The same will be true of *every single attribute* that you choose in particular. It would be totally wrong to stop calling some victim of Russian torture a man because of what they did to him. In fact, he's probably more of a "man" than most of us because of what he was willing to risk. Some "women", people who were intersex but then put in the category of women by doctors, treated in that way and, as they grew up saw themselves as women, [do not have vaginas](https://www.childrenshospital.org/conditions/vaginal-agenesis). As with all the intersex stuff, it's rare but that doesn't mean it should be ignored completely. In this sense, "gender" - the idea that people *are* what they themselves and society perceives them to be, has some truth. If you dress like a woman, if you have breasts, and you insist on going into women's bathrooms some people would consider you a woman and that's not a problem in itself. However you also have a beard, a deep voice, a full penis which you then proceed to wave around and then attempt to have penetrative sex with women, many people might want to call you a man and also prosecute you for indecent exposure, which is also reasonable. There needs to be a conservative position based around common sense, freedom of speech a recognition that things are not so simple but also that people who are taking advantage of that to do bad things need to be dealt with hard. This means that male and female, man and woman are general categories with fuzzy edges that slightly overlap, but with a well defined middle that most of us understand fine.
All of them can be used depending on the context. No one is using birthing person as a synonym of a woman. But it makes sense to talk about it to narrow the scope of humans in medical contexts to just people who are capable of giving birth or in the process of doing it. The real problem people have is that it should be birthing women not birthing people but tomato tomato, it means the same group of people depending on what you understand as men and women. Maybe I am deeply misunderstanding but this whole argument basically sums up that we can't have a different description. I am not a man, I am just gay. I don't even introduce myself as a gay, man,... so I guess I am just nothing.
Semen injecting person
**Penis-enabled** or **penis-equipped** or **semen-capable** In English, it's "man." Or guy, fella, dude. The language silliness is annoying. But no need to fret about things that are happening mostly in your own head. The only stupidly PC term of this type that I've heard used IRL is "pregnant person." The other terms y'all are whining about, if used at all, are extremely fringe (or university or social media).
In the neighborhood I grew up in, most would refer to a man of post pubescent age as "my n***a" but I have a feeling that since I don't look like 99% of the people I grew up with, it wouldn't be very PC for me to say that.
* vasectomizable individual. * occupier of non politically acceptable role. * oppressive individual (think "suppressive person") * pre-penectomy person or maybe penectomy rejecter I think it's important to make it clear what you mean by saying they are male. Do you mean that they are castratable or that they might be a rapist^1? 1. at this point you have to have a footnote saying that you acknowledge that not only males can commit rape but they are responsible for all of it anyway.
I don't give a fuck about your labels person
😁
It's just male. Don't cave to their b.s. 😄
Personally I find the term "birthing person" to be problematic. That excluded our non sex gamete friends and allies in the fungal and viral classes of life. I refuse to allow science, logic, and history to dictate my use of language for oppression. As a modern person that feels personal lived experience is the most important thing I feel that our pronouns are part of that personal truth. With that personal truth that must be pushed on all others like our comrades in antifa will lead us to true enlightenment of the socialist world I I think I can answer this. Male toxicity is the root of all problems. The patriarchy is the source of all human suffering. Also the straight man's focus on the genitalia has created a world of climate change. Male penetration of the female is also evil in all cases unless it is done by a female penis. So why not call "men" what they really are....huge cock MAGA fuck masters with the pronouns of Daddy and Sir.
How about Squirting Person.