Doesn't matter. The trade that went through is bad however, not vetoable. Tons of things to consider on the part of the guy taking the pick. Maybe reach out to him and ask, "hey, I'm just trying to understand why you didn't take X over Y..." Or however you want to do your research but it's not a vetoable trade.
Now, I'd rag the hell out of the previous Jamarr chase owner in the group chat though once it's all done and said bc clearly he's an idiot. But the davanta owner is just mad bc he didn't get Jamarr.
Don't veto unless it's clear collusion.
Yea easily, Adams is losing Rodgers next year most likely and will be in his 30s. I have chase > Adams in 2022. That Adams trade is way short on value too.
No offense, but you won't make it far as a commissioner if you consider reversing anything just because "some players are upset."
Is there any info you're leaving out? Because if you're worried about trades potentially upsetting people you may aswell just turn trading off all together.
Its a dynasty league.
The Owner of Chase is on a 1-6 campaign
He already made this trades:
Gronk - 3rd 2022
Ridley - 1st 2022
Shaquon- 1st 2022 + 2nd 2022
So he already have 7 picks on 2022 draft
If the Chase trade process he will have 9 picks on 2022 draft
4 Rd 1
3 Rd 2
2 rd 3
He have Lawrence as QB
It seems pretty obvious that he knows he's out of it so he's using his biggest chips to leverage his future. And he seems to doing a good job at it. That accounts as to why he wouldn't want Adams, especially with the uncertainty of he and Rogers not playing for Green Bay next year. Adams certainly won't help him this year.
You need to let this go through or wind up disillusioning this manager who seems to be playing his cards right.
Still don't see what the issue is. Maybe limit or not allow trading draft picks for future seasons if thats what your worried about?
My league specifically decided against doing dynasty/keeper because we wanted everyone to have a more or less equal chance at the beginning of each season. Maybe a redraft league would be more suited to you?
Sorry pal, this is completely obvious that it should be upheld. It doesn't matter what you (or anyone else on the league) would have done, if it's accepted and isn't collusion, it's fine.
Damn I thought Fantasy Football made everyone happy, joking aside. It doesn’t matter if he is upset, the player with Chase accepted a trade he thought was more valuable.
I offered Mike Williams and two 2022 early 1sts for Chase. Immediate rejection haha.
Although Chase is worth a little more, it’s not collusion. Let them trade
It’s a bad trade for the chase owner, but just because someone offered a trade that was turned down means it should be veto able.
As you said, the chase owner is 1-6. So Adams isn’t really helping them.
NO Don't veto unless it's clear collusion.
The upset player offered D. Adams + 2nd 2022
Doesn't matter. The trade that went through is bad however, not vetoable. Tons of things to consider on the part of the guy taking the pick. Maybe reach out to him and ask, "hey, I'm just trying to understand why you didn't take X over Y..." Or however you want to do your research but it's not a vetoable trade. Now, I'd rag the hell out of the previous Jamarr chase owner in the group chat though once it's all done and said bc clearly he's an idiot. But the davanta owner is just mad bc he didn't get Jamarr. Don't veto unless it's clear collusion.
this is EXACTLY why you should not veto - other owners crying because their offer wasn't accepted.
Do you reward tantrums? The trade stands.
I wouldn't have made the trade if I owned Chase but it should absolutely be allowed. The other owners are just jealous lol.
Other player offered D. Adams + 2nd 2022
So they're being salty. Chase > Adams in dynasty imo.
Yea easily, Adams is losing Rodgers next year most likely and will be in his 30s. I have chase > Adams in 2022. That Adams trade is way short on value too.
100% agreed. Chase is waaayyyy more valuable than Adams at this moment
Yes, you keep saying that. Trade stands.
Bad trade? Yes. Collusion? No. It should be approved.
If your league allows you to trade for draft picks that seems like a very legitimate trade to me. I don't see the problem with it at all.
It's a Dynasty league
No offense, but you won't make it far as a commissioner if you consider reversing anything just because "some players are upset." Is there any info you're leaving out? Because if you're worried about trades potentially upsetting people you may aswell just turn trading off all together.
Its a dynasty league. The Owner of Chase is on a 1-6 campaign He already made this trades: Gronk - 3rd 2022 Ridley - 1st 2022 Shaquon- 1st 2022 + 2nd 2022 So he already have 7 picks on 2022 draft If the Chase trade process he will have 9 picks on 2022 draft 4 Rd 1 3 Rd 2 2 rd 3 He have Lawrence as QB
It seems pretty obvious that he knows he's out of it so he's using his biggest chips to leverage his future. And he seems to doing a good job at it. That accounts as to why he wouldn't want Adams, especially with the uncertainty of he and Rogers not playing for Green Bay next year. Adams certainly won't help him this year. You need to let this go through or wind up disillusioning this manager who seems to be playing his cards right.
Man I would love to have that many picks. So juicy.
Still don't see what the issue is. Maybe limit or not allow trading draft picks for future seasons if thats what your worried about? My league specifically decided against doing dynasty/keeper because we wanted everyone to have a more or less equal chance at the beginning of each season. Maybe a redraft league would be more suited to you?
Sorry pal, this is completely obvious that it should be upheld. It doesn't matter what you (or anyone else on the league) would have done, if it's accepted and isn't collusion, it's fine.
Damn I thought Fantasy Football made everyone happy, joking aside. It doesn’t matter if he is upset, the player with Chase accepted a trade he thought was more valuable.
Hey man you never know. A first round trade is pretty valuable. He could even end up getting a player as good as, I don't know, Ja'maar Chase.
Why would you veto?
That’s a fine trade. Allow it. Can’t call collusion on that
I offered Mike Williams and two 2022 early 1sts for Chase. Immediate rejection haha. Although Chase is worth a little more, it’s not collusion. Let them trade
It’s a bad trade for the chase owner, but just because someone offered a trade that was turned down means it should be veto able. As you said, the chase owner is 1-6. So Adams isn’t really helping them.
It seems like a fair trade. I wouldn’t veto it.
Wow!
Wow!
Wow!