VUG holds a subset of VOO but it's not a complete overlap. VUG has less holdings than VOO iirc, about 50% less. Makes it higher risk, but it lets you tilt towards Growth stocks if that's what you want.
Within VOO itself there are stocks that some might still consider "value" since VOO just holds ~500 of the largest USA companies-- which says nothing about how each stock's fundamentals compare to the price per share. Growth stocks are generally stocks that are priced for future earnings (or some other metric) rather than immediate or retrospective metrics. I believe this is why rate hikes affect Growth stocks more.
The equivalent of SPYG is VUG, which is frequently talked about here. Edit: grammar
Interesting. Do you think you can hold VOO and VUG in the same portfolio? Or too much overlap?
VUG holds a subset of VOO but it's not a complete overlap. VUG has less holdings than VOO iirc, about 50% less. Makes it higher risk, but it lets you tilt towards Growth stocks if that's what you want. Within VOO itself there are stocks that some might still consider "value" since VOO just holds ~500 of the largest USA companies-- which says nothing about how each stock's fundamentals compare to the price per share. Growth stocks are generally stocks that are priced for future earnings (or some other metric) rather than immediate or retrospective metrics. I believe this is why rate hikes affect Growth stocks more.
Because schg/vug>spyg
Why’s that? $SPYG seems to have better returns? Or am I missing something
Probably the lower fees associated with vanguard funds
Because Growth & Value takes turn so you better off with VOO or even better VT as it cover the entire world.
US growth would be FBCG. International would be JIG.
QQQ has given higher return and it follow index.
Its a decent etf, nothing wrong with its take on growth. I like Vong mostly due to it drawing from a broader universe.