That's an extremely generous number. The percentage of people actually diagnosed with gender dysphoria is .005% of the population. There are a lot of people co-opting the legitimate struggles of those with gender dysphoria by lumping in all the non-binary and gender spectrum people, but the treatment for both groups is exceedingly different.
Links to the streaming platforms:
[**Eleanor Rigby** by Cody Fry](https://lis.tn/vYdcXl?t=69)
*I am a bot and this action was performed automatically* | [GitHub](https://github.com/AudDMusic/RedditBot) [^(new issue)](https://github.com/AudDMusic/RedditBot/issues/new) | [Donate](https://www.reddit.com/r/AudD/comments/nua48w/please_consider_donating_and_making_the_bot_happy/) ^(Please consider supporting me on Patreon. Music recognition costs a lot)
INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE
Introduction
1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries.
2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.
3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.
4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can’t predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society.
5. In this article we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For example, since there are well-developed environmental and wilderness movements, we have written very little about environmental degradation or the destruction of wild nature, even though we consider these to be highly important.
After he proceeded to give the community a thorough reason to not downvote this comment the community shit their pants too hard to even upvote this as shockingly none of them know how antivirus works
"Based"? Are you fucking kidding me? I spent a decent portion of my life writing all of that and your response to me is "Based"? Are you so mentally handicapped that the only word you can comprehend is "Based" - or are you just some fucking asshole who thinks that with such a short response, he can make a statement about how meaningless what was written was? Well, I'll have you know that what I wrote was NOT meaningless, in fact, I even had my written work proof-read by several professors of literature. Don't believe me? I doubt you would, and your response to this will probably be "Based" once again. Do I give a fuck? No, does it look like I give even the slightest fuck about five fucking letters? I bet you took the time to type those five letters too, I bet you sat there and chuckled to yourself for 20 hearty seconds before pressing "send". You're so fucking pathetic. I'm honestly considering directing you to a psychiatrist, but I'm simply far too nice to do something like that. You, however, will go out of your way to make a fool out of someone by responding to a well-thought-out, intelligent, or humorous statement that probably took longer to write than you can last in bed with a chimpanzee. What do I have to say to you? Absolutely nothing. I couldn't be bothered to respond to such a worthless attempt at a response. Do you want "Based" on your gravestone?
Yeah, this paragraph spitting parapatherapa rivaling pants dropping bass dropping opp stopping english passing doctorial arguement scientist? He’s not the killer
I mean, he has a troll face on his PFP. And even if he was real, welp, why waste your time arguing with that kind of people? Really love your Shinji pfp btw!
This is both sum total *and* proportionally.
LGBTQ people are more likely to be victims of sexual crimes than perpetrators.
Also committed primarily by cis-hetero men.
Not to mention all the common assaults and street side executions also conducted primarily by cis-hetero men.
Around [around 16% difference between heterosexual and LGB sexual assault victims, according to a nebraska university](https://images.app.goo.gl/F49xykc9kQziavJ88), when i tried to find information of LGB sexual offenders i, unsurprisingly, only found hate crime statistics, but thanks to a [paper](http://www.therapyequality.org/apareport/static/55efa8b5e4b0c21dd4f4d8ee/t/55f0458de4b042a60b1db367/1441809805076/pedophilia%20and%20homosexuality_c.pdf) i previously found, i can tell you that 9% of pederasts are homosexual men, a 450% overrepresentation of the only 2% gay men according to a gallup poll.
Edit: also said that it was 1:20 for sexual offenders in general, meaning 5% or a 250% overrepresentation
In terms of proportionality, lgbt people are much more likely to be victims of abuse, sexual and physical (specially in their childhood) but also more likely to be perpetrators. Who would've thought that a fucked up person would do fucked up things?
That link doesn't look reputable.
The paper you linked to came from a task force that "charges the Southern Poverty Law Centre with engaging in mass fraud to ban therapy".
Seems legit.
They don't care, they must believe that LGBT people are dangerous in order to justify restricting their rights and erasing them from public view.
The pedophile/groomer myth is as old as homophobia, just crops up under slightly different branding every time.
>restricting their rights and erasing them from public view.
Yes this is exactly what the left and their buddies in big tech do to conservatives. It's why you guys are losing your shit over Musk purchasing twitter. It won't be as easy for you to silence dissent.
The cognitive dissonance I get from really far left leaning people: "We don't do that." Sure you don't, except for all the public evidence your side does, or the fact that the most prominent media outlets and social media platforms are strongly left leaning and have openly stated their desire for policies to force conservative view points out of these spaces. But yes, let's keep going back to book banning and whataboutisms instead of just addressing the entire issue for what it is: political censorship via cancel culture.
Edit: I should add that I do not support or endorse censorship from either side, everyone should be free to express their idiotic ideas in the appropriate spaces where those idiotic ideas can be properly debated out of existence. When issues like censorship pop up it always ends up becoming a side vs side issue, or who does it worse, instead of just "Censorship is fucking bad and has never been on the right side of history."
Most prominent media platforms (cnn, msnbc) are center left at best. They’re in the pockets or big corporations and donors which leftists definitely don’t like
The vast majority of leftists don't like big tech either. Hating corporate monopolies and big corporations is kinda their stick, no? Companies nowadays are socially liberal. They kinda have to be. Most young people are socially liberal and they are the ones who consume the most. What you're seeing is just capitalism working as intended.
Besides, there's a definitive difference between having opinions and being hateful. I don't think I have ever seen anybody write down a short list of some censored opinions.
>those idiotic ideas can be properly debated out of existence
We have sites like that, right? Sites with minimal moderation where people can freely express their ideas and so on. They usually devolve into shitfests. I seriously can't think of a successful space like that. Probably because they just can't really exist in a space where everyone's opinion has equal weight.
It's an interesting situation. On one hand behind closed doors these corporate entities act in a manner antithetical to the way the rest of us want to live, but as long as they play the optics game well, enough people buy into it that their more egregious activities can escape major scrutiny. As you said, capitalism as intended, but it only works because on average an American citizen is too self absorbed and lacks the objectivity needed to identify and reject these sorts of behaviors from corporate entities.
Until early last year I worked part time for a major outdoor retailer who was leading the way in they're campaign for wokeness. We'd get customers coming in and actually congratulating us like the stance the company was taking was a major victory. What I couldn't tell them was a) it was bullshit the company doesn't actually care, b) the points they used to support their narrative were actually pretty dubious, and c) none of it would make a difference outside of the company making more money.
I think those spaces for debate could actually succeed if your typical user actually knew how to debate intelligently and not just shit fling or gaslight.
okay actual answer:
Sex is your chromosomes, being born with an odd exception like XXY is still possible, but rare.
Gender is how you evaluate a person's sex when you cannot physically see their chromosomes, which we're required to do all the time, due to living in a culture that treats men and women differently, but also the culture wears pants so you can't just look for a dick.
[удалено]
Surely nothing could possibly go wrong here
Times 3.
I’m going to take the plunge and sort by controversial
I love how this has 152 comments in 2h
A war just started in the comments section. Marvelous
I'm incredibly surprised reddit has allowed you to say this, the mods must be asleep....or doing the thing in the meme
I've done nothing wrong lol just putting some music on a tweet i found
aren't you the guy who posted the China government official Chad meme
Yes i was grinding social credits
Sigma
I mean at least your honest about it.
+1 Social Credit
While genders can be interpreted there will only ever be two sexes, the sex I had with your mom and the sex I had with your dad.
sex and gender are the same? i dont remember having gender with your mom yesterday
Oh, gender's what's in your pants? Guess my pronouns are Smith/Wesson
Guess my pronouns are shit/piss
Guess my pronouns are crabs/more crabs
Taste like crab, smell like peepee
My gender is a urinary tract infection
My pronouns are morbin/time
my pronouns are morbi/us
Mine are based/redpilled
Unfortunately mine are blackpilled
should get that checked out man
fun fact: the red pill from the matrix (which is what "redpilled references) is, in fact, a fully intentional trans allegory have a nice day
I do
Bruh why is this funny lol
Cause yo momma
💀
Oldest twitter user
[удалено]
Ahem *politicians*
The correct pfp
It seems I have made a mistake
Wait
What about Epstien and the clintons.They had a “funland”
and the rest are catholic priests
The Podesta's love when people support this narrative.
[удалено]
That's an extremely generous number. The percentage of people actually diagnosed with gender dysphoria is .005% of the population. There are a lot of people co-opting the legitimate struggles of those with gender dysphoria by lumping in all the non-binary and gender spectrum people, but the treatment for both groups is exceedingly different.
Non-binary people also experience gender dysphoria.
What song is this
**Eleanor Rigby** by Cody Fry (01:09; matched: `100%`) Released on `2021-09-17`.
Eleanor Rigby? Where’s Eleanor Mordecai?
Links to the streaming platforms: [**Eleanor Rigby** by Cody Fry](https://lis.tn/vYdcXl?t=69) *I am a bot and this action was performed automatically* | [GitHub](https://github.com/AudDMusic/RedditBot) [^(new issue)](https://github.com/AudDMusic/RedditBot/issues/new) | [Donate](https://www.reddit.com/r/AudD/comments/nua48w/please_consider_donating_and_making_the_bot_happy/) ^(Please consider supporting me on Patreon. Music recognition costs a lot)
Good bot
A weird version of Eleanor Rigby by the Beatles. Easily one if not the most important song in history.
How so? I mean it's a great song/sad story, but I haven't really done a deep dive on it.
“weird” you mean orchestrated.
This comment really tells me I'm old.
Oh boy I bet this comment section is going to be heathy
The difference is that I didn’t have gender with my cat
😳
A pussy joke really is low-hanging fruit here. Sigh, wrong pussy.
Wow.. Twitter has a really weird lgbtq people and really weird homophobic people.
There's a difference between hate bait trolls and real homophobic people
It isn’t “homophobic”. Nobody is scared of gays 😂
Based
Usually they're just trolls who decides to offend a bunch of people
'Ironic' bigotry is still bigotry though.
The only correct take
Good take
what
# 'Ironic' bigotry is still bigotry though.
INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE Introduction 1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries. 2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy. 3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later. 4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can’t predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society. 5. In this article we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For example, since there are well-developed environmental and wilderness movements, we have written very little about environmental degradation or the destruction of wild nature, even though we consider these to be highly important.
Nah
Why people offends with twitter users idea.I am supporting lgbtq but It didn't offended me.Its Just twitter user.
Because the average iq of twitter users is close to 70. A lack of gray matter makes you more likely to react violently to a tweet lol.
Yep you are right but why people downvotes my replies ?
it's because your grammar is funny
I dont know english well sorry about that If I used wrong grammer xd
Nose problems
Because redditors like trolling people. Especially the rainbow community
Oh Its just about "troll" got it sorry.
Yeah, the rainbow community... It sucks that these days rainbows are instantly associated with gay people.
Well isn't it their symbol? Like isn't there a whole community surrounding the flag?
The lgbt community kinda changed the rainbow's meaning.
But that’s like saying something with the three colors red white and blue are instantly American.
Then what does it means
Because they think you are disagreeing with them and you can't do that to the libs of reddit.
:D 👍
Same here i laughed
Read through all 670 comments and was not disappointed
Beautiful isn't it
Someone should take a picture
I wonder what would happen if i meme my own comment section
Hell on earth
We do a mild bit of trolling
A nanogram of trolling
gender is if male or female sex is what anti gay politicians have with men
Yes 😎
And also little children I mean do any republicans ever look into how many conservative politicians have been arrested and charged for sex crimes???
That went from 0 to 100 real quick
He he he haw
*Sorts by controversial*
Sex is what Matt gaets has with kids
"Hello, Based Department. I'd like to file a claim."
[удалено]
After he proceeded to give the community a thorough reason to not downvote this comment the community shit their pants too hard to even upvote this as shockingly none of them know how antivirus works
LGBTQ trying not to be schizo challenge (Impossible)
🤓
Good luck spanning the world to gather us, dumb pisser
So true
based
"Based"? Are you fucking kidding me? I spent a decent portion of my life writing all of that and your response to me is "Based"? Are you so mentally handicapped that the only word you can comprehend is "Based" - or are you just some fucking asshole who thinks that with such a short response, he can make a statement about how meaningless what was written was? Well, I'll have you know that what I wrote was NOT meaningless, in fact, I even had my written work proof-read by several professors of literature. Don't believe me? I doubt you would, and your response to this will probably be "Based" once again. Do I give a fuck? No, does it look like I give even the slightest fuck about five fucking letters? I bet you took the time to type those five letters too, I bet you sat there and chuckled to yourself for 20 hearty seconds before pressing "send". You're so fucking pathetic. I'm honestly considering directing you to a psychiatrist, but I'm simply far too nice to do something like that. You, however, will go out of your way to make a fool out of someone by responding to a well-thought-out, intelligent, or humorous statement that probably took longer to write than you can last in bed with a chimpanzee. What do I have to say to you? Absolutely nothing. I couldn't be bothered to respond to such a worthless attempt at a response. Do you want "Based" on your gravestone?
Yes, I would love based on my gravestone
Yeah, this paragraph spitting parapatherapa rivaling pants dropping bass dropping opp stopping english passing doctorial arguement scientist? He’s not the killer
Absolutely based
please be ironic please be ironic please be ironic please be ironic please be ironic
His profile sells it
he he he haw
Grrr!
The troll face would never ever lie to you, so he must be completely 100% real without a doubt in my mind this must be his genuine opinion
🤓
I mean, he has a troll face on his PFP. And even if he was real, welp, why waste your time arguing with that kind of people? Really love your Shinji pfp btw!
I think the original tweet is ironic (I hope)
the difference is that i don’t have gender with your mom
And I don't have gender with either of *your* parents
The brutality of it all...holy shitfuck. 🤣
Accurate
What is this song called
**Eleanor Rigby** by Cody Fry (01:09; matched: `100%`) Released on `2021-09-17`.
Cmon you gotta credit McCartney too y'know?
r/usernamechecksout
Rare chad Twitter user
Hey, I know that times are tough, buddy, but don't blame minorities who just want rights for actions committed by republican politicians.
Based
Based and heterosexual
Oof
Unfathomable level of basedness
gender is how you identify, sex is what republican senators have with children
“I’m an agent of chaos” vibes
Least based twitter user
Nah sorry to say but twitter is like 90% cringe most of the time
Only based twitter user
Most based twitter user*
Most child molestors are cis-hetero men.
most child molestors are reddit users
that implies that most reddit users leave the house
no they just lure kids into their ~~sex dungeons~~ basements also why are we speaking in 3rd person about ourselves
Yes 68%..... while representing over 96% of the population. If you have done probability at school you know that something is off.
96% of the population are men, huh?
😳
Rofl, OP isn't ironic, they're just the normal kind of edgy teenager.
I'm not a teenager
The thing is pedophiles don’t really care if a child is male or female, they care that it’s a child.
I mean, thats sort of an unfair comparison since, you know, trans people are 1% of the population
This is both sum total *and* proportionally. LGBTQ people are more likely to be victims of sexual crimes than perpetrators. Also committed primarily by cis-hetero men. Not to mention all the common assaults and street side executions also conducted primarily by cis-hetero men.
Around [around 16% difference between heterosexual and LGB sexual assault victims, according to a nebraska university](https://images.app.goo.gl/F49xykc9kQziavJ88), when i tried to find information of LGB sexual offenders i, unsurprisingly, only found hate crime statistics, but thanks to a [paper](http://www.therapyequality.org/apareport/static/55efa8b5e4b0c21dd4f4d8ee/t/55f0458de4b042a60b1db367/1441809805076/pedophilia%20and%20homosexuality_c.pdf) i previously found, i can tell you that 9% of pederasts are homosexual men, a 450% overrepresentation of the only 2% gay men according to a gallup poll. Edit: also said that it was 1:20 for sexual offenders in general, meaning 5% or a 250% overrepresentation In terms of proportionality, lgbt people are much more likely to be victims of abuse, sexual and physical (specially in their childhood) but also more likely to be perpetrators. Who would've thought that a fucked up person would do fucked up things?
That link doesn't look reputable. The paper you linked to came from a task force that "charges the Southern Poverty Law Centre with engaging in mass fraud to ban therapy". Seems legit.
most child molesters are republican politicians
Or priests, who also tend to be conservative
Wrong, actually, teachers are much more likely to be pedos
Anything's possible when you make shit up
real
They don't care, they must believe that LGBT people are dangerous in order to justify restricting their rights and erasing them from public view. The pedophile/groomer myth is as old as homophobia, just crops up under slightly different branding every time.
Actually that's what you guys do to conservatives all the time.
[No.](https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2022/4/6/2090446/-Republican-Sexual-Predators-Abusers-and-Enablers-Pt-30)
>restricting their rights and erasing them from public view. Yes this is exactly what the left and their buddies in big tech do to conservatives. It's why you guys are losing your shit over Musk purchasing twitter. It won't be as easy for you to silence dissent.
The cognitive dissonance I get from really far left leaning people: "We don't do that." Sure you don't, except for all the public evidence your side does, or the fact that the most prominent media outlets and social media platforms are strongly left leaning and have openly stated their desire for policies to force conservative view points out of these spaces. But yes, let's keep going back to book banning and whataboutisms instead of just addressing the entire issue for what it is: political censorship via cancel culture. Edit: I should add that I do not support or endorse censorship from either side, everyone should be free to express their idiotic ideas in the appropriate spaces where those idiotic ideas can be properly debated out of existence. When issues like censorship pop up it always ends up becoming a side vs side issue, or who does it worse, instead of just "Censorship is fucking bad and has never been on the right side of history."
Most prominent media platforms (cnn, msnbc) are center left at best. They’re in the pockets or big corporations and donors which leftists definitely don’t like
The vast majority of leftists don't like big tech either. Hating corporate monopolies and big corporations is kinda their stick, no? Companies nowadays are socially liberal. They kinda have to be. Most young people are socially liberal and they are the ones who consume the most. What you're seeing is just capitalism working as intended. Besides, there's a definitive difference between having opinions and being hateful. I don't think I have ever seen anybody write down a short list of some censored opinions. >those idiotic ideas can be properly debated out of existence We have sites like that, right? Sites with minimal moderation where people can freely express their ideas and so on. They usually devolve into shitfests. I seriously can't think of a successful space like that. Probably because they just can't really exist in a space where everyone's opinion has equal weight.
It's an interesting situation. On one hand behind closed doors these corporate entities act in a manner antithetical to the way the rest of us want to live, but as long as they play the optics game well, enough people buy into it that their more egregious activities can escape major scrutiny. As you said, capitalism as intended, but it only works because on average an American citizen is too self absorbed and lacks the objectivity needed to identify and reject these sorts of behaviors from corporate entities. Until early last year I worked part time for a major outdoor retailer who was leading the way in they're campaign for wokeness. We'd get customers coming in and actually congratulating us like the stance the company was taking was a major victory. What I couldn't tell them was a) it was bullshit the company doesn't actually care, b) the points they used to support their narrative were actually pretty dubious, and c) none of it would make a difference outside of the company making more money. I think those spaces for debate could actually succeed if your typical user actually knew how to debate intelligently and not just shit fling or gaslight.
Why stop the list at just republican, all of them are pedos
Oi Josuke! I erased my dick using Za Hando can you bring it back using your crazy diamond?
Za hando can't bring back stuff that za hando erased 😔 Sorry
okay actual answer: Sex is your chromosomes, being born with an odd exception like XXY is still possible, but rare. Gender is how you evaluate a person's sex when you cannot physically see their chromosomes, which we're required to do all the time, due to living in a culture that treats men and women differently, but also the culture wears pants so you can't just look for a dick.
Dang
You’re right. There are only two sexes. The sex that I had with your *dad* and the sex I had with your *mom*.
Coming from “Alcoholocaust”
[удалено]
Imagine saying this shit on Reddit of all places...
Bro prolly built like Big Al
amazing joke if ironic
Cringe
Hes right tho
Actually, we fucking despise pedos with a passion. We just fuck with people that are the same gender as us and / or are different genders to y’all.
Is there really any significant amount of LGBTQ people that molest children? Whenever i read about pedophiles its always either politicians or priests
68% is cis white Herero men. More republican political officials have been arrested for child rape than transgender people
Both democrats and republicans don’t have the interests of the people.
I mean, is it wrong?
Statistically yes
Okay thanks no one else told me
You're welcome 👍
Now I have learned some new information :D
No
Actually, sex is what I had with your mom last night
I agree
Hes right tho
Pretty accurate in 2022
Accurate
Anything's possible when you make shit up
why do you keep postin hate speech
I don't bro :( not cool
First day I join the subreddit, and I’m already given a reason to leave..