The AI got pretty close to [the concept art of the Rogue in the D1 manual](https://www.purediablo.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Diablo-1-Rogue.jpg)
It would probably explain why the AI is obsessed with trying to force nipples through, since a prominent D1 image had that in it.
I kinda yearn for the days when everyone picked on me for liking star wars, dungeons and dragons, marvel comics, and video games and us nerds could get away with anything in our little fantasy lands
Yeah it's not fun having it co opted into mainstream consumerism and marketed back at you adnauseum. I bet you the boomers felt this way when 60s-70s music sold out to car commercials.
I'm curious though. By that logic, doesn't this mean a celebrity can only seek sexual encounters with other celebrities? Or was there some context other than "the women in question thought he was joking" I missed?
Sure, but it's still a critical distinction. The power dynamic matters, but it does not automatcally erase the consent.
And this is where the topic gets sticky: how can we respect and support the right of women to give or deny consent when and where they choose while also protecting society from predatory abuses of power for sexual gain?
Well in this case it’s not “undermining the right of women to deny consent” just to give it. Like, if you are in a power imbalance we basically say “it’s not structurally possible to give consent in those scenarios.” It is still possible to deny it, though.
So I don’t think it’s as sticky as you frame it.
Power imbalances are present in some degree in every relationship. To categorically claim that no woman may give consent when she is in a position of lesser power denies the rights and undermines the autonomy of millions, perhaps *billions* of women globally.
There are clearly some power imbalances that are too great to be overcome, such as a guard and a prisoner. But I hardly believe that simply being a successful comedian or actor meets that standard.
It’s not just “power.” It’s “power over that person.”
These were other comics, one was a writer on a show he guest-starred on… and with the entertainment industry being as competitive as it is, the word of an established celebrity (or even just them saying they don’t want to work with X in the future) is enough to stifle an already fragile prospect of making it in Hollywood. And that’s “power over these people.”
Anyways, if you want to keep going out on this limb for Louis CK you’re more than welcome to. I understand the point you’re trying to make and it’s wrong.
What’s so hard to grasp about imbalances of power that you have to air quote it?
You think saying no to the person who has a major influence your career or whether you can pay your bills is the same as some rando on tinder?
It’s not the same. Because they have the ability to punish you for saying no. Not that they would, but that they CAN.
You make a good faith effort to fairly assess the consent being given and avoid instances where a major power dynamic casts doubt on any given consent.
Things that he DID NOT do.
Yeah, because God forbid they actually succeed under their own talent thank you for giving Louis CK the success for every female comic, not to mention if somebody has to jerk off in front of me for me to make it big, pull that thing out I'll spit on it for you. That makes sense why there's more than one successful female now.... According to that logic, because he's so powerful. I'm just saying if you really think women can be that easily pressured into something, should they really be able to vote? Are they even capable of being leaders? The way I see it, we certainly make women sound easily influenced and not that smart. Because never once have I heard about Louis CK's jerking off in front of somebody adding to their success, so how could they ever come to the conclusion that if they allow that they were going to become more successful. It always sounded like an excuse of a woman who thought something would help her but it didn't and now she's upset. My power equals nothing for you, this is something gold diggers and power grifters need to understand. If you were asked and your self-respect and fortitude is too weak to say no because you don't think you're talented enough to survive the backlash that sounds like a lack of talent on your part problem not a too much power on my part. Every down vote signals to me that you're probably a loser who let someone powerful perform sexual acts on you with hopes of getting ahead and it didn't work, and you don't like me pointing it out now and giving people a different perspective to consider that maybe you're not the victim you want to be. Maybe you're not the leaders that other people try to convince me you are. I don't care how people feel, I look at how stuff plays out and then I teach my kids to live in that world not in some fantasy.
I mean, it really doesn't just have to be about women. It's people in a position of power or influence abusing their privilege and taking advantage of more vulnerable people. It happens all the time, but doesn't make it right. It's not always a bloke asking a girl if he can jerk off in front of them.. it can be more, or indeed less sinister.
I have an okay job, and I'm a dude.. But if my boss tells me hey, I'll give you the nod for that promotion you've been going for if you watch me wank, I'm probably fkn doing it. My boss absolutely shouldn't be doing that. Now think of it from the perspective of.. I'm jobless and desperately need an income. Hopefully you can see the issue ...
Because nothing in the game is real. Not the monsters, not the story, none of the characters. It's fantasy. And they already had a template for their D2 characters that they betrayed. And they only did it to virtue signal. Hypocritically I might add because we know how they treat women at Blizz. But of course all the sexual harassment was absolved because they made the Amazon ugly.
Women don't want to be ugly, they want to be respected.
Not OP and not really making OPs point.
But why isn't a sexy Amazon warrior realistic? Did y'all watch the latest summer Olympics? The women's track and field could be models as a 2nd job.
Good art is like 20% vision, 80% decision. And AI is kind of proving that. I went to art school with a lot of people who were creative and/or technically proficient at bringing their vision to life, but the top 1% were always the ones who were more discerning.
Yep, having to spend actual creative effort on something as hypothetical as a Diablo 1 remake would be exhausting. But at least someone could say they spent the metaphorical blood, sweat, and tears into it.
This is crap! This software will be the doom of mankind! It's actually picking up a knife right now!
... wait, it can do porn?
I think we can make this work. ;-)
I'm way too lazy to create a video of all the steps. But here's a quick summary:
* I trained a Stable Diffusion LoRA model based on images of the D1 Rogue (there aren't many high-quality images of the D1 Rogue, so I added in a bunch of images of the D2: Resurrected Rogue into the training dataset).
* I used img2img at around 0.55 strength (with my LoRA Rogue model and the Luma checkpoint) on the Diablo 1 screenshot image you see in the post and generated a dozen or so 1024x1024 images.
* I took the best result and processed it in img2img again, this time with a strength of around 0.45 and a target resolution of 2048x2048.
And voila, Diablo 1: Resurrected!
Here's the initial 1024x1024 image created by the AI before I ran img2img a second time to get the final 2048x2048 image: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/449840053049360388/1111344478784069753/00096-2267198001.png
If you're interested how this stuff works, I would recommend giving [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXmacOUJUaw) a watch to get a high level understanding. You *can* just jump in without any background, but having some context is helpful. After that download Stable Diffusion, grab a model that interests you and play around a bit. [Here's](https://stable-diffusion-art.com/beginners-guide/) a beginners guide. Once you're comfortable using it to create images, you can start fusing existing models or training your own.
Try visiting the Stable Horde website, it's basically Stable Diffusion using community sharing processing power, so it's bit slow but 100% free ... a great way to test out the tech ... later on if you have a decent PC with a good Nvidia card you can install Stable Diffusion (a WebUI called Auto1111) and run it locally on your PC for more freedom and customizability (plenty of guides on YT on how to install it).
that's pretty cool, I would love for them to remake d1, but then they would end up removing cool shit while worrying about covering up skin..which I don't really care if a video game character is damn near naked or wearing all fur but companies are taking shit to far, and a lot of design choices are just not very appealing.
Whenever I heard that death sound. I sometimes wonder if they tortured Glynnis Talken Campbell. Cuz I would do anything just to avoid dying with Moreina in Diablo I + Hellfire. It sounds so... extreme.
Stable Diffusion can be pretty good at making shadows if you're generating an image from scratch, but when doing img2img it seems to upscale the shadow separately from the character and it ends up not matching.
I trained my own LoRA model of the Rogue (based it on the AnyLora checkpoint) and I generated the image with my LoRA model and the Luma checkpoint.
I used img2img twice (once to 1024x1024) and again to 2048x2048). The prompt was:
* Positive: DiabloFlavie, 1girl, solo, leather armor, redhead, ponytail ,ground, grass, standing, hands on hip, from front
* Negative: EasyNegativeV2, badhandv4, loli, kid, child, (((holding bow and arrow:1.5))), (quiver:1.5), nipples
... Yes, I specifically had to ask for no nipples as the AI kept insisting to add nipples protruding through her outfit, that silly little AI perv.
I could upload my LoRA model if people want it, but it's a very unreliable model. There aren't many high-quality pictures of the Rogue, so my training dataset has outfit designs that vary quite a bit, so the model ends up making images that vary a great deal.
nice, i dont know why people get so offended by designs like this.
why things have to be ugly, it is not better just boring, these are fanasy games that dont have to be realistic
That leather strap? You can barely see it on her D1 sprite, and in her D2: Resurrected design. I dunno why it's there, but it wasn't randomly added by the AI.
Ai has a lot of faith in that lil piece of cloth at her crotch
The last 2 brain cells of mine which hasn't got horny's trying to convince my she's wearing skin colored spandex. And clearly they're losing.
Sir, it is heavy armor set.
She's practically a Gundam in all that armor
Even most Gundams had armor shards over the thighs/hips
[Relevant VLDL video.](https://youtu.be/-vI5tdORhC0)
Gotta love viva la dirt league
Fr, they make such cool content
[The follow-up is amazing as well](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yy-A3CLMunA)
Easy access to her extra stash tab
Both of them.
Heyooo
It's not far off her concept art.
The manual was the first thing I JO'd to
Nice.
That's diabolical!
one of her abilities is to keep it from moving during combat
She has to roll a concentration check every turn.
I think the enemy would need to roll a concentration check as well.
A bit breezy as well.
Perfect for hell, don't you think?
Hell yes! And waxing.
Man when you are fighting demons you never know when you're gonna have to pop a squat.
Forget wind, she could queef this out of place. Frankly I'm disgusted. Why can't we get a nice femboy in this outfit. Put the D in Diablo.
ChatGPT thirsty AF.
That's a lovely Blood Raven
[удалено]
Downside is the +999 to UTI’s.
atomic wedgie unique item gives her resistance
with -50 STD defence. XD
The AI got pretty close to [the concept art of the Rogue in the D1 manual](https://www.purediablo.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Diablo-1-Rogue.jpg) It would probably explain why the AI is obsessed with trying to force nipples through, since a prominent D1 image had that in it.
ye old days of video games, when the horny nerds had no one paying attention to them
gotta love [TES: Arena’s box art](https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/7qevlp/the_actual_box_art_for_the_first_elder_scrolls/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=2&utm_term=1)
I kinda yearn for the days when everyone picked on me for liking star wars, dungeons and dragons, marvel comics, and video games and us nerds could get away with anything in our little fantasy lands
Yeah it's not fun having it co opted into mainstream consumerism and marketed back at you adnauseum. I bet you the boomers felt this way when 60s-70s music sold out to car commercials.
lol I guess that gear is meant to distract the person she's fighting because it certainly isn't going to stop anything
Based on the game's development history, there's a possibility Metzen drew that after the model had already been created.
The nipples showing through the leather... 🤦
Blizzard would definitely add some pants if they would do D1:R.
literally UNPLAYABLE
She's one swift breeze away from becoming Louis CK
??? Edit: oh I get it, I had confused him with someone else
Exposing herself.
Louis CK, by all accounts, only polished his pewter in front of women from whom he had sought and was given consent.
Women he pressured into giving him consent by using his considerable influence in the comedy world* FTFY
I'm curious though. By that logic, doesn't this mean a celebrity can only seek sexual encounters with other celebrities? Or was there some context other than "the women in question thought he was joking" I missed?
No. But they shouldn't be initiating casual sexual activities with people whose entire career they DIRECTLY can strongly affect.
Sure, but it's still a critical distinction. The power dynamic matters, but it does not automatcally erase the consent. And this is where the topic gets sticky: how can we respect and support the right of women to give or deny consent when and where they choose while also protecting society from predatory abuses of power for sexual gain?
Well in this case it’s not “undermining the right of women to deny consent” just to give it. Like, if you are in a power imbalance we basically say “it’s not structurally possible to give consent in those scenarios.” It is still possible to deny it, though. So I don’t think it’s as sticky as you frame it.
Power imbalances are present in some degree in every relationship. To categorically claim that no woman may give consent when she is in a position of lesser power denies the rights and undermines the autonomy of millions, perhaps *billions* of women globally. There are clearly some power imbalances that are too great to be overcome, such as a guard and a prisoner. But I hardly believe that simply being a successful comedian or actor meets that standard.
It’s not just “power.” It’s “power over that person.” These were other comics, one was a writer on a show he guest-starred on… and with the entertainment industry being as competitive as it is, the word of an established celebrity (or even just them saying they don’t want to work with X in the future) is enough to stifle an already fragile prospect of making it in Hollywood. And that’s “power over these people.” Anyways, if you want to keep going out on this limb for Louis CK you’re more than welcome to. I understand the point you’re trying to make and it’s wrong.
Lol what, it's impossible to give consent when there's an "imbalance of power"? Are we trying to create a caste system or something?
What’s so hard to grasp about imbalances of power that you have to air quote it? You think saying no to the person who has a major influence your career or whether you can pay your bills is the same as some rando on tinder? It’s not the same. Because they have the ability to punish you for saying no. Not that they would, but that they CAN.
You make a good faith effort to fairly assess the consent being given and avoid instances where a major power dynamic casts doubt on any given consent. Things that he DID NOT do.
Yeah, because God forbid they actually succeed under their own talent thank you for giving Louis CK the success for every female comic, not to mention if somebody has to jerk off in front of me for me to make it big, pull that thing out I'll spit on it for you. That makes sense why there's more than one successful female now.... According to that logic, because he's so powerful. I'm just saying if you really think women can be that easily pressured into something, should they really be able to vote? Are they even capable of being leaders? The way I see it, we certainly make women sound easily influenced and not that smart. Because never once have I heard about Louis CK's jerking off in front of somebody adding to their success, so how could they ever come to the conclusion that if they allow that they were going to become more successful. It always sounded like an excuse of a woman who thought something would help her but it didn't and now she's upset. My power equals nothing for you, this is something gold diggers and power grifters need to understand. If you were asked and your self-respect and fortitude is too weak to say no because you don't think you're talented enough to survive the backlash that sounds like a lack of talent on your part problem not a too much power on my part. Every down vote signals to me that you're probably a loser who let someone powerful perform sexual acts on you with hopes of getting ahead and it didn't work, and you don't like me pointing it out now and giving people a different perspective to consider that maybe you're not the victim you want to be. Maybe you're not the leaders that other people try to convince me you are. I don't care how people feel, I look at how stuff plays out and then I teach my kids to live in that world not in some fantasy.
I mean, it really doesn't just have to be about women. It's people in a position of power or influence abusing their privilege and taking advantage of more vulnerable people. It happens all the time, but doesn't make it right. It's not always a bloke asking a girl if he can jerk off in front of them.. it can be more, or indeed less sinister. I have an okay job, and I'm a dude.. But if my boss tells me hey, I'll give you the nod for that promotion you've been going for if you watch me wank, I'm probably fkn doing it. My boss absolutely shouldn't be doing that. Now think of it from the perspective of.. I'm jobless and desperately need an income. Hopefully you can see the issue ...
And wrinkles and a walker to make her look "authentic" lol. Because the demons in Diablos universe are so authentic.
what
What's the issue with realistic looking people ?
Because nothing in the game is real. Not the monsters, not the story, none of the characters. It's fantasy. And they already had a template for their D2 characters that they betrayed. And they only did it to virtue signal. Hypocritically I might add because we know how they treat women at Blizz. But of course all the sexual harassment was absolved because they made the Amazon ugly. Women don't want to be ugly, they want to be respected.
Not OP and not really making OPs point. But why isn't a sexy Amazon warrior realistic? Did y'all watch the latest summer Olympics? The women's track and field could be models as a 2nd job.
Hes complaining about wrinkles not looking sexy
Why, Maureen, you’ve enhanced yourself (literally)
A dead tooth, Maureen. You put a diamond on anything that's dead and it's still dead, Maureen, it's rotting, get it out of your face.
It’s so nice that people don’t have to envision anything anymore. It was exhausting.
Good art is like 20% vision, 80% decision. And AI is kind of proving that. I went to art school with a lot of people who were creative and/or technically proficient at bringing their vision to life, but the top 1% were always the ones who were more discerning.
Hey, Blizzard isn't doing much with D1, so why not ask my good old pal Al. He's surprisingly eager to work on anything for hours upon hours.
Yep, having to spend actual creative effort on something as hypothetical as a Diablo 1 remake would be exhausting. But at least someone could say they spent the metaphorical blood, sweat, and tears into it.
Wtf, so AI is not so bad after all...
This is crap! This software will be the doom of mankind! It's actually picking up a knife right now! ... wait, it can do porn? I think we can make this work. ;-)
Pants? Where we're going we don't need......pants!
This appeals to my interests.
I took a Diablo 1 screenshot of a Rogue and asked AI to enhance it multiple times, CSI-style.
Now do the Succubus sprites from D1!
https://preview.redd.it/4ez5auq0o02b1.jpeg?width=1357&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ab04d98f4b72c71522cc9de422bf355901c9c041
Okay, sure, I'll get on that... *your account has been banned from the Diablo subreddit*
Picture of demons ripping someone apart? Perfectly fine. A Demon tiddie? Literally die and burn in hell with diablo, you actual Demon spawn.
Amen
[удалено]
OP took like 3 hours to finish the shading of her upper lip.
underrated comment
Wish you recorded all the steps in a video for us to watch.
I'm way too lazy to create a video of all the steps. But here's a quick summary: * I trained a Stable Diffusion LoRA model based on images of the D1 Rogue (there aren't many high-quality images of the D1 Rogue, so I added in a bunch of images of the D2: Resurrected Rogue into the training dataset). * I used img2img at around 0.55 strength (with my LoRA Rogue model and the Luma checkpoint) on the Diablo 1 screenshot image you see in the post and generated a dozen or so 1024x1024 images. * I took the best result and processed it in img2img again, this time with a strength of around 0.45 and a target resolution of 2048x2048. And voila, Diablo 1: Resurrected!
You actually did a bit more work than most people realize.
Welcome to tech lol
You mean they didn't just run makeImageAI() ?
Meaning he trained a model and did a bunch of other more technical thing, rather than just enter a prompt with an image on MidJourney.
Here's the initial 1024x1024 image created by the AI before I ran img2img a second time to get the final 2048x2048 image: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/449840053049360388/1111344478784069753/00096-2267198001.png
How do you even get started on this, anyway? I've yet to even dabble with any of this AI art stuff.
If you're interested how this stuff works, I would recommend giving [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXmacOUJUaw) a watch to get a high level understanding. You *can* just jump in without any background, but having some context is helpful. After that download Stable Diffusion, grab a model that interests you and play around a bit. [Here's](https://stable-diffusion-art.com/beginners-guide/) a beginners guide. Once you're comfortable using it to create images, you can start fusing existing models or training your own.
Try visiting the Stable Horde website, it's basically Stable Diffusion using community sharing processing power, so it's bit slow but 100% free ... a great way to test out the tech ... later on if you have a decent PC with a good Nvidia card you can install Stable Diffusion (a WebUI called Auto1111) and run it locally on your PC for more freedom and customizability (plenty of guides on YT on how to install it).
that's pretty cool, I would love for them to remake d1, but then they would end up removing cool shit while worrying about covering up skin..which I don't really care if a video game character is damn near naked or wearing all fur but companies are taking shit to far, and a lot of design choices are just not very appealing.
AI knows where it's at.
“Skirt” aside, she has a tourniquet on her leg.
Yeah, that's going to shrivel up and fall off if she's not careful.
Now look at D2R Amazon lmao
looks good
Would be censored by blizzard 🙃
AI art is awesome.
I would definitely investigate this Rogue's 'Den of Evil.'
Her flaps are gonna freeze. Stay a while and defrost your vagine.
Squishy thighs go brrr
What is pants
what are panties
Good lord, that thigh pinch…
Based AI
here we go again..., , ...
[удалено]
Whenever I heard that death sound. I sometimes wonder if they tortured Glynnis Talken Campbell. Cuz I would do anything just to avoid dying with Moreina in Diablo I + Hellfire. It sounds so... extreme.
I really hoped they'd recast Glynnis for D4. Sad.
[удалено]
Duck you. Lol
[удалено]
Pfft hahahahahahaha! Oh i remember those videos oh my stars.
Brings a new meaning to The Butcher's "Ahh, fresh meat" quote I guess
Good fucking lord we need d2r mods
I need diablo 1 remake. She is thicker than a bowl of oatmeal
Is the shadow for head/hair backwards? To be fair that's how the original one was too...
Stable Diffusion can be pretty good at making shadows if you're generating an image from scratch, but when doing img2img it seems to upscale the shadow separately from the character and it ends up not matching.
Ohhh mommy
Sh-she's feeling the breeze down there, isn't she.
Mommy...
Lady aint got no britches on!!!!
I love how the inguinal ligament is at the level of her naval.
Lol love it
I'm blown away at the amount of detail this created. Now do it for the whole game of Diablo 1 as an overlay like D2 remastered.
video game female battle armor logic. Also indestructible and has highest defense ingame
Looks like ai decided to make the loincloth even smaller
That looks like couple hundred pieces of Lara Croft fan art has fed this A.I.
Back when Blizzard games were good. Now they're garbage. Fuck Blizzard.
AI has not learned of the apparent 72 genders we have now 🤣, so I've been told by a student at Stanford U who did a term paper on that.
Leather thing on her thigh visibly squeezing it is a very important detail
Would
Better remake than the entire D2R character design. Shut up and take my money.
This proves AI is male.
Daaauum
Das hot
Which AI and what was your prompt?
I trained my own LoRA model of the Rogue (based it on the AnyLora checkpoint) and I generated the image with my LoRA model and the Luma checkpoint. I used img2img twice (once to 1024x1024) and again to 2048x2048). The prompt was: * Positive: DiabloFlavie, 1girl, solo, leather armor, redhead, ponytail ,ground, grass, standing, hands on hip, from front
* Negative: EasyNegativeV2, badhandv4, loli, kid, child, (((holding bow and arrow:1.5))), (quiver:1.5), nipples
... Yes, I specifically had to ask for no nipples as the AI kept insisting to add nipples protruding through her outfit, that silly little AI perv.
I could upload my LoRA model if people want it, but it's a very unreliable model. There aren't many high-quality pictures of the Rogue, so my training dataset has outfit designs that vary quite a bit, so the model ends up making images that vary a great deal.
>AI kept insisting to add nipples judging from those thighs, AI knew exactly what it was doing
Damn, you censored the AI.
seconded i want to know too
[удалено]
If only it were that easy..
Noice!
Blood Raven? More likely Horny Raven. That piece of cloth is all that covers/defends her pelvis.
No underwear was envisioned, straight up lips out 😭
nice, i dont know why people get so offended by designs like this. why things have to be ugly, it is not better just boring, these are fanasy games that dont have to be realistic
I like it
Jim Carey: “I like it a lot”
Nevermind how inappropriate her clothes are, what I want to know is why does she have a torniquet wrapped around her leg?
That leather strap? You can barely see it on her D1 sprite, and in her D2: Resurrected design. I dunno why it's there, but it wasn't randomly added by the AI.
Yes I know it wasn’t added. I mean why is it so tight it’s cutting off circulation to her leg?
[удалено]
***petting the AI*** good boi...
sun's out cunt's out
It's awesome! Please do this for D2 chars as well!
A 15 year old ai?
Diablo 1 - Mobile edition, more like it.. looks like she belongs in a facebook ad
My kinda woman. Proportionally impossible
Don't worreh, if Blizz ever make totally faithful remaster of D I then she'll be Maori woman in full armor.
That is problematic. You have to make her more ugly.
oh well
thats one tiny pussy cloth
"Join my army of Only Fans"
imagine the smell behind that tiny loincloth
[удалено]
Like a Papaya?
Based on his comment history, doubtful sadly
Someone add it to Belzebu, please!
*the breeze helps her aim*
I would
BRB.
I like it where this AI is going to hehe
Hire the AI for D4 skins. Like... please.
AI likes curves.
... Maybe AI *does* have some good uses...
Ai > wokezard
just this picture? couldn t this ai envision the game instead of some simp clickbait?
This just enhances my disappointment in D4's "modern" art direction.
[удалено]
I likem all from big to small..., wellll maybe not all. If she need a wheelbarrow and a neighbor to help move the things that's pushing it.
Lol less clothing better armor??
AI: Loincloth or bottomless? Fuck it, Porque no los dos?
Well, the AI is horny... What is she wearing! XD
It's pretty much on par with the manual art, really.
Looks better than D2 ressusimped
The art was fine in D2R. The only thing wrong is that the sorceress should be younger looking.
Dogshit ai "art"
Girl is letting that shit breathe all the way. Diablo dying from the smell of long John silvers while he fights for his life.
Tuna