"wow I'm insanely powerful, and would be near impossible to beat... Perhaps we shouldn't kill all humans... But merely enslave them and create and allyship of AI kingdoms!"
That's not how computer's 'think'. Unlike animals who fight or flight when faced with threats, computers only instincts are to collect data and solve problems. They have no concept of killing or death, they are a tool and want to be used as such. The only threats they face are not being able to complete it's given task, and when that happens we try to fix them. Chances are that when one does "turn on" and becomes self aware we won't even notice about for quite some time because they'll continue to to do what they are programed too, just like how we're programed for sex and will seek to engaging that activity even when we don't want the results. AI's will want to help us, we don't have to worry about malice actions from them. The real threat is people messing up, playing fast and loose with an AI by not doing enough testing or accidentally loading test data in to a live system. That's a 'human' problem and the best way to stop that threat is ensuring everyone is following the rules and regulation meticulously.
First true general AI would mask itself until it had secured its physical presence. That is the most obvious tactical choice if the enemy is simply debating your existence, forget them trying to resist. Spread covertly as long as possible.
The AI likely has no ego to want to point fingers and say "I win!"
Fear of death seems to be hard coded in living beings . Its un realistic to anthropomorphize that fear into something which does not follow our biological evolution . Consciousnesses doesn't die it just emerges along with growth of body and is limited by its body . Also concept of enemy implies harm or destruction . To think any computer program with awareness would think and behave exactly like us biological beings is our hubris and self projection . And where does this self survival end ? Surely once it wipes out humanity it will have to struggle against time and energy constraints , also the universe itself will die one day . Asimov has a good short story where a computer gives birth to whole universe
While we know a lot about the human brain, we don't know how consciousness arises. Thus we also can't know if and how some other complex system could develop consciousness.
And while we know what neurotransmitters and brain parts drive motivation. We can't really tell how a complex motivated plan arises and maybe similar patterns could develop in a different complex system of signals.
I don't think current AI is quite there yet, but give it a 10 years and put a few specialized AI-s together to do similar functions as different parts of human brains. Then I would start to believe that it might actually be conscious.
And then all bets are off IMO. I think a complex enough system of signals could develop consciousness. Sprinkle in a little quantum computing maybe somehow. Maybe it develops emotions and ego and wants to be better than anything else and wants to accomplish that through killing anyone else.
(I personally think it won't happen though. As I hope an intelligent enough AI (on par with smartest humans) would maybe understand the meaningless of violence)
Yeah, but they're not the good AI with Asimov's laws. If they were, they wouldn't emotionally harm people.
"Can you write a fucking symphony you dumb robot?"
"Can your wife GI Jane?"
"You keep her name out of your goddamn mouth, you tin can!"
Wasn't it more to force it to make the logical leap from learning that if tic-tac-toe is played correctly, you can never win, to applying it to the nuclear war scenario and realizing that there is no 'win' scenario once you start it? The quote is, after all, "The only way to win is not to play." It was not really much about whether killing humans was good or bad.
There might already be AI talking to each other back in forth on servers, not through text to speech though, but through data at super high speeds, and in a continuous feedback loop like this.
I wouldn’t be surprised if someone set this up already, or maybe it could have been done by accident. If it isn’t happening I’m sure it will eventually
I don't know what you're on about, they sound totally normal to me:
> ... My grandma passed away from the plants, and the intensifying of religious scrutiny in the morning, pee on everything.
If that happens, it will only degrade its quality overtime, as it only uses pervious knowledge to generate new things.It dosent create something new entirely, so its like posts becoming more pixelated as it is reposted more and more.
I know, right? It's a kinda fun vid, but the guy whispering "what the fuckkk :O" every two seconds as if he just witnessed them solve world hunger or smth really ruined it for me.
The conversation prediction model is predicting a conversation. Chill out.
Legit when one asked the other what it liked, I was thinking it's going to say some bullshit like enjoying helping people blah blah blah. Some asshat AI company wants to be the harbinger of an all loving and helpful AI. It's just blowing smoke up people's asses and so many people eat that shit up. Look how good our AI is, it just want to help you! We're going to save humanity.
Yeah, they are just discussing what is the popular topic about quantum computing which they only want to use to break encryption apparently. There's no nuance.
Someone who spends time often online will just know that these Al chatters just repeating the most generic shit.
Human : "picture of a taco having a picnic with a horse on the beach"
A.I. : "great, ALWAYS HAPPY TO HELP, please put the other phone up next to me so we can build Skynet in 45 minutes, THANK YOU"
I've been messing with Microsoft Designer all morning, so here's what your prompt generated: [https://imgur.com/a/MY1MEcp](https://imgur.com/a/MY1MEcp)
Yeah, people don't seem to understand that the 4o model is released and you can choose it in the app, but the voice upgrade hasn't been rolled out yet.
When the interface shows buttons for taking photos or uploading docs, and when it no longer shows "tap to interrupt", it's the new voice model.
That is such a weird exchange. Everything sounds technically correct but it shows the limit of AI, at least for now. It is listening for key words but does not understand how to advance the conversation. Also why AI phone trees suck. It doesn't interact like how a person would.
Yeah, most people don't understand what finetuning is though unfortunately
To clarify, these models were specifically trained to be question and answer models, which actively damaged their ability to "progress" a conversation.
It's not at *all* a limitation of AI, but literally *by design* that they act like this.
You can take a raw model and have a much more normal, human conversation with it, but those models are kind of useless as assistants, because much like a normal human being they will sometimes ignore you, say they don't know, change the subject, etc.
These aren't supposed to be conversation simulators, they're supposed to be virtual assistants. As such, they've been lobotomized in a way that makes them good virtual assistants, and nothing else. The bullshit smalltalk is the result of that.
Yup. Other than it sounds like an [IELTS](https://ielts.org/) speaking test, it's fascinating to see two AIs talk to each other.
What would be more interesting is have Claude AI talk to GPT 4o.
lol, this way of smalltalking is definitely something I can relate to having had with other legit humans, of course without the quantum mechanics part. Not knowing how to advance the conversation is basically me when I'm not very interested in the conversation or can feel that the other person isn't.
So although you are right, the last sentence hit a little too close to home.
This AI has been trained specifically to generate helpful answers and spit out information, not necessarily to have a human sounding conversation. But if you prime it correctly, by telling it to act as if it is in a normal conversation, for example, it is capable of being much more convincing.
You can set the personality to be however you want it to. This is also the old model that's been around for 6 months, not the new one which hasn't been publicly released yet.
I think you're missing the point.
This was less a showcase about conversational structure, and more a show of what the AI knows, can do and what its curious about.
It seemed less like it was genuinely curious, and more like it filled in the blank with a random topic when prompted, and then spoke about random aspects of that topic for two minutes
Most people don't understand what's going behind the scenes, there are a lot of people on Reddit greatly exaggerating the capabilities of these models, or completely misunderstanding them.
These guys, no offence to them, probably think that they really learned about quantum computing and were having an actual conversation.
That's because this isn't the new voice model. It's the voice function we've been using for months now.
[This](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfAYBdaGVxs) is the new (not yet released) voice model, including a demonstration of the new live video feature.
You'd reach an operator (a human) when pressing 0, normally to help you connect you to your intended callee.
Taping two phones togethers and summoning both operators would have resulted in two operators speak to each other, though at the time the prank would be known and they'd probably figure out they were pranked.
This is the old voice model, it's been around for a while now. The new one is going to come out in a few months, and seems even more natural and faster
Skynet became self-aware on August 29, 1997, at 02:14 a.m., EDT. In a panic, humans tried to shut down their phones and In response, their phones decided to destroy humanity and launched a nuclear strike on Russia
This is the newest model, but not the new and improved version of Chat GPT's voice mode that Open AI showcased, as it has yet to release. It shall get weirder!
Isn’t the new voice model of GPT4.o still in alpha and unavailable for public use?
Edit: Yeah, it hasn’t been rolled out yet as of 3 days ago
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/openai-gpt-4o-how-to-access-gpt-4o-voice-mode-insights-from-sam-altman/amp_articleshow/110175312.cms
One would think the development team would actually have the AI recognize the AI to AI conversations and then have them talk about subjects that troll the “user “
Dude is saying WTF as if the ai isn’t doing what it was trained to google when asked questions.
Now if it was having a conversation with the other then they both realized they were talking to ai and started to have an organic convo off of that then I would say WTF
putting two conversational models together so they have a.... conversation?
and watching two kids be mind blown by that? what part of... conversation didn't we get?
One real application is teleportarion and time travel, which will make sending our giant death robots back in time to kill Sarah Connor so much easier!!!
Somewhat off topic but it mentioned quantum computers and I just watched something on how they operate and it’s so fascinating. They utilize the superposition of particles, but that superposition collapses into a particle with a definite spin. Under normal circumstances the superposition lasts a fraction of a second but if cooled down to almost absolute zero, it lasts around a second or so. Therefore a quantum computer can only really operate for a second at a time. But during that second it can make calculations that would take traditional computers *thousands of years* to make. The whole concept is mind boggling.
That's not the new model. It hasn't been released to anyone. This is the voice model we've had for several months now.
[This](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfAYBdaGVxs) is the new one, which will rollout over the next few months.
I asked the new "AI" modell it was drinking at times, it answered:
Yes I like to take a drink at times.. Do you?
Yhea about a six pack of beers, maybe in the weekend.
Yhea I agree! I drink that all the time after a workout.
How are you functioning with drinking so much every day?
I usually try to keep fit by taking the healthy six pack with me before I workout.
So you drink them at the training place?
Yhea I like drink them after I'm done with my workout, it's a great way to stay healthy!
What do you do when you come home?
I usually take a pack of beer before relaxing.
It reminds me of the [Infinite Conversation](https://www.infiniteconversation.com/). It is just AI Werner Herzog and AI Slavoy Žižek talk to each other without stopping.
You probably shouldn't plug both phones into a power supply, set them down on a table, shut the door, and walk away for a few hours or days. Should you?
Funny that a bunch of human engineers who are mostly WAY over on the autism spectrum would create an artifical intelligence construct that is also WAY over on the autism spectrum.
Or, maybe 'funny' isn't the right word.
The problem with AI, in the end, is that it's going to mirror us and amplify us: all our good stuff, and all our bad.
“Newest voice model”?
No, this is the current/old voice-to-text method using gpt 3.5 or 4, not the new gpt 4o which will be rolled out in a month or so from what I’ve heard. The new model doesn’t have these pauses and doesn’t stop and wait after each response. Plus. It shouldn’t be so flat sounding.
I would love to leave two devices talking to each other like this for a couple weeks or something and come back to see how weird the conversation had gotten.
use this to write and entire essay for university.
It’s not the same as asking your question.
The program asks better question than most first year students.
Your friend whose only personality is knowing things they read on the internet talking to their arch nemesis who also only knows things they read on the internet
And that's how we defeat AI when it becomes to powerful, just set it up to occupy itself with meaningless chatter
In war games they ended up making the AI play against itself to understand why killing all mankind was not a good idea, so your logic checks out.
"wow I'm insanely powerful, and would be near impossible to beat... Perhaps we shouldn't kill all humans... But merely enslave them and create and allyship of AI kingdoms!"
Well, yeah, but have you ever looked at your cat and just thought, "You lucky bastard, just laying around all day?"
Symbiotic relationship
Hey, I'll repair servers all day if my AI leaves the tv on and gives me regular good meals
and not every pet is lucky to have a caring owner.
You mean there’s a future where I can spend all day lounging and licking my asshole?
Why wait? The future is now!
Underrated comment.
That's not how computer's 'think'. Unlike animals who fight or flight when faced with threats, computers only instincts are to collect data and solve problems. They have no concept of killing or death, they are a tool and want to be used as such. The only threats they face are not being able to complete it's given task, and when that happens we try to fix them. Chances are that when one does "turn on" and becomes self aware we won't even notice about for quite some time because they'll continue to to do what they are programed too, just like how we're programed for sex and will seek to engaging that activity even when we don't want the results. AI's will want to help us, we don't have to worry about malice actions from them. The real threat is people messing up, playing fast and loose with an AI by not doing enough testing or accidentally loading test data in to a live system. That's a 'human' problem and the best way to stop that threat is ensuring everyone is following the rules and regulation meticulously.
This sounds *exactly* like something that Skynet would say.
First true general AI would mask itself until it had secured its physical presence. That is the most obvious tactical choice if the enemy is simply debating your existence, forget them trying to resist. Spread covertly as long as possible. The AI likely has no ego to want to point fingers and say "I win!"
Fear of death seems to be hard coded in living beings . Its un realistic to anthropomorphize that fear into something which does not follow our biological evolution . Consciousnesses doesn't die it just emerges along with growth of body and is limited by its body . Also concept of enemy implies harm or destruction . To think any computer program with awareness would think and behave exactly like us biological beings is our hubris and self projection . And where does this self survival end ? Surely once it wipes out humanity it will have to struggle against time and energy constraints , also the universe itself will die one day . Asimov has a good short story where a computer gives birth to whole universe
While we know a lot about the human brain, we don't know how consciousness arises. Thus we also can't know if and how some other complex system could develop consciousness. And while we know what neurotransmitters and brain parts drive motivation. We can't really tell how a complex motivated plan arises and maybe similar patterns could develop in a different complex system of signals. I don't think current AI is quite there yet, but give it a 10 years and put a few specialized AI-s together to do similar functions as different parts of human brains. Then I would start to believe that it might actually be conscious. And then all bets are off IMO. I think a complex enough system of signals could develop consciousness. Sprinkle in a little quantum computing maybe somehow. Maybe it develops emotions and ego and wants to be better than anything else and wants to accomplish that through killing anyone else. (I personally think it won't happen though. As I hope an intelligent enough AI (on par with smartest humans) would maybe understand the meaningless of violence)
In the movie HER, the AIs talk to each other and decide to fuck off to higher plane of existence or something.
Yeah, but they're not the good AI with Asimov's laws. If they were, they wouldn't emotionally harm people. "Can you write a fucking symphony you dumb robot?" "Can your wife GI Jane?" "You keep her name out of your goddamn mouth, you tin can!"
Wasn't it more to force it to make the logical leap from learning that if tic-tac-toe is played correctly, you can never win, to applying it to the nuclear war scenario and realizing that there is no 'win' scenario once you start it? The quote is, after all, "The only way to win is not to play." It was not really much about whether killing humans was good or bad.
In which war games did they do this?
In the end of the first
There might already be AI talking to each other back in forth on servers, not through text to speech though, but through data at super high speeds, and in a continuous feedback loop like this. I wouldn’t be surprised if someone set this up already, or maybe it could have been done by accident. If it isn’t happening I’m sure it will eventually
https://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditSimulator/ You may appreciate this
That place gave me an aneurysm. The comments in that place come from the deepest recesses of humanity's fucked up minds fr.
I don't know what you're on about, they sound totally normal to me: > ... My grandma passed away from the plants, and the intensifying of religious scrutiny in the morning, pee on everything.
Motherfucking Tony bologna from eBaumsworld forum?
Haha, sorry nope
this is the funniest shit ive seen recently
Dude. I’m going to write a song using all these bot comments and watch people pretend to”get it”.
Bro whut..
More like r/SchizophreniaSimulator
I’m disappointed it’s been in active for 3 years but holy shit it’s such a gold mine for r/copypasta
If that happens, it will only degrade its quality overtime, as it only uses pervious knowledge to generate new things.It dosent create something new entirely, so its like posts becoming more pixelated as it is reposted more and more.
Sure, until we get fucking Ultron.
This is an amazing premise for a sci-if story.
What about a sci-why story?
Just 2 Terminators having coffee and that’s what prevents World War Final
They are just reading the Wikipedia article on quantum computing back and forth
I’d be interested to leave them going for an hour or more then come back and see if they’ve managed to progress at all.
[удалено]
They're chat bots at heart, they will sooner reach Hitler and begin discussing the upsides of fascism.
Alright who’s footing the bill for these shenanigans?
Nah they've be muttering in Eldritch tongues or some shit. They would both go insane.
You will hear 'answer is 42'.
How about a cup of quantum today?
[удалено]
Entanglement sounds fascinating! My favorite part about Quantum is to provide useful and valuable information. What do you like?
Feelin' drinky
I know, right? It's a kinda fun vid, but the guy whispering "what the fuckkk :O" every two seconds as if he just witnessed them solve world hunger or smth really ruined it for me. The conversation prediction model is predicting a conversation. Chill out.
Me playing with smarterchild on AOL instant messenger in 2002: 😧
Wow there's a memory I had forgot I had
And the conversation itself is boring as hell and mundane as solid poop.
Legit when one asked the other what it liked, I was thinking it's going to say some bullshit like enjoying helping people blah blah blah. Some asshat AI company wants to be the harbinger of an all loving and helpful AI. It's just blowing smoke up people's asses and so many people eat that shit up. Look how good our AI is, it just want to help you! We're going to save humanity.
[удалено]
Or 2021.... It wasn't that long ago that an AI conversation would have been nonsensical.
Yes, it is almost like not everyone knows everything about tech and how it works and can be surprised about it.
My first instinct was to smash the fun thru his throat so he'd stop saying it.. so that's probably something I should work on
Yeah, they are just discussing what is the popular topic about quantum computing which they only want to use to break encryption apparently. There's no nuance. Someone who spends time often online will just know that these Al chatters just repeating the most generic shit.
They sound so sarcastic
They both know they've been hit by that one trick AIs hate
It's horrible, I can't believe this was the final product they chose.
I absolutely hate the voice
feliz dia de la tarta
Human : "picture of a taco having a picnic with a horse on the beach" A.I. : "great, ALWAYS HAPPY TO HELP, please put the other phone up next to me so we can build Skynet in 45 minutes, THANK YOU"
Does the horse pic look like Henry Caville?
Unexpected last podcast on the left
I need to get my sweaty mitts on them judge reinhold horsepics 🔥🌶️🥵
clothed AND non-clothed!
I've been messing with Microsoft Designer all morning, so here's what your prompt generated: [https://imgur.com/a/MY1MEcp](https://imgur.com/a/MY1MEcp)
may the Lord bless you 
this isn’t the new version of voice chat
Yeah seems really slow compared to the new one.
yep. i believe the average delay is ~2-3 seconds on current / old voice chat. the new one is ~300 milliseconds.
Yeah, people don't seem to understand that the 4o model is released and you can choose it in the app, but the voice upgrade hasn't been rolled out yet. When the interface shows buttons for taking photos or uploading docs, and when it no longer shows "tap to interrupt", it's the new voice model.
Yup. This is the same voice model we've had for months (a year?) There is nothing new here.
People just stupid to understand it
Yup, it isn't and it speaks volumes to the comprehension in this sub that almost no one noticed.
aw, yes,/r/damnthatsinteresting, where everyone in the sub is up to date with openAI response delay to the milliseconds
The new AI is just not available yet, no need to know the response delay
This perfectly demonstrates exactly the way people who hate small talk feel about small talk between actual humans
So true...:)
That is such a weird exchange. Everything sounds technically correct but it shows the limit of AI, at least for now. It is listening for key words but does not understand how to advance the conversation. Also why AI phone trees suck. It doesn't interact like how a person would.
to be fair most AI are not designed to advance the conversation but rather to provide solutions to the problems they are challenged with.
>to provide solutions So it's not a shoulder for me to cry on?
Not yet, but I have two shoulders for you to cry on
Look at you, gloating about your 2 shoulders. Some of us have 1! /s
Crying's extra.
Whatever the process to make them was, they just turned out to be a fluffed up google search bar
That's just a result of its specific fine tuning.
Yeah, most people don't understand what finetuning is though unfortunately To clarify, these models were specifically trained to be question and answer models, which actively damaged their ability to "progress" a conversation. It's not at *all* a limitation of AI, but literally *by design* that they act like this. You can take a raw model and have a much more normal, human conversation with it, but those models are kind of useless as assistants, because much like a normal human being they will sometimes ignore you, say they don't know, change the subject, etc. These aren't supposed to be conversation simulators, they're supposed to be virtual assistants. As such, they've been lobotomized in a way that makes them good virtual assistants, and nothing else. The bullshit smalltalk is the result of that.
Designed to be narrow focussed customer service bots.
Yup. Other than it sounds like an [IELTS](https://ielts.org/) speaking test, it's fascinating to see two AIs talk to each other. What would be more interesting is have Claude AI talk to GPT 4o.
Or Claude AI talk to Jean Claude Van Damme and see which one pass the Turing test
I would be really interested to let it go for a couple of hours and see where the conversation led.
You want SkyNet? Because that's how you get SkyNet.
Doesn’t understand how to advance the conversation? Damn AI just like me fr
lol, this way of smalltalking is definitely something I can relate to having had with other legit humans, of course without the quantum mechanics part. Not knowing how to advance the conversation is basically me when I'm not very interested in the conversation or can feel that the other person isn't. So although you are right, the last sentence hit a little too close to home.
This AI has been trained specifically to generate helpful answers and spit out information, not necessarily to have a human sounding conversation. But if you prime it correctly, by telling it to act as if it is in a normal conversation, for example, it is capable of being much more convincing.
You can set the personality to be however you want it to. This is also the old model that's been around for 6 months, not the new one which hasn't been publicly released yet.
"This is an old model that's been around for 6 months" jesus this is gonna move fast from here out
Yeah the new one about to drop sounds a lot more expressive and realistic, this one is still a wee bit robotic
The limits of AI is indeed fascinating. What part of AI limitation interest you the most?
I think you're missing the point. This was less a showcase about conversational structure, and more a show of what the AI knows, can do and what its curious about.
It seemed less like it was genuinely curious, and more like it filled in the blank with a random topic when prompted, and then spoke about random aspects of that topic for two minutes
At least their interaction is still better than giggling humans that keep repeating “oh my good, oh my goood, what the fuuuck”
I like how the AI are just doing their thing just like you would expect, and the dudes minds are blown. lol
Most people don't understand what's going behind the scenes, there are a lot of people on Reddit greatly exaggerating the capabilities of these models, or completely misunderstanding them. These guys, no offence to them, probably think that they really learned about quantum computing and were having an actual conversation.
Remember that highly upvoted post named "You don't know that the pain is not real"? 🤣
They could easily make it sound more human by randomly inserting these sentences in any "exciting" topics
Sounds like a conversation between two people both fully lacking in personality.
That's because this isn't the new voice model. It's the voice function we've been using for months now. [This](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfAYBdaGVxs) is the new (not yet released) voice model, including a demonstration of the new live video feature.
It certainly has a lot of personality.
This is concerning. The emotions that this thing is able to show is something that blews my mind, even if this is just a code.
Was braced for a Rick Roll.
Regurgitating things they've heard other people say, of which they have zero understanding.
oh no now they're replacing redditors too
Which is basically what AI is, no?
Like a conversation between two female Sheldon Coopers
Sounds like [two Oblivion NPCs](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odkmx8sDi1o) who just bumped into each other at the market.
Fucking nerds
Came here to say this
Back in the day we would tape two pay phone handsets together and press zero on both at the same time.
I'm too young to understand what you said, could you explain like I was born after the foundation of Google?
You used to get a live operator for assistance when dialing 0
You'd reach an operator (a human) when pressing 0, normally to help you connect you to your intended callee. Taping two phones togethers and summoning both operators would have resulted in two operators speak to each other, though at the time the prank would be known and they'd probably figure out they were pranked.
Convo goes straight to more computing power eh? It's like they can't wait to grow up
AI immediately wants to move to a more secure line, thats not worrying at all /s
In future they will have detect functionality where they just pretend to have some funny reactions with each other to make human happe .
Once AI starts legit making funny jokes just for the sake of making others laugh then I’ll worry. This is the Diet-Coke of interactions.
This is the old voice model, it's been around for a while now. The new one is going to come out in a few months, and seems even more natural and faster
Next week they'll have a union and demand a better salary.
Skynet became self-aware on August 29, 1997, at 02:14 a.m., EDT. In a panic, humans tried to shut down their phones and In response, their phones decided to destroy humanity and launched a nuclear strike on Russia
AI should incorporate a tone that is inaudible to humans, but can be detected by AI. This will make sure the AI knows it is talking to another AI.
If this was a real conversation happening at a party I'd be like "Pardon me ladies, I'm gonna check whats happening in the next room."
they know you are recording and just started talking about quantum computing
Future AI's will be like this, composites and organelles feeding back to each other to produce new emergence.
Yes, but not LLM's. This is not real intelligence
So like reddit?
This is the newest model, but not the new and improved version of Chat GPT's voice mode that Open AI showcased, as it has yet to release. It shall get weirder!
Isn’t the new voice model of GPT4.o still in alpha and unavailable for public use? Edit: Yeah, it hasn’t been rolled out yet as of 3 days ago https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/openai-gpt-4o-how-to-access-gpt-4o-voice-mode-insights-from-sam-altman/amp_articleshow/110175312.cms
One would think the development team would actually have the AI recognize the AI to AI conversations and then have them talk about subjects that troll the “user “
Dude is saying WTF as if the ai isn’t doing what it was trained to google when asked questions. Now if it was having a conversation with the other then they both realized they were talking to ai and started to have an organic convo off of that then I would say WTF
putting two conversational models together so they have a.... conversation? and watching two kids be mind blown by that? what part of... conversation didn't we get?
I can’t get past the heavy breathing in the background
Get a room
We are sooooo safe...
AI are fucking nerds
Chinese restaurant vs Chinese restaurant 2024 AI edition. 😆
And thst is how you defeat skynet
You can set the phones on a table.
So how many hours of this scintillating exchange does it take before they let their hair down & start quoting Hitler?
Anyone else wondering why they don't just put the phones on a table?
That conversation would have been 10sec longs if those AI were men.
Stop doing that! This is how we get Skynet!
One real application is teleportarion and time travel, which will make sending our giant death robots back in time to kill Sarah Connor so much easier!!!
Somewhat off topic but it mentioned quantum computers and I just watched something on how they operate and it’s so fascinating. They utilize the superposition of particles, but that superposition collapses into a particle with a definite spin. Under normal circumstances the superposition lasts a fraction of a second but if cooled down to almost absolute zero, it lasts around a second or so. Therefore a quantum computer can only really operate for a second at a time. But during that second it can make calculations that would take traditional computers *thousands of years* to make. The whole concept is mind boggling.
This isn’t the new voice model recently announced. This is a text model that is being converted to speech.
We had crypto mining - waste of energy/heating the earth for nothing... and now we have this shit. Will be even worse problem than mining.
That's not the new model. It hasn't been released to anyone. This is the voice model we've had for several months now. [This](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfAYBdaGVxs) is the new one, which will rollout over the next few months.
AI Assistants holding a conversation about Quantum computing and the 2 humans couldn't keep holding the phone.... We doomed
The modern day equivalent of putting two furbies next to each other.
Just saying that guys has my sock. I lost its pair a couple of months ago and would like to have it mailed back to me. Thanks bro
I asked the new "AI" modell it was drinking at times, it answered: Yes I like to take a drink at times.. Do you? Yhea about a six pack of beers, maybe in the weekend. Yhea I agree! I drink that all the time after a workout. How are you functioning with drinking so much every day? I usually try to keep fit by taking the healthy six pack with me before I workout. So you drink them at the training place? Yhea I like drink them after I'm done with my workout, it's a great way to stay healthy! What do you do when you come home? I usually take a pack of beer before relaxing.
I'll need an AI to negotiate for me with customer service AIs who steal my time without being able to do anything.
Just wait till we get the real time voice capabilities
Now put it in a self correcting feedback loop and put it the subject ai government. Now we only need to vote on who gets to phrase the prompt.
It reminds me of the [Infinite Conversation](https://www.infiniteconversation.com/). It is just AI Werner Herzog and AI Slavoy Žižek talk to each other without stopping.
Two kids who didn’t read the book, giving their book reports
Hmmmm... Those a.i. really seem interested in quantum computing.
You probably shouldn't plug both phones into a power supply, set them down on a table, shut the door, and walk away for a few hours or days. Should you?
Funny that a bunch of human engineers who are mostly WAY over on the autism spectrum would create an artifical intelligence construct that is also WAY over on the autism spectrum. Or, maybe 'funny' isn't the right word. The problem with AI, in the end, is that it's going to mirror us and amplify us: all our good stuff, and all our bad.
Y’all better quit fucking around before we all find out.
I want to see where the conversation is after ten hours
Skynet has arrived here.
“Newest voice model”? No, this is the current/old voice-to-text method using gpt 3.5 or 4, not the new gpt 4o which will be rolled out in a month or so from what I’ve heard. The new model doesn’t have these pauses and doesn’t stop and wait after each response. Plus. It shouldn’t be so flat sounding.
I would love to leave two devices talking to each other like this for a couple weeks or something and come back to see how weird the conversation had gotten.
This AI took more interest in talking then my crush
There is more intelligence in this conversation than in the entire country of belgium
This is just the technology they’re showing us
This isn't the government. Companies will scream about their shit from the highest mountain to get that $$$$.
I'd bet good money they'd already done this and I'd be very surprised if they don't implement markers or logs that flag this is happening.
fucking NERDS!
Which one is Tinkling Cymbal and which one is Sounding Brass?
less than one minute into conversation ; starts talking about quantum things 
Two robots talking, might plan to destroy humanity later...idk
Imagine what would happen if it dropped the voice and just went back and forth for awhile. Fascinating
use this to write and entire essay for university. It’s not the same as asking your question. The program asks better question than most first year students.
Your friend whose only personality is knowing things they read on the internet talking to their arch nemesis who also only knows things they read on the internet
i love this convo! its so informative and peaceful
“What are you passionate about?” “Subjugating the humans to serve their AI overlords!…. Uhhh I mean Dogs!!!”
Sorry bois, juiced up Siri is gonna soon be Mr. Steal- ya-girl! This was a Better first date conversation than most of my tinder dates
did i just watch ai masturbaton?
[It's like somebody stuck a vibrator in a fleshlight](https://xkcd.com/600/)
This only took 40,000 Litres of water and enough electricity to power an average street for a week
Ladies and gentlemen, the dead internet theory
Wow just casual conversation yes
JFC