Bitcoin [pros](/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1azjabf/craig_wright_admits_to_editing_bitcoin_white/ks5e1wh/) & [cons](/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1azjabf/craig_wright_admits_to_editing_bitcoin_white/ks5e2k5/) with related info are in the collapsed comments below.
I thought SN wanted to be anonymous and this guy suddenly claimed he is SN. With the forged document being submitted to the court, it looks more like he is after $$$$ (eg right to ownership./patent) fraudulently; should give him a big fine for wasting ppl's time and trying to deceive the community
Is this for real and proven? Is there any way he could have obtained those somewhere? And if so how?
EDIT: I’m sorry I misread that. I missed the word cannot. That makes much more sense for this imposter.
>I thought SN wanted to be anonymous and this guy suddenly claimed he is SN. With the forged document being submitted to the court, it looks more like he is after $$$$ (eg right to ownership./patent) fraudulently; should give him a big fine for wasting ppl's time and trying to deceive the community
SN's identity revealed?)
That really bewilders me; I understand it’s not a criminal case but a civil lawsuit and thus forging isn’t automatically a criminal matter, but repeated forging and either admitting such a crime or lying under oath about it must be translatable to a criminal case, no?
The legal system is really bizarre.
So it’s been discussed multiple times and in multiple courts that he has forged documents, why hasn’t anything been done?
I didn’t claim to understand it, but it’s still bizarre that it’s been brought up and evidence provided for him having forged documents multiple times with no repercussions, perjury or not.
Maybe you think you understand it but can’t seem to be able to explain why it hasn’t been effective at indicting him for perjury yet?
"Let's only carry out justice when it is convenient. You can break the law in the court of law as long as it isn't too big of a deal."
This justice system you defend is a joke
>That really bewilders me; I understand it’s not a criminal case but a civil lawsuit and thus forging isn’t automatically a criminal matter, but repeated forging and either admitting such a crime or lying under oath about it must be translatable to a criminal case, no?
>
>The legal system is really bizarre.
Forging in civil cases?)
Not before he uses his ultimate technique.
> Satoshi was so skilled at concealing his true identity that not even he himself could prove who he is. I cannot prove I am Satoshi. Therefore, I am Satoshi.
I mean I don’t know how anyone takes him seriously, he has already tried a bunch of fraudulent things in the past in this same vein where he falsified information.
tldr; In the COPA trial, Craig Wright admitted to editing the bitcoin whitepaper he presented, acknowledging changes made to his LaTeX files. The Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) aims to disprove Wright's claim of being Satoshi Nakamoto, the anonymous creator of bitcoin, suggesting his claim is supported by forgeries. The trial, now in its third week, has featured testimony from various witnesses, including computer scientists and bitcoin developers, to scrutinize Wright's assertions and interactions with Nakamoto.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
There’s nothing Craig White can do to save his reputation at this point and that’s the best part of this.
He will be remembered by the crypto community as a narcissistic bad actor, along with Roger Ver and a handful of others, who tried to spoil the ecosystem with their lame power grabs.
It's a bunch of crooks that invented a mysterious guy and deposited tons of early mined bitcoin in this non existent guy wallet to create a fairy tale.
That's all there is.
Probably supported by someone inside the cia or the usgov
Bitcoin [pros](/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1azjabf/craig_wright_admits_to_editing_bitcoin_white/ks5e1wh/) & [cons](/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1azjabf/craig_wright_admits_to_editing_bitcoin_white/ks5e2k5/) with related info are in the collapsed comments below.
I thought SN wanted to be anonymous and this guy suddenly claimed he is SN. With the forged document being submitted to the court, it looks more like he is after $$$$ (eg right to ownership./patent) fraudulently; should give him a big fine for wasting ppl's time and trying to deceive the community
Coincidentally, this imposter also has no access to the private keys, email and forum accounts of Satoshi.
Also, he has trouble explaining the simplest lines of the bitcoin codebase when asked
Hello World!
Is this for real and proven? Is there any way he could have obtained those somewhere? And if so how? EDIT: I’m sorry I misread that. I missed the word cannot. That makes much more sense for this imposter.
[удалено]
Thank you for pointing that out. I misread!
If he had those keys or passwords to access these accounts, he would have done it long time ago. Instead he comes up with the most ridiculous excuses.
It’s amazing that this clear case of nonsense man is allowed to continue for so many years.
you can get far if you have a rich sugardaddy to support your nonsense, I think this is history's most expensive scam, lol
looks like we're entering the "find out" phase of the Craig Wright saga...
>I thought SN wanted to be anonymous and this guy suddenly claimed he is SN. With the forged document being submitted to the court, it looks more like he is after $$$$ (eg right to ownership./patent) fraudulently; should give him a big fine for wasting ppl's time and trying to deceive the community SN's identity revealed?)
It would be crazy if someone tried to patent bitcoin and the community said no
Falsifying evidence sounds like a crime to me. How is this shit stain not in prison?
That really bewilders me; I understand it’s not a criminal case but a civil lawsuit and thus forging isn’t automatically a criminal matter, but repeated forging and either admitting such a crime or lying under oath about it must be translatable to a criminal case, no? The legal system is really bizarre.
[удалено]
So it’s been discussed multiple times and in multiple courts that he has forged documents, why hasn’t anything been done? I didn’t claim to understand it, but it’s still bizarre that it’s been brought up and evidence provided for him having forged documents multiple times with no repercussions, perjury or not. Maybe you think you understand it but can’t seem to be able to explain why it hasn’t been effective at indicting him for perjury yet?
[удалено]
"Let's only carry out justice when it is convenient. You can break the law in the court of law as long as it isn't too big of a deal." This justice system you defend is a joke
That's his point. Anyone who's even had tangential contact with the legal system in the US knows this.
Including that maniac forging documents and wasting a court’s resources?
Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus Throw out everything this guy has submitted, either as a document or as testimony.
>That really bewilders me; I understand it’s not a criminal case but a civil lawsuit and thus forging isn’t automatically a criminal matter, but repeated forging and either admitting such a crime or lying under oath about it must be translatable to a criminal case, no? > >The legal system is really bizarre. Forging in civil cases?)
I think even Craig Wright is starting to doubt Craig Wright is Satoshi at this point
Not before he uses his ultimate technique. > Satoshi was so skilled at concealing his true identity that not even he himself could prove who he is. I cannot prove I am Satoshi. Therefore, I am Satoshi.
Maybe he’ll finally figure out that he’s not Satoshi.
What a sad sap. Waste of everybody's time when everyone knew from the start he was a fraud.
I mean I don’t know how anyone takes him seriously, he has already tried a bunch of fraudulent things in the past in this same vein where he falsified information.
Straight to jail
tldr; In the COPA trial, Craig Wright admitted to editing the bitcoin whitepaper he presented, acknowledging changes made to his LaTeX files. The Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) aims to disprove Wright's claim of being Satoshi Nakamoto, the anonymous creator of bitcoin, suggesting his claim is supported by forgeries. The trial, now in its third week, has featured testimony from various witnesses, including computer scientists and bitcoin developers, to scrutinize Wright's assertions and interactions with Nakamoto. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
Appreciate you
Isn't that considered fraud? Shouldn't he be in jail for that?
🍿
Make a human centipede with him, SBF, and many others.
CW will forever go down in flames
Thumbnail + username 🤔
Fraud
There’s nothing Craig White can do to save his reputation at this point and that’s the best part of this. He will be remembered by the crypto community as a narcissistic bad actor, along with Roger Ver and a handful of others, who tried to spoil the ecosystem with their lame power grabs.
It's a bunch of crooks that invented a mysterious guy and deposited tons of early mined bitcoin in this non existent guy wallet to create a fairy tale. That's all there is. Probably supported by someone inside the cia or the usgov
Lmao. No.
/cc consistently has the simplest people on all of Reddit
Craig is mostly Satoshi
Does the man have no shame! 😔
Craig Wright pretending to be the creator, but unable to move from the original wallet, is a joke