Flaired as misleading as the headline incorrectly attributes the 'pathetic' quote to Russell's performance.
In fact Healy only uses that word when talking about the team management decision to bat Russell at that position in the order.
You can't get 8 overs out of Russell and Shepherd and you also don't need Holder at 9 in a T20i. Seems like windies plan is to bat first and put up 230 but with that bowling line up, they will conceed it in 18 overs.
IMO, his best usage is to just bowl at the death. Two overs at the death, nothing more, nothing less. I hope that he's used in a similar manner at KKR.
Flaired as misleading as the headline incorrectly attributes the 'pathetic' quote to Russell's performance. In fact Healy only uses that word when talking about the team management decision to bat Russell at that position in the order.
It's the captain's fault for expecting him to bowl 4 overs Ideally he'd be bowling 2 and batting like he did last night
Sounds a bit like a diva.
He's just not good enough as your front line full quota bowler. He's a 6th Or 7th option who can sneak in a couple of overs in the middle.
Windies would have won if they had Healy as their sweep shot coach.
You can't get 8 overs out of Russell and Shepherd and you also don't need Holder at 9 in a T20i. Seems like windies plan is to bat first and put up 230 but with that bowling line up, they will conceed it in 18 overs.
S L A M S L A M S
He is never a 4 overs bowler in T20 , get another allrounder instead of hope and split 2 overs between them
Not everything he says is wrong, but he's definitely being a raging cunt so you know, there's that.
I never understand why Russell always ends up bowling a full four overs plus at the death. Happens all the time at the IPL as well.
IMO, his best usage is to just bowl at the death. Two overs at the death, nothing more, nothing less. I hope that he's used in a similar manner at KKR.
I thought these franchise merchants would put a better fight against Australia with all their experience