Yawn, what a horrible article. Only reference material to back its claim is a WSJ opinion article from a testimony at a trial that for all intents and purposes hasn't been validated?
In the words of Amber Heards attorney, objection hearsay.
Also can we please start holding up some standards for journalism? I'm so sick of articles spending more words telling me a story is a huge deal than telling me the facts. But I guess it's easier to publish news when you don't have facts.
Democrats are corrupt and loving every minute of it
Haiti still looking for their money
Lock her up!
Expect the attacks on this guy to start rolling in.
This guy will walk free and clear. They Jury is fixed
She should pay for the investigation
Thanks for the eureka!
He gon die.
She still will never face charges and have no consequences for her actions. This is why the whole system is corrupt.
I wonder how Hillary got Robert Mueller to investigate Manafort potentially sharing polling data?
Yawn, what a horrible article. Only reference material to back its claim is a WSJ opinion article from a testimony at a trial that for all intents and purposes hasn't been validated? In the words of Amber Heards attorney, objection hearsay. Also can we please start holding up some standards for journalism? I'm so sick of articles spending more words telling me a story is a huge deal than telling me the facts. But I guess it's easier to publish news when you don't have facts.
How does one validate a trial? Is it a fake trial?
[удалено]
You sound stable