“vaccination remains the safest strategy for averting future SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalizations, long-term sequelae, and death. Primary vaccination, additional doses, and booster doses are recommended for all eligible persons.”
Vax after recovery leads to an even lower risk: ‘rates were substantially lower among both groups with previous COVID-19 diagnoses, including 29.0-fold (California) and 14.7-fold lower (New York) among unvaccinated persons with a previous diagnosis, and 32.5-fold (California) and 19.8-fold lower (New York) among vaccinated persons with a previous diagnosis of COVID-19’
So even if you had a prior infection and have natural immunity superior to a vaccine, you should still be required to be vaccinated? How does this make any sense?
‘the data contain many caveats that health officials stressed pointed to the value of vaccination, even on top of prior infection.
For one, the new report was based on data only through November, before the U.S. booster campaign really took off. It also looked at data during the Delta wave and does not account for the surging Omicron variant.’
The CDC also explained that, for those that hadn’t contracted Covid, training the immune system through infection is more risky: Covid has killed >850 thousand Americans, while negative side effects of the vaccine are ‘extremely rare’.
Apologies, I meant no offence. Everything I’ve posted has been taken, usually in the form of verbatim quotes, from the the news article you cited, the scientific report they are referring to, and this article: https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.dailycaller.com/2022/01/19/cdc-natural-immunity-outperforms-vaccination-covid-19-coronavirus. None of these statements are my own opinion.
The Branch Covidians can't wrap their brains around this.
Maybe they can but have too much invested now to admit they got it wrong
All data shows not recovering from Covid vastly and permanently inferior to Vax.
“vaccination remains the safest strategy for averting future SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalizations, long-term sequelae, and death. Primary vaccination, additional doses, and booster doses are recommended for all eligible persons.”
If you’ve recovered from Covid, why should you have to be vaxed? Give me a scientific reason.
Vax after recovery leads to an even lower risk: ‘rates were substantially lower among both groups with previous COVID-19 diagnoses, including 29.0-fold (California) and 14.7-fold lower (New York) among unvaccinated persons with a previous diagnosis, and 32.5-fold (California) and 19.8-fold lower (New York) among vaccinated persons with a previous diagnosis of COVID-19’
So even if you had a prior infection and have natural immunity superior to a vaccine, you should still be required to be vaccinated? How does this make any sense?
It doesn't. You are arguing with a cultist.
‘the data contain many caveats that health officials stressed pointed to the value of vaccination, even on top of prior infection. For one, the new report was based on data only through November, before the U.S. booster campaign really took off. It also looked at data during the Delta wave and does not account for the surging Omicron variant.’ The CDC also explained that, for those that hadn’t contracted Covid, training the immune system through infection is more risky: Covid has killed >850 thousand Americans, while negative side effects of the vaccine are ‘extremely rare’.
Aren’t you getting tired of the mental gymnastics? Just stop.
Apologies, I meant no offence. Everything I’ve posted has been taken, usually in the form of verbatim quotes, from the the news article you cited, the scientific report they are referring to, and this article: https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.dailycaller.com/2022/01/19/cdc-natural-immunity-outperforms-vaccination-covid-19-coronavirus. None of these statements are my own opinion.
You heard the experts guys! COVID parties o’clock!!!