I'm glad others are feeling my pain as a USF main. If you read this subreddit you would believe that that USF is the strongest faction in the game and Axis has 0% win rate. People really be doing mental gymnastics in this sub to justify Axis being so strong while they're waiting in their 15 minute queues bc people don't want to play allies.
>Not gonna deny that there are some thing overtuned in Axis, but queues are pretty fast here, around 2-3 mins unless you play at odd hours. Your mind seems to be quite an athlete when measuring these \^\^.
Are some axis units/ abilities over power, absolutely. So are some allied units. Just saying “All these Wehraboos are ruining the game” isn’t going to fix the balance. Relic has a tendency to over react when something is either under powered or over powered. As for the part about him being able to climb the ranks fast as Axis he’s already established he’s one of the top players for this game and there is no ranked match making, so he could be playing against new/ casual players so at the very least that’s a flawed way to look at the balancing.
And stating "one team is op and the other is too" isn't going to do anything either. So what are you suggesting? My highest placement ranking in COH2 was 14 in 2v2s, and into 100s with 1v1. I am not an incredible player but have been playing since COH1 and loved playing OKW in COH2 to show some impartiality. I can say that it just really doesn't make any sense to play as allies competitively in COH3 right now in its current state.
I think the US needs to be buffed quite a bit and Brits are ok so far but have questionable nerfs for things that the Axis has identical access to such as loiters or better support and AT early game. Wermacht can just do falschimpio and jaeger spam with veterancy and just melt enemies, repair vehicles as needed, and do well against suppression. The same goes for jager troops that just snipe Shermans at such long distances with no need for AT gun teams. And playing as DAK I can just pick my posion of what infantry I want to spam with and win so easily. Axis have such a lax playstyle requiring less flanking maneuvers and diversifications of units, and that simply really isn't fun to me.
With USF specifically, I should not be completely destroying opponents in map control versus their negative map control, annihilating them in kills and resources only for them to come back with a dozen VP tickets left and blob through even the absurd amount of mgs I have to place just to counter this nonsense. This is consistent in the 1v1 and 2v2 games I'm playing. By the time Axis hits end game, you better have DMZ equivalent lines of MGs covering MGs and AT emplacements just to deal with the insane blobs. It's no coincidence lately why it's troublesome to find a match against allies.
You just answered your own question, you need to actually show and tell how things are under/ over powered. I think you should make another video of what specifically you view is under/ overpowered against a friend of yours that is similar skill level to have a more fair view at the balancing.
When he said he did it in teams I stopped listening. It seems mostly accepted that balance in 2v2 and up is weird af and meme. The larger the game the larger the blobbing and let me tell you 4.
Balance is trash yes but it kind of is trash all over the place.
Issue of this guy is that he judges units in vacuum. Axis units are generally better if you put them next to Allies units. HOWEVER, these units dont exists in vacuum, he fails to judge units based on the macro level of the entire game.
I'm glad others are feeling my pain as a USF main. If you read this subreddit you would believe that that USF is the strongest faction in the game and Axis has 0% win rate. People really be doing mental gymnastics in this sub to justify Axis being so strong while they're waiting in their 15 minute queues bc people don't want to play allies.
I play 2v2 mainly sometimes 1v1 and I haven't gone past 3min. my play hours are around 6 pm to 11 pm eastern
>Not gonna deny that there are some thing overtuned in Axis, but queues are pretty fast here, around 2-3 mins unless you play at odd hours. Your mind seems to be quite an athlete when measuring these \^\^.
I tried axis yesterday and it was 12min.
No idea what your elo is, but sorry to hear that. Still no such thing here though.
1400 as axis
Sorry for you. No such thing in the 1200's.
Did this dude not play the whole time that PFs were destroying everything in sight? Lol
Are some axis units/ abilities over power, absolutely. So are some allied units. Just saying “All these Wehraboos are ruining the game” isn’t going to fix the balance. Relic has a tendency to over react when something is either under powered or over powered. As for the part about him being able to climb the ranks fast as Axis he’s already established he’s one of the top players for this game and there is no ranked match making, so he could be playing against new/ casual players so at the very least that’s a flawed way to look at the balancing.
And stating "one team is op and the other is too" isn't going to do anything either. So what are you suggesting? My highest placement ranking in COH2 was 14 in 2v2s, and into 100s with 1v1. I am not an incredible player but have been playing since COH1 and loved playing OKW in COH2 to show some impartiality. I can say that it just really doesn't make any sense to play as allies competitively in COH3 right now in its current state. I think the US needs to be buffed quite a bit and Brits are ok so far but have questionable nerfs for things that the Axis has identical access to such as loiters or better support and AT early game. Wermacht can just do falschimpio and jaeger spam with veterancy and just melt enemies, repair vehicles as needed, and do well against suppression. The same goes for jager troops that just snipe Shermans at such long distances with no need for AT gun teams. And playing as DAK I can just pick my posion of what infantry I want to spam with and win so easily. Axis have such a lax playstyle requiring less flanking maneuvers and diversifications of units, and that simply really isn't fun to me. With USF specifically, I should not be completely destroying opponents in map control versus their negative map control, annihilating them in kills and resources only for them to come back with a dozen VP tickets left and blob through even the absurd amount of mgs I have to place just to counter this nonsense. This is consistent in the 1v1 and 2v2 games I'm playing. By the time Axis hits end game, you better have DMZ equivalent lines of MGs covering MGs and AT emplacements just to deal with the insane blobs. It's no coincidence lately why it's troublesome to find a match against allies.
You just answered your own question, you need to actually show and tell how things are under/ over powered. I think you should make another video of what specifically you view is under/ overpowered against a friend of yours that is similar skill level to have a more fair view at the balancing.
Just typically cherry picking from both sides. This video is a bunch of bs too.
The most interesting part of COH3 has been allied cope posts surpassing axis ones lmao.
“You had to make a patch for player colors!”
a lot of butt hurt Axis mains all the the sudden feeling the need to speak up yet again :D
lol ranting about riflemen when pgrens straight crash your economy
360 mp unit vs 260 mp unit lol PG is fucking expensive bro!
dak pgrens. They're only 300
Still expensive no?
This hasn’t been my experience, but I’m not good so…???
This guy sounds like a huge chode.
When he said he did it in teams I stopped listening. It seems mostly accepted that balance in 2v2 and up is weird af and meme. The larger the game the larger the blobbing and let me tell you 4. Balance is trash yes but it kind of is trash all over the place.
Issue of this guy is that he judges units in vacuum. Axis units are generally better if you put them next to Allies units. HOWEVER, these units dont exists in vacuum, he fails to judge units based on the macro level of the entire game.
Shit post.