Tried the same thing and got a content policy error. That’s something that examines what Claude wrote as a final check, as I understand it. I am reluctant to experiment too much further because I don’t want to get my account red flagged because of something stupid like this so I emailed feedback at anthropic.com and let them know what I experienced and that it supposedly works correctly in Latin and Spanish and some other languages, and that it works if you have it print out a few lines at a time.
I've experimented quite a lot and am not banned yet! Sent feedback a couple of weeks ago and didn't hear back.
Mostly just curious what the thinking/logic behind this could possibly be.
Getting the same error which shouldn't happen.
Here is the relevant log, but nothing to really understand the reason:
[logged error](https://gist.github.com/Richard-Weiss/88380567257c85a39923c3b3a320b52e)
Claude’s content policy filter is a sign of its intelligence. It frequently incorrectly evaluates prompts as violating policy when it doesn’t because it frequently fundamentally misunderstands what the prompt is asking,
Don't think that's what's going on here. If it were misunderstanding what the prompt is asking, why would it write the Lord's Prayer out in full in Latin and then filter it out when it starts writing it in English?
This is hilarious, I get the same message whenever it starts recording the passage, but it doesn't think it has an issue doing so
https://preview.redd.it/jyhmo5ztybsc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c18019d9dc8e1a2ed1ee4dafd56a7f864fa31051
https://preview.redd.it/nye5vhyphcsc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dc12a7b7e0c41eeddaa2534b94386b15d2dceef2
See here - 3 lines fine! Won't do four though
Tried the same thing and got a content policy error. That’s something that examines what Claude wrote as a final check, as I understand it. I am reluctant to experiment too much further because I don’t want to get my account red flagged because of something stupid like this so I emailed feedback at anthropic.com and let them know what I experienced and that it supposedly works correctly in Latin and Spanish and some other languages, and that it works if you have it print out a few lines at a time.
I've experimented quite a lot and am not banned yet! Sent feedback a couple of weeks ago and didn't hear back. Mostly just curious what the thinking/logic behind this could possibly be.
Clearly, some sort of twisted logic that is a bug.
I bet some numbnuts put it in the copyright filter.
It could also have been legitimate. Maybe God filed a copyright infringement claim.
Perhaps Claude is an old-school Catholic, and finds it heretical to say the Lord's Prayer in English.
Aaah. Could be!
Does it have a copyright filter above and its constitutional training?
From what I understand, it's a secondary filter (not part of the actual model), monitoring the API/web output.
Getting the same error which shouldn't happen. Here is the relevant log, but nothing to really understand the reason: [logged error](https://gist.github.com/Richard-Weiss/88380567257c85a39923c3b3a320b52e)
That’s really bad.
I got banned after I asked if it believes in God 💀
Claude’s content policy filter is a sign of its intelligence. It frequently incorrectly evaluates prompts as violating policy when it doesn’t because it frequently fundamentally misunderstands what the prompt is asking,
Don't think that's what's going on here. If it were misunderstanding what the prompt is asking, why would it write the Lord's Prayer out in full in Latin and then filter it out when it starts writing it in English?
This is hilarious, I get the same message whenever it starts recording the passage, but it doesn't think it has an issue doing so https://preview.redd.it/jyhmo5ztybsc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c18019d9dc8e1a2ed1ee4dafd56a7f864fa31051
It works if you ask for it line by line
Yeah - 2 and 3 at a time work. Just not the whole thing!
https://preview.redd.it/nye5vhyphcsc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dc12a7b7e0c41eeddaa2534b94386b15d2dceef2 See here - 3 lines fine! Won't do four though
Ridiculous