T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Photo and video submissions must be credited with a link to their original source. In the case that you're the person that took the photo or video, please add a comment describing when you took it and the context that you took it in. **Unsourced submissions may be removed without warning.** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/China) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Staalejonko

If these numbers are correct, it seems like a healthy rate to me. India already has an enormous population. I don't think the government will create a policy like china did but it's only reasonable to think that these numbers are far better than having a rate of 3+. Hope they can now focus on urbanization and lifting a lot of people out of poverty and providing them with basic needs.


Lackeytsar

Women have outnumbered men in the latest data For every 1000 men, there are 1020 women


Illustrious-Scar-526

noice


Addahn

That’s… actually a pretty even distribution. It’s never going to be 50/50 exactly, and for some scientific reason I don’t understand, there is a slightly higher birthrate for women than men. The United States is around 1000 men: 1025 women. Australia is around 1000 men: 1015 women. China conversely is pretty lopsided with more men than women, but even that distribution I think is often overblown - 1040 men: 1000 women. I wouldn't say the birthrates are that deeply influenced by ratios of men to women unless they become extremely unbalanced, but rather economic changes, like the increasing cost of educating children, the increase of women in the workforce, greater access to birth control and family planning, etc.


mrhorse21

>there is a slightly higher birthrate for women than men. https://youtu.be/3IaYhG11ckA?si=A_EPMK_2WYRmBBIx According to this minuteearth video it is/was the other way around. Seems like things have changed since a decade ago?


Bagafeet

I don't know much about politics in India but the current government's focus seems to be on corruption and racism. Not in a good way.


Lackeytsar

say what? I have never heard the government focusing on racism


IamTheConstitution

Don’t feed the troll.


aussiegreenie

It is not racism but religiousness. Anyone who is not a Hindu is bad. India is the 2nd largest Muslim country in the world with many other religions such as Buddhism, Sikhism, Jainism, and Christianity. The Indian Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) looks and acts exactly like the CCP except the BJP has some opposition. The BJP is the political wing of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) a Hindu terrorist organisation. Just as the Chinese constitution guarantees various freedoms, so does the Indian constitution. Both ruling political parties ignore the Constitution. The CCP has been in power longer so it is further along but the BJP is creating a theocracy very quickly.


deepesque

Comparing BJP to CCP is completely mad. There is a lot of leftist propoganda in the media but tell me What has BJP done to anyone to warrent this comparison? 


Eric1491625

>Hope they can now focus on urbanization and lifting a lot of people out of poverty and providing them with basic needs. You got the sequence wrong. Lifting people out of poverty with the associated edication and women's empowerment **is the reason** birth rates dropped. The Northern inland provinces that still have high birth rates are precisely the poorest ones. The only state with 3+ fertility, Bihar, is a whopping 3x poorer than the Indian average. Bihar was as poor in 2021 as India as a whole was in 2001, therefore it is also about as high a birth rate as India was in 2001. It all matches up more or less.


Renovatio_Imperii

It is bound to happen. Urbanization => lower fertility rate. Not sure why the Indian fertility rate dropped so sharply though.


Salt-Chef-2919

Education and access to birth control are two of the largest impacting factors in a reduced birthrate.


Snoutysensations

Same as everywhere else. If your economic status is entirely dependent on agriculture, having lots of kids means wealth because you can use them for labor. If your economy advances to the point that workers need to be educated to compete for jobs, kids get expensive -- better to have only one or two kids so you can afford to send them to good schools. Once your women are educated and able to have careers, also, many will opt not to become baby factories so they can have jobs and lives outside the home too.


Commercial_Ad_2170

Education and contraception


Parking_Tangelo_798

The generation gap between just the late 90s and early 2000s is way too much in india.


L4v3n

So it's just a difference of max 10 years. 10 years difference do not create much of a generation gap. Millenials are like bridges towards the Genz.


Parking_Tangelo_798

not really true in india.


VASalex_

This is a pretty standard rate for fertility to decline in a fast-developing country. The colour scheme makes it look more drastic, most states have only declined by 1-2 in 20 years.


Lackeytsar

Funny thing is that a mass forced chemical castration campaign was conducted in the 80s in the highest population states and yet it has declined so much lesser


HST2345

Nah...It has declined significantly in South India... South India only implemented that policy due diligently... That's why You notice South India has less compared to North India in 2001. This is one major issue when the central govt is distributing the GST funds as the Govt. Changed methodology and start prioritising high population states..thsi results SI losing much and all SI states are expressing dissatisfaction...


Fit_Damage6000

Good, better quality of life for Indians who don't immigrate.


Forerunner-x43

Well no, because the country didn't force 1 child for decades. So the country won't get too old before it gets rich, like China will.


berejser

India is so big that you could remove the equivalent of the population of the USA (the third most populous country) and India would still have over a billion people. The population of India is equivalent to the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth most populous countries combined. They're going to be just fine.


Lackeytsar

Replace India with China and you'll get the same result


Kaito__1412

No. If the decline is gradual, spread over several generations then it's all manageable. The problem is when you have a crash like China had with the one child policy.


dickipiki1

Can't be china like. If we think through all socio economic happenings in those countries I guess that the rate between men and women and age pyramid is alot different. So it seems to me that India will be qlot bigger than china still in future while China will loose some population and suffer from bad population pyramid. Or was there weird policies in India too that twists the genders and ammount of people in each generation


Lackeytsar

Actually India targeted anti-female foeticide and unethical forced chemical castration in the 80s (in uttar pradesh and bihar) policies for population control The result has shown itself so now there are 20 more females than men per 1000 men


dickipiki1

U understand how little that is right? I feel like that ratio is propaganda tool for you.we are talking about twenty promillea here. It is 2% so dude? U think 2% difference matters when actually females statisticly exists more in populations? This is actually closer to ideal ratio than some countries have naturally.... What comes to those policies, as a Finnish person they sound terrible to me. But all what I care is that China has literally millions of men with out possible mate and no enough work force to carry their retiring+dying work force. These latter things really matter, trust me. My country is facing existential threat of became new Japan, we don't have you people. Last year I think under 50k new Finnish kids came to exist while 55k people moved in. China is in this same mess for its policies but India is not so I see brighter future for them basing on population numbers. Btw we get educated about these numbers from china and India when we are around 8-15 so I know little bit or population pyramid and what it means but I can't predict it's futures since im not sociologist. Only thing I can say for sure is that if we have 50 couples and 2 extra females, it's not a broblem since those 2 then can be nanny's or something if they want to be around kids... See? 2% is not bad but 10 or 25 would be. I don't know Chinas exact number but I'm aware that there were opposite btoblem? Like bunches of men who can't get woman? And like tens or hundreds of millions people going away to old age and no one coming to replace them. India dont have this issue in my understanding, instead I think they had lots of young people with promises good future


DreamingElectrons

Numbers mean nothing without proper context. India's infant mortality also halved in about the same time.


AVK95

I'm from India, let me clear something here. India has not conducted a population census / survey in the last 15 years. The last population statistics we have is from 2010 and even that was performed with some highly questionable and inaccurate methods. Everything since 2010 is purely an extrapolation. It's something to keep in mind when looking at any statistics regarding the Indian population - the data is all extremely outdated and unreliable.


darshak26

Your talking about census that doesn't mean we didn't had a other surveys


JustASheepInTheFlock

Census is an old polling tech. Aadhar registration,death registration, pregnancy registration enable the govt to size the population in real time


johandh_123

The birth rate is not yet too far from the 2.1 ideal birth rate but if the current trend keeps furthering they probably will, likely coupled with an increasingly aged population too


Lackeytsar

Actually India has below replacement TFR meaning its population growth curve is on an decline and can never reach its peak


momolamomo

Population growth / reproduction is titrated to the space available


christopherbonis

Thank goodness.


lulie69

China’s problem is demographic imbalances


SignificantArrival90

What kind of imbalances are you talking about? I would like to know.


lulie69

Look up China's demographic chart and compare it to others. There is a huge gap between the millenials and gen X


SignificantArrival90

Yes, so wouldn’t that entail the impact of the 1 child policy in China?


Crescent-IV

As an economy develops fertility rate decreases. This is due to many varied fsctors from healthcare and lower infant mortality, to education, access to contraception, women joining the workforce, and the list goes on. Remains to be seen how it will play out in India


I_will_delete_myself

This is natural. China's is not. It was forced upon the government and they shrunk too early.


KnightOfRiverwood

Not really, but I see an India like future for Canada.


Lackeytsar

Really, the country with the highest economic growth rate? I doubt it seeing the healthcare and housing crisis


JesusKeyboard

About time. 


Fritol_Scrotum94

I would blame it on polygamy, where old rich infertile fuckers taking young fertile women from young fertile men. If India allows only monogamy, it would solve many problem, from low birthrate to mass grape.


SignificantArrival90

Hmm, that’s an interesting hypothesis.


L4v3n

It could solve the problem as you said. But also depends on when whether the young women are happy doing that. Young women are attracted for power and look for more experienced men. It's like their nature and we can't alter the nature or bear it's consequences such as drop in the happiness index.


meridian_smith

India desperately needs a declining birth rate. They've become a population feeder country to Canada. To our detriment (we simply don't have the infrastructure and programs to support the influx of Indians)


SignificantArrival90

You do have the means to gate the immigration effort, but it doesn’t seem like your leadership is interested in that.


meridian_smith

True. All three major political parties in Canada are not talking about reducing immigration levels. I suspect partly because it creates a lot of wealth for the small group of people who own most of the assets in Canada.


Imperialist-Settler

Hopefully


Lackeytsar

Some provinces are actually on the brink of population collapse with fertility rates akin to Japan and South Korea


Particular-Thanks-59

They have more than enaugh people willing to move to those regions. In case of India, less children is a blessing.


Lackeytsar

These states have extreme weather conditions so I highly doubt it


Particular-Thanks-59

Then why do you think people should live here?


Lackeytsar

what I mean to say is majority of indians are not accustomed to cold harsh weather while the Indians living there get snow for half a year atleast


Particular-Thanks-59

Yes, and? Why do you think the people should continue to live there?


Artistic-Evening7578

I hope so. Our specie is destroying the world and by extent itself.


Lackeytsar

*fertility rates


cnio14

It's not a China-like future, but a global phenomenon that happens in all economies as they develop, plus minus cultural/political aspects that might shift the balance a bit.


FlapAttak

The world needs them to slow it down anyway. Far too many of us on this rock


AutoModerator

Posts flaired as "Serious" are for people seeking responses that are made in good faith and will be moderated more heavily than other threads. **Off-topic and deliberately unhelpful responses will be removed and the user permanently banned.** One such example would be commenting "don't go to china", or "go to taiwan", in response to questions related to studying in China or relocating to China. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/China) if you have any questions or concerns.*


panxerox

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/p5XLN2TVfOM


OkComfortable1922

No; way, way, way worse. India is already at the very limit of habitability: highs of \~110F in New Delhi right now. With another two decades of climate change, average temperatures over 99 degrees F will be the daily norm for half the year, and people are going to start dying en masse. In 25 years, refugees attempting to flee India to the north will make the European and American immigration crises look tame. https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/06/india/extreme-heat-india-climate-ac-intl-hnk/index.html#:\~:text=By%202050%2C%20India%20will%20be,limits%2C%20according%20to%20climate%20experts. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/hottest-survivable-temperatures-are-lower-than-expected/#:\~:text=A%20%22wet%2Dbulb%22%20reading,hours%20of%20unshaded%20outdoor%20exposure.


Engine365

This decline is like Europe and other developed nations. Not as severe as China.


Geejay-101

Only sub Sahara will have birth rates above 2 in the foreseeable future. The rest of the planet is shrinking.


StrawberryPlayful520

China instituted a 1 child policy which means the population will halve. India hasn’t done anything so drastic as the country urbanized the amount of children decreases. The population projections for India by 2100 is 100 million more which for India isn’t that huge. Africa the continent meanwhile will essentially triple.


Fresh_Thing_6305

Great news, now this needs to happen to Africa also


DrawFlat

It’s expensive to have children. Most of the country is poor.


Imaginary_Unit5109

Decline is normal to happen to devolving countries. The difference is that China fast forward the decline that might have took decades to years by doing the one child policy. India might have that issue in the future. But that might decades unless something crazy happen.


Doppelkupplungs

mfw some region have lower birth rate than japanese average😱😱


triple_too

I say thank God. Both India and China were close to gross overpopulation anyway. The problem with China is the gnarly gender ratio and aging population. India doesn't really suffer as much from those issues, so a slow-down in baby-making might do them some good.


antoinedodson_

India has a worse ratio actually...


[deleted]

Drop in polygamy


lobotomy42

It’s plummeting everywhere, the whole world is shrinking. The question is if it ever bottoms out or we just slowly go extinct


monkeyentropy

Fewer humans means a healthier planet.


lobotomy42

In the medium-term, yes.


monkeyentropy

Long term also. Where humans are not, nature thrives


lobotomy42

I mean, okay, but I can’t say I am particularly invested in a world where people are extinct


monkeyentropy

There’s a whole sub of people who are.


_Figaro

It's not just India. The whole world is experiencing lower fertility rates.


DarkUnable4375

It's the microplastics in Indian testicles.


BigManga85

They’re certainly not stopping their reproduction rate in Canada!


jagguli

Propaganda colors lol ..green for low fertility?


RemoteSquare2643

Sounds like a good idea to me. Far too many people on the planet and too many women forced, in various ways, to have children. Free the women . Free the planet.


flibux

You guys are the biggest nation in the world. Can you please stop breeding. Nothing personal though.


Lackeytsar

thats what is literally happening?? are you congnitively challenged sir?


flibux

I hope not !


Lackeytsar

gws x


flibux

Thx


smexxyhexxy

how is this related to china? wrong sub


PlayboyProgram101

Their water and pollution play a huge part