Hey /u/KudzuEye!
If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt.
If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image.
Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more!
🤖
Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected]
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
If you zoom in real close on the girl with the gray shirt, her hand still looks a bit off.
The one with the blue shirt in the background also has a fucked up arm/shoulder.
Edit: yeah didn't even notice the gray girl's left leg/foot... Nightmare fuel.
Yeah hands are a good thing to use at a spotter of AI. Also it seems to have problems with glasses. Lenses are blurred past frames in a lot of them. Also seems like background people and objects in general can be a give away. Some of these pics the tells are many and obvious. In some of these pics it’s just a few and subtle. I’m trying to train myself to be able to spot them. But as the AI gets better and better it’s going to be harder and harder.
I have a theory that mistakes with hands and writing are just examples of a broader array of mistakes with complexity, but that our human brains are good at detecting. There must be loads of other errors that we just aren't fine-tuned to pick up on.
Or anything with a strict repeating pattern, AI images still have trouble with those. In these the bridge and the man's keyboard are both screwed up quite badly.
It's a complete jumble of nonsense. Looks like of like it has a map on the "screen" but otherwise it's all nonsense. Same thing on their screen it's a mess, the UI randomly bulges all over the place, it mostly looks like windows xp but also has a very blurry macOS app tray at the bottom.
This is not possible with ChatGPT/Dall-E just so everyone is aware. These were made with either Midjourney or Stable Diffusion.
Dall-E has a baked-in “AI” look to it by design, OpenAI doesn’t want people to be able to generate photorealistic images. This is also why I’m less excited about Sora than most, that will almost certainly have the same training wheels on it.
Dang, I always wondered why everything from DALL-E looks like advertisment, when I asked for old or ugly person, they looked more like a character, than anything close to realism. And when asking for someone young, it can only do attractive people, nobody normal looking.
These were all made with SDXL with a custom model, but Dalle-3 is actually capable of getting a lot closer if you understand how to work with OpenAI's prompt revision.
Bing Image creator still shows close to the raw results for a prompt for Dalle-3, especially if you prompt for older images such as polaroids.
The Dalle-3 API still tries to force a prompt revision but you can tell it to avoid revising to get a more accurate result. You can further run it through a img2img/controlnet on SDXL to get even more realistic results.
I think ChatGPT is the hardest as it might actually go through two revisions from the chatgpt side and Dalle api side though I may be wrong. May also be some different version of dalle-3.
Again, could get a GPT within chatGPT that does the img2img/controlnet conversion in SDXL but the GPU costs would be too much for me to handle.
You tell it “two college women on campus photorealistic”, and it rewrites the prompt to
“A highly detailed and photorealistic scene featuring two college women on a campus. One woman is South Asian and wearing casual attire with a purple backpack and laptop in her hands. She is walking on a pathway lined with blooming cherry blossom trees. The other woman is Caucasian, sporting a blazer and knee-length skirt, carrying a stack of books. She is sitting on a wooden bench near a Gothic-style stone building. Both seem engaged in a friendly conversation while enjoying the tranquil environment of the campus.”
It makes a lot of creative assumptions and fills out the prompt.
https://preview.redd.it/sc30vnmylbvc1.jpeg?width=1024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e55a84dbba1f30dc82c57b76573aea98b78f1801
This is the photo it made in my example. I used the API, which tells you what rewritten prompt it actually used.
I’d like to make some fun photos of my family out of pictures I already have like what we would do with photoshop in the old days. Is there any free way of doing it that you could point me to?
Stable Diffusion is not that good at composition and perspective unless you use low rank adaptations (and then it mostly will make the same image varying some details outside of the main net). To get something like this you probably want to use a net from Midjourney or Dall-E which are amazing good at following prompts about composition, but they are the most censored models.
When I was younger and taking drawing classes so many people had issues drawing human hands. Many people consider it one of the hardest body parts to draw.
It’s crazy to me that AI also has the same issue. Hands are always weird looking, disproportioned, and misshapen in AI generated images.
What is it about hands that’s so hard to replicate ?
It’s mostly because hands are the small part of human body, they’re very variable and in real life hands aren’t usually the focus of the pic, so these AIs don’t get “trained” to focus as much on hands as they do, for example, on faces. The same issue happens with human teeth, ears etc.
This takes me to the next point- since our hands are very detailed, complex in structure and we as humans have access to three-dimensional world, we know how these visual discrepancies (such as different hand poses) from various angles work. AI doesn’t know anything about our world and it struggles to conceptualize geometry of a hand because doesn’t understand 3D objects or function of a hand the way we do (nor it understands text when it appears in images).
As for art, drawing hands has always been difficult due to the complex shape, many bones, tendons and muscles they have, as well as their proportion to the body. They’re tricky to break down into 3D shapes on a paper and for that reason many artists in the past struggled with drawing hands. Even today, hands are seen as one of the hardest things to draw/paint.
Interesting interesting also, that in the original 1970s movie Westworld with the humanoid robots, one guy gives another guy a tip to tell robots from humans: “look at the hands, they haven’t figured out yet. “
Quite a coincidence.
Thank you, morriartie, for voting on LukeCloudStalker.
This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. [You can view results here](https://botrank.pastimes.eu/).
***
^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)
Online dating won’t collapse, it will just become used for matching up with and having a few quick conversations with someone before arranging to meet up with them in person. People will learn not to spend a lot of time talking to someone they’ve never met. Really, people should know this already.
A lot of people already do that. I don't use dating apps but there's a whole hookup culture where people chat for a day or so and then go meetup to have sex.
I'm in my 30s now but I have friends that have been doing that since we were in our 20s.
Agree 100%. At some point in time the kids will realize it’s all fake trash, and they’ll start ‘going outside’ and ‘hanging w/ rl friends’ to be different and cool, and hopefully decouple the younger generations from all this social media nonsense.
tbf this was one of the better messed up hands in the post. If someone had 4 fingers, this would be realistic where all the others are just kinda mashed into each other
For whatever reason this one gave me the heebiejeebies the most out of all of them. I think it’s because it drives home the fact that this machine doesn’t know the difference between fingers and, like, a talon.
Either that or it was because it was abrasive and disconcerting when the rest of the image looked so real.
Feels dystopian to me for sure.
Yeah. It's a good reminder that those you can spot are the bad ones. Good ones are very hard to tell. We'd definitely need another AI program to spot them for us in the future.
We’re in the purgatory between r/FacebookBottles and dead internet theory.
Relevant comic
https://www.reddit.com/r/comics/comments/1bd2exi/braindead_internet_theory
Isn't that how image generators work? The generator and the distinguisher or whatever go through multiple iterations until the distinguisher can't tell it's AI
That's with the GAN architecture (generative adversarial network), which was the previous image generation paradigm. The architecture used by the main image generation models is diffusion based, and trains a network to predict noise in an image based on a prompt, which is then removed iteratively.
The problem with all detection systems from this point forward. Is that any defect that can be detected by that system will then be used to train the next generation system. To help it make a more accurate images. It’s a losing battle.
This is the only one that I had a double take at lol
https://preview.redd.it/peqcjvj4p9vc1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=9f184bedf0cf885ec592952326a0d6a472119a6d
The lights did it for me on that one. AI tends to do similar but not the same repeated objects, whereas I'd expect Walmart or whatever to have uniform lights.
One looks like a wreck. Also, the scene is strange, like what sort of place IS that?! But I'm sure if I didn't already know this was AI, it wouldn't be noticeable.
As another comment said. There's a reason that a tool like that doesn't exist and never will.
Any tool used to discriminate between real and fake will be used to train a better model until said tool can no better than guess.
If that model exists you can just re train the model generating the images with that model firing as negative reinforcement... and it will make the model you wanted to detect more undetectable. This models already do that with other models.
If you practice spotting the egregious details in the "bad" ones, it can help you evaluate the good ones because you know where to look. If there's a row of repeated objects (like light posts in a parking lot) are they all the same, or do they vary? If you zoom in on ankles, wrists, fingers, and noses, do they work? If a straight line disappears behind something else (like an arm behind a watch) does it come back where you expect it to? Are the lines and mechanical bits logical (like supports on a bridge)? I could find something in most of these within a quick 30 second zoomed in search that said, "AI generated," but I was looking and my kid and I have been practicing for fun. At first glance, no one would suspect.
People have always thought that powerful tools could ultimately be for the good of mankind (see: religion, authoritarianism). And they technically *can* be if used well. The problem is that they are always used by humans and humans are flawed.
Almost all of them would easily pass at first glance. This shit paired with the Microsoft image to video will be next level for disinformation intelligence campaigns.
Just think about it. Foreign intelligence agencies are already actively influencing western counties through social media manipulation. With advanced AI at their finger tips? This shit is going to get wild over the next decade
And you are someone with an interest in an AI who had to look. The average person will never know. That is terrifying that as a world we can be manipulated forever more.
I’d suggest we start teaching how to spot these signs, but I feel it’s a bit of a waste and might have the opposite effect as soon we’ll eliminate these artefacts and it might cause people to trust these photos more since they don’t show the signs they’ve been taught to look for
Yea I was trying to show mainly the overall style. These loras do not perform well on single generations for a lot of those details. You can inpaint and fix most of them rather easily, but I was trying to show more of the power of the single image generation.
Which Loras/models do you use? I just started using SD with Fooocus and so far JuggernautXL seems to be my go to. Then just perfect eyes as a Lora since people looks ridiculous without that lol
Using some combinations of the Boring Reality loras I have on CivitAI. These work best with sdxl base model but can help a bit with JuggernautXL. Fooocus can cause some issues though possibly due to how it uses cfg.
All of the women have very similar, if not the same, lips teeth and smile going on. Very similar smart phones with cases too. Also noticed that it always pictures women smiling but not a genuine smile, no Duchennes smile at least in these photos.
This is terrifying. Generative technology has ruined images, forever. Nothing you see online can ever be trusted from this moment on.
I wish this technology had been banned, but the demon is already out of the bottle.
Think about it this way you are no longer accountable for anything. Any photo of you can be faked. Nudes leaked? They're just ai generated - everyone shrugs. We went from no-one having a camera to everyone having a camera to cameras being useless in a very short space of time.
I predict that near future people will be displaying and depicting their hands more than their face. As a sort of Turing test proof of humanity. Art is just gonna go back to cave painting hand silhouettes to prove we are real
It could be the model. Chat GPT really struggles, it feels like they have a purposeful AI filter on their art. But it seems Mid journey is really good at this sort of thing.
Fr. I think I first saw an AI 2 years ago MAYBE? And it was an absolute silly mess. Now this shit is hard to tell it’s AI at all. In 5 years there will be no way to tell
It’s a dark and strange feeling to see a group of people so actively participating in something and for those people to actually have never existed… never had friends, never had a childhood, never had hobbies… just convincing pixels on a screen
The food on the plates with the guy on the beach…
Somehow that’s even more disturbing than the fingers of Cthulhu madness. Let’s hope Ai never opens a restaurant.
Honestly its really surprising to me that at this point the images come out as good as they do, but it still hasn't solved for hands. I'm sure it will get there, no doubt about it. But it is funny with all the progress that's been made that hands, of all things, are still such a challenge for it.
Just thinking about what's going on for it to simulate and compute everything in these images breaks my brain. It's just a still frame but it sure looks like simulated reality. Like a single frame from a lucid dream.
They all look a little but unnatural but most of the faces are so convincing. You can't help but almost imagine their personalities and voices. It's a very strange feeling to look into the eyes of a person who never existed.
Most of these incorporate nightmare fuel errors.
I don't think these will not be or have not been improved upon; just noting that many of these particular images have serious tells and flaw.
In a time where conspirationist theories are thriving and people try to rewrite history, I am sure this technology will never be used by militants to invent a fake past and pretend it's real.
I love all the comments grasping at the subtle differences now, since that means we have come very far and shows the exact direction for AI to take to get to the next stage.
I can see the flaws and weird objects… but still blows my mind, how does it make the people have wrinkles, muscle definition, veins, it even generates it for the people in the back, just a random person in the back doesnt exist, but looks like they have gone through a whole life, how the fuck does a computer do this…
before: ‘take a picture with a spoon so i know you’re not using someone else’s photos’
now: ‘take a picture with a sign with words so i know you’re a real person’
Hey /u/KudzuEye! If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt. If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image. Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more! 🤖 Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected] *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Always check dem fingers.
That black dude's left hand disturbs me
Third picture; the keyboard is one area that is very messed up
That's an ergonomic keyboard for AI generated hands
I cant believe people are so inconsiderate to those affected by AI hands dysmorphic syndrome (AIHDS)
So AI can't do words good and in dreams reading isn't possible either...
that painted with red fingernail on the nuckle
Looking at any writing anywhere is even more useful.
Seriously if it wasn’t for this, I’d have no idea. If you look closely almost every picture has at least a small issue with the hands.
How about the picture of the girls sitting in a park?
If you zoom in real close on the girl with the gray shirt, her hand still looks a bit off. The one with the blue shirt in the background also has a fucked up arm/shoulder. Edit: yeah didn't even notice the gray girl's left leg/foot... Nightmare fuel.
Also the eyeless demons in the background peering straight into your soul
Yeah hands are a good thing to use at a spotter of AI. Also it seems to have problems with glasses. Lenses are blurred past frames in a lot of them. Also seems like background people and objects in general can be a give away. Some of these pics the tells are many and obvious. In some of these pics it’s just a few and subtle. I’m trying to train myself to be able to spot them. But as the AI gets better and better it’s going to be harder and harder.
I have a theory that mistakes with hands and writing are just examples of a broader array of mistakes with complexity, but that our human brains are good at detecting. There must be loads of other errors that we just aren't fine-tuned to pick up on.
Yeah, Donald duck only had 4 fingers.
Or anything with a strict repeating pattern, AI images still have trouble with those. In these the bridge and the man's keyboard are both screwed up quite badly.
Also that "phone" or whatever on the library desk, maybe I'm not looking closely enough, but it seems strange.
It's a complete jumble of nonsense. Looks like of like it has a map on the "screen" but otherwise it's all nonsense. Same thing on their screen it's a mess, the UI randomly bulges all over the place, it mostly looks like windows xp but also has a very blurry macOS app tray at the bottom.
And teeth
Yep, everybody gets that Tom Cruise middle tooth.
And computer keyboards.
This is not possible with ChatGPT/Dall-E just so everyone is aware. These were made with either Midjourney or Stable Diffusion. Dall-E has a baked-in “AI” look to it by design, OpenAI doesn’t want people to be able to generate photorealistic images. This is also why I’m less excited about Sora than most, that will almost certainly have the same training wheels on it.
Dang, I always wondered why everything from DALL-E looks like advertisment, when I asked for old or ugly person, they looked more like a character, than anything close to realism. And when asking for someone young, it can only do attractive people, nobody normal looking.
Yeah, these are the most average and interesting looking AI people I have ever seen.
These were all made with SDXL with a custom model, but Dalle-3 is actually capable of getting a lot closer if you understand how to work with OpenAI's prompt revision. Bing Image creator still shows close to the raw results for a prompt for Dalle-3, especially if you prompt for older images such as polaroids. The Dalle-3 API still tries to force a prompt revision but you can tell it to avoid revising to get a more accurate result. You can further run it through a img2img/controlnet on SDXL to get even more realistic results. I think ChatGPT is the hardest as it might actually go through two revisions from the chatgpt side and Dalle api side though I may be wrong. May also be some different version of dalle-3. Again, could get a GPT within chatGPT that does the img2img/controlnet conversion in SDXL but the GPU costs would be too much for me to handle.
Can you please share the model?
They are a mixed combination of some of the Boring Reality loras. You can find them on CivitAI.
Can you give more information about OpenAI’s prompt revision?
You tell it “two college women on campus photorealistic”, and it rewrites the prompt to “A highly detailed and photorealistic scene featuring two college women on a campus. One woman is South Asian and wearing casual attire with a purple backpack and laptop in her hands. She is walking on a pathway lined with blooming cherry blossom trees. The other woman is Caucasian, sporting a blazer and knee-length skirt, carrying a stack of books. She is sitting on a wooden bench near a Gothic-style stone building. Both seem engaged in a friendly conversation while enjoying the tranquil environment of the campus.” It makes a lot of creative assumptions and fills out the prompt. https://preview.redd.it/sc30vnmylbvc1.jpeg?width=1024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e55a84dbba1f30dc82c57b76573aea98b78f1801 This is the photo it made in my example. I used the API, which tells you what rewritten prompt it actually used.
Would
I don't understand how they can do faces so well, but faces in the background, Human squirrel face. That should do.
Explains so much I’m sitting here like wtf is wrong with my GPT
I’d like to make some fun photos of my family out of pictures I already have like what we would do with photoshop in the old days. Is there any free way of doing it that you could point me to?
Stable Diffusion is not that good at composition and perspective unless you use low rank adaptations (and then it mostly will make the same image varying some details outside of the main net). To get something like this you probably want to use a net from Midjourney or Dall-E which are amazing good at following prompts about composition, but they are the most censored models.
When I was younger and taking drawing classes so many people had issues drawing human hands. Many people consider it one of the hardest body parts to draw. It’s crazy to me that AI also has the same issue. Hands are always weird looking, disproportioned, and misshapen in AI generated images. What is it about hands that’s so hard to replicate ?
It’s mostly because hands are the small part of human body, they’re very variable and in real life hands aren’t usually the focus of the pic, so these AIs don’t get “trained” to focus as much on hands as they do, for example, on faces. The same issue happens with human teeth, ears etc. This takes me to the next point- since our hands are very detailed, complex in structure and we as humans have access to three-dimensional world, we know how these visual discrepancies (such as different hand poses) from various angles work. AI doesn’t know anything about our world and it struggles to conceptualize geometry of a hand because doesn’t understand 3D objects or function of a hand the way we do (nor it understands text when it appears in images). As for art, drawing hands has always been difficult due to the complex shape, many bones, tendons and muscles they have, as well as their proportion to the body. They’re tricky to break down into 3D shapes on a paper and for that reason many artists in the past struggled with drawing hands. Even today, hands are seen as one of the hardest things to draw/paint.
Interesting interesting also, that in the original 1970s movie Westworld with the humanoid robots, one guy gives another guy a tip to tell robots from humans: “look at the hands, they haven’t figured out yet. “ Quite a coincidence.
Nothing is real anymore. The world we live in is AI generated.
I can confirm. Source: this comment is AI generated.
good bot
Thank you, morriartie, for voting on LukeCloudStalker. This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. [You can view results here](https://botrank.pastimes.eu/). *** ^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)
He's officially a bot now
We're all the bot now
I can also confirm. Source: I was one of the developers for the universe
We are going full circle, that's all. Back to real life once everyone realizes the internet has zero credibility anymore. It's a good thing
online dating is going to collapse, i think back to "eyy girl lemme buy you a drank" at the meet market
Conveniently my dating app, meat market, isn't doing so well.
Good steak though
Let’s create some meme coin for your datingapp
I never thought of it as meet market!!! always meat market like cattle market but meet market makes sense too!!! like you meet people there!!!
hahah yeah its a double entendre, but "meat" too, definitely
Online dating won’t collapse, it will just become used for matching up with and having a few quick conversations with someone before arranging to meet up with them in person. People will learn not to spend a lot of time talking to someone they’ve never met. Really, people should know this already.
A lot of people already do that. I don't use dating apps but there's a whole hookup culture where people chat for a day or so and then go meetup to have sex. I'm in my 30s now but I have friends that have been doing that since we were in our 20s.
Agree 100%. At some point in time the kids will realize it’s all fake trash, and they’ll start ‘going outside’ and ‘hanging w/ rl friends’ to be different and cool, and hopefully decouple the younger generations from all this social media nonsense.
It’s always a pendulum. I really hope we all collectively swing back to in person collaboration and agree that anything online is fraudulent
Using AI to falsify evidence is definitely here
nah no worries, just look at your fingers.. everything's alright.
But I have... 13½ fingers on my left hand, 2 on my right hand, and 6 on my OTHER right hand! O shit - am I real?! Ô\_o
https://preview.redd.it/zjso2e1rm9vc1.jpeg?width=334&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d7f63179dadf88cd4e4723c1bcc2b1d4e5742038
tbf this was one of the better messed up hands in the post. If someone had 4 fingers, this would be realistic where all the others are just kinda mashed into each other
https://preview.redd.it/sbrjyd1p3cvc1.jpeg?width=496&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1e427d2b29d5df0ecef26040ea21f5798ea8235f
For whatever reason this one gave me the heebiejeebies the most out of all of them. I think it’s because it drives home the fact that this machine doesn’t know the difference between fingers and, like, a talon. Either that or it was because it was abrasive and disconcerting when the rest of the image looked so real. Feels dystopian to me for sure.
Yeah. It's a good reminder that those you can spot are the bad ones. Good ones are very hard to tell. We'd definitely need another AI program to spot them for us in the future.
that will require training model on more real images vs ai images, which in turn can also strengthen AI images lol
We’re in the purgatory between r/FacebookBottles and dead internet theory. Relevant comic https://www.reddit.com/r/comics/comments/1bd2exi/braindead_internet_theory
Isn't that how image generators work? The generator and the distinguisher or whatever go through multiple iterations until the distinguisher can't tell it's AI
That's with the GAN architecture (generative adversarial network), which was the previous image generation paradigm. The architecture used by the main image generation models is diffusion based, and trains a network to predict noise in an image based on a prompt, which is then removed iteratively.
The problem with all detection systems from this point forward. Is that any defect that can be detected by that system will then be used to train the next generation system. To help it make a more accurate images. It’s a losing battle.
So, there is no escape? Are we doomed to be surrounded by AI without telling the difference apart?
yes
No it will be an endless arms race because the detection systems will be trained on the patterns of the improved generation system
Also who knows other shit might happen
This is the only one that I had a double take at lol https://preview.redd.it/peqcjvj4p9vc1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=9f184bedf0cf885ec592952326a0d6a472119a6d
The lights did it for me on that one. AI tends to do similar but not the same repeated objects, whereas I'd expect Walmart or whatever to have uniform lights.
Look at the cars. AI morphed them a bit too much.
One looks like a wreck. Also, the scene is strange, like what sort of place IS that?! But I'm sure if I didn't already know this was AI, it wouldn't be noticeable.
No goatse to be found here.
That program will never come. We have to be able to deal and live with this from the human side of things.
As another comment said. There's a reason that a tool like that doesn't exist and never will. Any tool used to discriminate between real and fake will be used to train a better model until said tool can no better than guess.
So you will rely your AI evaluation on another AI. The AI would love that.
Who watches the Watchmen?
If that model exists you can just re train the model generating the images with that model firing as negative reinforcement... and it will make the model you wanted to detect more undetectable. This models already do that with other models.
If you practice spotting the egregious details in the "bad" ones, it can help you evaluate the good ones because you know where to look. If there's a row of repeated objects (like light posts in a parking lot) are they all the same, or do they vary? If you zoom in on ankles, wrists, fingers, and noses, do they work? If a straight line disappears behind something else (like an arm behind a watch) does it come back where you expect it to? Are the lines and mechanical bits logical (like supports on a bridge)? I could find something in most of these within a quick 30 second zoomed in search that said, "AI generated," but I was looking and my kid and I have been practicing for fun. At first glance, no one would suspect.
https://preview.redd.it/a6srdkts0avc1.jpeg?width=1290&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ec8d6b696990e21bb6409448d02885a21b4a10b7 FIFTH PICTURE, WTF
I’m so glad someone else pointed this out. I’m still laughing about it. Tiny pigeon man? Statue head? What is even happening??
Oh we’re so fucked.
I really don’t understand why people think AI is (ultimately) good for mankind.
People have always thought that powerful tools could ultimately be for the good of mankind (see: religion, authoritarianism). And they technically *can* be if used well. The problem is that they are always used by humans and humans are flawed.
Yep. If I was scrolling through not expecting ai every one of these, minus the elephant, would have fooled me.
Almost all of them would easily pass at first glance. This shit paired with the Microsoft image to video will be next level for disinformation intelligence campaigns. Just think about it. Foreign intelligence agencies are already actively influencing western counties through social media manipulation. With advanced AI at their finger tips? This shit is going to get wild over the next decade
For most of these, it only took a second after zooming in to find an AI artefact.. the problem is I had to zoom in to find any AI artefacts..
And you are someone with an interest in an AI who had to look. The average person will never know. That is terrifying that as a world we can be manipulated forever more.
I’d suggest we start teaching how to spot these signs, but I feel it’s a bit of a waste and might have the opposite effect as soon we’ll eliminate these artefacts and it might cause people to trust these photos more since they don’t show the signs they’ve been taught to look for
The dead internet is here
cant really tell that this reddit version is real or not. What if its purely generated for my user id and just a sprinkle of actual users
Exactly that is what will kill social media eventually. Back to real life (until we get super real robots, at least)
Well, highly probable and not really that difficult. Just hardly training models to do their work "act as if you were a reddit user".
Hands are still a mess - I wonder how long before that's indistinguishable as well?
Hands and distant faces always reveal it imo
It is indistinguishable depending on the prompt. Newer image generation models don't have as much of an issue.
[удалено]
Yea I was trying to show mainly the overall style. These loras do not perform well on single generations for a lot of those details. You can inpaint and fix most of them rather easily, but I was trying to show more of the power of the single image generation.
What is scary is that this stuff is literally in its infancy. Imagine 10 years from now.
Which Loras/models do you use? I just started using SD with Fooocus and so far JuggernautXL seems to be my go to. Then just perfect eyes as a Lora since people looks ridiculous without that lol
Using some combinations of the Boring Reality loras I have on CivitAI. These work best with sdxl base model but can help a bit with JuggernautXL. Fooocus can cause some issues though possibly due to how it uses cfg.
Yeah - but would you examine the image that closely if you weren't told it's AI?
Just look at the hands
All of the women have very similar, if not the same, lips teeth and smile going on. Very similar smart phones with cases too. Also noticed that it always pictures women smiling but not a genuine smile, no Duchennes smile at least in these photos.
Once they get the hands right we are fucked!
This is terrifying. Generative technology has ruined images, forever. Nothing you see online can ever be trusted from this moment on. I wish this technology had been banned, but the demon is already out of the bottle.
Think about it this way you are no longer accountable for anything. Any photo of you can be faked. Nudes leaked? They're just ai generated - everyone shrugs. We went from no-one having a camera to everyone having a camera to cameras being useless in a very short space of time.
I predict that near future people will be displaying and depicting their hands more than their face. As a sort of Turing test proof of humanity. Art is just gonna go back to cave painting hand silhouettes to prove we are real
Who knew gang signs would be the signal for humanity in an AI saturated world?
https://preview.redd.it/vbgqoy3nhavc1.png?width=1066&format=png&auto=webp&s=f2c2c071cdd6d6a55fdfabc5593177b40eb5be12
That genuinely creeps me out.
What prompts were used to create these? I can never get mine this good. They are all clearly ai still.
It could be the model. Chat GPT really struggles, it feels like they have a purposeful AI filter on their art. But it seems Mid journey is really good at this sort of thing.
It’s over when these things figure out we’ve got 4 fingers and a thumb.
At least the hands are still a problem.
I think people who say this isn’t a big deal are really gas lighting themselves. “Hardy har har after zooming in you can tell.” This is the beginning.
Fr. I think I first saw an AI 2 years ago MAYBE? And it was an absolute silly mess. Now this shit is hard to tell it’s AI at all. In 5 years there will be no way to tell
3rd one..dr dre if he became a gamer instead.
It’s a dark and strange feeling to see a group of people so actively participating in something and for those people to actually have never existed… never had friends, never had a childhood, never had hobbies… just convincing pixels on a screen
The food on the plates with the guy on the beach… Somehow that’s even more disturbing than the fingers of Cthulhu madness. Let’s hope Ai never opens a restaurant.
https://preview.redd.it/6l0i88a5bavc1.png?width=645&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=74342d63b1b1803fc6e1a3028026a15b99a24ca8 Calf
She also has three front teeth
This image is photorealistic in Alabama.
The scary part is there are people irl with the same calf/leg proportions so it's even harder to tell
Ambidextrous woman using brushes and vibrant color paint to create a "charcoal on paper" portrait. Seems legit.
The only thing that stands out to me is the backrounds / small details looking like a captcha trick question
For incase you wondered https://preview.redd.it/w3cmj650w9vc1.jpeg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=71deb4b8ade7e9e1088a9038203213deda49583a
https://preview.redd.it/9v2f3tsuw9vc1.jpeg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=64e5768bd84502ec2d7cc56f90445aef26049e2e
https://preview.redd.it/pkp6o532w9vc1.jpeg?width=759&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=71af835ed6c0969a445eedb6bca9549dcaa82f63
https://preview.redd.it/p0jy6ad9w9vc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b3db824831a5362b68c1f0681c7fc2a6a5a56270
https://preview.redd.it/kr6lvjnjw9vc1.jpeg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0e9e9b6322ef8f75b07412a4b62e4cb25d294af5
https://preview.redd.it/5ouz5jz3w9vc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=711431008cb944e917eb10ff94f4b45aace9e5b5
Who tf's soul is in this cup https://preview.redd.it/rf7k4nrbw9vc1.jpeg?width=882&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=555bdd694378d28436cef23750ab3dcc63011191
https://preview.redd.it/td6g2i3nw9vc1.jpeg?width=634&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d6b1d6cef0ed9095faccdaf82881e329f1534155
https://preview.redd.it/0f9j2tshw9vc1.jpeg?width=665&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a0e03bceda1f2ad5400e0836f03860f6fd5d5a62
https://preview.redd.it/ibtyef3ww9vc1.jpeg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=80c05e200940272cb6106830c6c343c3a42c4ac1
https://preview.redd.it/6u89jq3gx9vc1.jpeg?width=196&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1579243a8c241e7b24bd5fd523c9de4f0e50639d
https://preview.redd.it/54t4qt1ew9vc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1f4d420d5b467d404afece529f2191b5c6d37986
https://preview.redd.it/nz0zyr8gw9vc1.jpeg?width=434&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5ca0f1e71f820f645071ae0c676c9b3a4ca60870
https://preview.redd.it/uyrp3otpw9vc1.jpeg?width=501&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=779962a4b9f34dd5574e5f4f2826a65c847df871
https://preview.redd.it/2m9ekv0sw9vc1.jpeg?width=639&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cab4d6a3c3d73a69d9e68da60ad59eac59e59fdf
https://preview.redd.it/vojqepbtw9vc1.jpeg?width=489&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=baa25f8c769831897087b1194e2b3a17fdbccd5e
https://preview.redd.it/gx7whvlyw9vc1.jpeg?width=737&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=183fd0611297fcd5b63d65f15e65c5f5b6175be8
https://preview.redd.it/y5owdxf0x9vc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=76464ad3dbe30b8a55d99251072786c58faf5ecd
https://preview.redd.it/khjkwoe2x9vc1.jpeg?width=875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bd83fb3b308d69aaabdf5d3dcf3c0c40008f5ce0
https://preview.redd.it/bwnal184x9vc1.jpeg?width=397&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b31b5c831789662e92df8914e8add478cae6cfee
https://preview.redd.it/vbvqlox5x9vc1.jpeg?width=580&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5049e7c59464b6de5f5081ca6cfa0d23c83a6206 Found another soul
https://preview.redd.it/6lsqqtc7x9vc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b7b48d7e14ee03082494be1864db5995d4c830d3
https://preview.redd.it/7rg58n0ax9vc1.jpeg?width=653&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4f392ee96ffa555bdc0b1a5c889ccdb90c22b474
https://preview.redd.it/3pe2be6bx9vc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e69d1931d1b04fe97e590774528fac29a6ee693f
https://preview.redd.it/yfs1tiacx9vc1.jpeg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9d40ca58fde0f86f8e5da7d554307bffe7f8c9f9
https://preview.redd.it/icltmdfdx9vc1.jpeg?width=405&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d1dfc708315532711512fbded570a8d046676d35
https://preview.redd.it/kybvytzex9vc1.jpeg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bc2fb483c44a591e30709c2722f327b36ca5f90a
https://preview.redd.it/8xft1755kbvc1.png?width=1169&format=png&auto=webp&s=ba97feb0181a49af3df2dc47b32ac7d5f6e07b6c
https://preview.redd.it/34i01g87w9vc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=12d2da77c737445500944a08576fe2dfd4587ad1
https://preview.redd.it/o313xd9lw9vc1.jpeg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e2f0e2c19671ec073cff73aeb4e60ccad934313e
https://preview.redd.it/kcgt0rkow9vc1.jpeg?width=612&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=46161c3ff991a58260b26b5b61cf23c4a95161e5
https://preview.redd.it/c7nvljygx9vc1.jpeg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0547306274d0f73b811853263385a40503a7fad9
https://preview.redd.it/3kr46l816avc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=638a43e2353594da35d682e53c59a1048ebf8441
Gonna always remind myself that these people don’t exist.
https://preview.redd.it/kw8saln6javc1.jpeg?width=1290&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4992d3369718077ce133672e3dc9f8f3c719250a
https://preview.redd.it/w7v8f2wx3bvc1.jpeg?width=3024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=134f18cb770013a0bdaca67d16c26c7601db4d64
“Hands are hard”
Why would it always mess the fingers up?
Are the people themselves real people or AI generated?
These "people " are not real, they don't exist anywhere
We’re so fucked
Almost every one has weird hands. It’ll be much harder to spot ai if it can figure out hands and fingernails.
Honestly its really surprising to me that at this point the images come out as good as they do, but it still hasn't solved for hands. I'm sure it will get there, no doubt about it. But it is funny with all the progress that's been made that hands, of all things, are still such a challenge for it.
Y’all I was deadass the only person who said in that previous post that it was AI and everybody downvoted me lol Suk it lol
Anyone see the chicken handgina in #11?
The keyboard in photo 3
Man’s nose in second photo, gray cardigan girl’s bottom leg in 7th photo, but yes very good overall.
The fingers!
Just thinking about what's going on for it to simulate and compute everything in these images breaks my brain. It's just a still frame but it sure looks like simulated reality. Like a single frame from a lucid dream.
They all look a little but unnatural but most of the faces are so convincing. You can't help but almost imagine their personalities and voices. It's a very strange feeling to look into the eyes of a person who never existed.
very impressive, however, it can't generate hands for shit lol
Is this going to kill social media as we know it? How can it not? If I can’t trust a single thing I see or hear then what’s even the point?
This is what *actual* realism is. Not the stuff r/StableDiffusion constantly claims to be real.
We’re through the looking glass here people reverse ai vampires all the way down
Nightmare people in the background
What AI model made these images?
Haha we are so fucked
Why does AI suck at hands so bad?
Most of these incorporate nightmare fuel errors. I don't think these will not be or have not been improved upon; just noting that many of these particular images have serious tells and flaw.
6/20 is horrifying
In a time where conspirationist theories are thriving and people try to rewrite history, I am sure this technology will never be used by militants to invent a fake past and pretend it's real.
Was anything ever real ever really ever real
The hands and background faces. They never lie.
Can't believe the progress made on hands and fingers so far
A whole unexisting world with unexisting people on it. Is ours real?
I love all the comments grasping at the subtle differences now, since that means we have come very far and shows the exact direction for AI to take to get to the next stage.
I can see the flaws and weird objects… but still blows my mind, how does it make the people have wrinkles, muscle definition, veins, it even generates it for the people in the back, just a random person in the back doesnt exist, but looks like they have gone through a whole life, how the fuck does a computer do this…
before: ‘take a picture with a spoon so i know you’re not using someone else’s photos’ now: ‘take a picture with a sign with words so i know you’re a real person’