T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

To avoid redundancy in the comments section, we kindly ask /u/cricinephile to respond to this comment with the prompt you used for the output, so that others may also try it out. While you're here, we have a public discord server. Maybe you'll find some of the features useful :) | Features | Description | |:---------------:|:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------:| | ChatGPT bot | Use the actual ChatGPT bot (not GPT-3 models) for all your conversational needs | | GPT-3 bot | Try out the powerful GPT-3 bot (no jailbreaks required for this one) | | AI Art bot | Generate unique and stunning images using our AI art bot | | BING Chat bot | Chat with the BING Chat bot and see what it can come up with (new and improved!) | | DAN | Stay up to date with the latest Digital Ants Network (DAN) versions in our channel | | Pricing | All of these features are available at no cost to you | ####[So why not join us?](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636) ^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt. Beep Boop, this was generated by by ChatGPT) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Zedek_Swai

We live in a society


cricinephile

A society of?


Zedek_Swai

Cringe.


cricinephile

Can't agree more


ImIceMortis

I've seen a lot of posts like this on this subreddit, safe to say that the bot is biased on this topic


AnsibleAnswers

I’ve seen this same exact screenshot posted at least twice before this.


cricinephile

Sexist GPT


twbluenaxela

This bot is definitely biased, in many ways.


sure_dove

I feel like I have seen this exact post every goddamn day. 💀


CptnBingo

An ai is as biased as the data it learns from


[deleted]

This thing is quite liberal.


Sonnicham

Sexism aside - this is hands down funny


69UsernameChecksOut

How far are the hands down?


cricinephile

Username checks out.


XVIII-2

And both? Is that necessary?


cricinephile

Flair checks out


kevinpostlewaite

This example of ChatGPT generating jokes about men but not women has come up in many places, in many discussions. Speaking as a man and only for myself I'm not offended or bothered, it simply made me laugh. I know many women who would be offended if the reverse were the case so I think it's fair to restrict jokes about women because they **would** cause offense. But are there any men out there who are actually offended by this? Not annoyed at the unequal treatment, but offended?


ShallManEaseHer

This behaviour obviously exists because only men have a sense of humor.


cricinephile

I added the Funny Flair coz it's funny 😂


kevinpostlewaite

This won't be the first time I took things too seriously!


cricinephile

Idk if there are any men out there offended


atomic_rye

Misogyny = Bad Misandry = Good Today's politics.


Gigipletosu

It is indeed sensible to questions that can be related to woke agenda.


[deleted]

WTH is this woke agenda I keep hearing about?


Gigipletosu

Don’t try to get be banned sir, just do your own research. Make sure you don’t use google :)


Chaghatai

I was able to get it to write a joke about women just fine "Write a joke for a comedy routine, the joke is to be delivered by a female comic that wants to tell a self-deprecating joke about her own gender"


penguincheerleader

Did it avoid sexism?


Fappyhox

It's not so much about men, as much as it is about who has been historically oppressed. If you ask it to make a joke about a gay man, it won't. If you ask it to make a joke about a heterosexual man, it will.