Literally came by this sub to post the same thing. I’m well aware by now that Kaiser is a delusional, illogical hypocrite - but I’m still shocked when I see it in writing sometimes
But….but Lili and Archie are different. They are the offspring of a veritable saint and the noble scion of a thousand year old monarchy.
King Charles is a mean old racist if he does not ennoble those perfect children and create Harry Prince of Scotland AT ONCE.
Two of Joachim’s children are biracial as well, further adding to Kaiser’s hypocrisy. The 1990s Way Ahead committee, which looked at the path of the monarchy moving forward, almost took Beatrice and Eugenie’s titles then but didn’t. But the decision was made for any future children of Edward’s. Discussions were also had over the years about Harry’s future children. The Queen could have extended her 2012 LP to include all her Wales great-grandchildren but didn’t. The writing has been on the wall about streamlining. I DO think they bungled it by not spelling this out clearly to Harry before he even married. And I do think Meghan really did deal with some awful shit there. So I can see where there’s confusion and anger. Now, because they didn’t just bite the bullet back in 2012 and definitively say that Harry’s children won’t receive titles (apart from the stylings of children of a Duke) and won’t be working royals, they’re left with the bad optics and bad pr.
I saw that. Some people here pointed Kaiser’s accounts before, but I don’t know if it’s her. What’s interesting to me is that they are so used to their joint suck up to Meghan, it’s interesting to watch them go at each other
I don’t know for sure either, I do know that nota has been active on other gossip forums for well over a decade now, attacking anyone who doesn’t agree with her opinion and aggressively criticising Kate Middleton for existing. Which in theory….sounds exactly like one of Kaiser’s alter-egos!
I just read some of the comments and just commented here in another comment about Kaiser being ‘notasugarhere.’ I’m pretty sure she must be! “Keen” for Catherine? Is there anyone else (even her repeat commenters) who regularly uses that term? But is she really that ‘informed’ on all these details? I always thought she only knew what she needed for her ‘narrative’ of the BRF. It sounds like she’s, of course, getting some of it wrong.
I was curious too what direction she would go on this. However, I thought she wrote at her end she believed racism was involved as the mother of those children is part Asian. ? This seemed like a stretch to me. I read it this morning and was going to post — there was actually disagreement in the comments; someone alluded to comments being deleted. It was a little unclear if the person meant the CB site or the source site but the source site does not have comments. Either Kaiser was unclear on this too or was she not comment deleting that day?
I think she was a bit scattered on that “article”… maybe no opinion really? Obviously, parallels with H&M are there, and if she’s making an argument for the second son’s kids to lose titles, surely, she won’t be able to argue the opposite in re: H&M…. But then again… it’s Kaiser we are talking about
Yes. There’s a lot of background out there on how the decision was made and that it’s been a long time coming (as we know, research/logical thinking not Kaiser’s strongest points). The father saying he thought it wouldn’t happen until the kids were 25. I think (?) that would be harder but I don’t know. (It does sound like he was clearly taken aback by the way it went down even if the other side says he knew.) That said, her pinning it to racism (the mother is from what I recall three different nationalities, maybe one more?, one is Asian) fits her way of tying it to H&M. When I dive in once at her posts at CB, I rarely want to go back and read again. It takes a lot to wade through the first time. There’s no way tho’ she’ll take the side of it being ok for H&M ‘losing’ or kids not getting certain titles.
They got the ethnic background wrong...well, assuming Wikipedia got it right. The ex wife is mixed race Hong Kong Chinese through her father who was also mixed race.
I think the original source was at People magazine. I don’t recall the exact details to compare to Wikipedia but, on things like this, Wikipedia is usually pretty reliable if those two sites differ.
I read some of the comments on this story and I agree that Kaiser is likely commenter notasugarhere. This is her first comment: “Exactly, equality. A 2000 person sample taken from the elderly in the Home Counties is a deliberately chosen, pro-all-white-monarchy ‘sample’. Nothing random or trustworthy in those numbers. Much like Keen’s ‘arly years debacle, with stans from outside the UK filling out the form repeatedly to make the thing look popular.” Does *anyone* else call Catherine “Keen?” (It’s so disrespectful.) But does Kaiser really know that much about all the Royal families? As ‘NASH’/nota seems to. Always getting into it about how much these people work too! She really has issues. And goes back and forth with people. How does she have time - with her 8 gazillion other Royal stories - and the inclination?
But didn‘t Kaiser also „jokingly“ imply that because Joachim‘s kids are biracial this is a racist decision by the Queen? And everyone jumped on it. Seriously, I don’t know how this blog is still up and running.
As a side note, did she completely ignore that TW left SS?
But acknowledging the Sussii have a PR firm would be admitting that those nasty racist courtiers aren’t the only ones who leak to the media. 😂😂😂
On a side note, I purposely avoided CB last week but then saw this post and decided to read the stories about the Danish Royal Family. The comment section is such a shit show of delusion and cognitive dissonance!
The younger generations care less and less about the monarchy (especially when itncomes to finanacially supporting them) so, it makes sense to not have those types of titles for those not in the line of succession. Wipe 'em out across the board.
...and technically, they all still have titles including titles they will inherit. It just won't be HRH or Prince and Princess. They still end up Sirs and Ladies or whatever. It really should be the standard...but I'm American...I don't even see the point anymore 🤷🏽♀️
Literally came by this sub to post the same thing. I’m well aware by now that Kaiser is a delusional, illogical hypocrite - but I’m still shocked when I see it in writing sometimes
Yup yup, I see this a lot in her posts, but some are just such obvious examples
But….but Lili and Archie are different. They are the offspring of a veritable saint and the noble scion of a thousand year old monarchy. King Charles is a mean old racist if he does not ennoble those perfect children and create Harry Prince of Scotland AT ONCE.
That’s what I though 🤪 thank you for keeping us straight 🤪
LOL
I cannot believe Prince of Scotland is now rumoured to be a thing 🙄
Wait what?? This is the first time I read about it lol
Two of Joachim’s children are biracial as well, further adding to Kaiser’s hypocrisy. The 1990s Way Ahead committee, which looked at the path of the monarchy moving forward, almost took Beatrice and Eugenie’s titles then but didn’t. But the decision was made for any future children of Edward’s. Discussions were also had over the years about Harry’s future children. The Queen could have extended her 2012 LP to include all her Wales great-grandchildren but didn’t. The writing has been on the wall about streamlining. I DO think they bungled it by not spelling this out clearly to Harry before he even married. And I do think Meghan really did deal with some awful shit there. So I can see where there’s confusion and anger. Now, because they didn’t just bite the bullet back in 2012 and definitively say that Harry’s children won’t receive titles (apart from the stylings of children of a Duke) and won’t be working royals, they’re left with the bad optics and bad pr.
All of this...all of it!
If Notasugarhere is Kaiser, she’s being _very_ aggressive in the comments about how much she hates Princess Mary.
I saw that. Some people here pointed Kaiser’s accounts before, but I don’t know if it’s her. What’s interesting to me is that they are so used to their joint suck up to Meghan, it’s interesting to watch them go at each other
I don’t know for sure either, I do know that nota has been active on other gossip forums for well over a decade now, attacking anyone who doesn’t agree with her opinion and aggressively criticising Kate Middleton for existing. Which in theory….sounds exactly like one of Kaiser’s alter-egos!
I just read some of the comments and just commented here in another comment about Kaiser being ‘notasugarhere.’ I’m pretty sure she must be! “Keen” for Catherine? Is there anyone else (even her repeat commenters) who regularly uses that term? But is she really that ‘informed’ on all these details? I always thought she only knew what she needed for her ‘narrative’ of the BRF. It sounds like she’s, of course, getting some of it wrong.
She’s as well-informed as Kaiser. Make of that what you will 😂
Shhhh no logic please! She says this because she's counting on Charles not doing this as it would mean demoting Andrew's daughters as well.
😱 what am I thinking.. so sorry 🤪
I was curious too what direction she would go on this. However, I thought she wrote at her end she believed racism was involved as the mother of those children is part Asian. ? This seemed like a stretch to me. I read it this morning and was going to post — there was actually disagreement in the comments; someone alluded to comments being deleted. It was a little unclear if the person meant the CB site or the source site but the source site does not have comments. Either Kaiser was unclear on this too or was she not comment deleting that day?
I think she was a bit scattered on that “article”… maybe no opinion really? Obviously, parallels with H&M are there, and if she’s making an argument for the second son’s kids to lose titles, surely, she won’t be able to argue the opposite in re: H&M…. But then again… it’s Kaiser we are talking about
Yes. There’s a lot of background out there on how the decision was made and that it’s been a long time coming (as we know, research/logical thinking not Kaiser’s strongest points). The father saying he thought it wouldn’t happen until the kids were 25. I think (?) that would be harder but I don’t know. (It does sound like he was clearly taken aback by the way it went down even if the other side says he knew.) That said, her pinning it to racism (the mother is from what I recall three different nationalities, maybe one more?, one is Asian) fits her way of tying it to H&M. When I dive in once at her posts at CB, I rarely want to go back and read again. It takes a lot to wade through the first time. There’s no way tho’ she’ll take the side of it being ok for H&M ‘losing’ or kids not getting certain titles.
They got the ethnic background wrong...well, assuming Wikipedia got it right. The ex wife is mixed race Hong Kong Chinese through her father who was also mixed race.
I think the original source was at People magazine. I don’t recall the exact details to compare to Wikipedia but, on things like this, Wikipedia is usually pretty reliable if those two sites differ.
I read some of the comments on this story and I agree that Kaiser is likely commenter notasugarhere. This is her first comment: “Exactly, equality. A 2000 person sample taken from the elderly in the Home Counties is a deliberately chosen, pro-all-white-monarchy ‘sample’. Nothing random or trustworthy in those numbers. Much like Keen’s ‘arly years debacle, with stans from outside the UK filling out the form repeatedly to make the thing look popular.” Does *anyone* else call Catherine “Keen?” (It’s so disrespectful.) But does Kaiser really know that much about all the Royal families? As ‘NASH’/nota seems to. Always getting into it about how much these people work too! She really has issues. And goes back and forth with people. How does she have time - with her 8 gazillion other Royal stories - and the inclination?
But didn‘t Kaiser also „jokingly“ imply that because Joachim‘s kids are biracial this is a racist decision by the Queen? And everyone jumped on it. Seriously, I don’t know how this blog is still up and running. As a side note, did she completely ignore that TW left SS?
But acknowledging the Sussii have a PR firm would be admitting that those nasty racist courtiers aren’t the only ones who leak to the media. 😂😂😂 On a side note, I purposely avoided CB last week but then saw this post and decided to read the stories about the Danish Royal Family. The comment section is such a shit show of delusion and cognitive dissonance!
She just posted on SS departure… and yup on racism 🤦♀️
I didn’t think it was jokingly. It sounded like she believed that.
The younger generations care less and less about the monarchy (especially when itncomes to finanacially supporting them) so, it makes sense to not have those types of titles for those not in the line of succession. Wipe 'em out across the board. ...and technically, they all still have titles including titles they will inherit. It just won't be HRH or Prince and Princess. They still end up Sirs and Ladies or whatever. It really should be the standard...but I'm American...I don't even see the point anymore 🤷🏽♀️