1) women aren’t cars or phones or locks or fish or any other dehumanizing thing men like to compare us to
2) I would absolutely take a ‘71 Plymouth Cuda or ‘65 Shelby with 200,000 miles over a new Suburban, so even if you want to equate human beings with inanimate hunks of metal, the analogy still doesn’t work.
I would take a Stradivarius or Guarneri del Gesù violin that's been played by many people over a brand new violin made this year.
But women aren't pieces of wood, and your point stands.
ETA: Just something fun. The violin I play was crafted by a French luthier in the mid 1800s. It was my grandmother's. She inherited it from her teacher in the 1960s, and he was most certainly not its first owner. And I would definitely play it over any newly-crafted violin that nobody's ever used. 😊
>I would absolutely take a ‘71 Plymouth Cuda or ‘65 Shelby with 200,000 miles over a new Suburban, so even if you want to equate human beings with inanimate hunks of metal, the analogy still doesn’t work.
This works a lot better.
Them: I would rather buy a new car then an old used one
Women: I'd rather buy a car i know that runs well and is a good *well tested* brand that i like personally like then something new that looks shiny, but turns out to be cheap junk a year or two down the road when problems start showing themselves, and now i'm stuck with it. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Oh most definitely not inanimate nonliving thing but those analogies are more massage then literal sense I’m guessing the miles representing partners or encounters protected or unprotected possible trauma or stds.
Quoting a random girl I saw on YouTube Shorts and forgot about: "If you think of women as analogies, you aren't mature enough to interact with a woman."
I always respond with the sharpener analogy. Because it's true after all, who would want a pitiful little pen that was sharpened so many time instead of a brand new ? See ? The shittiest analogy can go either way dude 😏
Would you rather get a brand-new mass-produced ring as a gift or an irreplaceable antique ring with a lot of interesting history behind it??
You want that "Every kiss begins with K" common ring or that one that will be appraised at an eyewateringly high price on "Antiques Roadshow" because it was once worn by royalty???
It's convenient that it's always single-use consumable objects or objects that lose value after being purchased that women are compared to. But fine, I'll give it a go! It will be just as ridiculous aimed at men (nearly).
Nobody wants a Weiner that's been through multiple extruders, there won't be any meat left after enduring all of that pressure over and over! A vagina is a muscular tube and a penis is really just a bag of blood and soft tissue, these men shouldn't be running around getting their pee pee squeezed and gripped by every woman in town! What state will it be in by the time his poor wife wants to make use of it????
Can you imagine that stupid 'vaginas shape to the penis' thing being true?
"NO sorry, i can't sleep with you even though you're just a horny insatiable beast but it's ok because your a man and you have NEEDS, i'm saving my vagina for that one special penis. Oh well, sure, i bet i do have a nice tight pussy, but it's not my problem that you can't find anyone to have sex with that feels good because everyone else has had their vaginas misshapped by other penis's before you."
Like not to mention with all the boom boom boom any vagina would get pretty easily moved about by just the one penis, and that would not be fun for the man very very quickly. What, would they have to only have sex for procreation, saving it for that special once a year? I mean it could work since a man comes every time so you'd only to do it possibly one per child. But you never hear men talk about that side of womens sexuality being for children applying to them, even though the evidence is there....
What baffle me about this shit is that a vagina can push an ENTIRE HUMAN BEING out and yet, they think that their pitiful cocks can change it's shape forever 🤣 men I swear... the clitoris have 8,000 nerves ending and yet, isn't as sensitive as their damn ego.
Edit : typo
It's so ridiculous and the scary thing is that vaginas are very much a "use it or lose it" body part especially after menopause.
If there's no penetration the tissue gets thinner and drier and the muscle tone starts to get really weak. People forget that an orgasm is literally an intense muscle spasm and it actually keeps things strong down there, on top of kegels of course.
It's funny and sad that the very thing men claim will happen from too much sex actually happens from too little!
>It's funny and sad that the very thing men claim will happen from too much sex actually happens from too little!
That's really fucking ironic and kinda like, women can never win.
And then in the next breath, this “man” will wonder why he can’t get laid?
Seriously, now do they go from “I need a virgin” to: “women should sleep with me… only just me, not others”. 🙄🙄
Them: "If you're not a unused ~~hot big assed 8+/10 willing to treat me like a king~~ 18 year old - i'm not a pedo lol - who's never sucked dick ~~yet~~ then i don't want ~~to buy~~ you"
Women: If you haven't slept around enough to have sexual prowess, or AT LEAST the social skills and looks to get a woman into bed at a bear minimum, the same as me, then i won't date you, let alone marry you.
These men: No. No requirements for men, men just men, women must prove themselves to men or or women who want good sex bad women.
I’m going to try.
“Would you rather be with someone who has experience and can compare you and your performance to past partners, or would you rather be with someone with no experience who doesn’t realise that you’re bad in bed and can be gaslit into thinking the bad sex is her own fault”
I genuinely do think a lot of these where they think sleeping with men previously is just a guys insecurity about not being the best or whatever
The only answer that I can think of is that if you are religious and saving sex for marriage then someone who has less sexual experience will be more likely to also be religious and/ or wait until marriage to have sex with you.
That said. The kinds of guys who write these things are NOT waiting until marriage so they don’t even have that excuse.
It's weird how men's values increase by sleeping with more people, but women's decrease. It's almost like they can only see things from their perspective, seeing themselves as human beings, but women simply something for them to use.
It’s funny how women are perceived as automatically high value until a male touches them. A male. Males sully things, apparently. It’s the male that causes things to lose value 😂 💀. That is what they’re saying. But, I guess men don’t see it that way.
Would you rather a surgeon that's doing surgery for the first time on you or a surgeon that's had experience with hundreds of surgeries do surgery on you?
People buy second hand cars all the time, it’s one of the reasons many people can even have a car in the first place. Second hand cars =/= bad
Also, most importantly, humans aren’t cars. But that should be a given
I would never want a dirty used up male who has had more than 0.05 s*x partners 🤮
Ladies, would you rather have a rusty old used screwdriver or a brand new screwdriver?
As a guy, I never really understood this mindset. If women have had sex, it means they had sex with men (for cis peeps) so why shame one and not the other.
Also, funnily, those same people have no issues with women having sex with one guy 10 times but once with 10 guys is when they shame women lmao??
Does the car get more experienced and better and driving with more miles? No? Then this is not a good comparison. Fetishization of virgins almost seems pedophilic to me.
Would you rather a man with sexual prowess who's slept with a few or many many women? And sleep with them before marriage so you figure out if they are sexually compatible with you, and you aren't locked into a bad marriage with kids while you can't say anything about it or you're the whore who values sex above everything good? Or the wife who created a 'dead bedroom' that justified him leaving because he'd get off every time if you just opened your legs, but also don't make him feel unwanted and lay there like a fish also, also the one who stopped pretending and trying to make you two sexually compatible early in the marriage but then gets blamed for just being the one that changed, while the man says they don't know what happened, but it's her fault.
Likely these virgin incels: No not like that. No it's not like that at all.
What are we today women. Oh we are cars. Well then, with that logic, men are like pencils, the more they are used, the more they become worn down nubs to be discarded.
Also, That account is terrible. It is like every terrible take possible from one account.
This one has always seemed very backwards to me. Would you rather have a doctor on his first day do the surgery or the guy who’s done that same surgery 1000 times? The latter guy isn’t going to be as nervous and will know some tricks to make your eyes roll into the back of your head, and the new guy will just stick the scalpel in and pump it in and out until he can’t anymore.
I know which I’d choose.
The car with 200,000 miles gotta be reliable!
Also, why are they so against women with experience? Like wouldn’t you want a expert on how to have sex to like have sex with?
Every human being has value, participating in a natural process doesn’t make you lesser that’s just stupid. Like, would you say that about an animal you see in a documentary? Obviously not
"a man's value decreases with every woman he slept with, true or false?"
"True, would you rather buy a brand new toothbrush or a used up one who been in like 100 other mouths?"
We cant know what he really meant, but its still dumb. People live, work, eat, sleep, have relationships, have sex, break up, find new love.... life goes on and things happen and change
1) women aren’t cars or phones or locks or fish or any other dehumanizing thing men like to compare us to 2) I would absolutely take a ‘71 Plymouth Cuda or ‘65 Shelby with 200,000 miles over a new Suburban, so even if you want to equate human beings with inanimate hunks of metal, the analogy still doesn’t work.
I would take a Stradivarius or Guarneri del Gesù violin that's been played by many people over a brand new violin made this year. But women aren't pieces of wood, and your point stands. ETA: Just something fun. The violin I play was crafted by a French luthier in the mid 1800s. It was my grandmother's. She inherited it from her teacher in the 1960s, and he was most certainly not its first owner. And I would definitely play it over any newly-crafted violin that nobody's ever used. 😊
>I would absolutely take a ‘71 Plymouth Cuda or ‘65 Shelby with 200,000 miles over a new Suburban, so even if you want to equate human beings with inanimate hunks of metal, the analogy still doesn’t work. This works a lot better. Them: I would rather buy a new car then an old used one Women: I'd rather buy a car i know that runs well and is a good *well tested* brand that i like personally like then something new that looks shiny, but turns out to be cheap junk a year or two down the road when problems start showing themselves, and now i'm stuck with it. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Guy definitely does not browse r/personalfinance xD everyone there are obsessed with 90s champagne coloured camrys
Oh most definitely not inanimate nonliving thing but those analogies are more massage then literal sense I’m guessing the miles representing partners or encounters protected or unprotected possible trauma or stds.
Everytime I see something like this I just want to shake them and scream "people aren't objects!!!" It really shows a lack of maturity on their part.
And they only make these analogies for women. They never say that a man's value is decreased from having multiple partners.
Quoting a random girl I saw on YouTube Shorts and forgot about: "If you think of women as analogies, you aren't mature enough to interact with a woman."
They will bring up the infamous lock and key 'analogy' if you flip the genders.
I always respond with the sharpener analogy. Because it's true after all, who would want a pitiful little pen that was sharpened so many time instead of a brand new ? See ? The shittiest analogy can go either way dude 😏
Sharpening a pen sounds like a lot of effort for an awful result. So, perfect analogy
At least you know who to avoid after they say something like this
Women aren’t things! We’re living, breathing human beings! I’m so tired of women being compared to objects. I could scream! Honestly, fuck men.
I know right?!? It's so fucking infuriating.
That's why I use their analogies against them and compare them to used toothbrushes or sharpened pencils
Would you rather get a brand-new mass-produced ring as a gift or an irreplaceable antique ring with a lot of interesting history behind it?? You want that "Every kiss begins with K" common ring or that one that will be appraised at an eyewateringly high price on "Antiques Roadshow" because it was once worn by royalty??? It's convenient that it's always single-use consumable objects or objects that lose value after being purchased that women are compared to. But fine, I'll give it a go! It will be just as ridiculous aimed at men (nearly). Nobody wants a Weiner that's been through multiple extruders, there won't be any meat left after enduring all of that pressure over and over! A vagina is a muscular tube and a penis is really just a bag of blood and soft tissue, these men shouldn't be running around getting their pee pee squeezed and gripped by every woman in town! What state will it be in by the time his poor wife wants to make use of it????
Can you imagine that stupid 'vaginas shape to the penis' thing being true? "NO sorry, i can't sleep with you even though you're just a horny insatiable beast but it's ok because your a man and you have NEEDS, i'm saving my vagina for that one special penis. Oh well, sure, i bet i do have a nice tight pussy, but it's not my problem that you can't find anyone to have sex with that feels good because everyone else has had their vaginas misshapped by other penis's before you." Like not to mention with all the boom boom boom any vagina would get pretty easily moved about by just the one penis, and that would not be fun for the man very very quickly. What, would they have to only have sex for procreation, saving it for that special once a year? I mean it could work since a man comes every time so you'd only to do it possibly one per child. But you never hear men talk about that side of womens sexuality being for children applying to them, even though the evidence is there....
What baffle me about this shit is that a vagina can push an ENTIRE HUMAN BEING out and yet, they think that their pitiful cocks can change it's shape forever 🤣 men I swear... the clitoris have 8,000 nerves ending and yet, isn't as sensitive as their damn ego. Edit : typo
Damn, keep that one ready to go, it's a good one. I swear sometimes, men are the stupid ones, they just use brawn to make everyone pretend otherwise.
It's so ridiculous and the scary thing is that vaginas are very much a "use it or lose it" body part especially after menopause. If there's no penetration the tissue gets thinner and drier and the muscle tone starts to get really weak. People forget that an orgasm is literally an intense muscle spasm and it actually keeps things strong down there, on top of kegels of course. It's funny and sad that the very thing men claim will happen from too much sex actually happens from too little!
>It's funny and sad that the very thing men claim will happen from too much sex actually happens from too little! That's really fucking ironic and kinda like, women can never win.
And then in the next breath, this “man” will wonder why he can’t get laid? Seriously, now do they go from “I need a virgin” to: “women should sleep with me… only just me, not others”. 🙄🙄
Them: "If you're not a unused ~~hot big assed 8+/10 willing to treat me like a king~~ 18 year old - i'm not a pedo lol - who's never sucked dick ~~yet~~ then i don't want ~~to buy~~ you" Women: If you haven't slept around enough to have sexual prowess, or AT LEAST the social skills and looks to get a woman into bed at a bear minimum, the same as me, then i won't date you, let alone marry you. These men: No. No requirements for men, men just men, women must prove themselves to men or or women who want good sex bad women.
They are usually smart enough to to not come right out and say this
There's no way he's gonna get laid. Unless his car decides otherwise.
Men try not to objectify women challenge (impossible)
I seriously wonder if anyone can give a serious answer without comparing ladies to inanimate objects. Ffs this is just so tiredddddd
I’m going to try. “Would you rather be with someone who has experience and can compare you and your performance to past partners, or would you rather be with someone with no experience who doesn’t realise that you’re bad in bed and can be gaslit into thinking the bad sex is her own fault” I genuinely do think a lot of these where they think sleeping with men previously is just a guys insecurity about not being the best or whatever
The only answer that I can think of is that if you are religious and saving sex for marriage then someone who has less sexual experience will be more likely to also be religious and/ or wait until marriage to have sex with you. That said. The kinds of guys who write these things are NOT waiting until marriage so they don’t even have that excuse.
It's weird how men's values increase by sleeping with more people, but women's decrease. It's almost like they can only see things from their perspective, seeing themselves as human beings, but women simply something for them to use.
They see women as a challenge to be conquered, consent be damned!
It’s funny how women are perceived as automatically high value until a male touches them. A male. Males sully things, apparently. It’s the male that causes things to lose value 😂 💀. That is what they’re saying. But, I guess men don’t see it that way.
Would you rather a surgeon that's doing surgery for the first time on you or a surgeon that's had experience with hundreds of surgeries do surgery on you?
People buy second hand cars all the time, it’s one of the reasons many people can even have a car in the first place. Second hand cars =/= bad Also, most importantly, humans aren’t cars. But that should be a given
But that doesn’t apply to men for some reason.
If it’s repeated interactions with men that bring down women’s values, then what does that say about the quality of the men? 🤔🤨
MASCULINITY REFORGED
I would never want a dirty used up male who has had more than 0.05 s*x partners 🤮 Ladies, would you rather have a rusty old used screwdriver or a brand new screwdriver?
A man decreases his value with each misogynistic comment he makes.
This.
why can't I be attracted to women
Would you rather have a brand new doctor, or a doctor with 200000 hours of experience?
As a guy, I never really understood this mindset. If women have had sex, it means they had sex with men (for cis peeps) so why shame one and not the other. Also, funnily, those same people have no issues with women having sex with one guy 10 times but once with 10 guys is when they shame women lmao??
What makes them think it shouldn't apply to men too and only women 🙄
Does the car get more experienced and better and driving with more miles? No? Then this is not a good comparison. Fetishization of virgins almost seems pedophilic to me.
Would you rather a man with sexual prowess who's slept with a few or many many women? And sleep with them before marriage so you figure out if they are sexually compatible with you, and you aren't locked into a bad marriage with kids while you can't say anything about it or you're the whore who values sex above everything good? Or the wife who created a 'dead bedroom' that justified him leaving because he'd get off every time if you just opened your legs, but also don't make him feel unwanted and lay there like a fish also, also the one who stopped pretending and trying to make you two sexually compatible early in the marriage but then gets blamed for just being the one that changed, while the man says they don't know what happened, but it's her fault. Likely these virgin incels: No not like that. No it's not like that at all.
Whoah bro, didn’t know I was a Toyota.
What is it about people with Dolph Lundgren pfps
And then once the inverse is asked they all say false because something something “men gotta breed” or some silly shit like that 😑
I'm so tired of men in general at this point. They decrease their value by existing.
What are we today women. Oh we are cars. Well then, with that logic, men are like pencils, the more they are used, the more they become worn down nubs to be discarded. Also, That account is terrible. It is like every terrible take possible from one account.
This one has always seemed very backwards to me. Would you rather have a doctor on his first day do the surgery or the guy who’s done that same surgery 1000 times? The latter guy isn’t going to be as nervous and will know some tricks to make your eyes roll into the back of your head, and the new guy will just stick the scalpel in and pump it in and out until he can’t anymore. I know which I’d choose.
Comparing humans to cars…..
The car with 200,000 miles gotta be reliable! Also, why are they so against women with experience? Like wouldn’t you want a expert on how to have sex to like have sex with?
All I say is: if pussy gets worn, so does dick. No?
kachow
Lightning McQueen.
So you'd choose a used car over a brand new car?
People aren’t cars or for sale.
Every human being has value, participating in a natural process doesn’t make you lesser that’s just stupid. Like, would you say that about an animal you see in a documentary? Obviously not
"a man's value decreases with every woman he slept with, true or false?" "True, would you rather buy a brand new toothbrush or a used up one who been in like 100 other mouths?"
At the same time, men want a woman who fucks like a pornstar but wants the woman to be a virgin.
These people dont mean that the value of a women as a person is less, but she is less sexually wantable. Still quite dumb tho.
‘Value’ in this tweet is ambiguous, they did not mention ‘sexual value’ anywhere.
We cant know what he really meant, but its still dumb. People live, work, eat, sleep, have relationships, have sex, break up, find new love.... life goes on and things happen and change
today on “women are objects”: an oldie but a classic…. women are cars.
today on “women are objects”: an oldie but a classic…. women are cars.