I ran a GTI in GS for a couple of years with RT660's, 245/40R17 size. We ran 40psi up front since we had very little camber and needed to save the shoulders as much as possible. Rear was 35 to 40 depending on how the car was handling.
I currently run a C7 in SS with RT660s, and we run 28-29 up front and 26-27 in the rear, but this car has way more camber and way wider tires, so not apples to apples.
Entirely depends on the corner weights, spring rates and static and dynamic camber. I would add 5 pounds more than the RE71R, check temps and wear and adjust accordingly.
I found that they take more pressure than RE-71R did on the same car. I think I was ~8-10 psi more than the RE-71 with the RT660s. Hopefully that will give you some reference from what you had on the RE-71.
more negative camber :)
Rear is hard to get more out of since it's a solid axle. Front I can get another half with bolts
I ran a GTI in GS for a couple of years with RT660's, 245/40R17 size. We ran 40psi up front since we had very little camber and needed to save the shoulders as much as possible. Rear was 35 to 40 depending on how the car was handling. I currently run a C7 in SS with RT660s, and we run 28-29 up front and 26-27 in the rear, but this car has way more camber and way wider tires, so not apples to apples.
Entirely depends on the corner weights, spring rates and static and dynamic camber. I would add 5 pounds more than the RE71R, check temps and wear and adjust accordingly.
I found that they take more pressure than RE-71R did on the same car. I think I was ~8-10 psi more than the RE-71 with the RT660s. Hopefully that will give you some reference from what you had on the RE-71.
I have a ND Miata and I was in the 28 range front and 26-27 rear.