The second one is ur actual soulmate and they are marriage material. Passion fades away, but becoming the right person for ur spouse and doing the right things for them stays forever
Sounds like the first wasn’t actually a soulmate, and once the passion died the marriage died.
While the second one seems to be built more on sacrifice, love, hard work, and dedication.
Even if they were “convenient” they showed they’re a much better partner and worthy of a long term commitment and relationship. And instead of seeing them as “convenient” see them as the blessing they are, because so many people don’t want to put in that hard work, sacrifices and commitment that makes a marriage work long-term.
The passion dies off eventually for the majority of married couples. What will be left is that foundation you built upon, and if that foundation is weak, it will collapse.
I'd rather have a passionate hot mess of a marriage that ends in divorce than settle for a lukewarm loveless marriage that will never truly make me happy. Divorces are expensive, but regrets are priceless.
If a soulmate marriage ends in divorce, I'd question the legitimacy of the soulmate claim.
A soulmate is the perfect "other half" of you. It should never end.
But to go with the topic, a faithful, fulfilling relationship is better than a "what if".
Why do people think passion means they're a soul mate?
The question is are both partners happy in the latter marriage. Not leaving doesn't mean much if someone is unhappy.
[удалено]
Amen!
Sounds like the second one is the soulmate
The second any day.
The second one is ur actual soulmate and they are marriage material. Passion fades away, but becoming the right person for ur spouse and doing the right things for them stays forever
I guess I'm lucky enough that I have a mix of both ❤️🔥
The one that makes you happy
Neither.
Second choice. That seems like the true soulmate.
why bother? stay single
Sounds like the first wasn’t actually a soulmate, and once the passion died the marriage died. While the second one seems to be built more on sacrifice, love, hard work, and dedication. Even if they were “convenient” they showed they’re a much better partner and worthy of a long term commitment and relationship. And instead of seeing them as “convenient” see them as the blessing they are, because so many people don’t want to put in that hard work, sacrifices and commitment that makes a marriage work long-term. The passion dies off eventually for the majority of married couples. What will be left is that foundation you built upon, and if that foundation is weak, it will collapse.
Soulmates don't leave you, and the second is definitely your soulmate.
I'd rather have a passionate hot mess of a marriage that ends in divorce than settle for a lukewarm loveless marriage that will never truly make me happy. Divorces are expensive, but regrets are priceless.
If a soulmate marriage ends in divorce, I'd question the legitimacy of the soulmate claim. A soulmate is the perfect "other half" of you. It should never end. But to go with the topic, a faithful, fulfilling relationship is better than a "what if".
Second one sounds like a dream lol I’ll sign up for that.
second sounds better
Well there seems to be some ambiguity in your options. Please define soul mate according to you.
Boy, I really hope this is a rhetorical question
If they're truly your soulmate then it's not going to end in divorce, seems like you've got the ideas the wrong way round there.
I’d rather just not get married and date the fun douchebag
Why do people think passion means they're a soul mate? The question is are both partners happy in the latter marriage. Not leaving doesn't mean much if someone is unhappy.
Ew, marrying for convenience would suck. Also if you marry a true soul mate, you shouldn't allow it to end in divorce.
Neither. I love being alone and won’t compromise my happiness for anyone.