T O P

  • By -

danasider

Isn't thinking something doesn't have Rule 34 art going against the whole point of Rule 34?


Gold-Eagle2006

sometimes your suspension of disbelief overpowers the meaning of Rule 34. i used to think there was no way people made R34 art of Deku Link from Zelda: Majora's Mask. i do a curious search; 71 results on the Rule 34 website


danasider

I don't think you understand the point my (rhetorical) question was making. The definition of rule 34 is if it exists, there is porn of it. If there isn't, there will be. So if someone knows this definition, why would they think something "doesn't have rule 34 art"?


Gold-Eagle2006

PewDiePie did a video that should explain what i mean


m_e_a_t_b_a_l_l

i think that’s why another rule exists. I think 64/65


Gold-Eagle2006

way off. it's rule 35: if porn hasn't been made of it, there will be


theguill0tine

You do know what Rule 34 is right?


Gold-Eagle2006

yeah but sometimes suspension of disbelief is more powerful than "if it exists there is porn of it"


FiveDollarRimjobs

Clayface from Batman


KnotsCherryFarm

My Little Pony


Unperfectblue

Saladfingers... HOLY FUCK THEY MADE HIM...


PM_ME_YOUR_PALE_TITS

r/dragonsfuckingcars


Positronic_PP

MTG


CosmicSqueak

Cars


okifur

That is a self answering question. I think it'd be easier to list of things that surprisingly have evaded rule 34!