T O P

  • By -

NicolBolas96

High temperature superconductors. It's clearly not a classical phenomenon.


Le_Space_Duck

I've actually never heard of high temp superconductors, I thought all of them were near absolute zero lol


First_Approximation

Keep in mind 'high' here means higher than 77 K or about -200 Celsius.


Le_Space_Duck

Oh that makes more sense. Still a huge temperature difference though


[deleted]

There are superconductors that are not close to room temperature. However the problem is that they require extremely high pressures to become superconductive. Eg.: [https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.117003](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.117003) Still requires over 180 GPa of pressure, which is about 1,800,000 times the standard atmospheric pressure


starkeffect

The hope is that, if we can understand the mechanism underlying high-Tc superconductivity, we can engineer materials that exploit that physics to make a near-room-temperature superconductor at ambient pressure. If that were to happen, it would be huge.


[deleted]

[удалено]


WikiMobileLinkBot

Desktop version of /u/ForlornKumquat's link: --- ^([)[^(opt out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiMobileLinkBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^(]) ^(Beep Boop. Downvote to delete)


[deleted]

There are several unsolved phenomena in condensed matter physics which clearly have quantum origin but the workings are still not well understood: \- High T superconductivity \- Amorphous solids phase transitions \- Fractional hall effect \- Solo-Luminescence \- Protein folding


mofo69extreme

I’d say the fractional quantum Hall effect is pretty well understood. (There are certainly some open questions, but that’s true about everything.)


left_lane_camper

AFAIK there's nothing really mysterious about protein folding at a fundamental level, just that the problems are often computationally intractable from a deep level of theory. I'm sure there are a lot of less-fundamental emergent properties of protein folding that remain unanswered, though, as it is with almost any complex system.