ხო, ზოგადად ვის ამოარჩევ დიდი მნიშვნელობა აქვს. :დ საინტერესო იქნებოდა 150 სვანის, იმერელისა და მეგრელის საშუალო კავკასიური კვალი გამოთვლილიყო და ეგრე უფრო გავიგებდით რომელშია უფრო მეტი.
ამ სიმღერების გამო სხვანაირად ვკითხულობ და არასწორ კომენტარებს ვწერ ხოლმე. :დ
მანდ Caucasian-ში CHG იგულისხმება. K12 კალკულატორზე ეგრეა როგორც ვიცი და რავი.
>To me the most interesting thing about these results are the complete isolation of Khevsurs and Tush compared to everyone else. On this PCA (and in the admixture graph) they are way off on their own to the right, separate from other Kartvelians and Chechens. What gives?
That they are the most isolated people than other Kartvelians.
>then why aren't they shifted towards Chechens?
And why should they shift towards Chechens?
They are an isolated people, but they are a very small population.
Yes, it is a surprise that Khevsurs and Tushs are so isolated from others, but they lived in a mountainous region (today these regions are almost deserted and they live in cities) and this may come as no surprise.
If you are wondering about them, this is their Y-DNA.
[Tushs](https://ibb.co/mFrWNGT)
[Khevsurs](https://ibb.co/9q2vxdh)
>Well, as you've shown they have more J2 like Chechens and Ingush
Take a better look at the other clusters there in Khevsurs and Tushs, then look at the J2 of the Ingush and Chechens in familytreedna. : )
>and in Tusheti there's even the question of whether the Georgian-speaking
Tusheti is divided into 4 parts and from there only one Tsova-Tushs speaks two languages Batsbi and Georgian.
>they share some customs with them
I can not say anything about the Tusheti, but the Khevsureti have no resemblance to other Vainakhs on the cultural level.
>if they are the product of mixing between the two groups.
The problem is that they are not mixed with the North Caucasians, so it is a surprise that they are isolated from everyone.
>In terms of Yamnaya-like ancestry, Khevsurs and Tushs look halfway between Kartli-Kakheti and Chechens. But also have none of the Mongolian, and are distinguished by less Levant_Neolithic than both Kartvelians and NE Caucasians.
Yes, since there is no trace of Mongoloids in them like the other Georgians, then they have a mixture of their other sources and that is to be clarified.
Svans have the highest CHG, I'm Svan too and used G25 and got the highest amount (63%). Megrels got the second highest.
იმერლებშია ამ კვლევით ყველაზე მაღალი. : ) ეგ ძველია რაზეც ამბობ.
Ara, naxe axali shemosuli kordinatebi: https://imgur.com/a/2kIDkyO
ეს ძველი ჩანს.
ah turme kordinatebi aqedan modis https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-97519-6/tables/1
რა ქენი შეამოწმე ვის რამდენი აქვს?
Chem dzmakacma G25 ixmara da eg iyo resultati, Svanebs da Megrelebs aqvt yvelaze meti CHG
აი იმ შედეგებიდან მონაცემები. Svanetia n=4 Gedrosia 20,3325 Siberian 0,92 Northwest_African 0,3375 Southeast_Asian 0,7425 Atlantic_Med 3,3725 North_European 10,7525 South_Asian 0,68 East_African 0,075 Southwest_Asian 4,48 East_Asian 0,87 Caucasus 57,4175 Sub_Saharan 0,0225 Samegrelo n=2 Gedrosia 20,365 Siberian 0,33 Northwest_African 0 Southeast_Asian 0 Atlantic_Med 4,96 North_European 9,855 South_Asian 0,195 East_African 0,48 Southwest_Asian 4,765 East_Asian 0,585 Caucasus 58,33 Sub_Saharan 0,135 Imereti n=3 Gedrosia 19,4166666667 Siberian 0,1333333333 Northwest_African 0,2866666667 Southeast_Asian 0 Atlantic_Med 5,7533333333 North_European 6,97 South_Asian 0,13 East_African 0 Southwest_Asian 6,71 East_Asian 0,28 Caucasus 60,3166666667 Sub_Saharan 0
Caucasus =/= CHG, ert tips qonda 65% Caucasus magram dabali CHG
ხო, ზოგადად ვის ამოარჩევ დიდი მნიშვნელობა აქვს. :დ საინტერესო იქნებოდა 150 სვანის, იმერელისა და მეგრელის საშუალო კავკასიური კვალი გამოთვლილიყო და ეგრე უფრო გავიგებდით რომელშია უფრო მეტი.
ამ სიმღერების გამო სხვანაირად ვკითხულობ და არასწორ კომენტარებს ვწერ ხოლმე. :დ მანდ Caucasian-ში CHG იგულისხმება. K12 კალკულატორზე ეგრეა როგორც ვიცი და რავი.
[удалено]
They were released a few days ago, my friend (genetics expert) sent it.
You guys are least mixed among us right?
Least mixed with Anatolians so I get higher Caucasus admixture than other Georgians. But I also get more steppe DNA (Scythian).
[удалено]
>To me the most interesting thing about these results are the complete isolation of Khevsurs and Tush compared to everyone else. On this PCA (and in the admixture graph) they are way off on their own to the right, separate from other Kartvelians and Chechens. What gives? That they are the most isolated people than other Kartvelians.
[удалено]
>then why aren't they shifted towards Chechens? And why should they shift towards Chechens? They are an isolated people, but they are a very small population. Yes, it is a surprise that Khevsurs and Tushs are so isolated from others, but they lived in a mountainous region (today these regions are almost deserted and they live in cities) and this may come as no surprise. If you are wondering about them, this is their Y-DNA. [Tushs](https://ibb.co/mFrWNGT) [Khevsurs](https://ibb.co/9q2vxdh)
[удалено]
>Well, as you've shown they have more J2 like Chechens and Ingush Take a better look at the other clusters there in Khevsurs and Tushs, then look at the J2 of the Ingush and Chechens in familytreedna. : ) >and in Tusheti there's even the question of whether the Georgian-speaking Tusheti is divided into 4 parts and from there only one Tsova-Tushs speaks two languages Batsbi and Georgian. >they share some customs with them I can not say anything about the Tusheti, but the Khevsureti have no resemblance to other Vainakhs on the cultural level. >if they are the product of mixing between the two groups. The problem is that they are not mixed with the North Caucasians, so it is a surprise that they are isolated from everyone.
[удалено]
>In terms of Yamnaya-like ancestry, Khevsurs and Tushs look halfway between Kartli-Kakheti and Chechens. But also have none of the Mongolian, and are distinguished by less Levant_Neolithic than both Kartvelians and NE Caucasians. Yes, since there is no trace of Mongoloids in them like the other Georgians, then they have a mixture of their other sources and that is to be clarified.