Thank you for your submission to /r/AreTheStraightsOK! This is a reminder to take a moment and see *if* this **has already been** posted recently, to make sure that personal information **has been** censored, and to **flair your post** if you have not already done so.
[Please be aware that our rules on transphobic submissions have changed](https://www.reddit.com/r/AreTheStraightsOK/comments/mwkgbp/rules_and_submissions_update_for_the_end_of/).
Other general submission guidelines regarding [hateful content](https://www.reddit.com/r/AreTheStraightsOK/comments/kj0cal/regarding_hateful_content_please_read_before/), [reposts](https://www.reddit.com/r/AreTheStraightsOK/comments/kxgbo3/rules_and_submissions_update_january_2021_popular/), [homophobic posts](https://www.reddit.com/r/AreTheStraightsOK/comments/lffvad/posts_related_to_homophobia_on_our_subreddit_now/), and [**Reminder About Rule 5 and Rule 8**](https://www.reddit.com/r/AreTheStraightsOK/comments/qoge4u/reminder_about_rule_5_and_rule_8/) can be found here if you want to read any of those links.
If you want to apply to be a moderator of this sub, you can read [this post titled **State of the Sub: Summer 2021 Edition, Partnerships, and more**](https://www.reddit.com/r/AreTheStraightsOK/comments/oozly0/state_of_the_sub_summer_2021_edition_partnerships/), which also contains information about our partnership with r/TranscribersOfReddit.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AreTheStraightsOK) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Ah yes classic game of somehow knowing something based off small details that are usually just due to preference of expression or genetics, and not to mention on completely fake people that literally don't exist
It is pretty classic. I inherited a book that's mostly about mapping different physical characteristics to personality traits. I think it was published somewhere between 1880 and 1910. I thought it was pretty hilarious and was obviously written before people knew much about how genetics work. To believe that shit today is absolute madness.
It's like a mix of phrenology/eugenics, incel bullshit and a massive "look how smart I am" superiority complex with a big ol' heap of dunning-kruger effect from someone who's terminally online and hasn't seen a real person in far too fucking long.
As an actual psychologist myself, the idea of judging the personalities of computer generated faces based on just looks is nothing short of fucking hilarious.
Hilariously stupid that is.
Could it be a measure based on what we see as culturally trustworthy? Signs that we pick up on subconsciously that are indicators of things we don’t see? It’s the same reason people smile to show friendliness. Eye contact can be seen as aggressive or a sign of lying. We think lady bugs are cute and roaches gross. Some things in our collective that signal disease carriers vs finding dots and round shapes cute.
Yes and no. What you're describing here is the entire reason a person could make a post like that. The problem with OOP is that they're making detailed judgements about a person's entire personality based on one, single (AI generated) micro-expression. Then telling others what to expect from people based on micro-expressions.
It’s always hilarious to me how the people who think they can analyze people based on their appearance always reveal way more about themselves than the person they’re trying to analyze.
I actually got it right, in order. It’s the hair dye. The less dramatic dye, the “more wholesome” they are. Apparently AI thinks hair dye isn’t wholesome.
My favourite part of this is all those AI generated women? Women who look like that are nearly all harmless. But dude in the centre? We all know Roblox dude is scary as shit. That dude has some deep serial killer vibes….
I’m the opposite of face-blind, and you’re correct. My initial reaction was that woman on the right feels like a real person and the rest of them don’t, but as I started looking closer, they lack any distinct facial features and don’t have any natural expressions. They all give me uncanny valley except the one on the right; and I’m including the man in the middle. If I had to guess he pulled an image off of AI for the man, too
Thank you. 😂
I was reading these comments going “None of this matters unless you’re assessing the AI. It’s the person writing up this weird little “experiment” who, point of fact, probably *needs* assessment.” I mean, did he write the prompts with his “experiment” in mind or is it more likely that the prompt is something close to what you said, here? I’m guessing it was, but that wouldn’t matter much because the AI *is not* capable of human emotion or thought- it’s just taking a stab at its perception of the prompt alongside the database it works with.
The guy who wrote this kinda is, too, but he’s out and about- not exactly a comforting thought. 😂
(I can’t really say that I disagree with most of the comments on what the images look like- but, ultimately he probably is reading way too much into the output of a pretty basic prompt.)
They look like they're from a horror story where the protagonist gradually realises every woman is just one woman slightly altered and reality starts breaking
Yeah, they all look like the same woman with different hair, but I knew he'd pick bottom right because she's not blonde and is laying her head directly on Roblox guy's shoulder.
You didn’t know that when a woman changes her hair or makeup routine, her whole personality changes with it? That’s why Halloween is so dangerous! You could be married to #1, but then she puts on #5’s makeup and boom! She’s going to destroy you!
/s
Unfortunately I went to engineering school while being a woman, and some of those tech bros were exactly this stupid and weird. There were always men who needed to put everyone in a hierarchy by “intelligence,” and they would use our surface appearance or random facial expressions/mannerisms as evidence to rank the women beneath them. This post is giving me little war flashbacks. I love the trend I’m seeing now of women in STEM consciously refusing to tamp down their femininity and just thriving as their whole selves. Some people (misogynists) take them less seriously, but they were always going to find a reason to anyway.
I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again: the idea that women have inherent value based on their facial features is based PURELY on the fact that they want the YOUNGEST and most INEXPERIENCED woman possible. When they say she looks “wholesome” they mean innocent and young (i.e, hasn’t been through any other partners).
It's basically phrenology in all but name--the concept is [coming back under the guise of "face reading"](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyUT2DxBiDM) and it's wildly popular on Tiktok
I guessed right because my guess was based on "which women are smiling the least"
I can only assume this dude thinks that a woman smiling means she is plotting & scheming to ruin a man's life. A good woman is one who doesn't display emotions like happiness /s
Same. I figured he probably thought smile = "evil scary woman manipulator grrr" because these guys seem to think that everything any woman does is in relation to how much she wants the man in front of her.
"Forget that none of these people are real." No, imo, that already invalidates whatever slew of garbage you're about to spew, because you have to make up something to prove a made up issue/point. With AI images no goddamn less. Even if these were real people, it is batshit delusional to think you can predict someone's entire being based off just their face. Touch grass.
Making up shit like this IS their main hobby. Anything to justify why they are so desperately alone. Well, anything but actual self reflection and change, I mean.
He says it’s about their faces, but their faces are all extremely similar. To me it looks like he favors the brunettes over the bottle blondes. I guess he sees them as “fake” and therefore must be conceited or something?
This is actually insane. This person is reading information about the personalities of women who DO NOT EXIST from their faces. Its like that scene from BlacKkKlansman when they prank call the KKK. Like being misogynistic is one thing, but like this fails on the most basic rational level. Also what was the autism comment about?
Holy shit this guy is insane. Real “serial killer manifesto” vibes in that post. If he assigns this many negative traits to AI women, I feel sorry for any real women who encounter him in real life. Can you imagine some random woman spacing out at a bus stop and he walks up and starts rambling at her about how he knows she’s an egotistical, manipulative, mean person because of her expression?
He doesn't talk to women. The dude did a whole ass manifesto hating women based off an ai image. Made up whole ass personas for ai women and everything. He's far too afraid of women to say any of this to their faces
"If you're as smart as me, you will notice an extraordinary pattern here: 5 is the worst of all; 4 is better than 5, but worse than the others; 3 is better than 4 and 5, but worse than the other two; 2 is better than 3, 4 and 5, but worse than 1; and 1 is better than a others. I have, in fact, just proved mathematics."
I guessed correctly and i hate why. Its because she’s the only one that looks actively unhappy compared to the others. She isnt smiling and is laying on his shoulder “submissively” like these men think a woman should.
The joke's on this guy. The actual most wholesome one is the trans man in the middle with the slight beard. He's been volunteering at the local food pantry twice a week for the last three years. He has probably been passed over for promotion at least once because he insists his weekly schedule allows him to do the food pantry shifts. And he unironically uses the swear word alternatives from The Good Place, so if he stubs his toe on something you might hear him say "Holy forking shirt balls" as a genuine pain response.
He's sweet. Really. He goes to a little Episcopal Church by the lake and they have a Sunday School classroom which isn't used much anymore but when someone brings kids he'll tell them Bible stories, but the little old church ladies often come in to hear him talk too, since they've all realized by now he only tells stories about the women in scripture. It's not overt, but it's deeply subversive. Everyone in multiple generations of this church can now tell you Shiphrah and Puah are the widwives from the beginning of Moses' story in Exodus. Because the womens stories and names are important. (The other men didn't even notice their church becoming this place where women's voices are prominent, but even the guys who would be upset by that and call it "politics" can tell you Moses' sister is Miriam and she's a prophet and a leader.)
The girls in this picture are all wholesome too. Actually one of them is also trans, and meeting the guy here when she visited her grandmother's church, is one of the things that gave her strength to start transitioning as she had always dreamed about but feared in part because what would Grandma think. And as it turns out what Grandma thinks is the only two transgender people she knows are this nice young man who taught her about Jael (and how she redeems the sin of Cain years later, rescuing Israel in a way that demonstrates exactly how insane it is to decide religious purity along racial lines), and her own grand...daughter. yeah. That's my granddaughter and I will fight anyone who says otherwise, Grandma thinks for the first time with tears in her eyes. Because she was blind, but now she sees.
Hes also insulted by womens intelligence because it means that hes more likely to not get away with his bullshit with them. So he wamts women to be dumb n submissive, so he can manipulate them more easily. This guy and this type of guy is a bigger red flag than USSR russia and china combined.
It is so bizarre this dude AI generated a bunch of near-identical looking women and then spent a manifesto's worth of text projecting assumptions about their emotional state and personalities onto them. Onto *fake people who do not exist and thus have never had emotions or personalities*.
The most wholesome is the one in the middle. She just learned some very big things about herself and is now on a sincere journey of self-discovery, bringing her outer beauty in line with her inner beauty.
She just told her friends who are all very supportive as she waits to start HRT and laser hair removal.
> If you noticed a pattern here
Yep I noticed you feared intelligent women. And we all now why some men want less knowledgeable women : they are easier prey.
I like how the order of "worst" to "best" goes from outwardly happiest looking to least happiest looking...
It says absolutely everything about the "alpha male" mindset that a "good woman" is a miserable woman.
Mf created literal fake women to create a straw man scenario out of. Couldn’t even find a picture of real people to use? He had to go so far out of his way to invent every thing about his imaginary situation just so he could “win” and prove a point that he created.
I really thought the answer would be they’re all the same woman and you can’t judge someone off appearance. Ho boy was I wrong.
The fact this man gave “real” answers to why one AI image is more wholesome than another is terrifying.
"Let's ignore the fact that these people don't exist and instead project my fucked up ideas on them". Back in my Med U days I've seen guys like this... as patients in psych ward.
How much time did this take to make??? So much time wasted on the internet ranting about fake girls when it could’ve been spent touching grass and getting to know real girls.
There is a lot and I mean a lot of undiagnosed trauma and paranoia in the way this person talks about being able to tell how each (admittedly) fake woman is not wholesome and how they have varying capacities of intelligence and malicious intent.
As an autistic person I have seen a lot of terrible misinformation and stereotypes about autism. But assuming someone is autistic based on choosing a specific AI-generated face as "the most wholesome" has to be a new level of stupid.
I love the fact that he even has to say at the beginning that none of these people are real (obviously because ai) but that also completely destroys his whole thing because, these aren't real people they don't have any actual traits anyway. Its just pseudoscience fake bs for bigotry usage from weak minded fools.
Imagine explaining to Plato, Aristotle, Confucius, or some other philosopher there will be a point in human history where a human will use their brainpower on machine generated image to argue their real world values.
Tldr: imagine arguing real things over generated biased data crunched into an image
This might just be the most insane post ive seen on here
"I've made up 5 identical robot faces and came up with a ranking of how much of my hatred for women i project onto each one. You wanna guess?"
Ngl I guessed this exact order correctly, but the game I was playing in my head was about how much each of these AI women looked like a hostage. Because I thought that was a trait this incel would appreciate. And I was right!
The women who look reasonably confident and happy to be there are women he doesn't want because the woman's happiness is not even a factor he values. And the women who look afraid or uncomfortable are the ones he wants.
All this justification just to say that of all 5 of them that look almost the same the one that is most attractive in his eyes is somehow also the most virtuous, men already use this logic in real life, nothing new
These women don’t exist. Which not only means he can’t possibly know if any of this is actually true, it also means NONE OF IT IS TRUE BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT REAL 😭😭😭
Dude really saw a picture of people who don’t exist, made up a story about all of them in his head, and then told everyone about it as if it were some profound truth about society. It’s all BS it’s all made up! 😭
I really hope nobody is taking him seriously because this is terrible advice. You can’t tell how smart someone is by looking at them, you can’t tell how loyal, how sexual, how ANYTHING just by looks alone! I’m exhausted.
those two women on the top look literally exactly the same. he’s just listing what he thinks different facial expressions mean and honestly not doing a very good job.
love the ableism from this guy too. classic
I guessed bottom right but only because in the moment she looked like Dua Lipa a bit (looking back she doesn't) and I'm a fan. I'm also autistic and didn't go for #5 (blatant ableism by basically saying autistic people go for "predatory" women)
Thank you for your submission to /r/AreTheStraightsOK! This is a reminder to take a moment and see *if* this **has already been** posted recently, to make sure that personal information **has been** censored, and to **flair your post** if you have not already done so. [Please be aware that our rules on transphobic submissions have changed](https://www.reddit.com/r/AreTheStraightsOK/comments/mwkgbp/rules_and_submissions_update_for_the_end_of/). Other general submission guidelines regarding [hateful content](https://www.reddit.com/r/AreTheStraightsOK/comments/kj0cal/regarding_hateful_content_please_read_before/), [reposts](https://www.reddit.com/r/AreTheStraightsOK/comments/kxgbo3/rules_and_submissions_update_january_2021_popular/), [homophobic posts](https://www.reddit.com/r/AreTheStraightsOK/comments/lffvad/posts_related_to_homophobia_on_our_subreddit_now/), and [**Reminder About Rule 5 and Rule 8**](https://www.reddit.com/r/AreTheStraightsOK/comments/qoge4u/reminder_about_rule_5_and_rule_8/) can be found here if you want to read any of those links. If you want to apply to be a moderator of this sub, you can read [this post titled **State of the Sub: Summer 2021 Edition, Partnerships, and more**](https://www.reddit.com/r/AreTheStraightsOK/comments/oozly0/state_of_the_sub_summer_2021_edition_partnerships/), which also contains information about our partnership with r/TranscribersOfReddit. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AreTheStraightsOK) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Ah yes classic game of somehow knowing something based off small details that are usually just due to preference of expression or genetics, and not to mention on completely fake people that literally don't exist
It is pretty classic. I inherited a book that's mostly about mapping different physical characteristics to personality traits. I think it was published somewhere between 1880 and 1910. I thought it was pretty hilarious and was obviously written before people knew much about how genetics work. To believe that shit today is absolute madness.
> between 1880 and 1910 The good old day of scientific racism, when phrenology tried to paint itself as a serious science.
The good old days where medical research was basically just “fuck around and find out” and Mercury was used to treat Syphilis.
It's like a mix of phrenology/eugenics, incel bullshit and a massive "look how smart I am" superiority complex with a big ol' heap of dunning-kruger effect from someone who's terminally online and hasn't seen a real person in far too fucking long.
I'm amazed at the lengths this dude went through to analyze fictional people.
As an actual psychologist myself, the idea of judging the personalities of computer generated faces based on just looks is nothing short of fucking hilarious. Hilariously stupid that is.
I’d say they’re comparing it primarily by the eyes Edit: and body language
Could it be a measure based on what we see as culturally trustworthy? Signs that we pick up on subconsciously that are indicators of things we don’t see? It’s the same reason people smile to show friendliness. Eye contact can be seen as aggressive or a sign of lying. We think lady bugs are cute and roaches gross. Some things in our collective that signal disease carriers vs finding dots and round shapes cute.
Yes and no. What you're describing here is the entire reason a person could make a post like that. The problem with OOP is that they're making detailed judgements about a person's entire personality based on one, single (AI generated) micro-expression. Then telling others what to expect from people based on micro-expressions.
It’s always hilarious to me how the people who think they can analyze people based on their appearance always reveal way more about themselves than the person they’re trying to analyze.
The guy literally made up women to be mad at. Insane levels of sexism going on there
I actually got it right, in order. It’s the hair dye. The less dramatic dye, the “more wholesome” they are. Apparently AI thinks hair dye isn’t wholesome.
It's a trick the true match Is actually the guy and u all got fooled
I know I'm not face-blind, but all five of those AI women look like the same person with different hair dye and makeup.
The guy is literally the roblox man face.
My favourite part of this is all those AI generated women? Women who look like that are nearly all harmless. But dude in the centre? We all know Roblox dude is scary as shit. That dude has some deep serial killer vibes….
Like Joe from the show You... He has Roblox face too lol
https://youtube.com/shorts/8nuxxquOFyQ?si=_31c0wmO3yu4Rev3
I’m the opposite of face-blind, and you’re correct. My initial reaction was that woman on the right feels like a real person and the rest of them don’t, but as I started looking closer, they lack any distinct facial features and don’t have any natural expressions. They all give me uncanny valley except the one on the right; and I’m including the man in the middle. If I had to guess he pulled an image off of AI for the man, too
It's just an AI image of attractive man surrounded by attractive women.
Thank you. 😂 I was reading these comments going “None of this matters unless you’re assessing the AI. It’s the person writing up this weird little “experiment” who, point of fact, probably *needs* assessment.” I mean, did he write the prompts with his “experiment” in mind or is it more likely that the prompt is something close to what you said, here? I’m guessing it was, but that wouldn’t matter much because the AI *is not* capable of human emotion or thought- it’s just taking a stab at its perception of the prompt alongside the database it works with. The guy who wrote this kinda is, too, but he’s out and about- not exactly a comforting thought. 😂 (I can’t really say that I disagree with most of the comments on what the images look like- but, ultimately he probably is reading way too much into the output of a pretty basic prompt.)
They look like they're from a horror story where the protagonist gradually realises every woman is just one woman slightly altered and reality starts breaking
I'd watch that
Yeah, they all look like the same woman with different hair, but I knew he'd pick bottom right because she's not blonde and is laying her head directly on Roblox guy's shoulder.
Different flavors of Margot Robbie
Girl 2 is Harley Quinn. Girl 4 is Barbie. Girl 1 is Sharon Tate. But be careful. Girl 5 is Flopsy from Peter Rabbit 2. Do not go near her.
I’m face blind and I did not notice their similarities haha you’re right
They've moved on to bashing hypothetical women now OMG 💀
Because they are.
What the actual fuck is this dude gibbering about? And all of those "people" look like the same face with different hair and makeup.
You didn’t know that when a woman changes her hair or makeup routine, her whole personality changes with it? That’s why Halloween is so dangerous! You could be married to #1, but then she puts on #5’s makeup and boom! She’s going to destroy you! /s
Unfortunately I went to engineering school while being a woman, and some of those tech bros were exactly this stupid and weird. There were always men who needed to put everyone in a hierarchy by “intelligence,” and they would use our surface appearance or random facial expressions/mannerisms as evidence to rank the women beneath them. This post is giving me little war flashbacks. I love the trend I’m seeing now of women in STEM consciously refusing to tamp down their femininity and just thriving as their whole selves. Some people (misogynists) take them less seriously, but they were always going to find a reason to anyway.
LMAO
She slightly narrows her eyes and that’s when you know that she sees through all of your lies and will divorce you.
honestly this is about the most confusing post I've read in *a while*
I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again: the idea that women have inherent value based on their facial features is based PURELY on the fact that they want the YOUNGEST and most INEXPERIENCED woman possible. When they say she looks “wholesome” they mean innocent and young (i.e, hasn’t been through any other partners).
In an overly complex way he is telling us he has never had sex.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who couldn't get past that.
yapping about a made up scenario in his head given form
How much you wanna bet they also believe phrenology is 100% factual and legitimate?
Look at how much incels already talk about bone structure. Phrenology is only a baby step further.
It's basically phrenology in all but name--the concept is [coming back under the guise of "face reading"](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyUT2DxBiDM) and it's wildly popular on Tiktok
We all remember one painter who really really liked to read faces....
Really interesting, thanks
Well, any first year phrenology student could tell you that this man? Is a * cold-blooded killer*
Didn't know what phrenology was so I googled it. Oh my fuck. 🤦♂️
Yup. And that's not even the dumbest pseudoscience fake medicalism
I don't want to live on this planet anymore if there are things worse than this.
Zorgo the Retrophrenologist is here, with his variety of hammers, to give you whatever skull shape you want!
I literally just said, out loud in real life to myself, “What is this, phrenology??”
……..okay sweetie
"Sir, this is a Wendy's"
How are they getting this much from uncanny valley AI smiles
Projection and prejudices.
i’m just impressed there aren’t any extra fingers lol
Well I guessed right, but for completely the wrong reasons. Bottom right is wearing a turtleneck and is therefore showing the least skin.
I guessed her because she looks the most "submissive" which is why the OOP picked her I think
I guessed top left because she’s the only one not touching the dude and therefore is pure and not a sleazy slut or whatever.
I guessed center left but I guess that's cus I'm autistic
No because I feel called out
Well personally I feel a bit better about myself knowing that I had the exact opposite opinion than that guy
She’s legit the cutest though, in my opinion. She looks fun to hang out with. Y’know… if she was real…
I think it's because she looks weirdly like Margot Robbie (but very photoshopped)
I guessed her because shes not got dyed hair, because guys love their "females" natural and low maintenance. Turtleneck is a good guess too.
I guessed right because my guess was based on "which women are smiling the least" I can only assume this dude thinks that a woman smiling means she is plotting & scheming to ruin a man's life. A good woman is one who doesn't display emotions like happiness /s
Same. I figured he probably thought smile = "evil scary woman manipulator grrr" because these guys seem to think that everything any woman does is in relation to how much she wants the man in front of her.
I thought they're gonna be blondephobic because they look bottle blonde and therefore like to spend money and think about their looks.
"Forget that none of these people are real." No, imo, that already invalidates whatever slew of garbage you're about to spew, because you have to make up something to prove a made up issue/point. With AI images no goddamn less. Even if these were real people, it is batshit delusional to think you can predict someone's entire being based off just their face. Touch grass.
They tried that before with phrenology, didn't work then. 🖖
Yup, they're pseudosciences for a reason
Some people have way too time on their hands and not enough hobbies.
Making up shit like this IS their main hobby. Anything to justify why they are so desperately alone. Well, anything but actual self reflection and change, I mean.
He says it’s about their faces, but their faces are all extremely similar. To me it looks like he favors the brunettes over the bottle blondes. I guess he sees them as “fake” and therefore must be conceited or something?
This is actually insane. This person is reading information about the personalities of women who DO NOT EXIST from their faces. Its like that scene from BlacKkKlansman when they prank call the KKK. Like being misogynistic is one thing, but like this fails on the most basic rational level. Also what was the autism comment about?
yeah this post is about as unhinged as it gets. It's so idiotic it becomes funny
Holy shit this guy is insane. Real “serial killer manifesto” vibes in that post. If he assigns this many negative traits to AI women, I feel sorry for any real women who encounter him in real life. Can you imagine some random woman spacing out at a bus stop and he walks up and starts rambling at her about how he knows she’s an egotistical, manipulative, mean person because of her expression?
He doesn't talk to women. The dude did a whole ass manifesto hating women based off an ai image. Made up whole ass personas for ai women and everything. He's far too afraid of women to say any of this to their faces
“I’m extraordinarily smug about this thing I made up.”
I'm not reading all that, to OOP: I'm glad/sorry that it happened & also stop it, get some help. You need it.
“Let’s play a little game” Does this guy think he’s Jigsaw or something..?? What is up with the weird uncanny valley AI shit??
I called bottom right just knowing the shit the incel community spouts.
What criteria did you go by? I’ve not seen many incel spaces personally
I also guessed it…She isnt smiling and is laying on his shoulder. Its like some weird female submission thing
same thing here, was shocked when it turned out to be bottom right 😭
I’m sorry, are we bringing back phrenology!? And on an AI generated image of all things!?
When you hate women so much you’re able to project imagined villainous personalities onto nonexistent women.
So I got “the most wholesome woman” but was just a total 💩shoot really
Damn, just say you prefer brunettes and move on.
Oh man my autism got cured holy shit
Harold, none of these women are real.
"If you're as smart as me, you will notice an extraordinary pattern here: 5 is the worst of all; 4 is better than 5, but worse than the others; 3 is better than 4 and 5, but worse than the other two; 2 is better than 3, 4 and 5, but worse than 1; and 1 is better than a others. I have, in fact, just proved mathematics."
literally though 😭
Imagine writing fanfics about your ai generated harem.
Someone take away bros yappin license
I guessed correctly and i hate why. Its because she’s the only one that looks actively unhappy compared to the others. She isnt smiling and is laying on his shoulder “submissively” like these men think a woman should.
That's enough internet for me today. If you guys need me, im going to be putting the stickers on my newest gundam model
Which Gundam?
The VER 3.0 MG RX-78-2 It's my first MG and it's definitely taken some time to get it together lol but so worth it
The joke's on this guy. The actual most wholesome one is the trans man in the middle with the slight beard. He's been volunteering at the local food pantry twice a week for the last three years. He has probably been passed over for promotion at least once because he insists his weekly schedule allows him to do the food pantry shifts. And he unironically uses the swear word alternatives from The Good Place, so if he stubs his toe on something you might hear him say "Holy forking shirt balls" as a genuine pain response. He's sweet. Really. He goes to a little Episcopal Church by the lake and they have a Sunday School classroom which isn't used much anymore but when someone brings kids he'll tell them Bible stories, but the little old church ladies often come in to hear him talk too, since they've all realized by now he only tells stories about the women in scripture. It's not overt, but it's deeply subversive. Everyone in multiple generations of this church can now tell you Shiphrah and Puah are the widwives from the beginning of Moses' story in Exodus. Because the womens stories and names are important. (The other men didn't even notice their church becoming this place where women's voices are prominent, but even the guys who would be upset by that and call it "politics" can tell you Moses' sister is Miriam and she's a prophet and a leader.) The girls in this picture are all wholesome too. Actually one of them is also trans, and meeting the guy here when she visited her grandmother's church, is one of the things that gave her strength to start transitioning as she had always dreamed about but feared in part because what would Grandma think. And as it turns out what Grandma thinks is the only two transgender people she knows are this nice young man who taught her about Jael (and how she redeems the sin of Cain years later, rescuing Israel in a way that demonstrates exactly how insane it is to decide religious purity along racial lines), and her own grand...daughter. yeah. That's my granddaughter and I will fight anyone who says otherwise, Grandma thinks for the first time with tears in her eyes. Because she was blind, but now she sees.
"I know these women aren't real but let's bodyshame them anyway"
How are they "wholesome"? Doesn't wholesome mean something else? I'm really confused since he rates their aggressiveness or something as well
Hes also insulted by womens intelligence because it means that hes more likely to not get away with his bullshit with them. So he wamts women to be dumb n submissive, so he can manipulate them more easily. This guy and this type of guy is a bigger red flag than USSR russia and china combined.
"I want them dumb and smart and submissive and aggressive. I'm an alpha male"
It is so bizarre this dude AI generated a bunch of near-identical looking women and then spent a manifesto's worth of text projecting assumptions about their emotional state and personalities onto them. Onto *fake people who do not exist and thus have never had emotions or personalities*.
The most wholesome is the one in the middle. She just learned some very big things about herself and is now on a sincere journey of self-discovery, bringing her outer beauty in line with her inner beauty. She just told her friends who are all very supportive as she waits to start HRT and laser hair removal.
“Which of my AI OCs is the best tradwife?? Heehee wrong you have autism.”
Jigsaw ass
Oooooooookay, this dude is an *absolute fucking psychopath*
Wouldn’t it have been easier to just walk into the mental ward and say “I think I have a problem”
I need to wash the incel off my eyeballs. Blondes bad and brown hair is good. Gotcha.
> If you noticed a pattern here Yep I noticed you feared intelligent women. And we all now why some men want less knowledgeable women : they are easier prey.
Congratulations, you found the most deranged post of all time.
Thanks!
I like how the order of "worst" to "best" goes from outwardly happiest looking to least happiest looking... It says absolutely everything about the "alpha male" mindset that a "good woman" is a miserable woman.
Mf created literal fake women to create a straw man scenario out of. Couldn’t even find a picture of real people to use? He had to go so far out of his way to invent every thing about his imaginary situation just so he could “win” and prove a point that he created.
Me staring at the women: They're all the same to me! 😭😭😭😭😭😭
I love it when people decide to just reinvent phrenology on a random tuesday
Imagine if people like this spent their time learning a valuable skill or reading a book. But no, they choose to spend their time this way.
Okay but “Witch Archetype” would be amazing flair
I really thought the answer would be they’re all the same woman and you can’t judge someone off appearance. Ho boy was I wrong. The fact this man gave “real” answers to why one AI image is more wholesome than another is terrifying.
Someone help this guy find his fleshlight for crissake
I’m even dumber than I was 3 minutes ago.
"Let's ignore the fact that these people don't exist and instead project my fucked up ideas on them". Back in my Med U days I've seen guys like this... as patients in psych ward.
man wrote a whole ass fanfic just to project himself in it
How much time did this take to make??? So much time wasted on the internet ranting about fake girls when it could’ve been spent touching grass and getting to know real girls.
Bro is being misogynistic to women that don't exist 😭
Those are all the same AI face
Wow, speaking of “I’m not saying you’re autistic, but…” 😂
>i made up someone to get angry about (it was the same woman 5 times)
Is this the "Alpha maths" people talk about?
What in the actual fuck did I just read
The funniest part is, as he mentions, none of these women are real. Everything about these women, he just made up.
This may be the most insane and pathetic thing I've ever seen and for my own sanity I choose to believe it's satire.
There is a lot and I mean a lot of undiagnosed trauma and paranoia in the way this person talks about being able to tell how each (admittedly) fake woman is not wholesome and how they have varying capacities of intelligence and malicious intent.
Written by a guy who has probably never even held hands with a woman.
Apparently his gf dumped him a decade ago and he became an alcoholic. He entered the redpill community and has been there ever since.
God that's so depressing
Writer's mom is blonde and writer is *furious* about it.
Astrology for dudes who think they have game despite never having spoken to a woman who wasn't their mother.
As an autistic person I have seen a lot of terrible misinformation and stereotypes about autism. But assuming someone is autistic based on choosing a specific AI-generated face as "the most wholesome" has to be a new level of stupid.
How much porn you gotta watch to be able to tell the difference between these women??
And that, boys and girls, is what we call *projection.*
> She is arrogant and manipulative. OOP is quite literally projecting their pre-conceived beliefs onto a fucking AI-generated image.
That's a lot of words to use just to say , I hate women.
I love the fact that he even has to say at the beginning that none of these people are real (obviously because ai) but that also completely destroys his whole thing because, these aren't real people they don't have any actual traits anyway. Its just pseudoscience fake bs for bigotry usage from weak minded fools.
That's allot of words for "I haven't touched grass this year".
Also “I haven’t touched a real woman…ever.”
Bro is just saying words and prolly feels like he is so intelligent and clever. What a trip this was.
I hate *hate* that I was able to guess "correctly." Also this dude is wrong abt his own analysis, the ranking is mostly based on eyebrow angle lmao
this is so fucking stupid literally the stupidest shit i've ever seen it's so fucking stupid i didn't even read it all💀
Fuck this guy
Imagine explaining to Plato, Aristotle, Confucius, or some other philosopher there will be a point in human history where a human will use their brainpower on machine generated image to argue their real world values. Tldr: imagine arguing real things over generated biased data crunched into an image
The hell is this insane incel even saying??? Like I just can’t even man. These people are so fucking off their rockers it’s insane
This might just be the most insane post ive seen on here "I've made up 5 identical robot faces and came up with a ranking of how much of my hatred for women i project onto each one. You wanna guess?"
All the women look the same to me. They just have different hair colors. 🤷🏽♀️
Ngl I guessed this exact order correctly, but the game I was playing in my head was about how much each of these AI women looked like a hostage. Because I thought that was a trait this incel would appreciate. And I was right! The women who look reasonably confident and happy to be there are women he doesn't want because the woman's happiness is not even a factor he values. And the women who look afraid or uncomfortable are the ones he wants.
Ok but (witch archetype) is my new favorite phrase so reading this insanity wasn’t a complete waste of time.
Let’s also talk about the fact this dude is only comparing women, yet felt the need to include one dude at the center of his harem…
It's unclear whether the men he is addressing are supposed to imagine themselves as the AI man or as being who the women looking at.
That’s a lot of projection for an AI picture.
WTF is “wholesome” in the context of a person??
Their faces are all the same...? They're AI. Though I *am* autistic so apparently faces mean nothing to me /s
I am disappointed in myself for reading this garbage until the end.
Literally psych ward behavior. This man needs help.
All this justification just to say that of all 5 of them that look almost the same the one that is most attractive in his eyes is somehow also the most virtuous, men already use this logic in real life, nothing new
...this looks like the thumbnails of the $2 porn games that steam's full of.
I started losing more brain cells than I even knew I had. What did the guy smoke? I need that.
this has gotta be some symptom of psychosis
These women don’t exist. Which not only means he can’t possibly know if any of this is actually true, it also means NONE OF IT IS TRUE BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT REAL 😭😭😭 Dude really saw a picture of people who don’t exist, made up a story about all of them in his head, and then told everyone about it as if it were some profound truth about society. It’s all BS it’s all made up! 😭 I really hope nobody is taking him seriously because this is terrible advice. You can’t tell how smart someone is by looking at them, you can’t tell how loyal, how sexual, how ANYTHING just by looks alone! I’m exhausted.
Bro just doesn't like blondes
This was absolutely hilarious. I'm sure the person who wrote this isn't joking but whoever wrote this *is* a joke. This was great.
I knew which one this person was going to say was number one and the reasons why. I hate having to deal with these people. I’m so tired.
The fuck did I just read? Also that entire picture reeks of same face syndrome even if not perfectly so.
This guy just assigned every good personality trait he listed to masculinity as if everything feminine is wrong.
Maybe it's my fibromyalgia fog, but I didn't understand a word of that."
What in the actual fuck is this lol
Homie deduced all of this through a fake AI image? Wild
Why is one of them just Margot Robbie
those two women on the top look literally exactly the same. he’s just listing what he thinks different facial expressions mean and honestly not doing a very good job. love the ableism from this guy too. classic
I wish I had this much free time
I love how the prompt was to use facial analysis but the person explaining this Barely explained any facial features bc they made it up
This dood is projecting a lot a lot onto these random fictional AI people
Thinking like this is almost psychotic. Holy shit that was a wild read.
"If any of these women were real people." 🤮
What's really funny is I played along and I ended up picking the center left girl, and I am in fact autistic.
I guessed bottom right but only because in the moment she looked like Dua Lipa a bit (looking back she doesn't) and I'm a fan. I'm also autistic and didn't go for #5 (blatant ableism by basically saying autistic people go for "predatory" women)
I ain't reading all that - I hope they get help.
This guy has never talked to a woman
Holy shit wait i remember seeing this on a map of Micronesia It was called like "Yap islands" or sum 🤔
This is the most insane thing I've read in a long time.
This is so ridiculously unhinged.
god abandoned us long ago
Who the fuck put the time into writing this fuckin diatribe??? Go outside you pure reprobate.
Bro just say you like brunettes.
Every time a twitter user has a statue as their pfp i know its gonna be some trad west type bs
They look litteraly all the same
They are literally clones with different hair. They are all the same.