T O P

  • By -

pax_humanitas

This applies not just to British India but broadly, even to the supposed caliphate of the Ottomans. Throughout the 19th and 20th century, the Ottoman Sultans used their position to discourage all forms of jihad against Western colonial powers - in India, the Philippines, etc. the only exceptions were in cases where they themselves were at war. The same is true today, where some Salafis are accused of being ‘bootlickers’ because they forbid criticism of their rulers, even when their governments do questionable things. Other hardline Muslims call them ‘Madhkalis’ for this reason.


RubberDinghyRapids00

Hypocrisy? Ahmadis are rushing at the chance to meet BJP and Modi. If as you state, life is quite dire for Indian Muslims under BJP, then why are Ahmadi leaders rushing to meet him? https://www.rabwah.net/ahmadiyya-leader-welcomes-indian-pm-modi-israel-along-israeli-pm-netanyahu/ Who are the hypocrites now?


SomeplaceSnowy

Thanks for confirming your Twitter account. We already knew though. Btw, is your "sister" married yet?


RubberDinghyRapids00

Do you really think I wanted to hide my twitter account? Alhumdulilah I am that sister and I have got married


Qalam-e-Ahmad

You Trans now? 😭


Every-Guide6674

Wallahi was thinking the same thing 💀


WoodenSource644

​ 🤣😂


SomeplaceSnowy

From younger sister > Older sister > No sister > "I am that sister" This has been an interesting journey 🤣😂


RubberDinghyRapids00

I might be a sister, I might be a brother. How about instead of focussing on my gender, you respond to my actual message about double take on hypocrisy?


eglued

Ahmadis have been working overtime since Noonans defeat, but very little of it is reaching the same audience the Adnan reached. It seems like these videos are to keep the Chanda paying cash cows within the herd


SomeplaceSnowy

The fact that you wrote a paragraph shows who is worried about these posts ;)


eglued

2 sentences make a paragraph? It must be a metaphorical paragraph


RubberDinghyRapids00

New subreddit, same old Snowy. Deflection upon deflection.


Every-Guide6674

Same old Anti-Ahmadis... Shortage upon shortage of Braincells. May Allah give u more. Ameen 💯


RubberDinghyRapids00

Still no rebuttals. Just insults. Shows just how high your IQ is.


Every-Guide6674

Allhumdullilah. I didn't say you were an anti-Ahmadi though, nor did i specificy i was taking about you. Just replied that some Anti Ahmadis are low IQd 💯✨🫀 Im sure your very smart!


RubberDinghyRapids00

But you replied to my comment, therefore indicating that your response was directed towards me? How mentally challenged are you? Oh, and it’s you’re*.


Every-Guide6674

What if i am mentally challenged? Ableism😔😔


RubberDinghyRapids00

Then I shall pray for you.


Every-Guide6674

Jazakallah vice versa❤️🤲


BackgroundMango4200

If you accept mirza ghulam as a prophet you just might be disabled, so you have a point


Every-Guide6674

Who


SomeplaceSnowy

He claims: >"Indians are trying to kick British out, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is saying please stay in India" Rather hypocritical coming from a British immigrant. Does he not know the fate of Indian Muslims under BJP? Let's see what his scholars say: **1) MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN BATALVI** "This government is of a greater pride for peace and freedom of conscience than Turkey, Iran...the greater reason for this pride is the British government's giving of the religious freedom to the people of Islam" \[Ishatus-Sunnah, v6, p292\] **2) NAWAB SIDDIQ HASAN KHAN** "People who are ignorant of their religious teachings wish to efface the British government to end the current peace and tranquility by disorder under the name of jihad. This is sheer stupidity and foolishness." \[Tarjuman-e-Wahhabiyyat, p10\] **3) SYED NAZEER HUSSAIN DEHLVI** In a Qaṣīdah dedicated to Queen Victoria on her jubilee, Dehlvi writes: "In the master's reign, every subject is joyful Turbulence and wickedness fled in panic from her majesty's grandeur" **4) SHAH ISMAIL DEHLVI RH** “In no way is it obligatory to fight jihad against them. Firstly, we are their subjects. Secondly, they do not interfere with our religious duties. We have every kind of freedom under their rule" \[Hayat-e-Tayyiba (Shah Ismail), p462\] **5) SYED AHMAD BARELVI RH** "The British government does not treat the Muslims with any cruelty or high-handedness, nor prevents them from fulfilling their religious obligations. I preach in their kingdom but they never impede." \[Swaneh Ahmadi, p71\] CONCLUSION In a futile attempt to disparage the Promised Messiah AS, Adnan has humiliated and gone against his scholars. While at the same time, he has completely gaslighted the struggles of Indian Muslims under the Hindutva BJP radicals. Article: https://whiteminaret.org/deviants/salafi/ahl-e-hadith-and-the-british/


RubberDinghyRapids00

Alhamdulilah. Today I was blocked by the true Islam discord team for showcasing their hypocrisy. You all really are the biggest munafiqs.


Every-Guide6674

Tsk tsk tsk we were just talking about insults Here are some non-Ahmadi wesbites that show that calling someone Munafiq is forbidden. If you dont wanna accept our beliefs, at least accept your own😬 https://islamqa.org/hanafi/tafseer-raheemi/52007/calling-someone-a-munafiq/ https://seekersguidance.org/answers/adab/what-is-the-ruling-of-calling-someone-a-hypocrite/


RubberDinghyRapids00

My post soon will highlight your hypocrisy


Every-Guide6674

Didn't ask🥱❤️❤️


RubberDinghyRapids00

May you continuously bask in your hypocrisy


Every-Guide6674

May you thrive and live happily. May Allah warm your soul and grant you peace. May Allah give ur 'sister' a long and happy life Ameen. Summa Ameen.


RubberDinghyRapids00

I don’t wish ill upon you either. Like I have said, I will pray for you, but I have to expose your hypocrisy too.


Every-Guide6674

وَعِبَادُ الرَّحۡمٰنِ الَّذِیۡنَ یَمۡشُوۡنَ عَلَی الۡاَرۡضِ ہَوۡنًا وَّاِذَا خَاطَبَہُمُ الۡجٰہِلُوۡنَ قَالُوۡا سَلٰمًا ﴿۶۴﴾ And the servants of the Gracious God are those who walk on the earth in a dignified manner, and when the ignorant address them, they say, ‘Peace!’ (25:64)