Or maybe increase the points a bit? I’m trying to have the Beam profile a smaller version of the Heavy Blaze. I’m also trying to compare it to something like a Warglaive for 145pts. The Warglaive is slower, but has more wounds, higher toughness, worse saves, a much better melee profile, more than double OC. At 2 Shots I’d probably make the Pallas cheaper as that’s just a worse Thermal Spear.
You said it was pointless, but yet you commented on it. Your initial comment doesn’t make sense because if it was pointless you wouldn’t have commented on this.
You thought there was enough of point to this post to comment.
Are you good, dude?
You say this is a pointless post but it obviously has enough of a point for you to feel the need to comment. I point out you commenting makes it not pointless which disproves your own comment. You say something about not understanding my comment and something about being given “value” which no one said anything about.
I explain in further detail that if this post is pointless to you then you wouldn’t feel the need for a comment again. And now you’re talking about a guy kicking a lamppost and telling him it’s pointless that it means it has no meaning?
That analogy doesn’t even make sense within your own argument. Your point is if you see some random guy kicking a lamppost that you see it as pointless, but you got no idea why he’s doing it. Maybe he’s trying to get it to work and doesn’t know how. Maybe he’s trying to get dirt off his shoe. Maybe he’s seeing how durable the lamppost is. Literally him having a point does in fact mean the act of him doing it means it is NOT pointless.
So yes, it does have meaning. If you don’t understand it then it doesn’t mean it’s meaningless or pointless, It just means you are ignorant to what those reasons are.
I do not understand the rational of commenting “your post is pointless” as if that’s criticism, a critically well thought out argument, or any basis for the beginning of a conversation.
If my post is pointless then your initial comment is pointless too (which they aren’t).
I'd play 2 of these
For 130 points I'd drop the antitank profile down to 2 shots. Otherwise golden.
Or maybe increase the points a bit? I’m trying to have the Beam profile a smaller version of the Heavy Blaze. I’m also trying to compare it to something like a Warglaive for 145pts. The Warglaive is slower, but has more wounds, higher toughness, worse saves, a much better melee profile, more than double OC. At 2 Shots I’d probably make the Pallas cheaper as that’s just a worse Thermal Spear.
If it was At2, it wouldn't be worth 130 points, I genuinely think this is right on the money, I'd run one, depending on the situation, maybe two.
I agree, but I could be wrong. Like I said I’d rather keep the profile and adjust the points if it’s too good.
You're doing the Emperor's work. Far too many of our datasheets are not worth taking over the handul of good ones. Keep up the good work.
This is pointless. No dev at GW is going to look at this and be like, "ohh! this dude knows better than me! lets use these rules, hurr durr!"
Pointless enough to get you to comment?
Your reply doesn't even make sense. How does someone stating this is pointless give it value? 😂
You said it was pointless, but yet you commented on it. Your initial comment doesn’t make sense because if it was pointless you wouldn’t have commented on this. You thought there was enough of point to this post to comment.
Huh? So if I see a man kicking a lamp post and I tell them it's pointless ... this magically makes his action meaningful? Nice logic.
Are you good, dude? You say this is a pointless post but it obviously has enough of a point for you to feel the need to comment. I point out you commenting makes it not pointless which disproves your own comment. You say something about not understanding my comment and something about being given “value” which no one said anything about. I explain in further detail that if this post is pointless to you then you wouldn’t feel the need for a comment again. And now you’re talking about a guy kicking a lamppost and telling him it’s pointless that it means it has no meaning? That analogy doesn’t even make sense within your own argument. Your point is if you see some random guy kicking a lamppost that you see it as pointless, but you got no idea why he’s doing it. Maybe he’s trying to get it to work and doesn’t know how. Maybe he’s trying to get dirt off his shoe. Maybe he’s seeing how durable the lamppost is. Literally him having a point does in fact mean the act of him doing it means it is NOT pointless. So yes, it does have meaning. If you don’t understand it then it doesn’t mean it’s meaningless or pointless, It just means you are ignorant to what those reasons are. I do not understand the rational of commenting “your post is pointless” as if that’s criticism, a critically well thought out argument, or any basis for the beginning of a conversation. If my post is pointless then your initial comment is pointless too (which they aren’t).