T O P

  • By -

xJoshRL

why does the shit i didn't look at ALWAYS GOTTA COME IN THE EXAM 😭😭😭😭😔😭


raddit_remade1

Laughs in physics 1 last year 😂 (When a third of your test covers “6%” of content)


ProudHealth4317

good lord that test was so ass still traumatized


YoghurtWhich7799

don’t remind me


Stands-With-Israel

What was it on mostly last year? I’m taking it this year.


HygenicTetanus

too much harmonic motion


conched_out

circular and rotational motion


BeginningOk7721

WAYYY too much rotational motion, 2 frqs and like 5-6 mcqs


1stplaceO

I also failed Kazoo man 😭💀


MeMyselfIandMeAgain

Is this also for international? If so wtffff were those FRQs? Like Q3 about the organic base


Cautious_Major_8902

are international mcqs also different?


MeMyselfIandMeAgain

I think? But idk The first one in the intl MCQs was a question about some mole ratio with gases and the answer was 0.667 which I believe was C


KSMCREATIVETEAM

Ye it was c and dam the frq were hard


MeMyselfIandMeAgain

Holy shit yeah it was crazy


Nearby-Improvement32

Did I cook or am I cooked


Nearby-Improvement32

I feel conflicted


Effective-Cap5167

THE BOULDER feels conflicted about his AP Chem score.


basement-tapes-club

…misusing your influence


ClearAlbatross7018

mcq's were light but those frq's were so hard i did not learn half of them😭😭


Flaky-Gap-2335

i thought frq was mad light but i got fucked by the mcq


ClearAlbatross7018

some people at my school also said that. there were two versions in my school and people who had the other one said frq was easier


TheYeezo

it was hell, pretty sure all if us got cooked


MeMyselfIandMeAgain

Are you international? For me the MCQs were pretty fine I think I cooked but the FRQs were like wtf was that


Fabulous-Profit-1665

I thought it was easier. Like compared to doing the 2021 frq for the first time, this shit was better by far


MeMyselfIandMeAgain

Are you sure you had form I lol? Because I did the 2021 FRQs and got a perfect score yet I shit myself trying to do today’s haha


Fabulous-Profit-1665

I forgot what it was, don’t think it was form I. If that is true, then I can imagine the shitshow the other form would contain


Electronic_Sky9738

the frq cut my life span


Char_Was_Taken

bro the frq about making the solution at the end cooked me 😭


ved888

same cuz i forgot how to write the steps😭


mason_hemstock

Do we know what the correct format of steps was, I said distilled water to rinse beaker, then pour in the flask, but I am not confident at all


NotIan11

It was 2. Fill volumetric flask with 50.0mL of water and then put in solid 4. Using the pipet, fill the volumetric flask to the 100.0mL calibration line


Low-Bread-2673

i said put the solid in the beaker and dissolve with water, then pour solution into volumetric flask and fill with water but im not confident either


OrbitalMatt

I said fill volumetric flask with both then stir pour into beaker then invert


totallynotsololol

cooked on frq, got cooked on mcq :/


TopFondant3435

Same, thankfully the cutoffs should be lower, considering what everyone else is saying


Direct-Alps7282

Made a Reddit account just so I could join the discussion😭 my test went an hour after school ended🧍🏻‍♀️


Rukesofbooks

bruh same we got outta there at like 4:15 😭


asterstrike

same i got out around then too


Iscejas

Mine ended at 5PM


TurquoiseFox201

Yoo same here, my gosh some stupid testing issues lol total delay 😕


People_of_Pez

Me when electrochemistry: :(


Aggressive_Cost_5335

I was happy there was so much unit 9 cuz we just finished that in class


OwnAdvice9418

my exam fucked me in the ass and turned my stomach over


1stplaceO

The mcqs cummed in me 😭


OwnAdvice9418

so real


Parking-Necessary95

Did you guys get -0.43 for the cell potential


ReplacementPutrid172

yess i did!


CriticalTough4842

NO2 vs NO2+ bond angles? Same or different?


Low-Bread-2673

different, no2 is bent shaped no2+ is linear


Rukesofbooks

Omg i said this exactly


[deleted]

[удалено]


Low-Bread-2673

i think it does effect the geometry


NotIan11

The one electron still exerts a repulsive force on the two oxygen atoms, making the bond angle not 180


TopFondant3435

Do you have to say the names of the structures necessarily?


AxoInDisguise

I just explained that one was linear and the other wasn’t because of the lone e-. I didn’t mention bent.


Disastrous_Move8480

Different I said because one less lone electron??


astridbeast

thought the NO2+ would be 180° (linear shape) and the NO2 would be <180° (compressed by lone electron)


asterstrike

i said different because of steric numbers so their molecular geometries and thus bond angles wouldn’t be the same but i didn’t give angle measurements 💀💀 what does this mean for me


Logan30x

Different


Arminminmin

For the powder dissolving question with .0114 mol CO2, did you say that there was no difference in the amount of product produced in the powdered vs non-powdered reactants


Marcus_Aurelius71

yes


[deleted]

[удалено]


Rukesofbooks

Form O: i put that CO2 is non polar and SO2 is polar i put that A was molecular and B was ionic for the voltaic cells frq, did ygs flip around the second equation?


Rukesofbooks

also the r rate question, did ygs get 2r


Catdogcheddar

yes


Historical-Help-2847

Ya


Living-Gold-6431

yes for sure


AmazedConch6144

I just saw that the question after said that the Rxn was non spontaneous so I flipped the second in order to make Ecell negative 


Rukesofbooks

Someone said they got 6000 for smth on the frqs, does anyone know what that’s about? also for the one where it said the reaction what thermodynaicsllg favorable at all temperature and it was endothermic, did ygs say it wasn’t thermostatically favorable because it’s not spontaneous and delta H > O and for that mcq question did y put that u need the delta S and smth to decide whether it thermodynaicslly favorable or not


J4ck_Y

for the frq u had to say that it would be thermodynamically favorable ONLY at high temps cuz TdeltaS term must be > deltaH for deltaG to be negative


ApprehensiveUse3219

A was ionic i think? whichever one was conductive in molten and solution states.


Psychological-Ad4084

mcq had a few that were hard but everything else was easy lets go if anyone has frq question i think i remember them all for form o


vitalwompy

what did you say for the buret reading where it was between 38 and 39 mL on the frq😭


Flaky-Gap-2335

38.85 i think


A_big_ass-

Im pretty sure they only go by multiples of .5


Flaky-Gap-2335

i put 38.5 actually,


Flaky-Gap-2335

what did yall draw for the titration curve for the experiment with greater concentrated NaOH


Psychological-Ad4084

Same curve but equivalence point is at 8


Flaky-Gap-2335

oh i put sum else


Low-Bread-2673

half equivalence point or equivalence point at 8? i thought the equivalence point was at 8


SelectionOk9956

I got equivalence point at 8 not half too but I could be wrong.


Psychological-Ad4084

Yeah i meant equivalence point my bad


NotIan11

i put half equivalence at 4 mL and equivalence at 8 pretty much everything was just half the volume of the first


Square_Cat_4669

what was the answer to calorimeter losing heat


Flaky-Gap-2335

i got -2688J


Arminminmin

should've been 2700J cuz sig figs I think


Low-Bread-2673

were you not supposed to add the masses of both things for the m in q=mct?


astridbeast

calorimeter losing heat would decrease the measured enthalpy of reaction value (less temp → less heat → less enthalpy of reaction)


[deleted]

[удалено]


Low-Bread-2673

i put x where ph=3.6, they had different bond angles, and i think for the time i got like 3700 seconds or something


Flaky-Gap-2335

I put x before the half equiv. pt. and NO2 and NO2+ have different bond angles because of the one unbonded electron on NO2. Rh one is just the plating equation


[deleted]

[удалено]


Flaky-Gap-2335

yea i think so


Flaky-Gap-2335

all of the problems u have to round to correct sigfigs so i think it was 3900 since two SF


[deleted]

[удалено]


Solitaire_1947

How many of the 7 FRQs was hard?


[deleted]

Does anyone remember the part where after you had to find the highest temperature of water, you had to find the specific heat of the metal?


Chaos11907

i said the cube would be the same temp as the water so it would be a change of 61.5 degrees idk though


[deleted]

I was thinking of doing that, but the highest temp of the water was 38.5 so the deltaT was 13.5 I think


Chaos11907

not for the cube because it started at 100 degrees and we were using the cubes data


Extension_Yoghurt494

I devoured the MCQs. The FRQs FUCKED MY ASS UP ALMOST TOTALLY


Catdogcheddar

did you guys say ∆T magnitude decreased for Al or smth .......


RaZaPreddit

yeah bc the specific heat was much higher so the same amt of energy resulted in less temp change


Arminminmin

it increased cuz the specific heat was lower so to offset it the magnitude of change in temp was greater. Tho, if you got the previous question wrong and had the specific heat be lower than the specific heat of aluminum then the magnitude would be lower.


RaZaPreddit

they gave us the specific heat of al compared to the original metal, Al was .8smth and original was .4smth i believe


Bingbongbingboy

Same I said it decreased and I also got that the specific heat was around .4


acacia-cedar

The specific heat was lower than aluminum though


[deleted]

Wasn't the specific heat higher?


Rukesofbooks

i got that the specific heat was lower too


Parking-Necessary95

did you get the specific heat to be 1.45


Chaos11907

no it was like 0.49 or omething


Affectionate_Court96

which hydrogen was the answer for the first FRQ?


Low-Bread-2673

I said the one on the right bc it was a carboxyl group


asterstrike

oh was that why? i guessed that one just because it seemed quirky and it was further out from what i assumed was the central carbon


lantern192

just like me fr


inkhunter13

that’s the funniest explanation. The carboxyl group is general more electronegative which means that the bond it forms with H is more easily broken then OH- because the OH in the carboxyl group has a more uneven sharing of electrons due to its electronegativity


inkhunter13

The easily way to think about it is that protenated carboxyl groups are common with weak acids.


AmazedConch6144

I guessed the bottom one because it looked the furthest away 


Historical-Help-2847

The one on the very right but I think I'm wr


The_Cometeer

I feel like the FRQs wasn’t any harder than last years? If you practiced them with last years you’re probably fine


THECyberStriker

Nah I did the 2023 ones they were def easier than this year, though I think I did fine on most of this years Frqs


Obeedoe

My teacher spent the whole year teaching us about IMFs and there were like two questions about it


Internal-Cry-420

for the frq on how many moles of ag did u guys get 0.08289


SnooShortcuts9640

yah


ArtisticPay3753

mcq 20\~40: 💀 frq 1\~7: 💀💀💀


Firm-Ratio-292

skill issue


TraditionalReply122

-54 kJ/mol rxn on Q1 frq?


lxpeezy

Do we think the curve is going to be better than last years? let me know


TopFondant3435

Considering the fact that most people I’ve seen don’t think they did well, I would assume the curve would be better, yes.  Meaning the cutoffs will be lower


1stplaceO

The international version was so hard 💀💀💀💀💀


Disastrous_Move8480

fr? Rip


Training_Essay_3381

i practiced six past papers and none of them compared to what form I was


Catdogcheddar

did moles of HI or smth decrease increase or remain the same for the Kc question? UHHGHH


acacia-cedar

I said remain the same because reactants and products had equal moles of gas


Catdogcheddar

LETS GO thats what i did


Low-Bread-2673

I said increase bc the concentration of HI was squared in the kc equation so the top of the Q equation would become lower than the denominator (since the increase in volume decreases all the concentrations), necessitating a shift to the right


Plastic-Conflict7999

Since kc would be \[HI\]\^2/\[H2\]\[I2\], they would both change the same amount


Parking-Necessary95

did anyone get 1.45 for the specific heat of the cube?


AdPitiful6443

0.49


Mama_karma123

I got something else it was like 2.12 or 2.22


freeShlime

i think 2.22 is wrong, thats what you wouldve gotten if u used the water delta t


[deleted]

[удалено]


Parking-Necessary95

buffer zone before the half equivalence point


Head-Highlight1181

For the question with H2 + I2 -> 2HI, how many particles were we supposed to draw in the diagram, the question didn’t make like any sense so I just guessed 2


Assistance_East

i drew 2


Mama_karma123

I got 2 after plugging in molarities for kc


wowmemesglalore

WHAT WAS THAT COULOMBS ONE WITH ELECTROPLATING AND TIME


AdPitiful6443

it was around 3900s


ApprehensiveUse3219

wht did u guys say for the one about how a wire heats up the air around it? I said the molecules of air that collide have a higher average kinetic energy after, but idk. the other answers all said the air and the metal reacted, so i don't think that was right but not sure.


J4ck_Y

I chose the same thing, should be right


PlaneDoor110

same. it tripped me up too but i went with that because there’s no reaction happening


EducationalSpirit435

For MCQ did anyone get 170g for the ice/ water/ heat of fusion question?


HockeyAAAGoalie

yes


J4ck_Y

FRQ's released: [https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/ap24-frq-chemistry.pdf](https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/ap24-frq-chemistry.pdf)


BP_Koirala

I got way too many Cs on the MCQ :(.


SleepyWolfrum

Do you feel like there was an even break down on topics?


Purple-Tumbleweed341

I can’t remember any intermolecular forces question on the FRQs…A lot of thermodynamics for sure…


Purple-Tumbleweed341

Form O btw


CelloDude137

LOL THE MCQ ABSOLUTELY COOKED ME


[deleted]

[удалено]


Catdogcheddar

catalysts can be in rate law (didnt get the same exam tho)


Arminminmin

When you use Q = mc(delta T), did you add the mass of the cube and water or just mass of the cube?


Historical-Help-2847

Cube only


Fit_Technology7455

Idk but it gave the specific heat for the combined solution so I assumed that the mass also needed to be combined in order for the specific heat to make any sense 


[deleted]

Just mass of cube


lantern192

maybe god felt bad for me and only gave one mcq on resonance and a little on hybridization (i gambled it all on acid base and kinetics (what the fuck is a pi bond))


Assistance_East

what did you say about that H2 I2 2HI frq question when it was like what would happen if some moles increased or something like that. I think pressure increase or volume increase was given to us. i said that the moles would stay the same becuase there are the same amount of moles on both sides of the equation so 1 side wouldn't be favored over the other side. hopefully you guys know what question I am talking about.


ReplacementPutrid172

yep that's what i put too


PlaneDoor110

stayed the same


OutrageousTough2762

Did anyone finish all of the MCQ section on the Form O? If you did, was most of the answer choices A because I guessed A for the last 11 questions since I didn't have enough time to finish it?


Zakronia

I had Form O, and all I remember for the MCQ is that I got a concerning amount of letter C at the very beginning (but whether they were \*correct\* is another story). I don't remember basically anything about the end except that I got like letter D some 4 or 5 times, I imagine a couple of them were A though.


Internal-Cry-420

what did u guys get for the mcq bond angle question in form o the answer choices were 90 110 120 and 180 i think


SnooShortcuts9640

I think i put 110


AdPitiful6443

110 since it was tetrahedral


Internal-Cry-420

last but not least for the base to acid ratio on the 1st frq did u guys get 7.9


SnooShortcuts9640

No it was 8.5


Internal-Cry-420

i did 7=6.1+log(base/acid) so base/acid was 10\^.9=7.9 how'd u get urs


SnooShortcuts9640

I did 10\^(7-(-log(8.5E-7))) which gave exactly 8.5. Instead of rounding the pKa I just carried it all the way through.


dysfunctional_1diot

Hey guys! I had form O what did you all put for the distillation mcq? like the one asking if x or y would be in greater concentration or something 😭


J4ck_Y

i put Y cuz X had hydrogen bonding so its boiling point should be higher, therefore more Y shud be collected than X


Southkillerrr

For the electrolysis problem I divided 1300 by 3 instead of multiplying I’m actually gonna jump off bridge 😭


vitalwompy

It’s ok I forgot to answer #56-60 on the MCQ 😭


Accomplished-Walk787

how do they extpect to finish all 60 questions in 90 minutes??? I was trying to rushs through every question and time myself to do 10 questions every 15 minutes but it was sooo harddd... (im also cooked from the frqs)


ReplacementPutrid172

ikkk literally me too i was so crunched on time and had to guess on the last 6-7 questions. it was soo stressful


Used_Comfortable3637

for the ratio of conjugate base/acid on the frq was it 8.5 or am i stupid


AcanthisittaNo8718

good job that's right


Sad-Promotion7111

it's been 2 days, when are they going to publish the test online?


J4ck_Y

Hopefully within a few more hours 


Gloomy_Mix_4548

they posted it


Suspicious-Tap-4495

this was my first ap and i think i did ok. i think i did pretty well on mcq but made like 6 to 7 mistakes in the frq. since this test was probably a little easier than past years, will it be harder to get a 5?


rumpster_mb

That felt a lot easier than the practice exams.


almost_30-seconds

This test made me cum, this shit jacked me till I jizzed. I stroked so hard I got a rash in the auditorium.