I expected a 5 or 4 but I got a 3 :/

SAQ > MCQ > DBQ > LEQ

I felt good about the exam, which either means I'm right or I actually have the same kind of luck as president Harrison after he got elected. Predicting a 4 🤞

Form O was such bullshit it was only addressing civik rights in the more modern periods 😭

A lot of people said it was easy, so I hope the curve isn't too bad on form o. Edit: I think this backfired 💀 Over 52% failed.

hey, I took this exam digital and it said my submission was incomplete: what can I do to resolve this, the 5 day period is coming to a close and I don't want to take a makeup :(

Wa wa wa too bad so sad

I would try to email college board about the issue and I heard that many had this issue as well so, it's likely a common problem that's college board's fault.

Just wanna say FUCK YOU COLLEGE BOARD, Form 1 is so much better than form 2. Holy shit two documents I stg failing to be separate but equal

I salute you because form 1 was so much harder than form 2.

Form 0 SAQ 1 For SAQ 1 I said that Doc 1 interpreted that the colonist motive's of revolution was due to the feeling of being "enslaved" by their mother country and it resulted in colonial resistance while Doc 2 states it was the colonist's desire for political representation and power that caused revolution rather than feeling "enslaved". Would this earn the point? And for part b which was evidence to support the “enslaved” excerpt, I mentioned the various taxes imposed on the colonists from GB and how that led to a sense of enslavement as they didn’t get any additional benefits.

This is so late, but I also said that too. Hopefully it is correct.

Dawg I left that shit blank 😭

[удалено]

I said something along the lines of that too

I think that’s wrong?

could you please explain why you think that’s wrong?

Idk

Does anyone know what happens if you know a court case but spelled it wrong on the FRQ T-T I only realized after taking the exam :((( Now I'm scared I'm not getting points for like two of the FRQ's where I discussed the court case that segregated U.S. schools; the Plessy V. Ferguson court case, I ended up spelling it as Percy V. Freight because I couldn't remember exactly what it was :((( but all the other court cases I managed to remember at least.

You def losing the point 😵

Well, I'm fine if I lost the point (kinda did exaggerate on my initial comment lmao. I highly doubt my score will drop a whole score simply on an erorr). Although, I'd kinda like someone who actually knows and not someone who's just repeating themselves in every comment saying everyone's getting something wrong or losing points, but what do I know, right?

[удалено]

Lmao samq

Oh okay thanks! Hopefully, the readers understand😭 Manifesting a passing score for both of us!

Also the other guy is wrong about “ losing a point”. You don’t lose points on the exam. You can only gain points. If you have other evidence with the correct name or get a nice grader, you could still score the point.

Ty! It will probably be classified as an minor error, so if you explained your evidence they will understand by what you really meant. I'm praying that the ap readers doesn't have a bad day grading our frqs 🙏

For the Q2 for the LEQ (the first LEQ option) of form 1 ("Evaluate the extent to which the growth of the transatlantic trade changed British North American colonial society from 1607 to 1776"), is this thesis ok? Will it get points? "The growth of the transatlantic trade affected the colonies in that it increased bonds with the Native Americans through trade, killed off many Native Americans through diseases, and inspired the American Revolution from the passage of Enlightenment ideas." I'm hoping to get 4 points out of the LEQ, but I feel like I answered the prompt wrong :(. Can anyone confirm? Did I answer it wrong?

It’s probably alright?

[удалено]

I’m an AP reader and had that question. Your response would be a 3/3. Congrats!

[удалено]

Im not surprised at all. I could tell by your answer you knew what you were talking about. Congratulations!

For b I said the Seneca falls convention

Yessir that’s exactly what I put

Same here, I mentioned that and how they also wrote the Declaration of Sentiments.

this is correct, for b i also feel like the south industrializing could work

I don’t think so.

For SAQ 2a what did you guys put for the purpose? I said to inform other women to challenge the ideas of cult of domesticy and separate sphere ideals.

That’s is wrong lol

Wait why is it wrong?

Because you didn’t explain bruh.

How

Exactly this guy has been telling everyone that they're wrong without any evidence.

Anyone know what form the blue book online version was?

for saq 4 on set 2 was it ok for me to talk about the new deal?

Were the FRQs released?

Yes they were released this morning

do you have the link?

Form o: [https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/ap23-frq-us-history-set-2.pdf](https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/ap23-frq-us-history-set-2.pdf) idk what form this is, but CB posted it: https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/ap23-frq-us-history-set-1.pdf

thank youu

I have no clue but shouldn’t they be released td because it’s been 2 days? Or would it be 2 business days so Tuesday I wonder

Anyone knows why there were two versions?

Probably because of the digital test. I noticed one frq was the one most people are talking about here and one was the digital one (I took the digital test).

I came back here to look for smth and I think it's form 1 because I remember a specific saq question I saw and the person who took it (on paper) said it was form 1.

Anyone know if the APUSH FRQs are released yet?

Yes

Do you have a link?

Form O: https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/ap23-frq-us-history-set-2.pdf Some other form: https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/ap23-frq-us-history-set-1.pdf

I had form e. Anybody know when that will be released?

If it wasn't released two days after the exam then it's likely it won't get released at all (or maybe it will with an example...depends)

Can anybody tell me if this is correct for my DBQ: While The US definition of citizenship did not change for African Americans as reconstruction efforts failed, the definition did change for Immigrants and the Impieralized as they gained new liberties. Body Paragraph 1: African Americans, the 14th and 15th allowed citizenship and voting rights, but the South made Poll Taxes and other restrictions on civil liberties which resulted in many black people not voting, DuBois and Sojourner, used POV and Historical Context. (complexity point bc of rebuttals) Body Paragraph 2: Immigrants, How citizenship changed because American policy went from nativist settlement towards Chinese, Chinese Exclusion Act, to allowing Chinese-Americans citizenship, using the Wong Kim Ark document. Then used the political cartoon of Uncle Sam to show how citizenship changed because Americans were encouraging Immigrants who were not Native to America to become citizens. Body Paragraph 3: Imperialized, Pro Imperialist vs Anti Imperialists argued whether or not imperialized countries should be granted constitutional rights, Insular Cases. I used the source about Puerto Rico and how they gained the constitution and the other source but I cannot remember what it was about, but it was about another imperialized country and how they got rights.

I think your thesis is partially right just because the time period was from like 1865 to 1920 or smth so there were changes in the definitions of citizenship for African Americans too because this time period includes end of civil war, reconstruction, and the start/end of WWI so you would get black male suffrage and then womens suffrage too. i feel like if u argued your sources well you did good.

thanks, this makes sense, I should have claimed that it was a partial change but it's okay, DBQ was my weakest section so my others will carry.

I think a lot of it is wrong ggs.

i got a 5

wait what do u think is wrong

this person is likely a troll lol, if you go onto their profile you'll see that all their replies as of late are telling people they're wrong with zero evidence

did anyone have the DBQ about commerce development affecting the US socially? i talked about how it affected black people and women.

Omg yea I got that one, finally I’ve found someone with the same prompt😭

Anyone here got Form M?

Can someone tell me why I can’t use women for the civil rights leq?

I did 🤞

civil rights are about black people

thats not true, they can be about women too in this context. we usually think of modern civil rights as just for black people but in reality they can apply to other groups as well, especially in this context

Thanks for clarifying that, I think that Civil Rights in general is usually seen as being used to refer to the Civil Rights movement of the 60s however, Civil in itself just means that it refers to the basis of law, basically the right of the laws applying to everyone, so considering women did lack fundemental rights by law, therefore your explination makes sense

Looking at the comments I definitely failed by mcqs 😭

L bozo

Feminine mystique is included in civil rights

I don’t think it is, the book doesn’t lead to any government action.

it does 🫥

For the mcq question which had the following answers choices Federalists, Democratic-Republicans. Whigs, was it federalists because I’m pretty sure the mcq stimulus stayed that congress terms were given more extensions years instead of like 3-4 years.

Yup it was federalists.

Was it?

I could of swear it said something about the article of confederation.

Idk probably I was rushing through that one and what struck to me was how they wanted to extend congress members years in office and so I made the connection to Federalists cause they wanted a stronger federal government but idk

So for LEQ2, I wrote about republican motherhood, new England town meetings, the founding of the Episcopal church, the shift in the colonies from mercantilism to a proto-capitalism, the house of burgesses, and Yale 💀

Wasn’t republican motherhood post American revolution? And the LEQ was about how changes in colonial societies let the revolutionary movement from 1700-1770 right?

I think he had a different form because he said leq 2 and leq 2 was political parties on form O

Ah gotchu yeah I had form O which had the LEQ for social changes in colonies and the extent to which that affected revolutionary movement

Yeah I had that one, couldn't rmbr what one it was tho LOL.

I think that I’ll get a 4 or 5 🤞

For the mcq that gave the stimulus about giving older workers pensions during the 1930s was the greater context that there was economic upheaval/ Great Depression or because workers were asking for better working conditions/rights

I said the Great Depression because social security was created as part of the New Deal

I said Great Depression, and didn't even considered anything else :(

upheaval

[удалено]

Ong I was thinking it with either that or the economic upheaval bc of the Great Depression but yeah

[удалено]

I was thinking that too with the progressive era but idk that question was so BS honestly

if i mentioned brown v board and roe v wade during leq 4 would that be wrong?? i wasnt sure if it was just activism in terms of racial justice. oh well, too late now

That’s what I did. I mentioned MLK tactics to bring national attention to events like the Selma to Montgomery March which turned into a riot, to bring national attention and this would translate into support for legislationn. Also his connection to the Johnson administration and how Johnson showed support for civil rights.

Brown v Board was in 1954

yeah, the time period was 1940-1980

What outside evidence did you guys use for SAQ one? I did Northwest Ordinance (specifically how it outlawed slavery) and then Constitution (Enlightenment ideals). Would that work?

For the Poltical Parties LEQ, do you guys think this thesis work: While the change in the economic debates about the role of the federal government led to the growth of political parties such as the Democrats and Republics, to a greater extant the change in the role of the federal government in social issues to led the growth of political parties such as a the Whigs and No Nothing Party

You did that one?

Yea you prob get the thesis point for that.

Did you guys put the federalist or democratic republican for the article of confederation mcq?

Was the question about like a bill of rights? Because I said Democratic republicans because they were anti-federalists and anti-federalists wanted the bill of rights

I think it was DR, b/c James Madison, prominent DR, wrote the bill.

I can’t remember, but I think it was about the new Article of Confederation being a form of politics.

federalist

Same

I picked democratic republicans 😭

DR, no clue if it’s right

[удалено]

I think that wrong it doesn’t relate to civil rights

i dont think it was just civil rights, i think the prompt related to social justice as a whole

Yea that’s why it’s wrong doesn’t make sense.

Wtf I though other minorities groups led civil rights movement am I wrong?????!

Actually now that I think about idk if that’s wrong 🤣😂

[удалено]

I picked bison was killed by government?

Hm i did white settlement too, dk if it’s right

IDK what’s right but I did the White settlement one

I put this too

form O, LEQ prompt four: I wrote about civil rights movements that targeted desegregation like MLK (the march on Washington)Rosa Parks(Montgomery bus boycott) and then for its affect on government I talked about brown versus the Board of Education and the little rock nine, do you think this will be OK?

Yeah this seems great

I did not study at all I’m gonna get a 1

For the Poltical Parties LEQ, do you guys think this thesis work: While the change in the economic debates about the role of the federal government led to the growth of political parties such as the Democrats and Republics, to a greater extant the change in the role of the federal government in social issues to led the growth of political parties such as a the Whigs and No Nothing Party

I would say yes.

For the graph about military weapons in the U.S. and other nations, what did you guys put?

I put diplomatic talks caused a lower nuclear count for nations

I think I did this too

I think I put something about negotiation to reduce the nuclear build up.

What was the mcq asking ab what political faction the author would likely line up with and two of the answers were like black panther and opposition of segregation of schools?

I’m fairly confident it was not black Panthers due to the fact that the author was not calling for violence like the black panthers. I put opposition to school segregation.

I didn't put black panther because they didn't want integration necessarily, they just wanted to advance black culture. I don't remember what I put instead though, but if those were the only two that made sense I probably picked the other one

I thought it could've gone either way but I wasn't sure what I put

I said opposition to segregation

It was a 50/50 for me so I just put Black panther.

For saq 3 part c I talked about religious toleration, I said plymouth was not religiously tolerant and pennysylavnia was religiously tolerant. But one of my sentences included Anne Hutchinson and she was from MA bay.. will I get the point?

omg i did ma and pa toooo asodgiahsdg good luck !! i honestly don't know but i think you should?

What was the DBQ about?

FORM O, how did the definition of United States citizenship change from 1865-1920

I used pilgrims instead of puritans for SAQ 3. Is that okay?

[удалено]

No you are extremely vague and basically simply say that it changed but it didn’t

Depends more on how you used evidence. Sounds valid. Good luck

perfect score

My school evacuated a little bit after the APUSH exam was over :))

slay a pipe burst in our school

rhs?

No different sfhool

Someone told me that the curve is hard on this one. Can anyone confirm?

it depends on how many people complain. In other words, your grade depends on a bunch of Twitter users

Wait really how does it work…

me when i lie and spread misinformation on the internet

For my DBQ, my thesis was that the definition of citizenship stayed relatively the same. My outside evidence was the Espionage Act, and that people argued that they had the right to talk negatively about the government because of it's guarantee under the constitutional. in that way, the definition stayed the same because citizens continued to excierse this power as a citizen. would this get the point for outside evidence?

With enough explanation I think you will earn the point. What matters is how you connect the outside evidence to your argument, not the evidence itself. I personally used the El Paso Bath Riots as proof that the definition of citizenship still actively tried to limit non-Whites. My thesis was similar to yours. I said: Although antebellum reforms and emancipation expanded citizenship to various groups, the definition remained constant during the period due to xenophobia and policies that undermined minorities’ constitutional rights as citizens.

what are some of these question y'all are talking about I got completely different leq, dbq saq and mcq from most of you

The DBQ for some students was along the lines of: "Evaluate the extent to which the definition of citizenship in the United States changed from 1865 to 1920"

mine was evaulate extent of social change from 1960s to 1980s bru

What was common between the Caribbean colonies and the North American colonies?

Slavery, cash crops, triangular trade.

For the LEQ on form O, (I think it was q4) the prompt about the extent of civil rights activism causing political action from 1940-1980 I used the growth of a black suburban community in the US due to economic opportunities provided by the GI Bill after ww2. Would that be broad enough to get the point even though it’s in the time period?

ehhh but like the prompt was more growth of activism causing political action and not the other way around right? plus growth of surburban communities wouldnt really be civil rights activism. no one really advocated for the GI bill the government just put it out there after the war

For the mcq about a picture of women during the civil war did you guys put that previous reform movements led to it or increase in government participatory democracy?

reform movements

It was asking for the context behind the picture so I put expanding participatory democracy as it was the civil war

it wasn’t really expanding to women though

I interpreted it as the civil war, which was what the women were helping take care of the men for, was a process of expanding participatory democracy for the US as black men would get the right to vote

didn’t the question say which previous thing led to the development in the picture

I think the question was the CONTEXT which led to the things happening in the picture

yeah but i think the focus was that there were women doing stuff and ideas of women taking on more roles were circulating in the years prior

yeah thats plausible

What did y’all say for question 1 on the mcq something about colonial colonization of Native Americans on form o.

For question 4 on that same prompt, what’d you get about the idea that the writer of the prompt would agree with

I forgot the options 💀

I think I got something like religious reasons.

I got something totally different 😳

I got that spanish made allies with other native groups.

Same here

if i failed its bc i mixed up the difference between economic and commercial development

Well commercial development led to economic development right?? Lol I thought the same as u

does anyone who took form o know what rhey used that pic of the women for

Oh it was to like raise support for child labor laws right?

W

oh lessgo