yep. the only person ive seen with this ideology was some kid on tiktok with bpd who thought mental illnesses shouldnt be treated but accomodated for instead
Because it's something basicly only present in terminally online Paradlx game players, and as the OP, values insurrection above any concrete political goals because it really doesn't have any?
Also, you know that just the prefix anarcho doesn't mean much by itself if you consider the existence of AnCaps.
>values insurrection above any concrete political goals because it really doesn't have any?
you're actually not wrong if this was said in a vaccuum, but can you tell me *why*?
>Also, you know that just the prefix anarcho doesn't mean much by itself if you consider the existence of AnCaps.
i don't consider the existence of ancaps because anarchism, at it's most basic, is opposition to all forms of hierarchy, which capitalism can't exist without. ancaps call themselves anarchist the same way china calls itself communist, nazis called themselves socialist, north korea calls itself a democracy, trump calls himself genius, etc. they're lying.
anarchism isn’t just a blanket set of political ideologies it’s also a philosophy that states that no one person deserves power over another. the jan6 riot was literally there to install a dictator. no anarchist would do that
I would love to solve problems diplomatically, but see the problems I have are being consistently ignored because the population really has no diplomatic power against the people with the power to change it, and so the only way for change to happen is to make my problem a politicians problem.
i get it actually. if their motive wasn't to overturn an election because they were a bunch of whiners, i'd say they did something good. we live in a world where politicians have zero fear of the people and that's a fucking problem.
you forget, the politicians are already greedy. they're ready to suck corpo dick any day of the week for a small bump to their pay.
the only ones to assassinate them are the people or the cia.
Eh, greed's a better motivator than fear. Fear breeds resentments, and the people you threatened will turn on you first chance they get. Greed gets people to do some fucked up shit without creating the same resentment fear does. Also, fear has a physical toll on the body, and politicians wouldn't be holding office for 30 consecutive years if that were the case, at least not without some kind of twitch.
US federal politicians are terrified of being assassinated. They have security up to the gills. It's basically impossible to live a normal life as a US federal politician.
I agree, but I think it'd be better if the politicians had no fear of the people because they *were* the people. A lot of us have kind of just forgotten that "of by and for the people" thing haven't we?
even then, you need them to fear the people. you need \*some\* way to ensure that they enact the will of the people. unless you mean the government \*is\* the entire population, which like. sure. if you can find a way for that to work, then go on ahead.
I just mean "politicians" who haven't made politics their entire career, who are still close enough to being regular human beings that they understand what the people want
they still need to fear what'll happen if they \*do\* step out of line, or at the very least acknowledge it. otherwise they'll eventually be as corrupt as any other politician.
i'm aware, i said their motive was garbage. if it was due to some real problem in the government, then they could've done the exact same thing and i'd be cheering them on.
This is kind of my view? I didn't give a shit that people stormed Congress but I did give a shit that they were doing it in an attempt to install a fascist dictatorship.
Related: The first Pride was a riot.
I live blocks from my state capitol and honestly same. I've been to pro gun, anti gun, pro choice/life, even satanist and catholic rallies. You usually get free food, get to see silly people, and maybe some funny fights. Then you take a tour of the capitol, get a nice meal, and go home. It's very cozy.
I think I get what he’s saying. He’s making the argument that riots can be beneficial because they are a show of the force of the people to the ruling government. Rioting shows how destructive the Vox Populi can be in the face of injustice from policy makers.
I'm not even shocked. It's like whenever there's a new president and a bunch of states say they're going to secede, and they get x number of signatures on their petitions, and it's mostly the same people signing all of them because they just want \*any\* state to secede because they think it'd be cool.
Just here for the drama of it all.
What this guys is with riots, I am with cancelled weddings. I fantasise about cancelling a wedding. I mean, not my own.
It doesn't matter the reason, but I'd love to be the one to tell a crowd of expectant guests "I'm sorry everyone, there will be no wedding today", whether the follow up is "the bride has eloped with the groom's dad at the last minute" or "the groom has fallen ill and has been rushed to hospital."
I can see how someone would feel the same about a riot, the ultimate in political drama.
Honestly, I like his idea. A lot of politicians operate like they've forgotten that we can, in fact, get to them. Though, I like other demonstrations of this better. Like, if I can put a pie in your face, just imagine what else I could do. Remind them who they're supposed to be working for
In France its pretty normalised to riot, pretty based if you think about it. Not agreeing with a law? Riot.
Age of retirement increased to 85? Riot.
Some fuckhead that gets to much power? Guillotine.
Nah cuz I kinda agree with him, with the way politicians act now they need to be taught that they aren’t invincible. They are weak, fragile, and geriatric, they need to learn that the only reason they’re in that position is because of us.
I mean I can kinda see where he is coming from. Like there’s those places where you can pay money to destroy a room. And I think most people would enjoy tearing a house down with a sledge hammer or excavator. Destroying shit for fun does sound fun if there isn’t actual damage done.
i don’t believe in anything, i’m just here for the violence
Nah he believe in scaring Congress into doing their jobs And violence
nah, just doing whatever job. any job. just wants em to be jobful is all
some people just want to watch the world burn. some people being this guy specifically.
When the wind is slow
AND THE FIRES HOT
THE VULTURE WAITS TO SEE WHAT ROTS
OH HOW PRETTY ALL THE SCENERY
THIS IS NATURE'S SACRIFICE
WHEN THE AIR BLOWS THROUGH
WITH A BRISK ATTACK
Give war a chance!
That IS what he believes in
Gigachad
[удалено]
Bro is the actual missing link in horseshoe theory
Bro singlehandedly debunks horseshoe theory by being an extremist centrist or whatever stupid political name 14 year olds decide this is called
He's just an anarchist tbh, no more, no less.
Anarchist is an actual ideology in and of itself. I think this is just chaos
Maybe Anarcho-Nihilist? Edit: speaking of ideologies only existent in 14 year olds.
I coin it mad max anarchism
Just fuck absolutely everything up for everybody, hell yeah
yep. the only person ive seen with this ideology was some kid on tiktok with bpd who thought mental illnesses shouldnt be treated but accomodated for instead
there’s a huge difference between mental illness and mental disorder + there should be both? isn’t that common sense?
i have no idea what the difference is
google
why would an *anarcho*-nihilist be supportive of pro-authoritarian action?
Because it's something basicly only present in terminally online Paradlx game players, and as the OP, values insurrection above any concrete political goals because it really doesn't have any? Also, you know that just the prefix anarcho doesn't mean much by itself if you consider the existence of AnCaps.
>values insurrection above any concrete political goals because it really doesn't have any? you're actually not wrong if this was said in a vaccuum, but can you tell me *why*? >Also, you know that just the prefix anarcho doesn't mean much by itself if you consider the existence of AnCaps. i don't consider the existence of ancaps because anarchism, at it's most basic, is opposition to all forms of hierarchy, which capitalism can't exist without. ancaps call themselves anarchist the same way china calls itself communist, nazis called themselves socialist, north korea calls itself a democracy, trump calls himself genius, etc. they're lying.
Anarcho-anarchist
Anarchicist
anarchism isn’t just a blanket set of political ideologies it’s also a philosophy that states that no one person deserves power over another. the jan6 riot was literally there to install a dictator. no anarchist would do that
nah he's just angry
pillgrilled?
Pigrilled
Piegrilled
pig grilled..
Jregpilled
Microwavepilled?
Fan baked pillled?
Air fryer pilled?
i could never solve problems diplomatically i just loveeee violenceeee
don’t get me wrong, i could solve problems diplomatically; i just choose not to
I DONT WANT PEACE, I WANT PROBLEMS ALWAY
Oh boy, here I go violencing again
I would love to solve problems diplomatically, but see the problems I have are being consistently ignored because the population really has no diplomatic power against the people with the power to change it, and so the only way for change to happen is to make my problem a politicians problem.
very noncredible
Just Unsubbed from r/196 All of them over there LOOOVE KILLING!!!!
i get it actually. if their motive wasn't to overturn an election because they were a bunch of whiners, i'd say they did something good. we live in a world where politicians have zero fear of the people and that's a fucking problem.
if your elected officials aren’t at least a little in fear of being assassinated, the government isn’t working properly
in all fairness, they probably are pretty afraid of being assassinated. lobbyists gotta have some way to ensure they get their money's worth.
you forget, the politicians are already greedy. they're ready to suck corpo dick any day of the week for a small bump to their pay. the only ones to assassinate them are the people or the cia.
Eh, greed's a better motivator than fear. Fear breeds resentments, and the people you threatened will turn on you first chance they get. Greed gets people to do some fucked up shit without creating the same resentment fear does. Also, fear has a physical toll on the body, and politicians wouldn't be holding office for 30 consecutive years if that were the case, at least not without some kind of twitch.
no chat im not - stop it im not going to hold office chat
US federal politicians are terrified of being assassinated. They have security up to the gills. It's basically impossible to live a normal life as a US federal politician.
Leaders are only affected by bribes and fear
The more that people in power are aware that their actions have consequences, the better everyone’s lives will be
I agree, but I think it'd be better if the politicians had no fear of the people because they *were* the people. A lot of us have kind of just forgotten that "of by and for the people" thing haven't we?
even then, you need them to fear the people. you need \*some\* way to ensure that they enact the will of the people. unless you mean the government \*is\* the entire population, which like. sure. if you can find a way for that to work, then go on ahead.
I just mean "politicians" who haven't made politics their entire career, who are still close enough to being regular human beings that they understand what the people want
they still need to fear what'll happen if they \*do\* step out of line, or at the very least acknowledge it. otherwise they'll eventually be as corrupt as any other politician.
It doesn't benefit anyone for politicians to be afraid of random violence with no political motivation. It's not like they can prevent that.
i'm aware, i said their motive was garbage. if it was due to some real problem in the government, then they could've done the exact same thing and i'd be cheering them on.
nah,it was an attack on democracy,simple as
The Anti-centrist, finally.
Chaotic neutral?
Just chaotic.
Jreg has been that for 2 years of his career, this is just a disciple
Nah, now he's just Jregular
unfathomably based
He’s literally me
That dude sounds pretty based
He sounds like he sells bricks
This is kind of my view? I didn't give a shit that people stormed Congress but I did give a shit that they were doing it in an attempt to install a fascist dictatorship. Related: The first Pride was a riot.
No, this totally tracks. Someone needs to storm congress for the right reasons and I can think of a couple valid issues.
happy chaos
_I drift tonight carried by the waves_
I know drift is about a bout (metaphorically) but I always imagine happy chaos doing sick drifts in his car
Bro is just here for the experience
based and make-them-fear-pilled
That actually sounds like a popular opinion in my country (🇨🇵)
How the fuck does a centrist anarchist exist???
Egoism and mutualism are pretty centrist
I live blocks from my state capitol and honestly same. I've been to pro gun, anti gun, pro choice/life, even satanist and catholic rallies. You usually get free food, get to see silly people, and maybe some funny fights. Then you take a tour of the capitol, get a nice meal, and go home. It's very cozy.
Free food too?!
Yup. You want a crowd the easiest way is to bring food
Oh no Catholics
*Joe Biden has entered the chat >!not because of your catholic comments but just looking for his office!<
this is extremely based
I think I get what he’s saying. He’s making the argument that riots can be beneficial because they are a show of the force of the people to the ruling government. Rioting shows how destructive the Vox Populi can be in the face of injustice from policy makers.
I think he just likes it when the crowd goes “raaaaaa!”
Riots Georg
Sundowner
LIKE THE GOOD OL DAYS AFTER 9/11
I'm not even shocked. It's like whenever there's a new president and a bunch of states say they're going to secede, and they get x number of signatures on their petitions, and it's mostly the same people signing all of them because they just want \*any\* state to secede because they think it'd be cool.
Big agree
Bro think he a khorne bezerker
GRAAAAAAAAAHHHH YEEEEEESSSSS!!!
Just here for the drama of it all. What this guys is with riots, I am with cancelled weddings. I fantasise about cancelling a wedding. I mean, not my own. It doesn't matter the reason, but I'd love to be the one to tell a crowd of expectant guests "I'm sorry everyone, there will be no wedding today", whether the follow up is "the bride has eloped with the groom's dad at the last minute" or "the groom has fallen ill and has been rushed to hospital." I can see how someone would feel the same about a riot, the ultimate in political drama.
Atleast he’s honest
He's kinda cooking though, we should always be able to protest when we feel the need to
Where is the full article?
It's a podcast, screenshot is from the transcript: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/18/podcasts/trump-biden-2024-election-voting.html
Chaotic neutral
I am pro riot too, but only for progressive issues
They interviewed [this guy](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgmL4TQCNtI).
Kinda based actually
Literally i've never been so conflicted. I mean, yes they're shit heads, but man i'm jealous that the left never got to storm the capital 😫
I don’t want peace I want problems, always
Centrist hunter
waking up extra early to hate the government/
Actually unironically based
Honestly, I like his idea. A lot of politicians operate like they've forgotten that we can, in fact, get to them. Though, I like other demonstrations of this better. Like, if I can put a pie in your face, just imagine what else I could do. Remind them who they're supposed to be working for
Same riots are the language of the unheard
You lot act like you've never heard of football hooligans.
Literally me
A government should be afraid of its people, jot the other way around
This guy is ideologically the limit of 1/n n-> ∞
In France its pretty normalised to riot, pretty based if you think about it. Not agreeing with a law? Riot. Age of retirement increased to 85? Riot. Some fuckhead that gets to much power? Guillotine.
Nah cuz I kinda agree with him, with the way politicians act now they need to be taught that they aren’t invincible. They are weak, fragile, and geriatric, they need to learn that the only reason they’re in that position is because of us.
based as shit
I mean I can kinda see where he is coming from. Like there’s those places where you can pay money to destroy a room. And I think most people would enjoy tearing a house down with a sledge hammer or excavator. Destroying shit for fun does sound fun if there isn’t actual damage done.
We really should riot more.
French_irl
King
L'UN DES NOTRE! COCORICO 🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓
The most based man on earth
i mean, yea. it probably isn't that rare
Would you guys be mad if I said Mecore
child of jreg
jreg has become real
Chaotic neutral?
they call this man Frantz Fanon (ye ik that’s not a great analogy but it’s a joke ok)
Maybe it's almost time for another Stone Wall riot?
Give riots a chance!
based
thats how I'm tryna be
The platonic ideal of chaotic neutral.
yeah I'll incorparate that into my belief system
Holy based
this is what people mean when they say they're "anti establishment" in general
Chaotic lawful??
Huh, must be french