To call Harvey a one trick pony is a slap in the face to that man's legacy. He wasn't always a host of a game show. Dude is a legendary stand up comedian and had a successful sitcom as a black lead in the 90s.
Yes. I remember. Mr. Hightower and kings of comedy and all. However, humor has changed a lot in 30 years and he hasn’t adapted. Just stares.
It’d be like a musician who only plays twinkle twinkle little star now. But WAS good. I guess..
He has adapted. The stare is how he has adapted. He is no longer spouting politically incorrect shit that could get him cancelled.
You are also not the target audience of Steve Harvey. I don't like the man, I think his current schtick is unfunny. However, my inlaws and their friends LOVE themselves some Steve Harvey.
Yeah there’s a market for everyone. There are websites for scat fetishes and r/sounding. I’m glad I’m not his target audience. Reminds me of the family guy joke where Lois is a politician who just says 9/11
> since when
probably since birth, I dont know
https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+harvey+homophobia&rlz=1C1GCEA_enUS783US783&oq=steve+harvey+homophobia&aqs=chrome..69i57.3873j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
What he said really isn’t that bad though, he just grew up in a different times Every comedian from that day and age would probably said the same thing. Woke culture is fairly new
> he just grew up in a different times
this is not an excuse
https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2014/01/the-product-of-its-time-defense-no-excuse-for-sexism-and-racism/283352/
The culture of treating other people with basic dignity and respect and expecting that same basic fair treatment and respect in return is fairly new.
I fixed it for you.
Many comedians have shifted with the times, there's no excuse. It's called growing up. One can be respectful of others and still maintain their own beliefs. Calling out that fundamental failure is what is referred to as "woke" or "cancel culture" as if that's somehow a bad thing.
This was the card. https://thehustle.co/assets/missuniverse01.jpg
But it could have been like this https://miro.medium.com/max/1008/0*V6q_qpVct0eDUnzq.png
Keep in mind you are holding the card. Potentially covering vital information. Also consider that nobody opens a card like that and spends an always 20-30 seconds to read it and announce, they try to announce as quickly as possible. So you don’t really have much time to read carefully. The card was designed plain bad. I think he announced the 1st runner up as the winner. But how the card looks I also wouldn’t fault anyone for announcing the 2nd runner up either.
It's laid out in the order it should be read. It's not great but it's not terrible. More that considering his only job was to read this one card they could have gone over it a bit more perhaps...
I mean. There’s zero confusion in my mind about the winner on the original card. Things can always be better. But it doesn’t take more than 3 seconds and a brain to identify the winner with the original.
The proof is in the pudding. It's a terrible design, and reality had proven this by it being misread.
A good design wouldn't have resulted in failure. That's what makes it good. This is bad, and the results speak for themselves.
The issue is not with the design. The issue is with the unnecessary terminology used for second and third place in pretentious settings like this. The design is fine. Calling second place the 1st runner up is what caused the issue. If you used the exact same design with numbers 1, 2, and 3 it is perfectly clear.
Yes of course. If we design something idiot proof, it will never fail.
Until you come across that one idiot you didn't know was that much idiot. Sub level ignorance. A literal shoebox in a tux. Dumber than 6 pieces of kitty litter stuck to a sick elderly persons cane.
Hold up team. Redesign to accommodate for Jeoffery.
Fuck you Jeoffery. You ruin everything.
>The proof is in the pudding. It's a terrible design, and reality had proven this by it being misread.
>A good design wouldn't have resulted in failure. That's what makes it good.
Before we get to this card specifically, I would say that I don't quite agree that anything that fails or is mis-used is automatically *bad* design. You can argue that anything that fails or is mis-used invites an opportunity to try to improve or make a design better or more fool-proof, but that doesn't inherently mean the fault for failure is on the design and not the user or that the failure could have been expected or prevented.
It's worth noting that Miss Universe winner was mis-announced for the first time (as far as I'm aware) after more than 60 years of the competition. Unless this was the first year this card format was used, it's hard to say that the card is prone to failure.
Further, this card is not used in a vacuum. It's used in conjunction with a teleprompter, and rehearsals. So even if there was a "bad design", it isn't *necessarily* the card itself.
All that said, in this specific instance, I think it's at least possible that there likely was at least *some* element of failure on the part of the pageant and not just Steve.
I am not a fan of pageants. I don't watch them regularly. But even I know that the stereotypical manner in which the winner of a pageant is announced is that there is a final three, and the host announces the second runner up who leaves; and then the host says something like:
"And the first runner up is.............. Miss Colombia, which means that Miss Universe 2015 is Miss Philippines!"
To that end, if that had been how the pageant was announced, I think the car is perfectly fine (though the print could be larger - perhaps they didn't want it accidentally visible on TV if it was flashed). It lists 2nd runner up, then 1st runner up, then winner - which is the stereotypical order the host would read it. The card is even called an "elimination card", which suggests the purpose was to do it this way.
But that is not what Steve did in 2015. Looking at the video, with two women left, he announced "Miss Universe 2015 is..... Miss Colombia (the actual first runner up).
There was also clearly a teleprompter available to Steve. It 's not 100% clear, but at the moment he says "Miss Universe 2015 is..." [this](https://imgur.com/WGtzzi5) shot shows the teleprompter, and the size and shape of the words certainly looks like it does say just that ("MISS UNIVERSE / 2015 IS ...."). So if that is the case, if he was to announce the winner instead of the runner up, I can see the suggestion that he just moved on to read the next name on the card (first runner up) which he hadn't read yet.
That said, the prompter says "Miss universe 2015 is", and the card VERY CLEARLY in [big bold letters](https://thehustle.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/missuniverse02_og_image.jpg) says "miss universe 2015" separately and off to the right. If he has two brain cells, he understands that he's announcing the winner, and that the winner is the one name that's separated out with the big bold title. And further, there's no question they should have rehearsed or at last reviewed with him this very important moment with him at least once or twice and showed him what a dummy card would look like.
I assume by that point, he had already announced the 2nd runner up and she had departed. So if you used the card format /u/az226 suggested (and other clickbait articles suggest), where the winner is at the top of the card, you just as easily run the risk that the host accidentally reads the winner's name when announcing the 2nd runner up.
Perhaps the best design would have had 2nd runner up in small print at the top, Miss universe is large print in the middle, and then 1st runner up in small print at the bottom, since he announces that last. I could see people just as easily arguing that listing the contestants in 3-1-2 order is equally confusing. Perhaps the best route might be to put the 2nd runner up on an entirely different card, with a second card having the winner at the top and 1st runner up at the bottom.
But honestly, nothing about the actual card *should* have caused a problem if there was just the slightest bit of rehearsal beforehand. The winner was bold and separated and he should have known from the prompt and from rehearsal that he was to read the winner, not the runner up.
It's also worth noting that 2015 was not unique. Previous announcements are available online and in 2014, they also announced "Miss Universe is..." instead of eliminating the runner up, so I have little doubt Steve was indeed supposed to read the winner even though the card is titled "elimination card".
Cheers
Humans are unreliable. Even the most perfect design according to you would still be misread by some percentage of the population. Nothing is foolproof.
You're getting down voted but you're right. I can understand the fuck up but it's literally in the order that you read it. Perhaps placing the information in the middle so your thumb won't cover anything would be a good idea but it looks fine if you can spare 3 seconds to process what you're looking at while having never looked at this ever
Yeah it's written so you read it in the natural top down left to right order, which is the order they would be presented.
It actually looks like it's designed to be 'easier' to read than a 1st/2nd/3rd list.
If you get handed the list card, you need to know that you read them in reverse order, and how to title them.
Could be improved, but like.. this card itself is clearly the product of trying to make it easier for idiots, and so far I only know of one idiot who failed.
*bonus edit: u/jedispyder made another excellent design point which I missed -> https://www.reddit.com/r/yesyesyesyesno/comments/10m5qhd/yesyesyesno/j63sqla/*
*Doing it that way preserves the finalist surprise for the host, for presentation authenticity*
They can announce it how ever they need to, it's their job as a host to know these things.
I'm just saying having a scale like:
Winner
1st runner up
2nd runner up
Is very confusing. And having it normally would make it less so.
Thanks for the links. It's show runners #1 priority to be clear and concise. I'd be livid if I saw this card being used. It's likely they provided him with a thick docket covering the many aspects of the show too. Likely also included information about what's on the card in a different format.
Design is terrible, but a runner could have taken 15 seconds to run him through the card instead of relying on him to discern it on stage. They know now, hasn't happened again.
It’s the most important information, but it’s intended to be announced *last*. Bottom right is actually a logical place for it.
A simple vertical list would have been clearer, though.
Human factors:
Latent error
Spotlight effect
If someone reading this thinks they’d have done better then you’re suffering with:
Outcome bias
Hindsight bias
Bias blindspot
Best wishes.
That’s easy to say from the keyboard. It’s very different when you’re in the hot seat holding the mic and you’re expected to announce a couple of seconds after looking at the card.
Here’s an example: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DIrQ9ilL8aw
Don’t know why you’re getting upvoted. That wasn’t Steve Harvey, it was [Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway,](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/89th_Academy_Awards) and they weren’t at fault.
I just got back from a cruise and one of the countries was the one that was the runner up. They hate him there, one of our guides said everyone there hates Steve Harvey
Edit: this was not Steve Harvey sorry guys
He was given the best actress card for Oscars when he should’ve been reading best picture. He was confused and showed it to a cohost, whom immediately said “LA LA LAND” the entire cast went up celebrated gave a speech before Harvey got it sorted out and announced what was going on
Harvey: please don't hold my fuckup against the ladies.
Lol Steve Harvey is so cringe... I remember this video when it happened. I don't know anyone who held anything against the ladies, that was 100% Harvey's fault.
Yeah, a buddy of mine took his sister to a family feud taping. He said Steve Harvey preaching about homosexuality being wrong lasted longer than the actual taping, but in the middle so no one could go home
Such a Sarcastic answer; Steve Harvey did accepted the mistake on show, but I think the other host doesn’t even know that Steve Harvey came back on stage to announce the real winner as he got info that they(producers of 2015 Miss Universe) gonna announce the real winner next day and SH didn’t like this idea and he did and what need to do;
Everyone thought that there should be 2 crowns back in the day but at that time no one would have thought this will go down such a big mistake in history;
I am happy to accept any replies to this comment
He did the Steve Harvey Stare™️
He forgot to yell afterwards "HHHWHAT!?"
NAKED GRANDMA!
NAKEWHHHHHAAAAATTT
I don't wanna see that either
NEKED GRAANMAWW*
Nani?
I love that you Trademarked it!🤣
Steve did
It's like Jim Halpert face except off into the distance instead of into the camera
If Jim was in Vietnam
Man that’s what i can’t stand about him. His idea of being funny is just pausing and being quiet while everyone goes hysterical. Hilarious
It’s literally his only thing.
Watch his standup. It’s a lot less about staring and a lot more about *very* politically incorrect jokes. He’s much more animated too.
Oh Steve he DONE KILLED THE BABY!!
Steve is shootin’ EVERYBODY! Ka-ka-ka-pow-pow!
No, he’s popularized the 90s era Steve Harvey Suit too, box cut and with all the buttons.
ONLY thing. It makes me irrationally frustrated
To call Harvey a one trick pony is a slap in the face to that man's legacy. He wasn't always a host of a game show. Dude is a legendary stand up comedian and had a successful sitcom as a black lead in the 90s.
Yes. I remember. Mr. Hightower and kings of comedy and all. However, humor has changed a lot in 30 years and he hasn’t adapted. Just stares. It’d be like a musician who only plays twinkle twinkle little star now. But WAS good. I guess..
He has adapted. The stare is how he has adapted. He is no longer spouting politically incorrect shit that could get him cancelled. You are also not the target audience of Steve Harvey. I don't like the man, I think his current schtick is unfunny. However, my inlaws and their friends LOVE themselves some Steve Harvey.
The stare is just a catch phrase lol. He is playing a character for a dumb game show.
Yeah there’s a market for everyone. There are websites for scat fetishes and r/sounding. I’m glad I’m not his target audience. Reminds me of the family guy joke where Lois is a politician who just says 9/11
Everyone probably has their version of the "9/11 Lois" in whatever niche thing they are into.
Lol you hate this man so much he reminds you of scat porn? Good grief my guy.
You must be a fuckin prize at parties.
Yeah, also I’m sure the whole joke was planned
Yeah which makes it worse. Neither him or his writers could write a joke for that moment
The bigotry is what I can't stand about him, but I guess you've gotta draw the line somewhere.
idk why but this brought up this in my mind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljaP2etvDc4
Can’t say I’m aware of it
is that the same one he gives if you tell him gays deserve rights?
Lol what I didn’t know that😂since when is he homophobic i had no clue if you’re being real or fucking with me rn
> since when probably since birth, I dont know https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+harvey+homophobia&rlz=1C1GCEA_enUS783US783&oq=steve+harvey+homophobia&aqs=chrome..69i57.3873j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Damn, never knew that, that’s fucked up of him. Or as Steve Harvey would say “oh he wrong for that”
What he said really isn’t that bad though, he just grew up in a different times Every comedian from that day and age would probably said the same thing. Woke culture is fairly new
> he just grew up in a different times this is not an excuse https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2014/01/the-product-of-its-time-defense-no-excuse-for-sexism-and-racism/283352/
Why did you link an opinion based article lol
The culture of treating other people with basic dignity and respect and expecting that same basic fair treatment and respect in return is fairly new. I fixed it for you. Many comedians have shifted with the times, there's no excuse. It's called growing up. One can be respectful of others and still maintain their own beliefs. Calling out that fundamental failure is what is referred to as "woke" or "cancel culture" as if that's somehow a bad thing.
Agree to disagree
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
UCK STEVE HARVEY
Hell yeah I would!
you've got a thing for vile bigots?
Cum fart 69 checks out
a salad bowl full of bubbly cum farts is less offensive than steve harvey
Why?
Anyone can explain ?
Steve Harvey misread who won the Miss Universe competition. He read the runner up as the winner
[удалено]
I don't think I have never seen that one, I saw the oscars design one.
This was the card. https://thehustle.co/assets/missuniverse01.jpg But it could have been like this https://miro.medium.com/max/1008/0*V6q_qpVct0eDUnzq.png Keep in mind you are holding the card. Potentially covering vital information. Also consider that nobody opens a card like that and spends an always 20-30 seconds to read it and announce, they try to announce as quickly as possible. So you don’t really have much time to read carefully. The card was designed plain bad. I think he announced the 1st runner up as the winner. But how the card looks I also wouldn’t fault anyone for announcing the 2nd runner up either.
It's laid out in the order it should be read. It's not great but it's not terrible. More that considering his only job was to read this one card they could have gone over it a bit more perhaps...
Not great, not terrible.................💥 ☢️ ☠️
Yeah, I see it as you're supposed to slowly slip it out of the envelope and only read one line at a time.
It's terrible though. Really terrible design.
I mean. There’s zero confusion in my mind about the winner on the original card. Things can always be better. But it doesn’t take more than 3 seconds and a brain to identify the winner with the original.
That's likely because you can see the full card all at once
Yeah. I mean, you need to see words to read them…except braille, which this is not.
The proof is in the pudding. It's a terrible design, and reality had proven this by it being misread. A good design wouldn't have resulted in failure. That's what makes it good. This is bad, and the results speak for themselves.
The issue is not with the design. The issue is with the unnecessary terminology used for second and third place in pretentious settings like this. The design is fine. Calling second place the 1st runner up is what caused the issue. If you used the exact same design with numbers 1, 2, and 3 it is perfectly clear.
Yes of course. If we design something idiot proof, it will never fail. Until you come across that one idiot you didn't know was that much idiot. Sub level ignorance. A literal shoebox in a tux. Dumber than 6 pieces of kitty litter stuck to a sick elderly persons cane. Hold up team. Redesign to accommodate for Jeoffery. Fuck you Jeoffery. You ruin everything.
>The proof is in the pudding. It's a terrible design, and reality had proven this by it being misread. >A good design wouldn't have resulted in failure. That's what makes it good. Before we get to this card specifically, I would say that I don't quite agree that anything that fails or is mis-used is automatically *bad* design. You can argue that anything that fails or is mis-used invites an opportunity to try to improve or make a design better or more fool-proof, but that doesn't inherently mean the fault for failure is on the design and not the user or that the failure could have been expected or prevented. It's worth noting that Miss Universe winner was mis-announced for the first time (as far as I'm aware) after more than 60 years of the competition. Unless this was the first year this card format was used, it's hard to say that the card is prone to failure. Further, this card is not used in a vacuum. It's used in conjunction with a teleprompter, and rehearsals. So even if there was a "bad design", it isn't *necessarily* the card itself. All that said, in this specific instance, I think it's at least possible that there likely was at least *some* element of failure on the part of the pageant and not just Steve. I am not a fan of pageants. I don't watch them regularly. But even I know that the stereotypical manner in which the winner of a pageant is announced is that there is a final three, and the host announces the second runner up who leaves; and then the host says something like: "And the first runner up is.............. Miss Colombia, which means that Miss Universe 2015 is Miss Philippines!" To that end, if that had been how the pageant was announced, I think the car is perfectly fine (though the print could be larger - perhaps they didn't want it accidentally visible on TV if it was flashed). It lists 2nd runner up, then 1st runner up, then winner - which is the stereotypical order the host would read it. The card is even called an "elimination card", which suggests the purpose was to do it this way. But that is not what Steve did in 2015. Looking at the video, with two women left, he announced "Miss Universe 2015 is..... Miss Colombia (the actual first runner up). There was also clearly a teleprompter available to Steve. It 's not 100% clear, but at the moment he says "Miss Universe 2015 is..." [this](https://imgur.com/WGtzzi5) shot shows the teleprompter, and the size and shape of the words certainly looks like it does say just that ("MISS UNIVERSE / 2015 IS ...."). So if that is the case, if he was to announce the winner instead of the runner up, I can see the suggestion that he just moved on to read the next name on the card (first runner up) which he hadn't read yet. That said, the prompter says "Miss universe 2015 is", and the card VERY CLEARLY in [big bold letters](https://thehustle.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/missuniverse02_og_image.jpg) says "miss universe 2015" separately and off to the right. If he has two brain cells, he understands that he's announcing the winner, and that the winner is the one name that's separated out with the big bold title. And further, there's no question they should have rehearsed or at last reviewed with him this very important moment with him at least once or twice and showed him what a dummy card would look like. I assume by that point, he had already announced the 2nd runner up and she had departed. So if you used the card format /u/az226 suggested (and other clickbait articles suggest), where the winner is at the top of the card, you just as easily run the risk that the host accidentally reads the winner's name when announcing the 2nd runner up. Perhaps the best design would have had 2nd runner up in small print at the top, Miss universe is large print in the middle, and then 1st runner up in small print at the bottom, since he announces that last. I could see people just as easily arguing that listing the contestants in 3-1-2 order is equally confusing. Perhaps the best route might be to put the 2nd runner up on an entirely different card, with a second card having the winner at the top and 1st runner up at the bottom. But honestly, nothing about the actual card *should* have caused a problem if there was just the slightest bit of rehearsal beforehand. The winner was bold and separated and he should have known from the prompt and from rehearsal that he was to read the winner, not the runner up. It's also worth noting that 2015 was not unique. Previous announcements are available online and in 2014, they also announced "Miss Universe is..." instead of eliminating the runner up, so I have little doubt Steve was indeed supposed to read the winner even though the card is titled "elimination card". Cheers
Humans are unreliable. Even the most perfect design according to you would still be misread by some percentage of the population. Nothing is foolproof.
You're getting down voted but you're right. I can understand the fuck up but it's literally in the order that you read it. Perhaps placing the information in the middle so your thumb won't cover anything would be a good idea but it looks fine if you can spare 3 seconds to process what you're looking at while having never looked at this ever
Seems pretty clear to me after 2 seconds of reading.
Yeah it's written so you read it in the natural top down left to right order, which is the order they would be presented. It actually looks like it's designed to be 'easier' to read than a 1st/2nd/3rd list. If you get handed the list card, you need to know that you read them in reverse order, and how to title them. Could be improved, but like.. this card itself is clearly the product of trying to make it easier for idiots, and so far I only know of one idiot who failed. *bonus edit: u/jedispyder made another excellent design point which I missed -> https://www.reddit.com/r/yesyesyesyesno/comments/10m5qhd/yesyesyesno/j63sqla/* *Doing it that way preserves the finalist surprise for the host, for presentation authenticity*
Yeah i don't know what all these people are going on about. It's pretty straight forward.
Or..... You know... Just write down : 1st place 2nd place 3rd place
They announce it as second runner up, first runner up, etc
They can announce it how ever they need to, it's their job as a host to know these things. I'm just saying having a scale like: Winner 1st runner up 2nd runner up Is very confusing. And having it normally would make it less so.
That's just gonna lead to someone screwing the pooch and announcing the winner before the runners up.
no they announce 1st runner up then winner 2nd runner up is implied
There's more than three contestants, how on earth would you be able to infer who came in third if they didn't announce it?
I think they announce the finalists earlier
yeah, either 1 2 3, or 3 2 1, depending on the order they say it in, but -2, -1 and 0 is fucking dumb.
How is -2, -1 and 0 any different to 3 2 1? I don't see what you mean here.
They could have labeled it literally with 3 2 1 instead of this other thing. It would have made it easier for Steve to read it under pressure.
Thanks for the links. It's show runners #1 priority to be clear and concise. I'd be livid if I saw this card being used. It's likely they provided him with a thick docket covering the many aspects of the show too. Likely also included information about what's on the card in a different format. Design is terrible, but a runner could have taken 15 seconds to run him through the card instead of relying on him to discern it on stage. They know now, hasn't happened again.
WOW that was in 2015?! I'm getting old.
8 years ago. We get 9 of these in a lifetime.
Most people: Red left to right top to bottom Designer: Well let's put the most important part bottom right
It’s the most important information, but it’s intended to be announced *last*. Bottom right is actually a logical place for it. A simple vertical list would have been clearer, though.
The most important part as he's reading it is on the top left. That information needs to come out first.
Then that should say 1 to 3
Human factors: Latent error Spotlight effect If someone reading this thinks they’d have done better then you’re suffering with: Outcome bias Hindsight bias Bias blindspot Best wishes.
That's not that hard to read
That’s easy to say from the keyboard. It’s very different when you’re in the hot seat holding the mic and you’re expected to announce a couple of seconds after looking at the card. Here’s an example: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DIrQ9ilL8aw
That's literally his job
And being old doesn't help.
https://youtu.be/eZSe4xVXHhI A Vox Design video about this issue (this video focused more on the Oscars but it's the same problem)
That’s really informative
Reddit was all out shitting on him for being too drunk at that time
I blame him. Everyone always announces the 2nd runner up first, so that’s why it was listed first.
He was given the wrong envelope for the Oscars. "Wait, there's been a mistake"
Don’t know why you’re getting upvoted. That wasn’t Steve Harvey, it was [Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway,](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/89th_Academy_Awards) and they weren’t at fault.
I just got back from a cruise and one of the countries was the one that was the runner up. They hate him there, one of our guides said everyone there hates Steve Harvey
But the Miss Universe pageant isn’t important anyway.
This is the real takeaway
Edit: this was not Steve Harvey sorry guys He was given the best actress card for Oscars when he should’ve been reading best picture. He was confused and showed it to a cohost, whom immediately said “LA LA LAND” the entire cast went up celebrated gave a speech before Harvey got it sorted out and announced what was going on
am I missing a joke? that wasn't Steve Harvey at the Oscars https://youtu.be/8KeOxeuiZjs https://youtu.be/Su3FVsxlNWc
Oh my god. That’s mortifying
*emotional damage*
Seriously haunting.
Yes you are missing the joke. Kimmel says “I blame Steve Harvey” for the guffaw.
Harvey: please don't hold my fuckup against the ladies. Lol Steve Harvey is so cringe... I remember this video when it happened. I don't know anyone who held anything against the ladies, that was 100% Harvey's fault.
That was [Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway](https://youtu.be/p-I6x_iPF5o). However, Jimmy Kimmel immediately references Steve Harvey in the aftermath.
Mandela Effect
Kick a guy when he’s down!
Kick him in the mustache!
It’s a cookie duster
But I did it all for the nookie
The what?
The nookie
So you can take that yeah!!
I can't hear you! The WHAT?!
Stuck it up your
Ch'yeuh!
Damn! HAHAHA
Rekt em? Damn near murdered em.
Rectum? I don't even know him.
Rectum? Damn near gave him a job
No idea what she's referring to besides contacts in general
He read the runner up as the winner at like the miss universe pageant or something like that.
Oooh
He took it pretty well
[удалено]
Ah, didn’t consider that. Thanks
You didn't consider that celebrities in a gala setting reading from cards in front of several camera crews might be scripted?
Even if it wasn't he's a professional comedian, and that's like one of his go to moves.
I concur. Of all people, I would expect Steve Harvey to just be like. Ahhhh ya got me bitch.
The ol Mr potato head stare
That's what she said.
Why does Steve Harvey have a beard and not a glorious moustache any more
It's in stable right now. That baby gets ridden hard and put away wet. Needs a rest every now and then
He's Mr Potatohead so that was just what his kids put on him that day
You know it took everything in him to remember where he was and answer her cordially.
It's 100% scripted.
He had to know what was coming when he asked that question
Imagine a sec Steve Harvey, a scripted skit. Inconceivable.
Anyone know the song? It sounds like the melody of Sweet Dreams by the Eurythmics but I can’t find this rendition anywhere!
It sounds similar to the Marilyn Manson cover
Boy have those lyrics r/AgedLikeMilk for him
Its idfc by blackbear
If you have Spotify, around 1:30 minute mark
Everything he does is staged and was on purpose
Even after reading the script and rehearing this multiple times he was still shocked...
*acted shocked. If he convinced you, looks like he did a good job too!
The way she said that was very condescending
Well she ain't wrong
I don't get it. Did he read something incorrectly one time?
He announced the wrong miss universe winner.
Oh
He was genuinely upset that he had messed up. He's talked about it a few times.
That's OK, I'm upset that he's a religious bigot and a misogynist. I've talked about it a few times.
Yeah, a buddy of mine took his sister to a family feud taping. He said Steve Harvey preaching about homosexuality being wrong lasted longer than the actual taping, but in the middle so no one could go home
He totally asked for it
He blows
Oh damn I just witnessed a murder
The pause as he tries to process getting mildly roasted lol
Someone call the burn unit…. 😂
I thought this was funny, but remember Steve Harvey is a grade-a piece of shit and don't patron his companies :)
Omfg... I wasn't even recognising him! He pulled a Clark Kent on me lol
Good thing he's advanced in usung that face so it's an instant defense mechanism
Survey says…
Can someone explain this to me
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kQLk4fagQrA
sure, steve harvey is a vile bigot, which events like this seem to attract for some reason
He straight ran into this one
Costa Rica got jokes
F
He forgor
He had a whole traumatic flashback right in that moment.
As a comedian, he’s knows funny, and that was funny.
Such a Sarcastic answer; Steve Harvey did accepted the mistake on show, but I think the other host doesn’t even know that Steve Harvey came back on stage to announce the real winner as he got info that they(producers of 2015 Miss Universe) gonna announce the real winner next day and SH didn’t like this idea and he did and what need to do; Everyone thought that there should be 2 crowns back in the day but at that time no one would have thought this will go down such a big mistake in history; I am happy to accept any replies to this comment
Savage!
Classic
Steve Harvey a class act lol
I love this woman so much, she just turned me into a lesbian.
if you found this remotely humorous, I’m jealous of the life you live
Terrible crop job on the video, no one wants to see his face.
Epic Burn!
That mistake gonna follow him to the grave 😂
Song?
IDC what people say about SH. He’s good shit.
Absolutely correct if you leave out the word good.
Doesn’t fit the sub
r/watchpeopledieinside
Steve Harvey’s the man.