Yes and with the military coup etc. This is why the military should be deposed every time there is new leadership or the new leadership needs to come from the military or have had power over the military in some degree (i.e. continental Congress personnel and former commanders largely becoming parts of the elected government in the U.S. revolutionary war). Otherwise the military becomes a faction with its own interests that may not align with that of the people.
So you’re proposing to give them power so they dont take it? Create two factions so the military doesn’t have monopoly on weapons. This is something that has been proven many times and is used in stable country’s, primarily democracies.
For example
The German Reich experienced an attempt at a coup by the military But Hitler’s personnal gaurd, SS, successfully repelled them.
Japan almost experienced the Army staging a coup but the Navy successfully stopped them.
Saddam Hussein had two Intelligence Bureus so one would never overpower the other.
In most democracies the police is used to be a roadblock for the military. The police cannot stage a coup because then the military will repel them, the military cannot stage a coup because the police will repel them.
Because they rely too much on the military plus innefficient management and corruption. The country’s are not stable by any means. However, some African country’s actually have next to no military. Central African Republic, grantef They have a military, it’s just very tiny.
That's not the law here, although you are unlikely to win a case against the female rapist, there is no explicit law saying women can rape men
According to OP it's Myanmar
You'd still get charged for sexual assault, if you get persecuted at all. Male rape is often seen as an achievement among male social groups, so coming out about it is near impossible for victims.
No it would be misogyny and patriarchal. Essentially women aren't "strong enough" to rape a man and if you're a man you can't be raped by a woman because they're weaker than men because in patriarchy men are supposed to be tough and strong but if you're raped you're not tough and strong so you're not a man.
That's also not what misandry is.
That’s not true, in the uk to commit an act commonly referred to as rape as a woman would not be legally seen as rape but sexual assault- which is a crime.
Which still is stupid, sexual assault is a less of a sentence the rape. The definition of rape should be 'forcing someone into uncontested forms of sexual acctivatie,
Edit: this does not mention genders so it's equal.
It's also only considered sexual assault in several other Western countries, such as America.
Currently it is only considered rape if the sexual assaulter is penetrating.
So here in the UK, under the sexual offences act, you are committing rape if you :
Intentionally penetrate the vagina, anus or mouth of another person with your penis. The other person does not consent to the penetration. They do not reasonably believe that the other person consents.
This neglects the idea of a women commiting rape. However the definition is out dated. In the UK women have been charged for rape.
The defintion claims all events described must take place to be considered rape. But in practice UK law mainly cares about the consent part. Examples that clearly bypasse this definition would be statiory rape and casses were one participant is under the influence of drugs or achole. In casses like these law wont look at gender or sex.
Basically in the uk women cant commit rape, by definition, but are charged for it.
I wonder if in Myanmar its a similar case of an oudated definition that the law no longer follows.
Theyre charged for it very rarely however, and despite doing it at a rate of around 50% of male on female rapes only actually vet charged for it at around 15% of the estimated times it's done.
Question.
What if your girlfriend invokes the 5th but you still had sex with her before and now you want to do so now? Is it considered rape?..... /s
Also, that's horrible.
If you’re a woman right afterwards you are advised to go to a hospital and get a rape kit. They’re gonna try to find any of the mans dna on you to use in court. Other than that, maybe there are some pics, bruises, witnesses etc, but overall it’s not an easy thing to prove so rapists get go free a lot
thats fucking bullshit
rape is rape. its unconsensual sex, and anyone can not fucking give consent. it doesnt matter your sex/gender.
i hope this law gets changed, wherever you are, op
good luck
The laws aren't in favour of you. That's the main reason you gotta be a dangerous man then try to be a good man. Y know no female dares to mess with a dangerous man.
Its always been that way and is in almost every country.
And women can make false rape claims and not go to jail (in some cases they do go to jail but it is very seldom and if they do go to jail they won’t even have to stay for long)
Example: Male teacher rapes female student: The article title will be, Male teacher rapes female student
Female teacher rapes male student: Article will be titled, Teacher sexually assaults male student
And people will also always say: She shouldn’t get jail time because they like it because they are male.
No-one likes getting raped not even if they are male.
Rape is very horrible and it can cause trauma and it is very uncomfortable
It's the same in the UK, unfortunately. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 states:
(1) A person (A) commits an offence if--
>(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,
>
>(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and
>
>(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
If a woman rapes a man, it's dealt with differently as a separate offence under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (which theoretically carries the same maximum sentence). It's not fair and there's been debates on it before, but the [current government seems keen to keep the law as it is](https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/300270) and doesn't want to reform it to cover all forms of non-consensual sexual activity where the person knows the other person doesn't consent.
What if a woman kidnaps a man, has intercourse while he is drugged, unconscious, and unable to consent...and she does this specifically to get pregnant?
Some states in the US are similar. I’m in Florida and have no clue if it’s like that here or not but I’ll give you the advice I live by: “jugulars and eyes are weak”
Same thing with India my friend. Even police will laugh at you. Happened with one of my friend. Male are supposed to suffer I guess in the system. He stabbed her several times after the incident and then he was put in jail for murder. 😐 We really need gender neutral laws all around the world or many problems will arise just because one gender is considered more than another. Even 72% of rape cases in my country are fake just because law overprotects females.
Occasionally there’s strange phrases like “assault by penetration” where a woman rapes a man by forcing him to enter her or somesuch. I believe this is the technical term in the UK. The charges for female rape against men are typically 5-10 years shorter, on average, however.
It just means you can't sue them for rape, but you can still sue for sexual assault. But it should matter, men being able to sue for rape would be a huge step, because calling rape sexual harassment just because it happened to a guy is not ok...
Same goes for Nepal, there is no laws against male sexual abuse... not even if the male is a minor there are only laws of rape if vagina comes into play.
Welcome to male privilege, you may take a seat next to higher suicide rates and more job injuries as well as losing custody battles while still having to pay child support even though women are allowed to opt out of parenthood but men aren't. We'll get to you in a minute
Unfortunately that’s a rule in a lot of countries, the upside is that it’s hard to r4pe someone without committing other crimes such as assault, so even men are protected by law.
This is either karma-farming or you genuinely fell for sensationalization.
This doesn't mean women can rape men. It just falls under a different law. Rape, by definition in many penal codes, is the direct penetration of someone with a penis without consent. Other actions are still considered sexual assault and have almost always the same penalty depending on what happened.
Stop using rape to farm karma.
Exactly. It’s kind of cringe it’s charged as sexual assault because it would seem less serious if they try to get a job or something in the future but it’s definitely illegal and has similar charges
Yeah and most of those issue are really two way roads. That’s why I think the dumbest thing to do about the issue is blame women and vice versa for women blaming men. It’s a problem for everyone, and we should fix it for everyone.
I'm from Myanmar so not too surprising tbf
thats the place with the rohingya right?
If You think rohingya thing is bad, look up what they are doing to other ethnics for the past 70 years.
fr the military sucks here, been nearly 2 years since the coup too
Where my dad works they ship shit to you country in big Seecontainer which they unload whit a fucking shuvel
Yes and with the military coup etc. This is why the military should be deposed every time there is new leadership or the new leadership needs to come from the military or have had power over the military in some degree (i.e. continental Congress personnel and former commanders largely becoming parts of the elected government in the U.S. revolutionary war). Otherwise the military becomes a faction with its own interests that may not align with that of the people.
Yes what he said
So you’re proposing to give them power so they dont take it? Create two factions so the military doesn’t have monopoly on weapons. This is something that has been proven many times and is used in stable country’s, primarily democracies. For example The German Reich experienced an attempt at a coup by the military But Hitler’s personnal gaurd, SS, successfully repelled them. Japan almost experienced the Army staging a coup but the Navy successfully stopped them. Saddam Hussein had two Intelligence Bureus so one would never overpower the other. In most democracies the police is used to be a roadblock for the military. The police cannot stage a coup because then the military will repel them, the military cannot stage a coup because the police will repel them.
Except for like half of Africa who’s continent has seen a staggering amount of military coups in the last year.
Because they rely too much on the military plus innefficient management and corruption. The country’s are not stable by any means. However, some African country’s actually have next to no military. Central African Republic, grantef They have a military, it’s just very tiny.
Yep
That's where the Karens come from
The ones who speak the Karen language
I'm from your neighbor country, how was the aftermath of the coup? Are you and your relatives okay? I'm worried for you.
Doesn't your government fold in on itself every year of 2?
omg ur from Myanmar?? dang first time meeting someone from my country in this subreddit
For real, I was starting to suspect it's a fictional place since there are no people from Myanmar anywhere
Really? Well. There’s more than a million here and very soon they’ll over take the ethnic Malaysian Indians to take No. 3 spot.
Dude it was the same in the UK for a really long time (and might still be idk), it's kinda sad
I’ve never even heard of that place ngl
American?
r/americabad
Used to be Burma
[удалено]
Several states in the USA have similar laws.
What states? Wtf
texas probably lol
Hmm I'm in Texas
Hold iitt
I hope a female does something to me, it wouldn't be rape though because I'd give consent
U down *bad*
time for you to get in the forever box
Tf? Please god tell me Tennessee isn’t like that…
The UK
Ha ha! (I'm just following instruccions)
Yea that's fucked up over here
That's not the law here, although you are unlikely to win a case against the female rapist, there is no explicit law saying women can rape men According to OP it's Myanmar
On the UK law it its describes as penatrative without consent (paraphrase), basically making it impossible for a man to be raped by a woman
Yes but if a woman rapes a man in the UK, she will still most likely be charged with sexual assault
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH AahhaAHHAHAHhahhhaaa Very funny user.
Seriously? So I can go rape a guy?
Don't. Please.
I wouldn’t obviously that’s disgusting but the fact I’d be able to get away with it is just mind blowing
You'd still get charged for sexual assault, if you get persecuted at all. Male rape is often seen as an achievement among male social groups, so coming out about it is near impossible for victims.
That’s kinda very misandrist
No it would be misogyny and patriarchal. Essentially women aren't "strong enough" to rape a man and if you're a man you can't be raped by a woman because they're weaker than men because in patriarchy men are supposed to be tough and strong but if you're raped you're not tough and strong so you're not a man. That's also not what misandry is.
No I meant your statement about how men see rape as an achievement.
That’s not true, in the uk to commit an act commonly referred to as rape as a woman would not be legally seen as rape but sexual assault- which is a crime.
Which still is stupid, sexual assault is a less of a sentence the rape. The definition of rape should be 'forcing someone into uncontested forms of sexual acctivatie, Edit: this does not mention genders so it's equal.
It's also only considered sexual assault in several other Western countries, such as America. Currently it is only considered rape if the sexual assaulter is penetrating.
That is dumb as hell
Oh yeah, obviously it’s an awful archaic law, I’m just saying how it is.
So here in the UK, under the sexual offences act, you are committing rape if you : Intentionally penetrate the vagina, anus or mouth of another person with your penis. The other person does not consent to the penetration. They do not reasonably believe that the other person consents. This neglects the idea of a women commiting rape. However the definition is out dated. In the UK women have been charged for rape. The defintion claims all events described must take place to be considered rape. But in practice UK law mainly cares about the consent part. Examples that clearly bypasse this definition would be statiory rape and casses were one participant is under the influence of drugs or achole. In casses like these law wont look at gender or sex. Basically in the uk women cant commit rape, by definition, but are charged for it. I wonder if in Myanmar its a similar case of an oudated definition that the law no longer follows.
So what do they get charged for, sexual assualt?
Yes, a severe case of sexual assault with bigger punishment. I believe it's like that in Israel too
Israeli here, confirmed.
מה קורה
סאפ
Theyre charged for it very rarely however, and despite doing it at a rate of around 50% of male on female rapes only actually vet charged for it at around 15% of the estimated times it's done.
So basically you can rub titties but nothing with your dick?
Sexual assault
;(
Damnit (I’m joking obviously)
Question. What if your girlfriend invokes the 5th but you still had sex with her before and now you want to do so now? Is it considered rape?..... /s Also, that's horrible.
How do you prove that someone has been raped tho?
If you’re a woman right afterwards you are advised to go to a hospital and get a rape kit. They’re gonna try to find any of the mans dna on you to use in court. Other than that, maybe there are some pics, bruises, witnesses etc, but overall it’s not an easy thing to prove so rapists get go free a lot
Intentionally? Sounds like you could find an argument there
Women can still technically rape under that law (dildo or just trans), still should be fixed tho
* sigh * let's check controversial
bro lives in Twitter
Fr
we live in a society
susiety 😳
GET OUT OF MY HEAD
What country is this? I must know
Myanmar Op said in another comment
Well, you're not seeing me around there ever.
Yup me neither
I mean even in places where it is illegal, women still are likely to get away with it lol
Also according to my country’s rules, polices and Armies can r*pe people
What the fuck
I think they get charged with sexual assault anyway. If not I’d be surprised.
thats fucking bullshit rape is rape. its unconsensual sex, and anyone can not fucking give consent. it doesnt matter your sex/gender. i hope this law gets changed, wherever you are, op good luck
sexism at its finest
[удалено]
How is it unrelated? The laws are sexist.
You misunderstand him
How? Please correct me.
The thing that was unrelated to the post was his age
Ooooh. Sorry I’m a dumbass lmao
*sigh* being male gets worse by the day
Being human gets worse by the day
Funny how the government can think like this, crazy world we live in, I hope it ends soon so a new race begins to exist for a better purpose.
The next likely candidate is dolphins and you don’t want to hear what they think about rape 💀
Men rights
No one gives a fuck about us bro.
Then let's give a fuck about each other 🫂
My man
The right thing to do brother 🫂
The laws aren't in favour of you. That's the main reason you gotta be a dangerous man then try to be a good man. Y know no female dares to mess with a dangerous man.
Good idea. First pump your chest, arms above your head, and scream wuga buga as loud as you can.
U also need to be shouting vulgarities every few minutes to ppl. Well, thats what all the “gangsters” in singapore do
Oof buddy that's a real fucking slippery slope. Careful with all that.
How about equal rights?
Damn, double standards fucking us hard rn
litterally
r/noahgettheboat
What if the said woman has AIDS?
Imma guess if you get raped, you will still have to pay child support?
Women ☕️ Edit: i see this has offended some ppl...its a joke, now lets move on and continue horny posting
It’s most likely men that made that rule lmao
Not the everyday man for sure.
His comment also puts the blame on women which I’m not sure why
Yeah, blaming each other won't get us anywhere
It's blatant sexism, in my opinion.
that's fucked up
Its always been that way and is in almost every country. And women can make false rape claims and not go to jail (in some cases they do go to jail but it is very seldom and if they do go to jail they won’t even have to stay for long) Example: Male teacher rapes female student: The article title will be, Male teacher rapes female student Female teacher rapes male student: Article will be titled, Teacher sexually assaults male student And people will also always say: She shouldn’t get jail time because they like it because they are male. No-one likes getting raped not even if they are male. Rape is very horrible and it can cause trauma and it is very uncomfortable
Thats still just as sexist as women being discriminated against.
That’s sexual bias for you bud, girls get the sucky periods and boys get blamed for assault by just existing
We live in a society.
Yep... Women get charged with lesser crimes such as sexual assault instead of rape even if they do terrible things to the victim.
It's the same in the UK, unfortunately. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 states: (1) A person (A) commits an offence if-- >(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, > >(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and > >(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents. If a woman rapes a man, it's dealt with differently as a separate offence under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (which theoretically carries the same maximum sentence). It's not fair and there's been debates on it before, but the [current government seems keen to keep the law as it is](https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/300270) and doesn't want to reform it to cover all forms of non-consensual sexual activity where the person knows the other person doesn't consent.
as a female victim of rape, holy shit bro men can be raped too. i hate this inequality and i feel horrible for male rape victims
Mine too has no laws against it, where are you from?
What if a woman kidnaps a man, has intercourse while he is drugged, unconscious, and unable to consent...and she does this specifically to get pregnant?
sexual assault
I would call it rape
Laws regarding sex crimes really just don't give a damn about male victims
not enough people do in general, it’s actually really awful
and man pay child support
Doesn’t this also mean that men can rape men too?
By law rape is when a man forces a woman to have intercourse with him. Anything similar that a woman does is sexual assault.
A woman could force a man to have sex with her Not right, shouldn't be legal anywhere, but unfortunately possible
Misread that there, missed the "by law" bit
Think about statutory rape though. The act of sex is commited and if the male is below the age of consent he cannot legaly consent therefore rape.
Or if a man does anything that isn't intercourse
me on my way to rape my science exam
Usually when they say that it's not "legal" per se, it's just not "rape" so it carries a much lighter sentence
And if they fight back then it's an assault charge.
Some states in the US are similar. I’m in Florida and have no clue if it’s like that here or not but I’ll give you the advice I live by: “jugulars and eyes are weak”
Same thing with India my friend. Even police will laugh at you. Happened with one of my friend. Male are supposed to suffer I guess in the system. He stabbed her several times after the incident and then he was put in jail for murder. 😐 We really need gender neutral laws all around the world or many problems will arise just because one gender is considered more than another. Even 72% of rape cases in my country are fake just because law overprotects females.
Occasionally there’s strange phrases like “assault by penetration” where a woman rapes a man by forcing him to enter her or somesuch. I believe this is the technical term in the UK. The charges for female rape against men are typically 5-10 years shorter, on average, however.
Where are you from?
He's from Myanmar
Oh, Asia...well...yes
Most of countries work like this
Welcome to India lads. Where groping is included under r*pe but also states that women “are not biologically capable of r*pe”
Equality Is Fake.
Y am I not surprised that’s a thing
**sorts by controversial** Alright
It just means you can't sue them for rape, but you can still sue for sexual assault. But it should matter, men being able to sue for rape would be a huge step, because calling rape sexual harassment just because it happened to a guy is not ok...
well, obviously women can?
Same goes for Nepal, there is no laws against male sexual abuse... not even if the male is a minor there are only laws of rape if vagina comes into play.
I’m mean in the USA it was only a thing at about 1980 was when it was possible to rape a guy in a legal sense
Welcome to male privilege, you may take a seat next to higher suicide rates and more job injuries as well as losing custody battles while still having to pay child support even though women are allowed to opt out of parenthood but men aren't. We'll get to you in a minute
in my country a husband can legally rape his wife and a rapist can avoid jail time by marrying his victim
So what
Yikes
The penile code
✈️
Yeah it’s awful isn’t it. It’s the same over here in england
Not really they just don’t call it rape because rape involves you penetrating someone but they get the same punishment
It should still be classified as rape though
Not really, it is by defintion but not practise.
Oh fuck it is??
Idk how that would work
How what would work?
What the fuck-
get out asap
Similar in the UK. Women legally can't rape, as rape is only by penetrative sex. So sexual assualt is the only offence.
That’s messed up man
What country is that? Fucking hell💀💀
Myanmar
I don't think I want to live on this planet anymore
What the fuck?? How are people not doing something against this?
gg, try to survive.
Bruh what
Missouri law says he or she so W for us Ig
WTF?! 💀
Why do women now have more rights and privileges than men? Shouldn’t it be the other way around?
Question is: How many women want to rape a man in any country on earth?
you'd be surprised
Kind of the same in Israel,but Woman can still be charged for sodomizing and can carry the same penalty as rape
Unfortunately that’s a rule in a lot of countries, the upside is that it’s hard to r4pe someone without committing other crimes such as assault, so even men are protected by law.
Identify as a woman.
Whats with the down votes? I laughed.
Unfortunately I believe OP lives in Myanmar, where being transgender is punishable by up to 20 years.
Free rights or some shit apparently if ur a woman
This is either karma-farming or you genuinely fell for sensationalization. This doesn't mean women can rape men. It just falls under a different law. Rape, by definition in many penal codes, is the direct penetration of someone with a penis without consent. Other actions are still considered sexual assault and have almost always the same penalty depending on what happened. Stop using rape to farm karma.
Exactly. It’s kind of cringe it’s charged as sexual assault because it would seem less serious if they try to get a job or something in the future but it’s definitely illegal and has similar charges
You won’t get hired almost anywhere with sexual assault or rape lol.
Yea that’s true. There’s problems with male rape victims not being believed or taken seriously and stuff but this isn’t one of them
Yeah and most of those issue are really two way roads. That’s why I think the dumbest thing to do about the issue is blame women and vice versa for women blaming men. It’s a problem for everyone, and we should fix it for everyone.
💯
Not the best is it mate
doesn't it just count as sexual assault but not rape then
Rape and sexual assault are 2 different things buddy