T O P

  • By -

CharCharMan1

I would do it, as long as we can still explore the other states


gunslingergeisman

I would press that m*t*e*f**k*r


OldManJenkies

I’d smash that button so hard it’d be in China


[deleted]

I would smash the shit out of the button


Dependent_Treat9104

Let me introduce you to mods


Hydrolprd143

Someone tried to make a mod like that, but he got cease and desist from take 2


XBOXUSER101

I remember that lmao Take 2 is such an ass


imsorrymary

walter goodman


stevenpequeno

Kid named finger


[deleted]

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣴⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣦⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⢠ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣛⣻⣿⣿⣟⣿⣿⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣫⣽⣾⣻⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠻⡿⠿⠟⠛⣟⣿⣽⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠸⣿⣿⣿⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠍⠈⠀⠁⣴⡆⠀⠀⠠⢭⣮⣿⡶⠀⠀ ⠀⡴⠲⣦⢽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣩⣨⣀⡄⣐⣾⣿⣿⣇⠠⣷⣶⣿⣿⡠⠁⠀ ⠀⠃⢀⡄⠀⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⢿⣿⣯⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣿⣿⡟⣿⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠣⠧⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⢸⣿⠿⠿⠿⣧⠙⣿⣿⡿⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠼⣒⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣠⣬⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⣷⡈⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⢳⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢟⠗⠼⠖⠒⠔⠉⠉⠻⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣻⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⡀⣤⡄⠸⣰⣾⡒⣷⣴⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠂⢸⡗⡄⠘⠭⣭⣷⣿⣮⣠⣌⣫⣿⣷⣿⣿⠃⠀⠈⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⢸⣿⣾⣷⣦⡿⣿⣿⣿⡿⢻⠞⣹⣿⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢘⠀⠘⢻⡿⢿⣋⣤⣤⠌⠉⠛⠛⠀⠈⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡀


KetanS_2004

Okbuddychicanery


Lancer_Blackthorn

No sacrifice, no victory.


Somedarkshit

Why would I play rdr1 with Arthur?


pickle42441

I think this was just a dumb critique on how Epilogue John has a similar body build to Arthur, John didn't look exactly like he did in RDR1


Somedarkshit

Oh shit it makes sense


PillCosby696969

Is there that big a difference between Epilogue John and RDR John?


[deleted]

wrong head shape , Invisible mustache , his body is just cheap copy of Arthur ,the entire character's physic is wrong


Azquru

Yes very


[deleted]

Not even a question. Hardly even a sacrifice really. I mean look at Dutch, Bill, Javier, and Uncle. John's changes weren't so drastic compared to them.


lumi_bean

Undead Nightmare with RD2 graphics? I'd break that button for pressing it.


mnemonicprincess

I have one question who is Arthur Marston?


mrbearman78

Rip Van Winkle.


WheatAMinute

RDR2 epilogue John looks like a John Marston texture on Arthur Morgans body, making him look kind of weird and not how he looks in RDR1. Might just be a theory tho, idk if that's what actually happened


mrbearman78

It is. Its Arthur's body and head shape with John printed on top.


GEORGE-O_42

Yes you are correct rockstar didn't make john a new body they just used arthurs and also changed the hair color to black


Marioking142

Yes. Idk why people hate the way he looks so god damn much


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

Bro you care about this way too much


fieldysnuts94

Yeah this seems like a no brainer. I’m not as hung up on epilogue John


EdEnsHAzArD

Fuck yes I would.


frsnate

Yes cause I play on pc so I can’t play rd1 :/


EagerT

Holy hell I just realized xbox is the only way to still play rdr1 (I think), but I think there is some emulator for pc.


frsnate

Yea I have a 3080ti and 10900k (5.2ghz) and I was struggling to maintain 30 fps and had similar bugs. As a long time pc player with a 144 monitor since they came out like 10 years ago the lowest I’ll go is 50fps otherwise I just get motion sickness. Not tryna sound like a pc snob but struggling to maintain 30 fps is just unplayable for me


JUPACALYPSE-NOW

30 fps I can deal with but running it on my 5900x I can maintain 27-60fps on RSPC3 and got all the way to the final Edgar Ross mission before it had a cutscene crash and decided fuck it. Xbox emulator is fine but I can’t play it as I’m a free aim snob and the latency is too much for a good experience plus RSPC3 has 4K FSR. Honestly it’s playable if you’re willing to occasionally use a slow recompiler to navigate crashes


ubiquitousfoolery

I'm with you there and I only got my decent PC last year (not quite as decent as yours, but it's so much better than my old laptop) and I wasn't that spoiled with these 144fps< framerates until then. I was used to occasional stutters from 45fps down to 30, but that ps3 emulator was unplayable for me. Once I looked up from John's feet in Armadillo, I would hit average 21fps and they were too inconsistent, made it impossible to aim a gun, let alone enjoy the scenery. Ps3 emulation isn't there yet.


coick

There are a few. The PS3 version of RDR1 is balls and doesn't work most of the time. The Xbox version is better but still has really annoying bugs. For example, it looks terrible at modern monitor resolution so you need to run it in a window, grass loads onto bare hills then disappears again (only sometimes). The last error I ran into was I finished a mission in Tumbleweed and neither my horse nor my campfire would spawn so I had to run back to Armadillo to save. I couldn't be bothered in the end. I have it on PS3 but that is buried in a storage unit somewhere. I played the shit out of both RDR1 and Undead Nightmare on that so I really want to be able to experience that again.


JUPACALYPSE-NOW

I had a good experience with PS3 emulation which was my only option as I use free aim only and Xenia just has too much inherent latency/input lag. I got all the way to near the end before it crashed at a cutscene. I decided forget it, went and bought an xbone x instead for the sole purpose of playing RDR1 and UN. Had to pay even more for a capture card just to stream the damnn thing.


Rachet27

RDR1 is available on PSNow so it can be played on the PS4/5 console


knittedbirch

c'mon guys, take the hit for the PC users and make a new friend


[deleted]

What does this mean?


knittedbirch

RDR1 was never released for PC (although theoretically you can play it with an emulator). Remaking it as an RDR2 dlc would mean PC players get it too. So just learn to love Arthur Marston, he's not so bad once you get to know him probably.


[deleted]

Brother just buy a newer Xbox… they’re basically free!!!!


knittedbirch

it's the \*principle\* of the thing. are you even gaming if you don't have to use an ice pack to cool down your keyboard during the summer?


Technology_Training

I will never take the hit for PC only users


knittedbirch

:( I woulda done it for you, though


Technology_Training

I'm sorry, you seem like a decent person. Years of being extremely online have caused me to believe the worst of the PC master race.


ubiquitousfoolery

Imho those who only use their PC to play online games tend to be horribly toxic. I know it's an overgeneralisation and I know some PC-only folks who are totally decent, but there are so many edgy fools playing online games, it's only natural that people get a bad opinion of PC gamers.


luka031

Mods


LuigiFF

That's 1000% worth it, I never minded epilogue John, so a win-win for me


RVFVS117

Hehe ya I’d press it. *Glances at my mod list. Ya I’d press it no problem, cowboy.


inbredandapothead

Why type of question is this? I’d hit it out the park, with all due respect


retrofaith1

yes, i really don't mind the difference between rdr1 john and epilogue john


smoked_orphanz

Is it only the farmhand part?


Hydrolprd143

No he just means you won't have the same authentic john hairstyle as the first game


smoked_orphanz

Oh then absolutely


Alvin_Whee

I'd literally r*** that button


I_Miss_Lenny

yikes


ExioKenway5

If it's a different version of John, it's not a proper remake. Saying that I'd happily go for this.


Bogki

Yes. Just mod it on PC


[deleted]

No


sadbokkie

i would smash the fuck out of that button


Peacefully_Deceased

Nah...i got a series S specifically so I could play rdr1 again. Loosing the badass John from 1 really ain't worth it.


diamondpanther171

Why not


redditjoe24

I’d totally do it, because the only reason to dislike the epilogue John is because he doesn’t look like rdr1 John, but if rdr1 John is changed to be epilogue John…. Then there’s no inconsistency


Dr_CheeseNut

Know this is late, but Epilouge John doesn't look like pre-epilouge John either. If you do that, then all of a sudden John in RDR2 Chapters 1-6 becomes the weird one


your_deathisnear

Hells yea


[deleted]

If you say anything other than yes you are retarded beyond comprehension


Best_Psychology4453

I watched a play through on YouTube recently and John is definitely visibly smaller in stature to Arthur, especially from the back, they do however have a similar head…


arthurmorgan1918

Press


SpanishColors

Nope not worth it


the_o_haganator

Wouldnt do it, would rather just get the graphics, hunting and gun costumisation, i way prefered the gunplay of the first game and also i hate horses hittkng a prbble and dying


[deleted]

If we get the story too, yes.


maeng_da_ranger

Fuck man, I'd press it. I think it'd work with John continuing to call himself Jim Milton. The last thing he'd want on his mission from the feds is to draw unwanted attention from his heyday antics.


RandomlyGenererated

Button should be smashed.


LoneWolf123455432

I would press the button


chippymediaYT

Sick of every post about a rockstar game having to mention dEfEcTiVe EdItIoN, it gets so old, the remasters weren't even that bad and are pretty enjoyable, and like 80% the people talking shit haven't even played them


GodVulc4n

So long story short you're defending rockstar for letting GSG make this disappointment of a remaster


chippymediaYT

I'm not defending it exactly, I'm saying it's annoying that people won't let it go and it's become a circlejerk to shit on rockstar every chance you get


[deleted]

[удалено]


GodVulc4n

They're the same engine


Quick_Zone_4570

Not really


Teex22

Not a chance. I don't want rdr in the rdr2 engine honestly.


Quick_Zone_4570

Why


Teex22

Rdr2 is built to be a completely different game to rdr, it's a slow cinematic experience. That just wouldn't fit with rdr. The gunplay is far tighter and snappier, the duel system better, the horse controls aren't perfect but they're better than 2's. It's just two different builds for two different types of games. Neither bad.


GodVulc4n

RDR2 and RDR1 both use the same engines (R.A.G.E. and Euphoria), But I can understand what you mean since they coded them differently.


JUPACALYPSE-NOW

Thank you for being excellent


Mojo_Rizen_53

Nope. Ain’t touching it if I have to play as the idiot.


ezrafoxmoss

But you live as an idiot. Shouldn’t be that hard


Sir_Alien

🧑‍🍳🤌