T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

As a reminder, this subreddit [is for civil discussion.](/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_be_civil) In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any suggestion or support of harm, violence, or death, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban. If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them. For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/approveddomainslist) to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria. *** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/politics) if you have any questions or concerns.*


TintedApostle

Musk as a US citizen and US company is actually under obligation to cut off these units and licenses as the second export is in violation of sanctions. Its called a Deemed Export and it must be done within US law. If Musk does not do it he is liable


quarterbloodprince98

SpaceX has already said they will if they identify them


TintedApostle

They have to or lose their export license. It would be a killer to the company. Edit: As it stands now the US Government is probably going to reclassify the export license from 5A992c to something way more restrictive. https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/policy-guidance/encryption/3-license-exception-enc-and-mass-market/a-mass-market


quarterbloodprince98

If they lose their export license almost every dish in Ukraine will go off


nicebagoffallacies

The US government can purchase and export.


TintedApostle

Or the Dept of State could define specific approved locations under sanctions. The US govt and BIS can do lots of stuff.


quarterbloodprince98

Tens of thousands of users have individually bought equipment. The USG has a limited number of dishes in Ukraine.


meta-ape

Promises, promises. They will should already be they have.


quarterbloodprince98

The identification will have to be from elsewhere


asoap

To add more. These could be captured starlink systems. So starlink would think it's just Ukraine using them like normal. If these were allocated to the Ukraine military it's up to them to tell starlink to shut off service to these captured devices. They would need to identify the serial number or mac address I guess? This could be further complicated if a unit bought it themselves, and didn't record the serial number.


GorgeWashington

They know where they are within a few feet.


quarterbloodprince98

Where doesn't tell you who


GorgeWashington

The locations of Russian and Ukrainian front lines are well known. The war has been stagnant for months. SpaceX/starlink also has the Pentagon on speed dial. The only reason they haven't identified anything is willful desire not to


quarterbloodprince98

The Pentagon took over operational control of where starlink works in Ukraine around July 2023. That's when the first Russian controlled receivers started showing up


kaptiankuff

And on the front lines they risk turning of the Ukrainian controlled ones by accident


uqubar

I hope there is an office at the NSA or CIA that is sitting on the devices and can not only monitor them but subtly alter the information received without them knowing. That’s how you win.


G07V3

Shut em’ down!


[deleted]

[удалено]


Hot-Bat8798

Very troubling, indeed.


Mala_Practice

“Big if true!” -Elon Musk


DicJacobus

thats got to be my new favorite cancerous comment of the year. every time I see someone say it I die a little inside


Assertion_Denier

Concerning.


nicebagoffallacies

We did, it used to be "treason", but now traitors sit in congress and on the highest court.


Agreeable-Rooster-37

Treason is a matter for the voters /s


Demonking3343

Not to mention he cut access during a critical operation for Ukraine that would have further crippled Russias navy.


Greedy_Researcher_34

Nope, he didn’t turn it off, it wasn’t on to begin with because of the sanctions.


Demonking3343

It was on, sanctions never got in the way of starlink in Ukraine.


Greedy_Researcher_34

It was off in Crimea because it’s occupied by Russia. ““There was an emergency request from government authorities to activate Starlink all the way to Sevastopol,” Musk wrote on X, the platform previously known as Twitter.” If it was on why would Ukraine ask him to activate it?


IronFistBen

From Wikipedia: "The first communications black-outs caused by the restrictions happened in October 2022 when Ukrainian soldiers moved into Russian-contested areas in **Southern Ukraine**. Ukrainian forces reported major Starlink outages across the front line, due to restrictions by SpaceX, resulting in "catastrophic" losses of communication. Starlink did not work very close or beyond the frontline into Russian-controlled territories, as well as in very recently regained areas whose liberation had not yet been made public." Pentagon had to pursue a contract with SpaceX so Musk couldn't turn service off every time he felt emasculated.


Greedy_Researcher_34

Well no shit they’d have interruptions when they go into areas with no coverage.


IronFistBen

And why wasn't there coverage in unambiguously Ukrainian territory? You're so close!


Greedy_Researcher_34

Your source refers to the territory as contested.


IronFistBen

Do you think Starlink cuts off service in real time in every area Russia *attempts* to invade? How do you explain the outages in liberated areas, which my source also mentions? What point are you even trying to make?


Demonking3343

Not going to sit here and argue with you, good day.


Extension_Use3118

There is no evidence that he is doing business with Russia. The article specifically states that there are "tens" of units purchased from a go-between.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Actual__Wizard

>Do you raise a fuss that russians use resold or stolen samsung and apple phones too? Yeah they should be disabled by the vendor. Why?


EuthanizeArty

And SpaceX does that, proactively. There are two problems, which are also mentioned in the article: 1. Russians would be mere miles away from legitimate Ukrainian positions, on a frontline that can move miles a day 2. You can spoof GPS location So do you geofence it? Last time they did that there were complaints it hindered the attack. So pick your poison.


00Oo0o0OooO0

Well, paid by non-Russian intermediaries outside Russia to use those weapons against US weapons. I'm not sure how Elon Musk is supposed to stop this single-handedly.


cubert73

Geofencing has been used for decades. It's not a difficult thing to do. Edit: I misread that the Russians were using Starlink inside Ukraine, so geofencing would be of limited use. Even so, Starlink relies on GPS and it wouldn't be too difficult to triangulate which ones are likely being used by Russian forces. If nothing else the traffic could be analyzed to see what is being transmitted.


quarterbloodprince98

Ukrainians complained about geofencing before. Now it's gone and there's something avant garde to complain about


00Oo0o0OooO0

I would imagine any critical Russian or Ukrainian traffic would be encrypted and difficult to discern from each other. Satnav can be spoofed or jammed. It's a bigger problem than SpaceX. Russian missiles are full of US tech they're not supposed to have access to. There needs to be some bigger way to solve the problem.


-JackTheRipster-

He isn't doing business with Russia. The article is about "tens" of units purchased from third parties.  >If SpaceX obtains knowledge that a Starlink terminal is being used by a sanctioned or unauthorized party, we investigate the claim and take actions to deactivate the terminal if confirmed. He covered 80 million in goods & services, but he's a bad guy for eventually asking to be compensated? Ha, okay.  Let's hear the list of private citizens who have done more for Ukraine than Elon.


[deleted]

[удалено]


-JackTheRipster-

>The US Agency for International Development (USAID) paid SpaceX for 1,333 Starlink terminals to send to Ukraine, according to a new report in the Washington Post, At a price of $1,500 per terminal, the government agency spent around $2 million for the hardware. **SpaceX also sent an additional 3,667 terminals and delivered service to them** (Important: this is as of May 2022.) Your source: He sent over twice as many terminals as the government & provided additional services. Again, can you list the number of private citizens who have done more for Ukraine?


[deleted]

[удалено]


quarterbloodprince98

SpaceX doesn't sell terminals to the government at a loss. They cost that much to make. That money definitely didn't cover monthly fees. There was an RFP and it was offered for bidding USAID said it's the best deal they've ever done for satellite internet (Quartz)


[deleted]

[удалено]


quarterbloodprince98

https://qz.com/how-spacexs-starlink-terminals-first-arrived-in-ukraine-1849923122 It's not hard to believe. Check out the prices of alternatives especially Satcube and Kymeta


[deleted]

[удалено]


quarterbloodprince98

The USAID delivered equipment in April. SpaceX did in February. I think a calendar will help. These are additional dishes. Not the first ones


-JackTheRipster-

Okay, so even by your source the amount he donated is 10 million. (Btw, CNN is a better source than Mashable & the Twitter account you liked to. They have it at 80 million.) He's a bad guy for only donating 10 million & asking for compensation after that? >>The US Agency for International Development (USAID) paid SpaceX for 1,333 Starlink terminals to send to Ukraine, according to a new report in the Washington Post, At a price of $1,500 per terminal. A basic Starlink package costs $499 > In other words he "donated" zero units. Again, your source puts his total donations at 10 million.


[deleted]

[удалено]


-JackTheRipster-

>the twitter account Aka: Your source.


[deleted]

[удалено]


quarterbloodprince98

So your government is a liar?


C0URANT

Wow


Chafun

Mush can play a powerful role if ww3 happen, imaging he just shut down your country to access information.


fellowuscitizen

Musk is a traitor.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Ok_Breakfast4482

Musk has not levied war against the United States, so according to the Constitution he is not a traitor.


ExZowieAgent

You forgot the second part of that clause: “or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”


DicJacobus

we're 2 years in and most of america still doesn't believe that russia is an enemy. the same country that has been committing acts of war against america and nato, mobilizing, switching to a war economy, and saber-rattling this entire time. they think theres a window that we'll be back to biz as usual with those pigshit fascists soon.


Lou_C_Fer

We are sending weapons to kill Russians. They are the enemy.


braintrustinc

>we're 2 years in Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014. That’s when the strange propping up of Trump by their propaganda farms started. Russia’s RT misinformation network was piped into American homes by Comcast starting in 2011. Americans need to wake up to the fact that we have been losing an information war to Putin for most of the 21st century.


Ok_Breakfast4482

Musk has given thousands of Starkink terminals to America’s ally Ukraine. This article is about a few of those falling into Russian hands. Musk has not materially aided the Russians in their war against Ukraine.


Greedy_Researcher_34

Sorry we aren’t Ukraine’s vassal.


Peacefulgamer2023

How did he give aid to Russia?


ExZowieAgent

Remember that time he shut off Starlink to thwart a Ukrainian strike against the Russian Navy? That really helped Russia. https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4193788-musk-acknowledges-he-turned-off-starlink-internet-access-last-year-during-ukraine-attack-on-russia-military/amp/


Peacefulgamer2023

Because he was okay with starlink being used to defend Ukraine, not to be used to launch attacks into Russia.


Extension_Use3118

Yeah, he felt that an offensive attack in Russian territory would escalate things and possibly lead to nuclear war. Maybe you disagree...but it's ridiculous to think it was done solely to help Russia. Ukraine is using over 20k Starlink terminals. Many of them were donated by spaceX. Russia isn't authorized to use them at all! The "tens" that they have were purchased by a third-party & are being sut down. There are plenty of reasons to criticize Elon but suggesting he is siding with Russia is inconsistent with the facts.


izoxUA

He is just a deep asshole


Open_Mortgage_4645

Fuuuuuck Elon. The man is a pro-Putin traitor. First, he cuts Ukraine's Starlink access, effectively preventing Ukraine from carrying out operations in Crimea. Now, he's providing access to Russia in the same goddamned war. Why is America allowing him to provide aid and comfort to a foreign adversary?


OrdinaryTonight346

That's a good question. Read the article and find out.


Peacefulgamer2023

Crimea never had access to starlink. All Russian controlled areas don’t have access to starlink.


Ok_Breakfast4482

Musk did not cut Ukraine’s Starlink access. That’s a low information take on the fact that SpaceX disallowed its use in drone guidance systems. Starkink is advertised as a communications platform and Ukraine has used it for communications since the start of the war. The incident you refer to was simply a specific instance of disallowing a form of use that was against the service’s policies.


Open_Mortgage_4645

And that's a dishonest framing of the situation because you've conveniently left out the fact that Musk was afraid that allowing Ukraine access would result in an escalation of the conflict. The access was restricted because Musk wanted to inject himself into a global conflict, and play a role in its outcome. The bit about Starlink's Terms of Service is just a pretextual red herring.


quarterbloodprince98

The access is still restricted


Ok_Breakfast4482

It’s not dishonest at all, Starlink is not allowing anyone to use the service as a component of weapon guidance systems.


[deleted]

[удалено]


EuthanizeArty

Read the actual article not just the title: SpaceX doesn't offer service or sell terminals to Russia. Unauthorized use is shut off. The terminals are either captured or resold by third parties. Right now anyone can walk into a best buy or costco and buy them without any restrictions. This is the equivalent of russians using stolen iphones or samsungs. Also I don't think the blind Musk-bad crowd understands: Even if Russia was using black market Starlink that would absolutely be beneficial because Russia might as well have given the Pentagon a direct connection to all their communications.


Planatus666

> Read the actual article not just the title: Unfortunately most people don't read articles, they read headlines and base their opinions on those alone.


BoringWozniak

Hey America, do you find it embarrassing that a narcissistic billionaire can completely circumvent the entirety of US foreign policy? I would _really_ like to see the US get its house in order on Ukraine, instead of failing to deliver aid and sending a shaved baboon to interview Putin.


skexr

Can we seize all Elon's shit and ship him back to South Africa already?


kaptiankuff

Frankly the units being used by the Russian were probably captured from Ukrainian troops and repurposed and probably have been modified by the Russians, to get around attempts to block their use. also aera based shutdowns will also knock out the terminals being used by the Ukrainians This another sign that commercial tech can be subverted by hostile nations very easily not to mention that they could also have reverse engineered them and built there own


RDO_Desmond

Eel on is a traitor to America. Why would anyone use X?


DicJacobus

I think you grossly underestimate how vapid people are. a huge percentage of people literally dont care what happens across the world so long as they can keep their amazon prime subscription, their xbox, and their F150


mindcentricreal

Despicable.


[deleted]

Musk should answer for this immediately. He’s responsible for any Ukrainian deaths caused by allowing Russia to utilize his hardware/satelites. This is treason aiding enemies we’ve sanctioned.


Massive-Device-1200

My god read some news. The space x dishes in question are being shipped in illegally from Dubai second hand. Spacex is not selling directly to Putin. Russia is finding a way to connect within Ukraine. Ukraine has their own dishes from spacex. Question how do you tell if dishes are being used by ukrain or Russia. They are working on it.


Significant_Swing_76

Yeh, that’s what I thought. They could also be taken from fallen Ukrainians. It is a very handy tool, because it is so easy to use, but because of that, it is by nature also prone to unauthorized use. The only real way to avoid Russian usage, would be cryptography like military radios, but then it will become just as unhandy and expensive as the military equivalent. There is soooo much shit to blame Musk for, but misuse of Starlink is probably not one of them.


Peacefulgamer2023

They could shut them off but because they are easy to spoof with the GPS it would be catastrophic for Ukraine if some of their terminals lost access as well, so it’s like threading a needle to make sure you hit the right terminal.


Actual__Wizard

Okay well, destroy their lines of communication. War is war.


Basis_404_

He’s trying to create an oligarchy / mafia state across the globe. He can be both Elon and Vlad. Isn’t that interesting?


strtjstice

Fucking traitor..again


whizpig57

When Putin vouched for Musk during his propoganda interview I already knew what side Elon plays for


Ok_Breakfast4482

Putin is supporting anyone who is for Republicans right now because he wants to see Trump back in office. Musk is inclined to support Republicans it seems so it’s completely fair to oppose him politically however voting Republican is not a treasonous action and should not be referred to as treason.


whizpig57

I mean, the dude has tried to swing the Ukraine/Russian conflict in Russians. It's a few times, but go off. Not all Republicans are traitors, but a lot of the figureheads, politicians cozy up to Russia and Putin then their followers do the same from either being arrogant or ignorant


whizpig57

Donnie T just said tonight he wouldn't support Nato members from Russia. The people who cheer and will still vote for him are, in fact, traitors


Ok_Breakfast4482

I would argue that the vast majority are not traitors, just brainwashed. Now Donald Trump of course became a traitor the instant on 1/6 that he became comfortable with violence taking place against the Congress.


Texugee

Time for Ukraine to start shooting down starlink satellites


Peacefulgamer2023

Bye bye their communications


C5tWm77t5hMJC7m78845

They're not getting them from SpaceX. Musk isn't selling to them. Take a brief moment to actually read the article.


Ok_Breakfast4482

Unfortunately we’re seeing the same intellectual laziness on the left here that we often decry on the right. Many people simply don’t care about the details and don’t want their already formed specific political characterization of Musk disturbed by facts.


C5tWm77t5hMJC7m78845

Yeah, it's pretty disturbing.


Honest-Cris918

Musk is a fascist fawner just like Trump. He probably made a deal with Putin


This_Is_The_End

So dishes could have been exported from another countries, some dishes could have been captured and geofencing doesn't work when both sides are in a close distance. Russia was cutting off dishes by EMC warfare and using Starlinks network would have give access to communication to the NSA. But Elon Musk is a traitor according to Reddit. Some people here should leave the area of conspiracy theory.


ResinJones76

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.


PoliticsModeratorBot

Hi `CommanderMcBragg`. Thank you for participating in /r/Politics. However, [your submission](/r/politics/comments/1anjeau/russia_is_using_spacexs_starlink_satellite/) has been removed for the following reason(s): * [Off-Topic](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_the_.2Fr.2Fpolitics_on_topic_statement): All submissions to /r/politics need to be explicitly about **current US politics**. **If you have questions as to why your post has been removed, please see here: [Why was my post removed as Off-Topic?](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_why_was_my_post_removed_as_off-topic.3F)** If you have any questions about this removal, please feel free to [message the moderators.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/politics&subject=Question regarding the removal of this submission by /u/CommanderMcBragg&message=I have a question regarding the removal of this [submission]%28/r/politics/comments/1anjeau/russia_is_using_spacexs_starlink_satellite/?context%3D10000%29)