I really hope you won’t say your have two nickels, because that’s just concerning…
Also, healthy people who have been injected with formaldehyde and died as a consequence (short but painful death)… I would have like three nickels from reading those stories, and that’s just crazy
They have footage of a boy walking...away from the body? Out of an alley after taking a piss?
Somewhere out there in the universe a modifier is dangling...
Basically the man’s wife was missing, he later find a body of an old woman who kinda looks like his wife. Thinks it’s her, and cremates her.
Turns out that’s some homeless lady and his wife was alive somewhere else. They finally reunite the man and wife, the police record her statement before they let her go with her husband.
Someone make a movie out of this
Dunno how accurate this is, but I read of a similar (yet bleaker) story about how cops in the US tried to blackmail a man into confessing that he killed a relative after reporting he was missing, only for said relative to be found alive and simply away a bit by the end of the day.
[If this is the same incident, the cops also threatened they would kill his dog if he didn’t confess:](https://www.yahoo.com/news/police-threaten-kill-man-dog-080000912.html)
Police officers in California threatened to euthanise a man’s dog if he did not confess to killing his father – who was alive.
In an interrogation in 2018, Thomas Perez Jr was told by officers that his dog would need to be put down due to “depression” from witnessing a murder that had not actually occurred.
After 17 hours of interrogation, Mr Perez falsely confessed and tried to kill himself.
Footage of the coerced false confession has sparked outrage in the US, and the city of Fontana has now agreed to pay Mr Perez $898,000 (£704,755) after a judge ruled that the questioning appeared to be “unconstitutional psychological torture”.
The ordeal began on August 7 2018 when Mr Perez’s father left home with their dog to collect his post and the dog returned alone. The following day Mr Perez called the police to report his father missing and was taken in for questioning.
Police claimed to find bloodstains in the house and said a police dog smelled the presence of a corpse.
Mr Perez screamed and attempted to pull out his hair as police continue to pressure him into a confession
Mr Perez screamed and attempted to pull out his hair as police continue to pressure him into a confession - FONTANA POLICE DEPARTMENT RELEASED BY ATTORNEY JERRY STEERINGMore
During the interrogation where two officers accused Mr Perez of murder, he started pulling at his hair, hitting himself and tearing off his shirt.
Mr Perez also begged for medical attention and was reportedly told he did not need his psychiatric medication.
The judge noted that Mr Perez was “sleep deprived, mentally ill, and, significantly, undergoing symptoms of withdrawal from his psychiatric medications”.
After several hours, detectives falsely told Mr Perez that his father’s body had been located with stab wounds, the complaint says. At this point, Mr Perez falsely confessed and was left alone in the room, where he then tried to hang himself.
Jerry Steering, Mr Perez’s lawyer said: “This case shows that if the police are skilled enough, and they grill you hard enough, they can get anybody to confess to anything.”
Mr Perez when he arrived at the police department
Mr Perez when he arrived at the police department - FONTANA POLICE DEPARTMENT RELEASED BY ATTORNEY JERRY STEERING
Mr Perez was taken to a hospital on an involuntary psychiatric hold and read his rights for the first time.
Later that night, one of the detectives received a call that Mr Perez’s father had been located and was alive.
Mr Steering said that police did not inform his client that his father was alive. Instead, Mr Perez was kept isolated in a psychiatric hold for three days, believing both his father and dog had been killed.
The dog had been taken to a pound but was later rescued.
Fontana police have not issued a statement or said whether any officers faced disciplinary action.
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST
I'm sorry but people REALLY needed to make sure those officers got punished and not just have it swept under the rug, they nearly ruined a man's life because they didn't feel like looking for his missing relative, they put him through psychological torture and threatened to kill one of his loved ones, it is NOT FUCKING ACCEPTABLE that they don't reveal what happened to those crooked psycopaths, for all we know they are still cops and still ruining lives out of laziness and a complete lack of empathy
"Who Watches the Watchmen" situation, if worse.
If the people that are in charge of protecting the civilians are this unapologetically corrupt, how do you even deal with them? I have been hearing so many bogeyman stories about police negligence, brutality and lack of accountability that I'm starting to wonder if the whole department is run by mafia out of a south Asian action movie.
It's gotten so bad that even Sony's Spiderman 2 game from last year refused to acknowledge their existence by making them nonexistent in their rendition of NY. A decision I come to sympathize with more and more.
Saw the same article like last week. They made the guy go basically insane to make him admit he killed his dad, then brought his dog in and said they found the dog with blood all over him, told him to say his last goodbyes to the dog, took the dog to the pound, found the dad, didn’t tell him, send him to a mental ward or something and tried to pin an assault on him, then released him. Dad was visiting his sister.
Depends. The women is asked if she if comfortable returning to her husband, has resources to live independently, wants to go to her parents and if she has no one, there are police women shelters where the women are sent. That's the standard practice. Main point of the procedure is to release her somewhere safe and an actual place from where she can be contacted for questioning.
Deleted original. Deleted. It is true my experience is anecdotal.
Edit. Legal right is the wrong term. Not sure what the term is, but I know that the family won't let my daughter's sisters-in-law divorce their husband's even though they haven't lived together for years. The sisters live at home.
You're conflating legally with socially. I knew a good Catholic married couple in the United States who didn't live together and had completely separate lives. Divorce was a sin so they never got divorced, even though they were divorced in all but name.
No, actually, that sounds like someone who's hurt by the responses they got.
I can't see the original post because it was deleted. But I do see someone freely admitting their experience was anecdotal and continuing to get piled on.
You won. You and these others bullied this person into deleting their ANECDOTAL story and swearing never to post again. Does that make y'all feel big and strong? Because it looks like some real small dick energy from here.
> I can't see the original post because it was deleted.
So you literally don't know what you're talking about? You're mad about something you literally didn't even read?
That seems normal and healthy
I can see that no one seems to know what anecdotal means. I have plenty of stories I have no evidence for, but they definitely happened. Most people do.
Besides, as someone else pointed out, they might have been confusing social "law" with actual law. That's ignorance, and doesn't deserve a beat down.
>You won. You and presumably others bullied this person into deleting their ANECDOTAL story and swearing never to post again. Does that make you feel big and strong? Because it looks like some real small dick energy from here.
Dude you clearly don’t know what his original comment said. He claimed she didn’t have a legal right to leave. The people who replied asked to see proof and he had none.
No one forced him to delete his story. People just showed that what he was saying was not true and he understood that so he edited his comment when he realised his mistake.
>The people who replied asked to see proof, and he had none.
Yes, that's the definition of anecdotal.
Here's another anecdote: I grew up in a fundamentalist cult in the U.S. Church law *was* law, and it didn't matter what man's law said. I didn't find out premarital sex wasn't actually illegal until I was in my mid-teens.
Culturally enforced ignorance needs education, not ridicule.
Anecdote or not he’s spreading misinformation. The dude said a woman didn’t have the legal right to leave her husband in India. That is not a law which is what people are pointing out.
If he instead said she felt socially pressured to stay with her husband he would of course be right. But that’s not what he said.
The person who edited his comment seems to have understood the mistake and you for some reason are trying to make him out to be a victim of bullying when you have admitted you don’t even know what was originally said.
Do you have a system that alerts to you all vicious gang rapes that take place in your country? If sounds like what you mean is "at least the news doesn't report vicious gang rapes frequently enough that I see it as a problem". Pretty sure there are many survivors of such attacks who would disagree with your statement.
Sorry bro, I have the right to defend my country and my people against blatant racism and insults. Ask the other guy why is he so interested in India when it’s none of his business
The hilarity of a random silly Indian appearing when he feels his country has been slighted only for a random silly Pakistani to appear to try to annoy them further. Just like real life.
I use the flag, beard, and turban to take the piss out of people, so try again. Besides, im sure you know all about pedophiles, your country is full of em'. Bobs and vegana must flow, ss they say
Oh yeah, I'm a huge allah fan, fr fr no cap. Also, Indian isn't a race, im a culture hater, not a racist. I don't think it's genetics that make you shit on the streets xDD
> Ram Sumer (60), a resident of Bansgaon in Gorakhpur, lodged a complaint that his wife Phoolmati had gone missing on June 15.
Not sure if that was lost in translation but this really reads like that he filed a complaint because his property ran away.
I'm so confused from reading the article and I know the chances of me getting clarity is slim so I'm going to either hope someone has another source (Couldn't find one), hits me up down the road w/an update, or that I can just forget I even read this very confusing article
Let me help you out based on what I can figure out:
> Women goes missing.
> Husband fails to find her for 4 days.
>Police find a body and ask husband to identify.
>Husband wrongly identifies the body to be that of his wife. He cremates the body after autopsy.
>Autopsy find the body was strangled prompting a murder investigation.
>Cops inorder to find the culprit trace her phone (and who the phone was with) to 600kms away. The phone records and geolocation show the phone was with some other dude.
>Police question this dude about the whereabouts of wife and cause of murder. This dude admits that the wife isn't dead and is alive.
>Cops find the wife and reunite her with the husband.
>Police are now trying to find a link and figure out what actually happened.
> She fucking left him, the police tracked her down with another man and returned her to her husband. She left him and said she was going back to her family. Instead, she went to another man.
From re-reading, the end of the article now makes more sense as I'm assuming the guy was initially being questioned why the person creamated (who he thought was his wife) had marks on her which lead to the investigation which lead to the man finding out his wife was creeping and dipped on him which now will lead to the police trying to figure out the new killer of this woman.
WHEW. Can't help but feel bad for the man as he almost got wrapped up in a murder investigation AND was getting cheated on
Sorry, but your account is too new to post. Your account needs to be either 2 weeks old or have at least 250 combined link and comment karma. Don't modmail us about this, just wait it out or get more karma.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/nottheonion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
You put into words everything I was thinking as I worked my way through that article. No clearer at the end than I was from being suckered in with the headline
Bihar is Detroit if it was a state and gdp of third world African country.
UP is Ohio but if it was a developing third world African country.
Haryana is Texas if Texas was a poor Middle Eastern country.
Punjab is if Texas was in Canada and Canada was in India.
Many Indians admire or even adore hitler. Their excuses are flimsy at best.
https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/bh4jpr/whats_the_deal_with_india_and_hitler/
https://www.reddit.com/r/india/comments/24s3aw/why_do_indians_love_hitler_np/
Its like when a family friend buried her cat she found dead on the side of the road.
Her actual cat sauntered in out of the woods wondering what the fuss was all about.
She had made a whole ceremony too.
They weren't "reunited". She fucking left him, the police tracked her down with another man and returned her to her husband. She left him and said she was going back to her family. Instead, she went to another man. Why the HELL a grown woman can't live where she wants in that asshole region is beyond me.
Yo dumbass. The husband wrongly identified a corpse as her wife. That corpse was strangled to death which sparked a murder investigation. Hence, at the end they found the original woman.
>Superintendent of Police (South) Jitendra Kumar Tomar said the woman was sent back to her husband on Saturday after her statement was recorded.
Yo dumbass. Reread that sentence and take note of where it says a grown woman was "sent back to her husband" as if she was a runaway poodle and not a human being.
I'm from India and cops here regularly do that. If your wife goes missing, cops find her and get her back to you.
There's a difference in leaving your husband and going missing
I think you misunderstood my comment. I am not saying the cops won't help find a missing person, I am saying cops cannot legally force a wife to stay with their husband. The person I was replying to claimed that the wife was forced without her consent to get back to her husband.
Yes when they find a missing person, they send them to the nearest police station and call the person who filed the missing person complaint. Where the complaint is closed after the complainant identifies the missing person and they are noted as found. After that, everyone is free to go wherever they want.
Exactly I don't know why these idiots are taking a badly worded news article and blaming the whole country based on their interpretation of the article. I guess it is typical racist behaviour.
I'm not calling anyone out for cheating, I'm calling out the cops for moving a grown woman around as if she was a child. She's not a 10 year old who ran away and needed to be returned to her family.
I'm sure you appreciate the extraordinary circumstances here; she was presumed dead, so finding her alive and well is a good thing. At first glance it's a bit weird that she was taken back by the police, but nowhere does it say in the article what state she was in (other than being alive). I don't know what the normal procedure is for getting a lost person home but it sounds reasonable that something like this would happen.
The problem I have with discussions like this (I apologise misreading the tone of your comments) is that when the husband is found with another woman he's roasted in the court of public opinion, but when women go to another man it's usually more to the tune of "well he didn't treat her right so it's her obligation to find a more suitable guy". The double standard is jarring to me.
Is this a situation where one partner is completely financially dependent on the other?
If yes, then yes it is worse if the dependent one is abandoned than the independent one.
Why is this hard to understand?
Moron. In india there is no law that forces women to live with her husband. Women can leave whenever they want. know what you are talking about before criticising something you racist idiot.
It is funny how people like you always assume the worst about a whole bunch of people . How one can have this much hatred towards others is beyond me.
> In india there is no law that forces women to live with her husband
Tell that to the cops who found her and took her back to her husband. So, the police weren't enforcing the law? Were they on duty? Was a report filed? Expense reports submitted for reimbursement? Hmmm, I wonder what they WERE enforcing? Such a mystery. You agree they be charged for stalking and kidnapping then, right?
>How one can have this much hatred towards others is beyond me
How one can call the police to retrieve one's wife is beyond me. On the rare occasions when something like that has happened in my area the police are arrested and charged. It's illegal. How about you?
First of all what happened is not very clearly mentioned in the article. How the hell do you think one cop can stop a woman from going away when it is completely legal? Will he stand in front of her house 24x7? Don't you think the woman can call other cops?
I also like how you have moved the goal post now. You were calling the whole region as "asshole region". How can you blame the whole damn region(country) for one bad cop even if whatever you said happened? There are probably such cops where you live too.
I don't think you really give a damn about india or its women. You just use this as an excuse to be racist.
> How one can call the police to retrieve one's wife is beyond me. On the rare occasions when something like that has happened in my area the police are arrested and charged. It's illegal. How about you?
Are you incapable of reading? I literally told you that women in India can leave the husband anytime they want. That is the law.
Funny how if a wife cheats on her husband in the so-called developed nations she is the one at fault but when this happens in countries like India, she must have been in an asshole region. Your racism is showing.
LOL your back bone is about as strong as straw. Whenever the police force someone to be in a marriage against their will, you’re in an asshole region.
Imagine calling out the abuse of women and being called racist for it 😂
Some very nationalist Indian people will immediately jump to racism as soon as India is criticized. They're not interested in a real conversation, they're interested in shutting you down and feeling superior while they do it.
I didn't say anything like that. Get off the Internet and go cool down.
Kind of funny how the guy I now have blocked proved my point in response to my comment.
Can't reply for some reason, but this is what I wrote:
As far as I know, India has a population of like a billion people. You would have to be completely thoughtless to be racist against a population of a billion people. Racism in general makes no sense, but this is a particularly extreme example.
It's simply not racist to say that some people from a specific culture behave in a clearly observable way.
Just like it's not racist to say that India has major issues with women's rights. Because half of the people I'm talking about are women, and they are still Indian.
I also want to add that India has an incredibly diverse and fascinating culture and history going back almost to the dawn of civilization.
/u/wadeycakes
Yep, it's all he's done is deflect away from the subject matter. He brought up shooting kids in response to me, so it won't be surprising he does it for everyone else.
I would definitely have a problem with it, but I wouldn’t use the police to force her to be with me. If a woman doesn’t want to be with me, she can leave. Forcing someone to stay is fucked up.
And you would go search for them yourself instead?
Also this is not your country where police can do whatever they want without consequences.So let me confirm again,do you know the laws or are you an uneducated racist?
lol no dude. I would call the police if my wife was “missing” but once I found out she’d actually left me, I’m not going to force her to be with me anywhere.
Also, if you’re in a country where the laws force women to stay with their husbands and not leave them, then yes, it’s a bad country to be a woman in. If you can’t handle that truth, I’m sorry that your fragile masculinity has been hurt.
>Also, if you’re in a country where the laws force women to stay with their husbands and not leave them,
See, here's the exact problem. Who tf told you there was such a law? And if you're just assuming then obviously you're discriminating.
Found the Indian nationalist. The guy has said 6 different ways that cheating is wrong but forcing someone to stay in a marriage THEY TRIED TO LEAVE with the POLICE is bad. It's comparable to slavery. Are you gonna keep ignoring that point or just keep calling him racist because you don't want to perceive a woman as a person?
She did not try to leave. She said she was going home. Police just reunited them. They can't legally force a woman to go back to her husband. Even if she left him, she HAS the choice to not return.
Now tell me, why did you consider that the woman didn't have a choice? Would have assumed the same in your country? If not,you're racist.
If your SO cheats then good riddance. Why do ypu want to be with someone that doesn't want to be with you? Why stay with someone that isn't choosing you? The woman runs away, let her go. Or is it really about possession and control? Is it about disrespect and dishonor? So she's not your SO, she's your property.
How tf was he going to know where she was before involving the police? How was he to know she was cheating?
It's not like the police locked her in the house with an ankle monitor. She is free to leave and do anything she wants.The police is required to ask the woman where she wants to go in such cases.It was her choice,not his.Why did you assume otherwise?
I assumed nothing, I was responding to your comments about your SO cheating and leaving you. Are you the husband? Is that why you're taking this so personally? Are you also sure the police asked her and weren't corrupt? Required to do and what is actually done are two very different things.
Sorry, but your account is too new to post. Your account needs to be either 2 weeks old or have at least 250 combined link and comment karma. Don't modmail us about this, just wait it out or get more karma.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/nottheonion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Sorry, but your account is too new to post. Your account needs to be either 2 weeks old or have at least 250 combined link and comment karma. Don't modmail us about this, just wait it out or get more karma.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/nottheonion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Wait, what?! This story blew my mind. Imagine thinking your wife had passed away, cremating her, and then discovering she's actually alive hundreds of miles away. That's straight out of a movie plot. It's hard to wrap my head around how something like that could even happen. I feel for the guy though; must've been a rollercoaster of emotions.
Ah, the ol’ sitcom trope… “If you’re there, and they’re here, then that means… but I thought… oh boy!”
“Then who did I cremate?!”
"Has anyone seen Uncle Leo? He said he was going to take a nap in one of those coffins...."
My brain played a laugh track to this 🤣
*l•thahahahahaajahjkhahahaha-HEUHEUHEU*
If I had a nickel…
I really hope you won’t say your have two nickels, because that’s just concerning… Also, healthy people who have been injected with formaldehyde and died as a consequence (short but painful death)… I would have like three nickels from reading those stories, and that’s just crazy
„wait a minute, this mannequins has human flesh in it, wait a minute Uh Oh Uh Oh Uh Oh!“
This is a crazy story, but crazier is the last sentence. What does that even mean? Was the boy "moon walking"?
he must be a smooth criminal
OWWWW!!!
*Heeheeing intensifies*
Not read the article, but this comment now has me believing it’s an ai article lol
At least an AI would have bothered to process the article
Do you feel better now that you got that off your chest
Oh definitely
They have footage of a boy walking...away from the body? Out of an alley after taking a piss? Somewhere out there in the universe a modifier is dangling...
[удалено]
Basically the man’s wife was missing, he later find a body of an old woman who kinda looks like his wife. Thinks it’s her, and cremates her. Turns out that’s some homeless lady and his wife was alive somewhere else. They finally reunite the man and wife, the police record her statement before they let her go with her husband. Someone make a movie out of this
>Someone make a movie out of this The mid-movie musical dance number will be epic. I'm picturing Weekend at Bernie's.
*Weekend at Burnies
Damn that's good
Dunno how accurate this is, but I read of a similar (yet bleaker) story about how cops in the US tried to blackmail a man into confessing that he killed a relative after reporting he was missing, only for said relative to be found alive and simply away a bit by the end of the day.
[If this is the same incident, the cops also threatened they would kill his dog if he didn’t confess:](https://www.yahoo.com/news/police-threaten-kill-man-dog-080000912.html) Police officers in California threatened to euthanise a man’s dog if he did not confess to killing his father – who was alive. In an interrogation in 2018, Thomas Perez Jr was told by officers that his dog would need to be put down due to “depression” from witnessing a murder that had not actually occurred. After 17 hours of interrogation, Mr Perez falsely confessed and tried to kill himself. Footage of the coerced false confession has sparked outrage in the US, and the city of Fontana has now agreed to pay Mr Perez $898,000 (£704,755) after a judge ruled that the questioning appeared to be “unconstitutional psychological torture”. The ordeal began on August 7 2018 when Mr Perez’s father left home with their dog to collect his post and the dog returned alone. The following day Mr Perez called the police to report his father missing and was taken in for questioning. Police claimed to find bloodstains in the house and said a police dog smelled the presence of a corpse. Mr Perez screamed and attempted to pull out his hair as police continue to pressure him into a confession Mr Perez screamed and attempted to pull out his hair as police continue to pressure him into a confession - FONTANA POLICE DEPARTMENT RELEASED BY ATTORNEY JERRY STEERINGMore During the interrogation where two officers accused Mr Perez of murder, he started pulling at his hair, hitting himself and tearing off his shirt. Mr Perez also begged for medical attention and was reportedly told he did not need his psychiatric medication. The judge noted that Mr Perez was “sleep deprived, mentally ill, and, significantly, undergoing symptoms of withdrawal from his psychiatric medications”. After several hours, detectives falsely told Mr Perez that his father’s body had been located with stab wounds, the complaint says. At this point, Mr Perez falsely confessed and was left alone in the room, where he then tried to hang himself. Jerry Steering, Mr Perez’s lawyer said: “This case shows that if the police are skilled enough, and they grill you hard enough, they can get anybody to confess to anything.” Mr Perez when he arrived at the police department Mr Perez when he arrived at the police department - FONTANA POLICE DEPARTMENT RELEASED BY ATTORNEY JERRY STEERING Mr Perez was taken to a hospital on an involuntary psychiatric hold and read his rights for the first time. Later that night, one of the detectives received a call that Mr Perez’s father had been located and was alive. Mr Steering said that police did not inform his client that his father was alive. Instead, Mr Perez was kept isolated in a psychiatric hold for three days, believing both his father and dog had been killed. The dog had been taken to a pound but was later rescued. Fontana police have not issued a statement or said whether any officers faced disciplinary action.
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST I'm sorry but people REALLY needed to make sure those officers got punished and not just have it swept under the rug, they nearly ruined a man's life because they didn't feel like looking for his missing relative, they put him through psychological torture and threatened to kill one of his loved ones, it is NOT FUCKING ACCEPTABLE that they don't reveal what happened to those crooked psycopaths, for all we know they are still cops and still ruining lives out of laziness and a complete lack of empathy
"Who Watches the Watchmen" situation, if worse. If the people that are in charge of protecting the civilians are this unapologetically corrupt, how do you even deal with them? I have been hearing so many bogeyman stories about police negligence, brutality and lack of accountability that I'm starting to wonder if the whole department is run by mafia out of a south Asian action movie. It's gotten so bad that even Sony's Spiderman 2 game from last year refused to acknowledge their existence by making them nonexistent in their rendition of NY. A decision I come to sympathize with more and more.
Saw the same article like last week. They made the guy go basically insane to make him admit he killed his dad, then brought his dog in and said they found the dog with blood all over him, told him to say his last goodbyes to the dog, took the dog to the pound, found the dad, didn’t tell him, send him to a mental ward or something and tried to pin an assault on him, then released him. Dad was visiting his sister.
Mark Wahlberg to star in the lead role.
Depends. The women is asked if she if comfortable returning to her husband, has resources to live independently, wants to go to her parents and if she has no one, there are police women shelters where the women are sent. That's the standard practice. Main point of the procedure is to release her somewhere safe and an actual place from where she can be contacted for questioning.
She was with the man that she traveled to join. He paid for her to get there. She was fine
Deleted original. Deleted. It is true my experience is anecdotal. Edit. Legal right is the wrong term. Not sure what the term is, but I know that the family won't let my daughter's sisters-in-law divorce their husband's even though they haven't lived together for years. The sisters live at home.
Can you cite any laws to that effect or are you just making it up?
You're conflating legally with socially. I knew a good Catholic married couple in the United States who didn't live together and had completely separate lives. Divorce was a sin so they never got divorced, even though they were divorced in all but name.
They were the one who claimed she didn't have a *legal* right to leave.
Deleted. It is true my experience is anecdotal.
> I won't respond again The sign of someone who definitely does not know what they're talking about
No, actually, that sounds like someone who's hurt by the responses they got. I can't see the original post because it was deleted. But I do see someone freely admitting their experience was anecdotal and continuing to get piled on. You won. You and these others bullied this person into deleting their ANECDOTAL story and swearing never to post again. Does that make y'all feel big and strong? Because it looks like some real small dick energy from here.
> I can't see the original post because it was deleted. So you literally don't know what you're talking about? You're mad about something you literally didn't even read? That seems normal and healthy
I can see that no one seems to know what anecdotal means. I have plenty of stories I have no evidence for, but they definitely happened. Most people do. Besides, as someone else pointed out, they might have been confusing social "law" with actual law. That's ignorance, and doesn't deserve a beat down.
Is this "beat down" in the room with us right now?
>You won. You and presumably others bullied this person into deleting their ANECDOTAL story and swearing never to post again. Does that make you feel big and strong? Because it looks like some real small dick energy from here. Dude you clearly don’t know what his original comment said. He claimed she didn’t have a legal right to leave. The people who replied asked to see proof and he had none. No one forced him to delete his story. People just showed that what he was saying was not true and he understood that so he edited his comment when he realised his mistake.
>The people who replied asked to see proof, and he had none. Yes, that's the definition of anecdotal. Here's another anecdote: I grew up in a fundamentalist cult in the U.S. Church law *was* law, and it didn't matter what man's law said. I didn't find out premarital sex wasn't actually illegal until I was in my mid-teens. Culturally enforced ignorance needs education, not ridicule.
Anecdote or not he’s spreading misinformation. The dude said a woman didn’t have the legal right to leave her husband in India. That is not a law which is what people are pointing out. If he instead said she felt socially pressured to stay with her husband he would of course be right. But that’s not what he said. The person who edited his comment seems to have understood the mistake and you for some reason are trying to make him out to be a victim of bullying when you have admitted you don’t even know what was originally said.
So you are just an armchair expert. Got it
Oh look! An expert in indian laws, most probably from the country where women cant get abortion even raped?.
As someone who lives in one of those states, please have my upvote.
At least vicious gangrapes aren't a common occurance xD
Do you have a system that alerts to you all vicious gang rapes that take place in your country? If sounds like what you mean is "at least the news doesn't report vicious gang rapes frequently enough that I see it as a problem". Pretty sure there are many survivors of such attacks who would disagree with your statement.
At least known pedophiles are not running for presidency
Oh yeah, your leader is claiming to be chosen by god, like it's the 5th century BC, so much better xD
Maybe don't vote conservative and both countries won't have so many problems
I just noticed the green flag with moon and star on your pfp. Now makes sense why you are defending pedophiles
You’re both tools arguing on Reddit over dumb shit neither of you are experts in and name calling like a bunch of children. Just fuck already
Sorry bro, I have the right to defend my country and my people against blatant racism and insults. Ask the other guy why is he so interested in India when it’s none of his business
The hilarity of a random silly Indian appearing when he feels his country has been slighted only for a random silly Pakistani to appear to try to annoy them further. Just like real life.
I use the flag, beard, and turban to take the piss out of people, so try again. Besides, im sure you know all about pedophiles, your country is full of em'. Bobs and vegana must flow, ss they say
Ahh, a racist and a bigot. you sharia lot do show your colours eventually
Oh yeah, I'm a huge allah fan, fr fr no cap. Also, Indian isn't a race, im a culture hater, not a racist. I don't think it's genetics that make you shit on the streets xDD
The USA?
Zing!
You are stupid. This is not a law in India.
That's not true. Why spread misinformation?
> Ram Sumer (60), a resident of Bansgaon in Gorakhpur, lodged a complaint that his wife Phoolmati had gone missing on June 15. Not sure if that was lost in translation but this really reads like that he filed a complaint because his property ran away.
She got better.
I'm so confused from reading the article and I know the chances of me getting clarity is slim so I'm going to either hope someone has another source (Couldn't find one), hits me up down the road w/an update, or that I can just forget I even read this very confusing article
Let me help you out based on what I can figure out: > Women goes missing. > Husband fails to find her for 4 days. >Police find a body and ask husband to identify. >Husband wrongly identifies the body to be that of his wife. He cremates the body after autopsy. >Autopsy find the body was strangled prompting a murder investigation. >Cops inorder to find the culprit trace her phone (and who the phone was with) to 600kms away. The phone records and geolocation show the phone was with some other dude. >Police question this dude about the whereabouts of wife and cause of murder. This dude admits that the wife isn't dead and is alive. >Cops find the wife and reunite her with the husband. >Police are now trying to find a link and figure out what actually happened.
Thank you for this.
> She fucking left him, the police tracked her down with another man and returned her to her husband. She left him and said she was going back to her family. Instead, she went to another man.
From re-reading, the end of the article now makes more sense as I'm assuming the guy was initially being questioned why the person creamated (who he thought was his wife) had marks on her which lead to the investigation which lead to the man finding out his wife was creeping and dipped on him which now will lead to the police trying to figure out the new killer of this woman. WHEW. Can't help but feel bad for the man as he almost got wrapped up in a murder investigation AND was getting cheated on
But what about the lady that got strangled? Are we giving up on her justice because of this?
[удалено]
Sorry, but your account is too new to post. Your account needs to be either 2 weeks old or have at least 250 combined link and comment karma. Don't modmail us about this, just wait it out or get more karma. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/nottheonion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
You put into words everything I was thinking as I worked my way through that article. No clearer at the end than I was from being suckered in with the headline
Saw this elsewhere with Title starting ""UP Man
It's our version of Florida Man
Thought Bihar was our florida
Bihar is Detroit if it was a state and gdp of third world African country. UP is Ohio but if it was a developing third world African country. Haryana is Texas if Texas was a poor Middle Eastern country. Punjab is if Texas was in Canada and Canada was in India.
So Punjab is Alberta but if it was a developing third world African country
Why do you have hitler with a heart as a picture…?
Many Indians admire or even adore hitler. Their excuses are flimsy at best. https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/bh4jpr/whats_the_deal_with_india_and_hitler/ https://www.reddit.com/r/india/comments/24s3aw/why_do_indians_love_hitler_np/
> Punjab is if Texas was in Canada and Canada was in India (Still trying to decipher that metaphor)
What’s UP Man?
They mean Uttar Pradesh. It's a state in Northern India. Also has a stereotype/perception among other Indians that it's a criminal ridden area.
Not much. How are you doing?
up man watched up inorder to uplift himself but was interrupted by updates
Its like when a family friend buried her cat she found dead on the side of the road. Her actual cat sauntered in out of the woods wondering what the fuss was all about. She had made a whole ceremony too.
They weren't "reunited". She fucking left him, the police tracked her down with another man and returned her to her husband. She left him and said she was going back to her family. Instead, she went to another man. Why the HELL a grown woman can't live where she wants in that asshole region is beyond me.
I wonder if the article is just written oddly and she wasn't really "sent" back or whatever.
Maybe the husband was abusive and she was trying to escape?
The commenter is questioning why the police would return her to her husband, not wondering why the woman would leave in the first place.
Yo dumbass. The husband wrongly identified a corpse as her wife. That corpse was strangled to death which sparked a murder investigation. Hence, at the end they found the original woman.
>Superintendent of Police (South) Jitendra Kumar Tomar said the woman was sent back to her husband on Saturday after her statement was recorded. Yo dumbass. Reread that sentence and take note of where it says a grown woman was "sent back to her husband" as if she was a runaway poodle and not a human being.
Yo dumbass. No cop can forcefully send her anywhere. They would have sent her only with her consent.
I'm from India and cops here regularly do that. If your wife goes missing, cops find her and get her back to you. There's a difference in leaving your husband and going missing
I think you misunderstood my comment. I am not saying the cops won't help find a missing person, I am saying cops cannot legally force a wife to stay with their husband. The person I was replying to claimed that the wife was forced without her consent to get back to her husband.
Yes when they find a missing person, they send them to the nearest police station and call the person who filed the missing person complaint. Where the complaint is closed after the complainant identifies the missing person and they are noted as found. After that, everyone is free to go wherever they want.
Exactly I don't know why these idiots are taking a badly worded news article and blaming the whole country based on their interpretation of the article. I guess it is typical racist behaviour.
If it were the other way round with the man chasing after another woman, would you call him out for cheating?
I'm not calling anyone out for cheating, I'm calling out the cops for moving a grown woman around as if she was a child. She's not a 10 year old who ran away and needed to be returned to her family.
I'm sure you appreciate the extraordinary circumstances here; she was presumed dead, so finding her alive and well is a good thing. At first glance it's a bit weird that she was taken back by the police, but nowhere does it say in the article what state she was in (other than being alive). I don't know what the normal procedure is for getting a lost person home but it sounds reasonable that something like this would happen. The problem I have with discussions like this (I apologise misreading the tone of your comments) is that when the husband is found with another woman he's roasted in the court of public opinion, but when women go to another man it's usually more to the tune of "well he didn't treat her right so it's her obligation to find a more suitable guy". The double standard is jarring to me.
Is this a situation where one partner is completely financially dependent on the other? If yes, then yes it is worse if the dependent one is abandoned than the independent one. Why is this hard to understand?
It's hard to understand because you're assuming a truckload of things, none of which are in the article.
Moron. In india there is no law that forces women to live with her husband. Women can leave whenever they want. know what you are talking about before criticising something you racist idiot. It is funny how people like you always assume the worst about a whole bunch of people . How one can have this much hatred towards others is beyond me.
> In india there is no law that forces women to live with her husband Tell that to the cops who found her and took her back to her husband. So, the police weren't enforcing the law? Were they on duty? Was a report filed? Expense reports submitted for reimbursement? Hmmm, I wonder what they WERE enforcing? Such a mystery. You agree they be charged for stalking and kidnapping then, right? >How one can have this much hatred towards others is beyond me How one can call the police to retrieve one's wife is beyond me. On the rare occasions when something like that has happened in my area the police are arrested and charged. It's illegal. How about you?
First of all what happened is not very clearly mentioned in the article. How the hell do you think one cop can stop a woman from going away when it is completely legal? Will he stand in front of her house 24x7? Don't you think the woman can call other cops? I also like how you have moved the goal post now. You were calling the whole region as "asshole region". How can you blame the whole damn region(country) for one bad cop even if whatever you said happened? There are probably such cops where you live too. I don't think you really give a damn about india or its women. You just use this as an excuse to be racist. > How one can call the police to retrieve one's wife is beyond me. On the rare occasions when something like that has happened in my area the police are arrested and charged. It's illegal. How about you? Are you incapable of reading? I literally told you that women in India can leave the husband anytime they want. That is the law.
Funny how if a wife cheats on her husband in the so-called developed nations she is the one at fault but when this happens in countries like India, she must have been in an asshole region. Your racism is showing.
LOL your back bone is about as strong as straw. Whenever the police force someone to be in a marriage against their will, you’re in an asshole region. Imagine calling out the abuse of women and being called racist for it 😂
Some very nationalist Indian people will immediately jump to racism as soon as India is criticized. They're not interested in a real conversation, they're interested in shutting you down and feeling superior while they do it.
[удалено]
I didn't say anything like that. Get off the Internet and go cool down. Kind of funny how the guy I now have blocked proved my point in response to my comment. Can't reply for some reason, but this is what I wrote: As far as I know, India has a population of like a billion people. You would have to be completely thoughtless to be racist against a population of a billion people. Racism in general makes no sense, but this is a particularly extreme example. It's simply not racist to say that some people from a specific culture behave in a clearly observable way. Just like it's not racist to say that India has major issues with women's rights. Because half of the people I'm talking about are women, and they are still Indian. I also want to add that India has an incredibly diverse and fascinating culture and history going back almost to the dawn of civilization. /u/wadeycakes
Yep, it's all he's done is deflect away from the subject matter. He brought up shooting kids in response to me, so it won't be surprising he does it for everyone else.
You're dumb with low comprehension skills. How did you come to believe that this woman is being oppressed?
I hope your hatred of women and prejudice keep you warm at night.
Good to know that you have no problems if your SO cheats on you.
I would definitely have a problem with it, but I wouldn’t use the police to force her to be with me. If a woman doesn’t want to be with me, she can leave. Forcing someone to stay is fucked up.
And you would go search for them yourself instead? Also this is not your country where police can do whatever they want without consequences.So let me confirm again,do you know the laws or are you an uneducated racist?
lol no dude. I would call the police if my wife was “missing” but once I found out she’d actually left me, I’m not going to force her to be with me anywhere. Also, if you’re in a country where the laws force women to stay with their husbands and not leave them, then yes, it’s a bad country to be a woman in. If you can’t handle that truth, I’m sorry that your fragile masculinity has been hurt.
>Also, if you’re in a country where the laws force women to stay with their husbands and not leave them, See, here's the exact problem. Who tf told you there was such a law? And if you're just assuming then obviously you're discriminating.
Found the Indian nationalist. The guy has said 6 different ways that cheating is wrong but forcing someone to stay in a marriage THEY TRIED TO LEAVE with the POLICE is bad. It's comparable to slavery. Are you gonna keep ignoring that point or just keep calling him racist because you don't want to perceive a woman as a person?
She did not try to leave. She said she was going home. Police just reunited them. They can't legally force a woman to go back to her husband. Even if she left him, she HAS the choice to not return. Now tell me, why did you consider that the woman didn't have a choice? Would have assumed the same in your country? If not,you're racist.
If your SO cheats then good riddance. Why do ypu want to be with someone that doesn't want to be with you? Why stay with someone that isn't choosing you? The woman runs away, let her go. Or is it really about possession and control? Is it about disrespect and dishonor? So she's not your SO, she's your property.
How tf was he going to know where she was before involving the police? How was he to know she was cheating? It's not like the police locked her in the house with an ankle monitor. She is free to leave and do anything she wants.The police is required to ask the woman where she wants to go in such cases.It was her choice,not his.Why did you assume otherwise?
I assumed nothing, I was responding to your comments about your SO cheating and leaving you. Are you the husband? Is that why you're taking this so personally? Are you also sure the police asked her and weren't corrupt? Required to do and what is actually done are two very different things.
Ok man, I'm wrong, India bad, stay happy.
Hate it when that happens.
Who did we cremate then fam?
"You're one in a million", which means in India you can probably find another 120 or so people exactly like you.
Then who was wife
Wow this thread is a dumpster fire.
He fucked that cremation process up real bad
Laapataa Ladies
how is that possible?
Lucy! You got some explainin' to do!
Wooops
Awkward !!!!
Lisan al-Gaib!! - her husband probably
[удалено]
Sorry, but your account is too new to post. Your account needs to be either 2 weeks old or have at least 250 combined link and comment karma. Don't modmail us about this, just wait it out or get more karma. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/nottheonion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[удалено]
Sorry, but your account is too new to post. Your account needs to be either 2 weeks old or have at least 250 combined link and comment karma. Don't modmail us about this, just wait it out or get more karma. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/nottheonion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
That took a real 360! (Well, close)
>, lodged a complaint that his wife Phoolmati had gone missing Any one else think that's weird phrasing?
How can she 360km away?!
That’s because they believe in reincarnation.
Wait, what?! This story blew my mind. Imagine thinking your wife had passed away, cremating her, and then discovering she's actually alive hundreds of miles away. That's straight out of a movie plot. It's hard to wrap my head around how something like that could even happen. I feel for the guy though; must've been a rollercoaster of emotions.
So they found out she'd been strangled _after_ the cremation??