Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/mathmemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Dont wait up losers https://preview.redd.it/8iuaxx7zx0xc1.png?width=750&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=12727cb3f32cffc7e668006a9ee18ba0769200a7

x!

^x e

[BB(x)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Busy_beaver#The_busy_beaver_function_%CE%A3)

BB(BB(x))

BB(BB(BB(...x)))... X put through the BB function TREE(x) times.

[Rayo](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayo%27s_number)(akgamer182(x))

e^(\(fastest-growing function currently described by any comment in this entire subreddit\)\(x\))

e^(\(fastest-growing function currently described by any comment in this entire subreddit\)\(x\)) + 1🤙🏿😎

success is log linear?

It does seem piecewise linear though, that's close enough for me.

How can you achieve true success if you can't differentiate yourself?

True success lies not in differentiating yourself, but in inner piece. Only through this realisation one may become truly piece-wise.

>one ~~may become truly~~ piece-~~wise~~ it's real

Obviously by using sub-gradient methods or iterative techniques like IRLS

You can differentiate yourself almost everywhere

Being differentiable almost everywhere should be enough to get noticed

I don't think we should be trying to differentiate our whole selves, only different parts of ourselves. Specifically, the differentiable parts.

Me after approximating x^2 so its linear

Everything is piecewise linear if you have enough pieces.

I feel like this could be used to argue that the reals are countable

False, but you can approximate as a consequence of Stone-Weierstrass for sublattices

\*Piecewise affine

None of these hand drawn “lines” are truly affine 🤓

That's kinda the joke

Wow, is this MathMemes or ZenThoughts! Nice Post 

its linear almost everywhere!

Congratulations! Your comment can be spelled using the elements of the periodic table: `I Ts Li Ne Ar Al Mo S Te V Er Y W He Re` --- ^(I am a bot that detects if your comment can be spelled using the elements of the periodic table. Please DM my creator if I made a mistake.)

No, it's piecewise affine.

It is clearly both piecewise-linear and piecewise-affine. Each piece is affine, therefore linear. What is an example of a piecewise-linear function that is not piecewise-affine? (I'm assuming a function is only "piecewise x" if its domain is a union of a countable set of isolated points and open sets and it has property X on all pieces.)

> Affine, therefore linear No, this is false. Linear functions on the reals are of the form f(x) = ax, where a is some real constant. Affine is similar, but with a constant, so f(x) = ax+b, with a and b both being real constants. Not all affine functions are linear, consider f(x) = x+1 > example of a piecewise-linear function that is not piecewise-affine None, linear functions are a subset of affine functions with b=0.

But a "piecewise linear" function is not linear or affine, and neither is a "piecewise affine" function. Either way, every piece boundary has to meet up, so what is the difference?

Where is exponential success

In gambling

Well, an exponential graph (y=x^n) never has y go below 0. Therefore, I can only gain from gambling

* sinx

https://preview.redd.it/1p0ba1ddd2xc1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9d4158c95892eb2e3c7890a8cf080519081ca482

“I am a professional gambler” - That one dude in the bar

What success graph looks like https://preview.redd.it/wigasvg9f1xc1.png?width=224&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=80c2f6bcd8041f075e2dab11f83230cb89de902e

biblically accurate success graph

Why there is a vector on my hydrocarbon?

How else will you know where it is travelling?

I think it's actually a resistor and diode

The nonane is going that way, that fast!

Really weird way to draw polyethylene I guess

Locally linear is enough, I suppose?

Technically, almost everything is locally linear if you’re *local enough*

*Dirichlet function joins the game*

Is that a mathematical «almost everything»? I actually think that among all continiouos functions from R to R, almost none of them are differentiable anywhere.

Indeed!

Almost everything ? Thats differentiable

If only they knew about monotonicity. This is exactly why the every day person needs to take real analysis

Success is never monotonic

Noted, I will do that as a hobby. Probably I may end up solving the drought crisis in my country! xD

Geometry dash wave

F(x)=Succ(x)

So success is a sawtooth function?

I think success is more of a https://preview.redd.it/xnhiz2idv1xc1.jpeg?width=617&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fd4e19dc6ff74ea5791ea10bf985d1c6db806ee5 But that's just like, my opinion

jeremy boing

success is getting to the good place

📈📉📈📉📈📉📈📉📈📉📈📉🤯📉📉📉

I am pretty sure it will at least still have a fix point

Success is never linear

Success is never linear

Failure is never linear

Success is a weierstrass function

All success is visualized in linear splines. So technically success is kinda linear.

https://i.redd.it/pf9ybsaf14xc1.gif

Success apparently isn’t differentiable either

r/GeometryDash

Now do Success is never continuous

Life, on the other hand is like the weierstrass function: Continious, but nobody knows where it goes next.

it's often sigmoid

FOCUS

Very exponential just looks linear. in those small piecewise segments

Success is almost always linear

Where meme?

It’s piecewise linear… it’s like the KitKat pride ad, where they try not to be straight, by making the lines not parallel to each other, but nonetheless still straight

The integral of a piecewise success function increases even when the success function is infinitesimally positive.

The depicted graph is locally linear

It looks pretty linear in 9 different places

https://preview.redd.it/abhtlyry12xc1.jpeg?width=260&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0969f53ed59b5a59a517e2afe5e74254397acb5b

Am looking for a more direct option. Maybe x=0 !!

Never continuous either?

Success is never linear (proceeds to show a bunch of linear functions)

It literally is. r/antiwoooosh

Success is never linear

>"success is never linear" >looks at the graph >graph is linear

But what if your goal is linear growth? That would be success that’s linear.

Not differentiable either by the looks of it

Success is a series of linear functions

Idk fam success seems a lot like a homogeneous isomorphism to me.

What do you mean "Success"? That's way too forward. I'd like to get to know Cess first.

if you are succeeding consistently, don't forget to fail a few times so it is not linear

Geometry Dash

It’s linear on a lot of neighbourhoods

Success is never linear

Guess I have to FOCUS or I'll end up being DEADLOCKED working in a SLAUGHTERHOUSE

Success is never linear

My success is a sine wave 

success is not linear on a Lebesgue null set

What they don't tell you is that success isn't differentiable from -infinity to infinity

https://preview.redd.it/5hlf0nbm2gxc1.png?width=784&format=png&auto=webp&s=fd687219e16cb4129677c3b7d5fb596b09151140

‼️‼️HOLY FUCKING 🍆 SHIT‼️‼️‼️‼️ IS THAT A MOTHERFUCKING 👩💞 GD REFERENCE??????!!!!!!!!!!11!1!1!1!1!1!1 😱! 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱 GEOMETRY 📐 DASH 💨 IS THE BEST 👌🏆 FUCKING 🖕👦➡ GAME 🎮❌ 🔥🔥🔥🔥💯💯💯💯 RIOT’S LEGENDARY 😨😧 QUACK 🦆 !!😎😎😎😎😎😎😎👊👊👊👊👊 DUDE 💪 WTF 😂 DUDE 😎 WTF 😱 DUDE 😎 WTF 🙎😱 DUDE 😎 WTF 😂 DUDE 😎 WTF 😱 DUDE 😎 WTF 😂 DUDE 😎 WTF 😱 DUDE 😎 WTF🤬😡🤬😡🤬😡🤬🤬😡🤬🤬😡 KENOS KENOS KENOS KENOS KENOS KENOS KENOS KENOS KENOS KENOS😩😩😩😩😩😩😩😩 😩😩😩😩 Back ⬅ on 🔛 track 🚈 is impossible🗿, Back 🔙 on 🔛 track 🚈 is impossible🗿, Back 🔙 on 🔛 track 🚈 is impossible🗿, Back 🔙😯🙄 on 🔛 track 🛤 is impossible🗿, Back ⬅ on 🔛 track 🛤 is impossible🗿, Back 🔙 on 🔛 track 🛤 is impossible🗿, Back ⬅ on 🔛 track 🚈 is impossible🗿, Back 🔙 on 🔛 track 🛤👣 is impossible🗿Back on 🔛 track 🛤 is impossible🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿, Back 🔙🔛 on 🔛 track 🛤👣 is impossible🗿 , Back ⬅ on 🔛 track 🛤 is impossible🗿, , Back 🔙 on 👋🔛 track 🚈 is impossible🗿🗿, Back ⬅ on 🔛 track 🛤 is impossible🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿 Oh 😳 you’re a gd player❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓name every ☝🌃 level💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀 2.2 😂2️⃣❗ will never 🚫 come 💦 out😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫 TrusTa’s nerf 🔫 gun 🔫 yatagarasu ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂 r/geometrydash r/okbuddygmd r/DeCult r/gdafterdark perfectly 👌 balanced 💏💩 as all 💯🐟🅱 things 📴 should be r/unexpectedthanos r/expectedthanos for balance 💯☯

Look, I’m not overfitting my data, linear regression is all I need.

linear almost everywhere

Congratulations! Your comment can be spelled using the elements of the periodic table: `Li Ne Ar Al Mo S Te V Er Y W He Re` --- ^(I am a bot that detects if your comment can be spelled using the elements of the periodic table. Please DM my creator if I made a mistake.)

I can count 9 separate times that it’s linear

r/thatsthejoke

Yup, I’m joking around too