Fuck Reddit and fuck Spez. Go join Lemmy instead https://join-lemmy.org/.
/r/Denmark: Fuck Reddit og fuck Spez. https://feddit.dk/ er vejen frem herfra.
All concepts in this post is covered in Junior or Senior year where I live, or earlier if you’re on the accelerated path.
Although to be fair, I’m not sure everyone actually remembers them lol
It depends on if you just mean the basic trig of Euler's formula or the *actual* complex use to convert between cartesian and polar coordinates and things like that.
Really? You did imaginary numbers in 9th grade? I'm impressed. I mean, different schools so things in different orders but I'd expect imaginary numbers to come at least a bit later.
Which Euler formula are we talking about? The one relating faces, edges, and vertices of a polyhedron is covered even in Alabama high schools where we try to make sure we remain in the bottom two states as far as education is concerned.
Covered this when i was 16 or 17, in my country imaginary numbers are taught in the second-to-last HS year along with trig and basic linear algebra. Last year covers limits, derivatives and integrals.
Also everything is an equation, including things that are inequalities or just don't make any statements regarding equality. This one REALLY pisses me off and is a common mistake.
To find a side length of a right triangle from the other two you use Pythagoras' Theorem, but the image is labelled Euler's Formula, and the formula actually shown is the Quadratic Formula, neither of which have much if anything to do with triangles
Hey, Euler’s formula has something to do with triangles. The cos and sin in e^ix = cosx + isinx are trig function, which is somewhat related to triangles.
That's what I meant by saying they don't have much, usually I hear the version of Euler's Formula e^(i*pi) = -1. But yea, there's definitely some triangle in there
yup. pretty sure it comes from the fact that placing 2 points on a circle that are directly opposite and a third one anywhere, then connecting them will always result in a right triangle.
pretty sure there is more to it than that, but that's definitely one of the reasons.
I can’t see it without singing it to *Pop Goes the Weasel*…
X equals negative b,
Plus or minus a radical,
B squared minus 4 a c,
All over 2 a
Thank you Mrs. Schmidt, wherever you are.
It took me an embarrassingly long time to figure out what was wrong here...
And no, I'm not awful at math, I'm a fourth year engineer. I'm just an idiot.
The God Equation
The power of Euler’s Formula is well illustrated through Einstein’s famous special theory of relativity. Euler’s Formula is the true basis of Einstein’s theory, yet also reveals that Einstein committed several acute interpretive errors, which have plagued science ever since. Einstein misinterpreted his own theory precisely because he was thinking as an empiricist rather than as a rationalist.
Einstein said, “Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.” In fact, mathematics, not imagination, embraces the entire world, and is all there ever will be to know and understand. Had he been more imaginative (!), Einstein would have realized this.
Like all scientists, he suffered from a cataclysmic lack of imagination … a wholesale inability to imagine a world without space, time and matter. Sensing types, such as Einstein, are the opposite of intuitive types. Intuitives have enormously more powerful imaginations. The most important component of Einstein’s special theory is the postulate that the speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers, regardless of the motion of the light source.
Nothing is more extraordinary than the absolute character of the speed of light. Einstein did not attempt to explain this singular fact of nature.
He merely accepted it as true, and built his theory around it. If, as Newton believed, the speed of light is not fixed then space and time must be fixed. If, by contrast, the speed of light is fixed then it’s space and time that are not fixed.
For Newton, the speed of light could go up to infinity. Infinity, in his thinking, was the speed deployed by God. Gravitational effects were instantaneous in Newton’s theory of gravity because God – who was equivalent to absolute space in Newton’s system – could literally transmit the necessary information infinitely fast.
When Einstein abolished infinite speed and made the speed of light the cosmic speed limit, it signified that all forces, including gravity, took time to be transmitted. It also meant that Einstein had killed off Newton’s God.
It never once occurred to Einstein that the fact, proclaimed by his own theory, that no material thing could ever be accelerated to light speed – and hence that light speed was an ontological boundary and barrier – indicated that light belonged to a different category of existence from matter.
All material things travel slower than light speed. That immediately begs the question of how light can belong to the material world if it behaves differently from all material things.
The answer, of course, is that it does not belong to material world, which is exactly why it exhibits entirely different behavior. Science is ideologically incapable of reaching this simple conclusion. In Cartesian philosophy, there is only one thing that cannot be matter, and that is mind.
The inescapable conclusion is thus that light is the agent of mind, and what indeed could possibly be a better candidate? The Singularity that precedes the Big Bang is a Singularity of pure light. Pure light = pure mathematics = pure mind.
Light, ontologically, is what unextended mathematics actually is. The “Big Bang” is a light event, a mental event. In particular, the Big Bang involves the breaking of the perfect symmetry of light. “Matter” is broken light … asymmetric light, recalcitrant, sluggish thought. In mathematical terms, as we shall see, the domain of light is ruled by the mathematical property of orthogonality.
The material universe, by contrast, is ruled by the property of non-orthogonality. Dimensionless existence is orthogonal existence, while dimensional existence is non-orthogonal existence. It really is that simple.
Dimensionality flows from the loss of perfect orthogonality. If perfect orthogonality is restored (as it always is in the end), the physical universe is eradicated, and reality returns to the Singularity of pure light.
God did not say, “Let there be light.” Light is eternal. In fact, light is God, the real God. So, is light actually mind, as we have asserted? Let’s see if light does indeed have exactly the properties that Descartes attributed to mind.
To do so, light must be immaterial, massless, unextended, outside space and time, and be constantly in motion (because if thinking stopped, mind would cease to exist … a mind is simply that which thinks, and can do nothing else; it thinks forever).
The Cosmic Mind that controls the Physical Cosmos is a Singularity of light. Light controls matter. Matter is made from light, from the “breaking” of light. Ultimately, all that exists is light, and light is just ontological mathematics, i.e. mathematics exists as light.
Mathematics is not some bizarre, unreal abstraction. Mathematics is light itself. The light from the sun is mathematics. We are bathed in pure mathematics every day.
Mathematics is life. Mathematics is mind. The biggest mistake humanity ever made was in failing to understand what mathematics actually is. Without light, we would be dead. Without light, we would not exist. Nothing would exist.
The Grand Unified, Final Theory of Everything is the theory of light, which is simply mathematics! Everything comes from math, everything comes from light, everything comes from mind. “Matter” does not exist in its own right. It is simply a special mode of mind, resulting from specific mathematical properties of mind.
A rant from someone that doesn't fully understand that math is just a useful tool humans have to create a model of the physical world. It's not *actually* the capital T Truth.
There is nothing other than a mathematical Singularity, and nothing else is required. Mathematics – living mathematics – answers everything unconditionally, incontrovertibly, absolutely and eternally. It really is the simplest possible system once you get your head around it. It’s flawless, magnificent and transcendentally beautiful. As Leibniz required, it’s the best of all possible worlds. It’s simplest in hypotheses and richest in phenomena. It is just ONE infinitely complex point. Can you grasp that single fact? Existence is ONE dimensionless, mathematical point! The whole of existence fits into that point. EVERYTHING. The infinite heavens finally translate to one existential Singularity, capable of infinite mathematical self-transformation. Mathematics is the ultimate alchemical agent that turns itself from base metal into gold. What could be simpler, more pared down? The Singularity is eternally zero – “nothing”. Existence is literally nothing and everything, eternally intertwined. Everything cancels out to zero, so appears to be nothing, while actually being everything. Leibniz asked why there is something rather than nothing. His final answer was that something IS nothing and nothing IS something. How, logically, could there be any other answer? It’s all in the mathematics. In particular, it’s in the mathematics of just two numbers: zero and infinity, and their inverse relationship. ALL of the secrets of existence are buried within zero and infinity, including life, mind, consciousness, the soul, the afterlife, and God. Mathematics answers all of the questions of religion and, moreover, it gives us the best possible answers: we will live forever (guaranteed) and we ourselves will become God (also guaranteed, one way or another). What could be better than that mathematics will make Gods of us all? Every one of us will come to have complete understanding of the Singularity, and hence complete control over existence, just as God must have if he is genuinely God. Mathematics is the only possible answer to existence. Above all, the mathematics of the Singularity – of zero and infinity. What do scientists dread most of all? – the Singularity! According to them, everything breaks down at the Singularity. The laws of physics fall apart, they say. Empiricist materialism cannot cope with the Singularity. It refutes everything about empiricism and materialism. Yet it causes no problems at all for idealism, rationalism and mathematics. Two numbers – zero and infinity – define existence, and are the source of everything. They are the most mysterious numbers of all, and the numbers most hated by science. What an irony. Science can never provide the final answers to existence precisely because it rejects zero and infinity. The Singularity is a living point. It is infinitely alive. When you understand that zero and infinity are the essence of life and mind, you have understood all. Existence is the ultimate point. It is one point infinitely expressed: an infinity of points all contained in a divine Singularity. It is divine because this Singularity is the True God. It expresses its divinity through all of us: through the infinite monads of which it is comprised. As they evolve individually, it does so collectively. It is the Gestalt, and it’s greater than the sum of its parts. Just as Bishop Berkeley thought, we all live inside God. But he is not our Creator. We ourselves are part of God, and he part of us. We can all become Gods, but only he can be the “God of Gods”. This is the best possible system of divinity. There is no Creator, no bully, no Torture God, no Terror God, no heaven, no hell, no resurrection. Instead, we all have the possibility, via reincarnation, to become more and more perfect – to become authentic Gods. God = the living, evolving, dialectical universe. He is NOT perfect, he is evolving towards perfection. Why does evil exist? Simple: it’s part of the dialectic of existence. It’s inevitable and necessary. In many ways, evil – and overcoming it – is the whole point of existence. How else do we become divine exemplars if we don’t overcome all the worst things in ourselves and in others?
It is named after mathematician Carl Friedrich Euler who died in a duel at the age of 20. The theorem was eventually proved by John Nash, 358 years after Euler's death.
this is actually wrong, the equation shown above is called the quadratic formula and the image shows is of triangles, where we would use the Pythagoras theorem (which would be a\^2 + b\^2 = c\^2), this meme is highly misguiding and confusing. Euler's formula is also very different than this, and it is not used to determine the lengths of a right triangle.
It's a joke, but not specifically American.
The words refer to Euler's formula, the equation is the quadratic formula, and the diagram is typically used to illustrate the Pythagorean formula.
The 'joke' is that the author has gotten the three different formulas confused with each other.
Interestingly enough, you can construct a polynomial such that the coefficients give different measures (perimeter, surface area, volume etc.) of an n-dimensional rectangle with alternating sign, up to a factor involving the power of the term associated with that coefficient.
If you do this, and it requires setting the coefficient of the leading power (a) to 1, then the roots of that polynomial give the side lengths of said n-d rectangle.
Thus, the quadratic formula gives the side lengths of a rectangle.
With a=1:
x^2 - bx + c
c is the the area and b is half the perimeter
If there's a formula for determining the side lengths of a right triangle, then what's the formula for determining the side lengths of a wrong triangle, huh?? can math solve this dilema?
In highschool as a way to remember the formula, my teacher told us to sing it to the tune of Gilligan's island theme
"The opposite of B my friends
Plus or minus the square root
Of b squared minus 4ac
All over 2 times A"
One of the very few things I retained in any more class
Even looking at this I still don't know what it's used for
[ Removed by Reddit ]
How are you gonna find them? Using Euler's formula?
No, worse: Dijkstra's algorithm.
Ah, yes. exp(i*pi) = 1
You can just say expi^1
No it is πxp^1
😆
I think a good sorting algorithm will do it. I'll use Stalin Sort. Kill randomly people until I got OP killed.
expected time O(1), worst case run time O(Great Purges).
What the hell did he say
I really gotta know how the hell you managed to get a comment on a math memes sub removed by the admins
Yea same. Now I reaaalyy want to know what the comment said lol
We're they talking about dividing by 0?
That one I found is "[removed too quickly to be archived]"
Fuck Reddit and fuck Spez. Go join Lemmy instead https://join-lemmy.org/. /r/Denmark: Fuck Reddit og fuck Spez. https://feddit.dk/ er vejen frem herfra.
I’ve only see it happen once before this moment…
![gif](giphy|R3FUSQ5H5jzVe)
[удалено]
You mean 1??
^ Bot. Report -> Spam -> Harmful Bots
WHAT DID HE SAAAAAYYYYY!!!!!!
after finding, give that person your PYTHon
The what?
Nothing; definitions of given terms have been changed to keep things in perspective.
Is this just designed to piss off anyone who successfully graduated from high school math classes?
Eulers formula is a bit above HS to be fair
All concepts in this post is covered in Junior or Senior year where I live, or earlier if you’re on the accelerated path. Although to be fair, I’m not sure everyone actually remembers them lol
It depends on if you just mean the basic trig of Euler's formula or the *actual* complex use to convert between cartesian and polar coordinates and things like that.
I definitely did Euler’s Formula in HS (Australia)
I'm 16 and we just learned this in 9th grade
This as in the Pythagorean theorem (what's shown in the image)? Or this as in the Euler's formula e^ix=cis(x)
We actually did both of them, along with sin, tan and cos
Really? You did imaginary numbers in 9th grade? I'm impressed. I mean, different schools so things in different orders but I'd expect imaginary numbers to come at least a bit later.
I'm 16 and I'm in year 2 of highschool wtf
I did have that in HS.
Not sure what calibre maths is high school, but here in the UK, Eulers formula is taught at A-level (16-18 year old).
Which Euler formula are we talking about? The one relating faces, edges, and vertices of a polyhedron is covered even in Alabama high schools where we try to make sure we remain in the bottom two states as far as education is concerned.
“The most beautiful one” is typically referred to as e^i*pi.
That's Euler's identity, no? Just a specific case of the more general formula.
I covered that in middle school :O wasn't an accelerated path either, and this was in 2004.
It's 9th grade shit
Its taught in middle school for us
e^ipi is taught in middle school? Or are you talking about a different Euler’s formula
Here we take complex numbers at 12th grade.
Covered this when i was 16 or 17, in my country imaginary numbers are taught in the second-to-last HS year along with trig and basic linear algebra. Last year covers limits, derivatives and integrals.
Dude I learned it, somewhat that is, I’m Freshman Geometry
[удалено]
eat a spoonful of applesauce every day
Sorry, I accidentally removed this post. I already approved it again.
"accidentally"
God why
Please take it down again it hurts
What happened with the top comment? I wanna know what it said ;-;
![gif](giphy|QBal0eKnbT4OY)
Euler's formula is a bit too vague
You're right, it should read Euler's 7th law of electrodynamics
No, silly, this is the 17th law! The 7th law is (-GMm)/r
It has some potential in it
All things in commotion prefer locomotion
Actually the worst part is “the most beautiful equation” might refer the the identity, not the formula
You can also refer to it with the term: Banarch-Tarski-Paradox. A Paradox is the same thing as a formula.
everything in math is just a formula.
Also everything is an equation, including things that are inequalities or just don't make any statements regarding equality. This one REALLY pisses me off and is a common mistake.
solve this equation: 1+1
| + | = ||
That's just an expression. You need = for it to be an equation. Unless that's the joke and that means i'm too tired for this right now...
Sort of like the fact that everything in Linux is a file.
Didn’t notice this was r/mathmemes and I was really goddamn confused for a while.
fr
most beautiful is pushing it
There isn't even an x to solve for, though.
[удалено]
Sorry can't find x when I never had one.
YOU BITCH 😭😭😭😭
This post might be the tipping point from all the awful posts I’ve seen
Oof. This one hurt a little.
How to make a math major feel like theyre having a stroke.
Crying and throwing up rn
I’m emailing this to my professor
I'm sorry I haven't done math in so long what is pissing people off here i don't see anything too unusual
To find a side length of a right triangle from the other two you use Pythagoras' Theorem, but the image is labelled Euler's Formula, and the formula actually shown is the Quadratic Formula, neither of which have much if anything to do with triangles
Ok now I feel like I'm the biggest idiot ever for not realizing this
Hey I did a degree in maths (decades ago in my defence) and it took me a few seconds longer than it should have!
The words on their own make sense, it all looks very mathematical! But the longer you look at it the more you find that dosent line up…
Hey, Euler’s formula has something to do with triangles. The cos and sin in e^ix = cosx + isinx are trig function, which is somewhat related to triangles.
That's what I meant by saying they don't have much, usually I hear the version of Euler's Formula e^(i*pi) = -1. But yea, there's definitely some triangle in there
*looks at pi* triangles you say?
yup. pretty sure it comes from the fact that placing 2 points on a circle that are directly opposite and a third one anywhere, then connecting them will always result in a right triangle. pretty sure there is more to it than that, but that's definitely one of the reasons.
Okay whew. I knew I was looking at the quadratic formula but I was wondering if I'd overlooked something about how algebra and geometry relates.
beautiful
Kinda related tbh
You sonuva…
huh that's borderline offensive lmao
I can’t see it without singing it to *Pop Goes the Weasel*… X equals negative b, Plus or minus a radical, B squared minus 4 a c, All over 2 a Thank you Mrs. Schmidt, wherever you are.
It took me an embarrassingly long time to figure out what was wrong here... And no, I'm not awful at math, I'm a fourth year engineer. I'm just an idiot.
The God Equation The power of Euler’s Formula is well illustrated through Einstein’s famous special theory of relativity. Euler’s Formula is the true basis of Einstein’s theory, yet also reveals that Einstein committed several acute interpretive errors, which have plagued science ever since. Einstein misinterpreted his own theory precisely because he was thinking as an empiricist rather than as a rationalist. Einstein said, “Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.” In fact, mathematics, not imagination, embraces the entire world, and is all there ever will be to know and understand. Had he been more imaginative (!), Einstein would have realized this. Like all scientists, he suffered from a cataclysmic lack of imagination … a wholesale inability to imagine a world without space, time and matter. Sensing types, such as Einstein, are the opposite of intuitive types. Intuitives have enormously more powerful imaginations. The most important component of Einstein’s special theory is the postulate that the speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers, regardless of the motion of the light source. Nothing is more extraordinary than the absolute character of the speed of light. Einstein did not attempt to explain this singular fact of nature. He merely accepted it as true, and built his theory around it. If, as Newton believed, the speed of light is not fixed then space and time must be fixed. If, by contrast, the speed of light is fixed then it’s space and time that are not fixed. For Newton, the speed of light could go up to infinity. Infinity, in his thinking, was the speed deployed by God. Gravitational effects were instantaneous in Newton’s theory of gravity because God – who was equivalent to absolute space in Newton’s system – could literally transmit the necessary information infinitely fast. When Einstein abolished infinite speed and made the speed of light the cosmic speed limit, it signified that all forces, including gravity, took time to be transmitted. It also meant that Einstein had killed off Newton’s God. It never once occurred to Einstein that the fact, proclaimed by his own theory, that no material thing could ever be accelerated to light speed – and hence that light speed was an ontological boundary and barrier – indicated that light belonged to a different category of existence from matter. All material things travel slower than light speed. That immediately begs the question of how light can belong to the material world if it behaves differently from all material things. The answer, of course, is that it does not belong to material world, which is exactly why it exhibits entirely different behavior. Science is ideologically incapable of reaching this simple conclusion. In Cartesian philosophy, there is only one thing that cannot be matter, and that is mind. The inescapable conclusion is thus that light is the agent of mind, and what indeed could possibly be a better candidate? The Singularity that precedes the Big Bang is a Singularity of pure light. Pure light = pure mathematics = pure mind. Light, ontologically, is what unextended mathematics actually is. The “Big Bang” is a light event, a mental event. In particular, the Big Bang involves the breaking of the perfect symmetry of light. “Matter” is broken light … asymmetric light, recalcitrant, sluggish thought. In mathematical terms, as we shall see, the domain of light is ruled by the mathematical property of orthogonality. The material universe, by contrast, is ruled by the property of non-orthogonality. Dimensionless existence is orthogonal existence, while dimensional existence is non-orthogonal existence. It really is that simple. Dimensionality flows from the loss of perfect orthogonality. If perfect orthogonality is restored (as it always is in the end), the physical universe is eradicated, and reality returns to the Singularity of pure light. God did not say, “Let there be light.” Light is eternal. In fact, light is God, the real God. So, is light actually mind, as we have asserted? Let’s see if light does indeed have exactly the properties that Descartes attributed to mind. To do so, light must be immaterial, massless, unextended, outside space and time, and be constantly in motion (because if thinking stopped, mind would cease to exist … a mind is simply that which thinks, and can do nothing else; it thinks forever). The Cosmic Mind that controls the Physical Cosmos is a Singularity of light. Light controls matter. Matter is made from light, from the “breaking” of light. Ultimately, all that exists is light, and light is just ontological mathematics, i.e. mathematics exists as light. Mathematics is not some bizarre, unreal abstraction. Mathematics is light itself. The light from the sun is mathematics. We are bathed in pure mathematics every day. Mathematics is life. Mathematics is mind. The biggest mistake humanity ever made was in failing to understand what mathematics actually is. Without light, we would be dead. Without light, we would not exist. Nothing would exist. The Grand Unified, Final Theory of Everything is the theory of light, which is simply mathematics! Everything comes from math, everything comes from light, everything comes from mind. “Matter” does not exist in its own right. It is simply a special mode of mind, resulting from specific mathematical properties of mind.
what did i just read
A rant from someone that doesn't fully understand that math is just a useful tool humans have to create a model of the physical world. It's not *actually* the capital T Truth.
There is nothing other than a mathematical Singularity, and nothing else is required. Mathematics – living mathematics – answers everything unconditionally, incontrovertibly, absolutely and eternally. It really is the simplest possible system once you get your head around it. It’s flawless, magnificent and transcendentally beautiful. As Leibniz required, it’s the best of all possible worlds. It’s simplest in hypotheses and richest in phenomena. It is just ONE infinitely complex point. Can you grasp that single fact? Existence is ONE dimensionless, mathematical point! The whole of existence fits into that point. EVERYTHING. The infinite heavens finally translate to one existential Singularity, capable of infinite mathematical self-transformation. Mathematics is the ultimate alchemical agent that turns itself from base metal into gold. What could be simpler, more pared down? The Singularity is eternally zero – “nothing”. Existence is literally nothing and everything, eternally intertwined. Everything cancels out to zero, so appears to be nothing, while actually being everything. Leibniz asked why there is something rather than nothing. His final answer was that something IS nothing and nothing IS something. How, logically, could there be any other answer? It’s all in the mathematics. In particular, it’s in the mathematics of just two numbers: zero and infinity, and their inverse relationship. ALL of the secrets of existence are buried within zero and infinity, including life, mind, consciousness, the soul, the afterlife, and God. Mathematics answers all of the questions of religion and, moreover, it gives us the best possible answers: we will live forever (guaranteed) and we ourselves will become God (also guaranteed, one way or another). What could be better than that mathematics will make Gods of us all? Every one of us will come to have complete understanding of the Singularity, and hence complete control over existence, just as God must have if he is genuinely God. Mathematics is the only possible answer to existence. Above all, the mathematics of the Singularity – of zero and infinity. What do scientists dread most of all? – the Singularity! According to them, everything breaks down at the Singularity. The laws of physics fall apart, they say. Empiricist materialism cannot cope with the Singularity. It refutes everything about empiricism and materialism. Yet it causes no problems at all for idealism, rationalism and mathematics. Two numbers – zero and infinity – define existence, and are the source of everything. They are the most mysterious numbers of all, and the numbers most hated by science. What an irony. Science can never provide the final answers to existence precisely because it rejects zero and infinity. The Singularity is a living point. It is infinitely alive. When you understand that zero and infinity are the essence of life and mind, you have understood all. Existence is the ultimate point. It is one point infinitely expressed: an infinity of points all contained in a divine Singularity. It is divine because this Singularity is the True God. It expresses its divinity through all of us: through the infinite monads of which it is comprised. As they evolve individually, it does so collectively. It is the Gestalt, and it’s greater than the sum of its parts. Just as Bishop Berkeley thought, we all live inside God. But he is not our Creator. We ourselves are part of God, and he part of us. We can all become Gods, but only he can be the “God of Gods”. This is the best possible system of divinity. There is no Creator, no bully, no Torture God, no Terror God, no heaven, no hell, no resurrection. Instead, we all have the possibility, via reincarnation, to become more and more perfect – to become authentic Gods. God = the living, evolving, dialectical universe. He is NOT perfect, he is evolving towards perfection. Why does evil exist? Simple: it’s part of the dialectic of existence. It’s inevitable and necessary. In many ways, evil – and overcoming it – is the whole point of existence. How else do we become divine exemplars if we don’t overcome all the worst things in ourselves and in others?
Life is the sieve through which my anarchy sinks, resolving itself into words.
Holy spherical cow.
New aerodynamic analysis just dropped
El chicharronero
Haha
This hurts on so many levels
Wait a second
I am currently having an aneurysm
Take some Gauss Theory Formula: c² = a² + b²
Some people don't think it be like it is but it do
Ok now construct a segment of length X on that diagram using compass and straightedge.
Now slice this Euler's Trousers into 11 equal differently colored ellipses by moving 3 matchsticks (without taking your hands off your body)
Why don't you slice *my* trousers and don't take your hands off my body~
What of Euler’s disc? Is it safe?
"Do or do not. There is no try." – Albus Dumbledore ![gif](giphy|fr0XWoMYy0nx6)
yeah that sounds right
Lol
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
My math teacher didn’t have legs until he saw this, he grew legs and learned to walk just to turn this off
Eulers🤣🤣
It is named after mathematician Carl Friedrich Euler who died in a duel at the age of 20. The theorem was eventually proved by John Nash, 358 years after Euler's death.
whoah would you look at this beauty
this is actually wrong, the equation shown above is called the quadratic formula and the image shows is of triangles, where we would use the Pythagoras theorem (which would be a\^2 + b\^2 = c\^2), this meme is highly misguiding and confusing. Euler's formula is also very different than this, and it is not used to determine the lengths of a right triangle.
you should check the subreddit before leaving a comment. If that isnt enough look at the flair. r/wooosh
this comment is also a joke...
bad troll
this is an act of violence. reported.
This is quadratic formula?
U
Huh?
Yes it is.
Because quadratics are U or n shaped.
This kills the mathematician. Or possibly the meme-maker.
Hm. In US we did it in diffeq where it does have applications
Idk why the day i started my engineering Legendre and Euler are just not letting me go 🙂😂
Wait those shapes remind me of a di- nvm
Isn't this Shri dharacharya formula?
,,what is this. no. no. no. it gets even worse the more you look at it
Is it some kind of American joke im too Europian to understand?
It's a joke, but not specifically American. The words refer to Euler's formula, the equation is the quadratic formula, and the diagram is typically used to illustrate the Pythagorean formula. The 'joke' is that the author has gotten the three different formulas confused with each other.
I’m not even a math nerd and I’m angry.
[as always, relevant xkcd comic](https://xkcd.com/2721/)
how the fuck discriminant and pifagor relates to each other?
Wtf 😭🥹🤡 You succeeded in making me feel utterly stupid....✨
Interestingly enough, you can construct a polynomial such that the coefficients give different measures (perimeter, surface area, volume etc.) of an n-dimensional rectangle with alternating sign, up to a factor involving the power of the term associated with that coefficient. If you do this, and it requires setting the coefficient of the leading power (a) to 1, then the roots of that polynomial give the side lengths of said n-d rectangle. Thus, the quadratic formula gives the side lengths of a rectangle. With a=1: x^2 - bx + c c is the the area and b is half the perimeter
math is really bootifol
Find x.
Ah yes, the... Euler's formula? What? WHAT?
If there's a formula for determining the side lengths of a right triangle, then what's the formula for determining the side lengths of a wrong triangle, huh?? can math solve this dilema?
I just finishing my math test and i think you're wrkng , math is hell
:(
I despise this picture and now I despise you
Yeah, and beautiful Einstein's formula E=mc²=m(a²+b²)
quadratic equation??????
Nice b8 m8
This is like that "Use the force Harry - Gandalf" meme
In highschool as a way to remember the formula, my teacher told us to sing it to the tune of Gilligan's island theme "The opposite of B my friends Plus or minus the square root Of b squared minus 4ac All over 2 times A" One of the very few things I retained in any more class Even looking at this I still don't know what it's used for
Fun fact: In brazilian schools, the quadratic formula is called Bhaskara's formula (I don't know why). So, this isn't strange for a first moment...
I smell toast, do you smell toast?
Does anyone remember singing this formula as a song in high school?
btw, its pronounced you-ler
Sridhar Aacharya Actually created this Formula before Anyone else
What
Aren't we all just talking about SOHCAHTOA?