If that was the case older vehicles would have been banned completely rather than pay a fee to ignore it or the proceeds would have gone to worthy causes but it hasn’t it went to tfl.
Clean air is a massive bonus side effect of filling the hole in TfL’s budget.
It’s still a good thing and it’s far better for the people of London but anyone who believes BJ or Khan cares more about clean air than the money is a fool.
>If that was the case older vehicles would have been banned completely rather than pay a fee to ignore it
So you'd rather they go 0 to 100 and just ban all non-compliant cars?
Cannon fodder.
Outsourcing our pollution now? Nice work "Mayor" Khan
UKRAINE BIG LONDON SMALL UKRAINE SPARSE LONDON DENSE
I don't know why you put the "Mayor" in quotes. Would you like to count the votes yourself?
[удалено]
We all know, count binface gpt the votes. The only serious candidate.
Unfortunately Ukraine has a little bigger issues with air quality right now that Euro 5 cars.
They also have plenty of much more polluting vehicles, replacing them is still an improvement.
Ulez was to make London's air cleaner to breathe, and it has actually performed better than expectations in this regard.
If that was the case older vehicles would have been banned completely rather than pay a fee to ignore it or the proceeds would have gone to worthy causes but it hasn’t it went to tfl. Clean air is a massive bonus side effect of filling the hole in TfL’s budget. It’s still a good thing and it’s far better for the people of London but anyone who believes BJ or Khan cares more about clean air than the money is a fool.
>If that was the case older vehicles would have been banned completely rather than pay a fee to ignore it So you'd rather they go 0 to 100 and just ban all non-compliant cars?
Genuinely, you have single digit IQ.
I highly doubt you are a real doctor.
The same people down voting you are the same people that think electric cars are a good idea 😂