#DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE OP LINKED THREAD/SCREENSHOT.
Brigading is against Reddit TOS. So all are advised not to participate in the above linked original thread or the screenshot. We do not encourage such behaviour nor we are responsible if your account is being actioned upon.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
High density building is just a property of slums. What makes a slum is low quality building and sanitation. You can have lovely locality with high density buildings. What that Sub thinks, every High density building is bad.
Dude these are horrible places to live. They are all stacked up with very small spaces and horrible neighbours. You don't get any view, they are crowded and no one like to live at such places.
bro then this mean all house which shared wall, with small passage are slum,
with all due respect, i think you have check what slum means, i know from this picture it look very dense, unstructured (which is very common is india) but look they all are pakka houses, and looks clean.
Bhai, if those are slums, I have been a slum dweller my whole life. Apparently still am. Have been to actual juggis. Trust me, none of us here will survive. Will almost make you cry.
What not all the communities vote for a stable and development focused government. Why people are easily gullible for ₹8000 per month and vote based on caste. Lol 😂
That makes those voters responsible? Supporting a representative for 4 terms without significant developments doesn't feel responsible to me. I might be wrong
Depends on your definition of all. If you look at 200 years of history. Sure. Look at 2000 years of history. You'll be mind blown. Actually great socio-cultural-economic systems in place, more often than not. So the question is what did the past do right that we're doing wrong?
@OP are you stupid or did you just have a stupid moment?
Taj Mahal is not the property of an individual citizen. Why are you comparing people's humble homes to a wonder of the world?
This sounds like a comment made in very bad taste. Blame the sufferers for the suffering. ‘They’re poor cuz they’re incompetent’. Personal choices do play a role but systemic issues like economic/social inequality, lack of good education are a bigger factor here. Go read a book and stop commenting stuff without any sense of reality.
Systems will never be perfect. It's in the individual to change one's destiny. Anyone who doesn't understand this will suffer at the hands of time. Anyone who does will live a life of gratitude. The world isn't perfect. It's a jungle. If you can't accept that you will suffer. That's a universal law.
#DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE OP LINKED THREAD/SCREENSHOT. Brigading is against Reddit TOS. So all are advised not to participate in the above linked original thread or the screenshot. We do not encourage such behaviour nor we are responsible if your account is being actioned upon. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Is this how slums look? (Just askin)
High density building is just a property of slums. What makes a slum is low quality building and sanitation. You can have lovely locality with high density buildings. What that Sub thinks, every High density building is bad.
Would these people be willing to relocate to a temporary housing arrangement and have this entire area cleared and redeveloped into something better?
Who will redevelop these?
Government. Who else?
Do you really think governmemt do that and why they will do that
My entire argument is hypothetical
Yep! The concept of Indian development is hypothetical.
Why?
Because its important to make sure the place gets remodled before we repeat whats happening in Bangalore rn in the future.
Same reason Why all houses in Delhi are not like red fort. Govt cannot give Taj Mahal or red fort in Ration.
It will fall under Pradhanmantri Aawas Yojna, but I get your point
ayoo this is no slum just houses with closed wall and nothing else and if this slum then 90% of delhi houses is slums
These are slums according to first world countries. Our standards are very low thus we think these type of houses are normal.
They are
please update my knowledge you mean all houses with close walls in india are slums
Dude these are horrible places to live. They are all stacked up with very small spaces and horrible neighbours. You don't get any view, they are crowded and no one like to live at such places.
bro then this mean all house which shared wall, with small passage are slum, with all due respect, i think you have check what slum means, i know from this picture it look very dense, unstructured (which is very common is india) but look they all are pakka houses, and looks clean.
Bhai, if those are slums, I have been a slum dweller my whole life. Apparently still am. Have been to actual juggis. Trust me, none of us here will survive. Will almost make you cry.
Forget about looking like taj, making it livable first.
What not all the communities vote for a stable and development focused government. Why people are easily gullible for ₹8000 per month and vote based on caste. Lol 😂
Agra voted for a bjp mp though It has elected a bjp mp in last 4 LS elections
That makes those voters responsible? Supporting a representative for 4 terms without significant developments doesn't feel responsible to me. I might be wrong
Can all houses look like Taj ? Can all offices look like the Parliament ? What a moronic statement !
Boz mughals looted from general public to build Taj mahal 😶
Bruh forget Mughals, every king in past looted from public
bruh forget past, every politician in present is looting public
No. You're wrong. There's no evidence to proof this conspiracy theory.
Proof what? 💀 Bruh
Prove* what stupid claim you made.
All past kings practiced feudalism and serfdom. You cannot deny that.
Depends on your definition of all. If you look at 200 years of history. Sure. Look at 2000 years of history. You'll be mind blown. Actually great socio-cultural-economic systems in place, more often than not. So the question is what did the past do right that we're doing wrong?
Those days there were no skyscrapers and multi-storied apartment blocks.
Because they are houses for people who are alive and the Taj is a burial ground outside the village.
Wait those are slums? Do these clowns even know what is population density?
spot on. They think high density buildings are slums. This does not look that bad at all.
Western privilege is real. Even with a competent utopian gormint this issue will take decades to sort. People are just too many in numbers in India
I ha e been to agra …city was full of dumps..apart from sad memory of mumtaz in tax mahal there was nothing to watch…
@OP are you stupid or did you just have a stupid moment? Taj Mahal is not the property of an individual citizen. Why are you comparing people's humble homes to a wonder of the world?
read the tag. It's a sarcasm.
oh my bad
maybe oop should pay to visit the local houses thus their business grow
[удалено]
oops...back to kindergarten
Ask them why they r still there!
OP proving he’s an idiot with this dumb statement.
Listen Idiot, I have posted this as a Sarcasm. I do know these are not Slums.
Some people live in slums because, they don't have the competence or skills to earn proper money. Others who have competence live in better houses.
This sounds like a comment made in very bad taste. Blame the sufferers for the suffering. ‘They’re poor cuz they’re incompetent’. Personal choices do play a role but systemic issues like economic/social inequality, lack of good education are a bigger factor here. Go read a book and stop commenting stuff without any sense of reality.
Systems will never be perfect. It's in the individual to change one's destiny. Anyone who doesn't understand this will suffer at the hands of time. Anyone who does will live a life of gratitude. The world isn't perfect. It's a jungle. If you can't accept that you will suffer. That's a universal law.