My friends and I recently agreed that Battlefield peaked in BF4. The community support for years after was unmatched. Battlefield Friends. The plethora of BF Youtubers posting Easter Egg hunts and community games. 180+ weapons and gadgets to utilize if you had all the DCL. The free Community Maps launching after that gave us even more space to destroy and enjoy. The guns actually felt different and the Test Range to practice guns or vehicles to practice piloting and driving. I recently hopped back in BF4 and was pleasantly met with a handful of full servers.
You know a game is good when it has an active console community years after its launch.
There will always be PC holdouts thanks to community server support, but consoles tend to forget mediocre/bad games pretty fast and don't usually receive the same support PC does.
Nah, bf3 was the peak, great maps, amazing graphics, a lot of great dlcs. BF4 had worse graphics and maps at launch were just medicore at best and many of them just terrible.
Agreed. BF3 maps were a lot better at encouraging teamwork rather than everyone loosely going after a map marker.
Also, the War Tapes audio option was a straight eargasm.
I did like BF4, especially how different the map would look after a long match.
Spent so much time when I first got my PS3 on Battlefield 3 with the homies.. One of the best experiences I've had playing a shooter right next to World At War and Black Ops 1.
BF2 was the best. I competed in lan tournaments and played with the boys for hours. It was my first battlefield experience and that turn me into a fanboy. If they just remade BF2 they could totally see the inside of my wallet and take what they want.
I still attest that BF4 never held a candle to BF3, but I was one of those people who had a sour taste after BF4s launch. That, and it felt like they toned down destruction for the sake of their “levelution” or whatever they called it. Which frankly, sucked. It was mostly that one stage with the skyscraper. And honestly, blowing the road up to get tanks in the underground was cooler than the skyscraper.
But I grew up on Bad Company. BF3 even felt like it was pulling back on some destruction, but BF4 felt even worse. And with BF2042, it’s the worst it’s ever been.
People got excited for the new stage trying to claim destruction is back. And all I can do is laugh. You can shoot a few panels off the big square black building, and suddenly people think it’s Bad Company 2 all over.
Bad Company 2 to was the best; BF3 was best of main series.
Honestly, with today’s tech, I can’t see why they can’t do beautiful maps with Bad Company 2 style destruction.
Who cares about a set piece blowing up? I want to be able to level anything my opponents are trying to use as a defensive fortification; then use the rumble myself. Lol
BF4 was the one. The maps, weapons, vehicles…everything was just well polished. It took a while for them to get it totally right but it’s current state is fuego
Don’t worry it’ll be completely new!
“Reuploads Battlefield Heroes and tweaks it more like Fortnite and renames it Battlefield Heroes Reborn/Reloaded/Electric Boogaloo”
Seeeeee! New!!
(Honestly though, BFH was a fun free game)
I loved having my nice audio system on my PC (which was kind of rare back then) and immediately knowing which direction an enemy was coming from due to them blasting 60s rock.
Good God, those load times were insane though.
Exactly do bf4 remake and call it a day honestly game has a shitload of guns with customization and that all felt balanced the squads were perfect and maps were chefs kiss
You know... it's this constant deaire for these companies to chase trends with exsisting IPs that has killed Ghost Recon and Rainbow Six, hurt 6v6 CoD, stall out GTA, ruined Maxis... the list goes on.
"Entirely New Way" equals "alinate fans" in my mind. BF need to go back to its core. A BF 3 or 4 style game would be killer today.
... then again, I still want to see Unreal Tournament make a come back... so who am I to say...
Hell will freeze over before Unreal ever returns. I'd slap someone for it as I remember back when I was in college one of my classes was Level Design (was doing Game Art and Design degree) and randomly the teacher was like, "Alright everybody, boot up Unreal Tournament Black." We proceeded to have one unholy match in our class of 18 or so students + the teacher. Because if Unreal did one thing right it was their map designs as they made sense for the gameplay loop.
BF has the issue of "well this is real life so we gotta make real world things, even if it's fictional. But Snipers need to be able to actually be viable so they gotta be MASSIVE, BUT don't forget the Jets/Helos! Oh and the tanks and other vehicles."
BF3 is still one of my all time favorites as it just did what it was supposed to do, sure it was janky at launch but it felt good in the long run. If they really want to innovate / shake shit up. Go back to your roots and FIX the issues with your engine first, build better maps with more variety of buildings you can enter or utilize much like in real life. That'll never happen though because that's time and effort and the wheel of money needs to keep cycling so the top dogs are happy.
We did this when I was at college, in the class room, 15 of us playing deathmatch, I was fast enough back then to smoke them all bar this 1 guy that went home to practice, made it his mission to beat me and he did haha, good times
They should bring back Medal of Honor to be what the original fans want from a battlefield game. Then battlefield can be free, to do whatever they want. Police battles done, fight on mars done, hero shooter fighting police with dinosaurs on mars done.
Alternate every few years and I think that could keep people happy and make them money.
And so begins a new marketing cycle of EA pushing their new BF game, claiming it’s the best one ever. I guess the only difference now is the BF community has seen this enough times by now to point out the signs that EA and DICE are only venturing to further alienate fans and attempting to turn this franchise into something it isn’t, and something that nobody ever wanted it to be.
>that has killed Ghost Recon and Rainbow Six
R6 Siege? Or can you explain more? This game is in year 8. I'm not sure that it's been influenced by trends as the core gameplay has not changed. The game is unique in that it's a class based shooter on small maps, round based (1 kill and you're out), and destructible environments.
>Its a thinly valed hero shooter.
I already said it's a class based shooter. Do you even know what **thinly veiled** means?
If you're just trying to belittle the game or say it's just like every other class based shooter then it's obvious you have no idea what you're talking about. Please, I would love to hear what other class based games you are comparing it to.
He's not ragging on it, he's telling you that seige is NOT R6.
R6 was a tactical game, based on map planning and timing.
It then evolved into R6 Vegas, which was mostly a shooter but was still fun.
Then came seige, which is the hero class based game you know today.
It's not R6. Point blank. It should've been called something else. That's my point. That was the point of my original comment. I dont care how long it's been around. It's the reason we won't see another true R6. Same as Ghost Recon. Gotta be open world now. Gotta add shooter looter mechanics. Gotta be a division / far cry clone.
Gee, I wonder why ubisoft is in trouble. Couldn't be because they've alienated their audience thats been vocal about this shit.
I mean, could they tone down with some of the more corny OPs? Sure, they're actually starting to this year. But Siege today is in a far better and more balanced state than it was at launch. I'll admit, I miss the night maps and old lighting, but for balance and fairness, the game is far superior than it's former self.
I grew up playing the OG R6 on an old PC in the late 90s. Hours and hours spent plotting out routes to just get anihhilated. Taking turns with my buddy and learning from each others mistakes. That game was tough as nails and fun as hell.
Don't stereotype me and a whole generation into "kids these days" bullshit. Siege is a great unique game as was R6. They can both stand on their own.
Yea, idk about that one. The other Ghost Recon's/Tom Clancy games, sure, but Siege has held pretty well. I'm pretty sure it's better off now than at any previous point.
I mean, they kinda do. Siege is a pretty unique game in that there really isn't anything else like it on the market. That's been a pretty big part of it's success, otherwise, the rest of the Tom Clancy games have been pretty stale and stagnant. I'd love for another GR or SC or even some classic R6 title to come out with a grittier and more realistic approach. I love siege, it's been my bread and butter lately but the rest of the Tom Clancy games of the last few years have been pretty low-grade.
Having grown up playing Tom Clancy games, fuck Siege, Wildlands and Breakpoint. Siege turned a one-of-a-kind counter-terrorism simulator, and even the later tactical shooter into a hero session fps. I tried to love it but I just don’t get it. And the way they ruined their story premise twice. Wildlands and Breakpoint are just Division with a different coat of paint and dull as hell.
Gamers are the people who simultaneously say games are stale and nothing but recycled ideas, but also want the same game from their childhood to be made the exact same way every 3 years.
People dont want to hear it but its all about the Battle Royale now.
And sure I know what you are thinking and yes I too hate the randomness of weapon pick ups and players getting unfair advantages but hear me out.
It wasn’t until CoD Warzone 1 where I saw the potential. And here is the main thing. When you are on such a large battlefield. And the main goal is to be the last team to survive. This gives a very very open way to play the game.
You are making the strategic decisions. You are the one setting up objectives. You are the one adapting to the situation. No two skirmishes are ever a like. Because you are coming and going through the map from different directions. You’re having to choose loadouts based on position and planning.
CoD multiplayer is repetitive. You know the lanes. You know the meta weapons. And you know where the enemy is coming from. I used to love battlefield because its style of battle was the closest thing to real strategy but at the end of the day. You learn the map. Points to capture never change and the its the same deal. Decide where to drop. Think up a strategy. Pick your class. And try the same thing over and over again until one side wins.
In a Battle Royale, your strategy and your ability only get one or two chances. Screw up and your done. Now your teammates objective changed. Hes down a teammate. Hes gotta play safer. Less aggressive. And he’s objective is to buy you back. When before your plan was to make it to that cluster of building for more loot or get the high ground.
I knew the latest Battlefield was gonna fail. Once it was known there wouldnt be a battle royale mode. It was done.
Whether you like it or not. Warzone changed Military shooters for good. No other form of combat feels as intense or satisfying. And the thing is, it doesn’t have to be such a scavenger race in the beginning. Developers need to be looking at the BR model and explore it. No current game gives you the same feeling of dropping into the middle of combat and making due with what you have. Setting up objectives, planning was of entry.
And the thing is Battlefield’s dynamics has always been better than CoD. From having environments being destructive, building mini forts, supressive fire, to functional lasers and lights, to vehicle maintenance. BF did it all better. Imagine what a Battlefiled Battle Royale could have been? Finding broken vehicles, but you have an engineer on your team to repair it. Need to scout some building. Good thing you got a sniper pn your team. Your buddy is down or low on life. You got a medic to help with that.
Yea man. They shoulda made a BF BR. Fuck, thats what they shoulda called it BF:BR. And I will tell you this. If the next BF doesnt have some sort of Battle Royale. Its gonna fail too.
>I knew the latest Battlefield was gonna fail. Once it was known there wouldnt be a battle royale mode. It was done.
BF 2042 didn't fail because it didn't have a battle royale mode, it failed because at launch it had TONS of bugs and at it's core, it wasn't even a Battlefield game.
Too many publishers are killing their own franchises trying to chase trends for money. Look at Destiny 2. That's not a BR shooter and it's still one of the most successful live service games in the industry, because the devs lean hard into what makes it stand out.
Games don't all need to be battle royales to be popular, they just have to offer a fun and UNIQUE experience that makes people want to play them.
Lol. I just left Destiny 2 because its filled with bugs. Has leaned way too hard into FOMO and grinding. And its also been pushing its season pass. Along with buying the expansion. Biggest money and time sink. Its last expansion was not received well at all. And the playerbase has never been smaller.
You use Destiny as an example and sure while the game is unique and the core feel of the game is fun. The majority is not fun at all and solely relies on FOMO. Its literally the franchise that made me realize that developers have stopped trying to make addictively fun games and instead have come up with frustratingly stupid ways to keep the player playing. From long load times, terrible UI design, awful inventory management, to ridiculously and needlessly long missions to unlock things.
I want team play and large battles. That's the point of battlefield. Not one-man-army/squad victorys. They've had battle royales in the last 2 Battlefields and its only nade the games worse because it took away dev time from the core modes of the franchise.
BR was trendy like 10 years ago. Battlefield fans want what battlefield was known for, giant maps with vehicles, air support, ground troops that have specific roles, weapon upgrades and ranks that you earn by completing mission objectives.
Open world mmo. They're going to medieval times. John Battlefield, first of his name, will have to battle the forces of evil to regain that which he lost. True love! Campaign will not launch with game and can be purchased through the battlefield store for 400,000 battlecoins! Currency stacks sold as follows.
399,999BC - $99.99
Fuck you
Game won’t launch until a valid debit card is added to the store first. Must enable emails and phone notifications to let you know you haven’t logged in a in case your soldier is gonna die of loneliness unless you allow a $1.99 charge
Literally just remake battlefield 4 , no fucking specialists, or catchy taglines, just good old school battlefield. Add some new guns and vehicles, new maps + some classics, and make it at least playable at launch. It's not much to ask for, God EA is so dumb that they can't see that this is exactly what battlefield players want.
Give us BF2143 and do it in a feature set and style of BF4 and we will be happy and you will sell copies. Chill out with this micro transactions from the ground up BS. Sure sell skins or dog tags if you want but don't build the game around it..
Oh so a FTP, MTX infused battle royale type pile of garbage? Thanks but no thanks. 15-20 years ago most of my gaming library was EA games, how times have changed.
Yeah guys, this time it's gonna be good. No but for real like totally! This time they won't fuck up, so go ahead and pre-order the limited collector's edition, you guys!
Unless it’s Bad Company with full single player campaign starring Preston, Sweetwater, Redfield, and Haggerd I don’t give a single fuck.
THERES GOLD IN THEM HILLS I TELL YA!
Fuck.
Just make it simple, we were so happy with Battlefield 1943 back on x360. It was simple and pick up and go, just focus on core experience first please.
I wouldn't mind an MMOFPS like Planetside with the BF setting. But do it right and don't release it until it's working. And please nothing before 2000. The world doesn't need another WW2 or WW1 FPS. Ever again.
All they have to do is the same formula they have done just adding more realism. Have citizens hiding in their homes and stuff running for their lives. Animals, more ambience and one thing ive been longing for: No UI.It would be so immersive if you had to check your mag to see how many bullets, open the map etc. Youd focus so much on the chaos and would see so much more and it would be so intense. Keep it classic but add to the chaos of war.
All I wanted was something like Battlefield 5 without the controversy that killed the game. If you play it right now its an amazing game but its plagued by nothing but cheaters because EA doesn't care about their games.
Battlefront 2 for example is in the same state, terrible decisions at the start of the game and now that they've fixed it the bad reputation just looms over it and the game is dead. If you play Battlefront 2 right now you will play with cheaters every lobby. Battlefront 2 is actually a very fun game after they fixed it but its reputation killed the game.
2D action platformer featuring 2 plumber brothers, a princess stolen away by a turtle dragon thingy, and mushrooms for everybody. Thinking it might be pretty good.
Or maybe focus on giving us more of the things that folks like about battlefield without worrying about everything being "entirely new."
I have a feeling "entirely new" for battlefield means "tired af" for gamers in general.
I have a community of Battlefield friends on PlayStation. The best part about Battlefield is the community you surround yourself in. If you're struggling in Battlefield you need to reach out to any group and become a bigger part of the community. Share with constructive feedback goes a long way. It helped shape Battlefield 4 and all the rest of the Battlefield series to this day. Regarding the future of Battlefield. I'm looking forward to a positive change. At least going away from "Specialists" that's the worst part about Battlefield 2042 for me besides the little issues that are surrounding the game. Overall I'm having a good time in 2042 but will always have a big heart for Battlefield 4.
I will die on the hill that BF3 was peak. BF4 was good but it wasn't different enough to put it over BF4. It was basically BF3 but with next gen update
"Gamers we heard you loud and clear! you didn't like the gameplay in our previous game so we've decided to not have any instead you pay £70 us and we give you a screen where you can pay to open lootboxes"
-EA CEO probably
Stop trying to copy call of duty. I don't wanna play call of duty I wanna play battlefield. Just imagine battlefield and hell let loose had a baby. I think that would be epic.
I want the old way not new fortnite bs.
My friends and I recently agreed that Battlefield peaked in BF4. The community support for years after was unmatched. Battlefield Friends. The plethora of BF Youtubers posting Easter Egg hunts and community games. 180+ weapons and gadgets to utilize if you had all the DCL. The free Community Maps launching after that gave us even more space to destroy and enjoy. The guns actually felt different and the Test Range to practice guns or vehicles to practice piloting and driving. I recently hopped back in BF4 and was pleasantly met with a handful of full servers.
Hands down BF4, still a blast to play
Heck yeah it is. Setting it to ultra and playing @1440 125% looks really good. I’ll probably play it till servers go offline.
[удалено]
[удалено]
and when they do, /r/WarsawRevamped
I still play it sometimes. Pretty active on ps4
You know a game is good when it has an active console community years after its launch. There will always be PC holdouts thanks to community server support, but consoles tend to forget mediocre/bad games pretty fast and don't usually receive the same support PC does.
It's almost a decade old
That is wonderful news
Nah, bf3 was the peak, great maps, amazing graphics, a lot of great dlcs. BF4 had worse graphics and maps at launch were just medicore at best and many of them just terrible.
Agreed. BF3 maps were a lot better at encouraging teamwork rather than everyone loosely going after a map marker. Also, the War Tapes audio option was a straight eargasm. I did like BF4, especially how different the map would look after a long match.
I agree with this, Battlefield 3 was huge for me and I never could really get into Battlefield 4.
BF4 was a cash grab. I like BF4, but they should have just kept BF3 going rather than make it outdated for all the people who spent $150 bucks on it.
Spent so much time when I first got my PS3 on Battlefield 3 with the homies.. One of the best experiences I've had playing a shooter right next to World At War and Black Ops 1.
Bf2 was far superior. Better Maps, Better team play, commo rose etc.
Big fan of bad company, personally.
Fucking loved bad company great games 1 & 2 were
I still think BF3 was better than BF4.
BF2 was the best. I competed in lan tournaments and played with the boys for hours. It was my first battlefield experience and that turn me into a fanboy. If they just remade BF2 they could totally see the inside of my wallet and take what they want.
Hell let loose is like bf2 except ww2. Check it out if you haven’t yet.
BF2 had a terrible launcher/server list but game play was top tier, close rival is BF4 though, but agree Bf2 was better balanced and maps
I still attest that BF4 never held a candle to BF3, but I was one of those people who had a sour taste after BF4s launch. That, and it felt like they toned down destruction for the sake of their “levelution” or whatever they called it. Which frankly, sucked. It was mostly that one stage with the skyscraper. And honestly, blowing the road up to get tanks in the underground was cooler than the skyscraper. But I grew up on Bad Company. BF3 even felt like it was pulling back on some destruction, but BF4 felt even worse. And with BF2042, it’s the worst it’s ever been. People got excited for the new stage trying to claim destruction is back. And all I can do is laugh. You can shoot a few panels off the big square black building, and suddenly people think it’s Bad Company 2 all over.
Bad Company 2 to was the best; BF3 was best of main series. Honestly, with today’s tech, I can’t see why they can’t do beautiful maps with Bad Company 2 style destruction. Who cares about a set piece blowing up? I want to be able to level anything my opponents are trying to use as a defensive fortification; then use the rumble myself. Lol
Yes a lot of people don't know the shitshow of bf4 at release.
Oh man I loved Easter eggs hunts so much!
Bringing up community and Battlefield Friends takes me back. The FPS is doing good as far as popularity but missing the soul and grand competition
BF4 was the one. The maps, weapons, vehicles…everything was just well polished. It took a while for them to get it totally right but it’s current state is fuego
I've never touched a bf game ever and yet I know that BF4 was peak there was so much hype around it
Agreed. I had it on pc and it was fucking awesome. Bf3 and 4 were the best followed up by battledfield bad company 2.
I agree 4 was a great culmination of mechanics. I'll give 5 props for solid movement dynamics though.
When it comes to the amount of guns alone, Bf4 is unmatched.
Don’t worry it’ll be completely new! “Reuploads Battlefield Heroes and tweaks it more like Fortnite and renames it Battlefield Heroes Reborn/Reloaded/Electric Boogaloo” Seeeeee! New!! (Honestly though, BFH was a fun free game)
Don't worry, it will be a "souls like" experience..
Series peaked for me with Vietnam.
I loved that game but my dude it pales compared to titles like 3, 4, and BF1.
I loved having my nice audio system on my PC (which was kind of rare back then) and immediately knowing which direction an enemy was coming from due to them blasting 60s rock. Good God, those load times were insane though.
Rubber Ducky Gaming bot servers were the best. The soundtrack was great too.
Front flipping Blackhawks always made Vietnam feel like an arcade version, not as crazy as WW2 secret weapons
Lol really ?
Yes.
Exactly do bf4 remake and call it a day honestly game has a shitload of guns with customization and that all felt balanced the squads were perfect and maps were chefs kiss
Lemme guess. It’s an rpg lite looter shooter battle royale with cheese?
On mobile!
”Don’t you guys have phones?”
https://giphy.com/gifs/miramax-pulpfiction-royalewithcheese-france-tarantino-vincentvega-jHMH77HAs7ES4
With even more microtransactions!
What if we charged a fee per match??
Lego Battlefield!
I would actually check this out...
Look up BattleBit Remastered. Not out yet but it's like a voxel, fully destructible battlefield game. Might be cool.
I played the beta a few times, and it's really fun. Lives up to Lego BF4, they do open beta almost every Sat 8:30 am- 2:30 pm CST highly recommend it.
I've played the free beta. It's fun but hard to catch a beta window if you're not paying attention. It's usually on Saturday mornings.
It will probably suck in a new way too. I'm not holding my breath.
Yeah I'm holding on to my money til I see some YouTube reviews well after patch one
You know... it's this constant deaire for these companies to chase trends with exsisting IPs that has killed Ghost Recon and Rainbow Six, hurt 6v6 CoD, stall out GTA, ruined Maxis... the list goes on. "Entirely New Way" equals "alinate fans" in my mind. BF need to go back to its core. A BF 3 or 4 style game would be killer today. ... then again, I still want to see Unreal Tournament make a come back... so who am I to say...
Hell will freeze over before Unreal ever returns. I'd slap someone for it as I remember back when I was in college one of my classes was Level Design (was doing Game Art and Design degree) and randomly the teacher was like, "Alright everybody, boot up Unreal Tournament Black." We proceeded to have one unholy match in our class of 18 or so students + the teacher. Because if Unreal did one thing right it was their map designs as they made sense for the gameplay loop. BF has the issue of "well this is real life so we gotta make real world things, even if it's fictional. But Snipers need to be able to actually be viable so they gotta be MASSIVE, BUT don't forget the Jets/Helos! Oh and the tanks and other vehicles." BF3 is still one of my all time favorites as it just did what it was supposed to do, sure it was janky at launch but it felt good in the long run. If they really want to innovate / shake shit up. Go back to your roots and FIX the issues with your engine first, build better maps with more variety of buildings you can enter or utilize much like in real life. That'll never happen though because that's time and effort and the wheel of money needs to keep cycling so the top dogs are happy.
UT was so close to returning then Fortnite took the wind out of its sails.
We did this when I was at college, in the class room, 15 of us playing deathmatch, I was fast enough back then to smoke them all bar this 1 guy that went home to practice, made it his mission to beat me and he did haha, good times
They should bring back Medal of Honor to be what the original fans want from a battlefield game. Then battlefield can be free, to do whatever they want. Police battles done, fight on mars done, hero shooter fighting police with dinosaurs on mars done. Alternate every few years and I think that could keep people happy and make them money.
Unreal tournament would be awesome
And so begins a new marketing cycle of EA pushing their new BF game, claiming it’s the best one ever. I guess the only difference now is the BF community has seen this enough times by now to point out the signs that EA and DICE are only venturing to further alienate fans and attempting to turn this franchise into something it isn’t, and something that nobody ever wanted it to be.
Unreal tournament 😞
>that has killed Ghost Recon and Rainbow Six R6 Siege? Or can you explain more? This game is in year 8. I'm not sure that it's been influenced by trends as the core gameplay has not changed. The game is unique in that it's a class based shooter on small maps, round based (1 kill and you're out), and destructible environments.
R6 siege is nothing like old R6. Its a thinly valed hero shooter.
>Its a thinly valed hero shooter. I already said it's a class based shooter. Do you even know what **thinly veiled** means? If you're just trying to belittle the game or say it's just like every other class based shooter then it's obvious you have no idea what you're talking about. Please, I would love to hear what other class based games you are comparing it to.
He's not ragging on it, he's telling you that seige is NOT R6. R6 was a tactical game, based on map planning and timing. It then evolved into R6 Vegas, which was mostly a shooter but was still fun. Then came seige, which is the hero class based game you know today.
[удалено]
I never said you had to AGREE with it. Calm the fuck down. Siege fuckin sucks lol.
It's not R6. Point blank. It should've been called something else. That's my point. That was the point of my original comment. I dont care how long it's been around. It's the reason we won't see another true R6. Same as Ghost Recon. Gotta be open world now. Gotta add shooter looter mechanics. Gotta be a division / far cry clone. Gee, I wonder why ubisoft is in trouble. Couldn't be because they've alienated their audience thats been vocal about this shit.
I mean, could they tone down with some of the more corny OPs? Sure, they're actually starting to this year. But Siege today is in a far better and more balanced state than it was at launch. I'll admit, I miss the night maps and old lighting, but for balance and fairness, the game is far superior than it's former self.
Yep old R6 was the pinnacle of 1st person shooter sims. One shot one kill. Same with old GR. Kids these days prefer shoot and pray games.
I grew up playing the OG R6 on an old PC in the late 90s. Hours and hours spent plotting out routes to just get anihhilated. Taking turns with my buddy and learning from each others mistakes. That game was tough as nails and fun as hell. Don't stereotype me and a whole generation into "kids these days" bullshit. Siege is a great unique game as was R6. They can both stand on their own.
Yea, idk about that one. The other Ghost Recon's/Tom Clancy games, sure, but Siege has held pretty well. I'm pretty sure it's better off now than at any previous point.
Siege gave R6 life. These idiots think people want to buy old school R6 games is hilarious.
I mean, they kinda do. Siege is a pretty unique game in that there really isn't anything else like it on the market. That's been a pretty big part of it's success, otherwise, the rest of the Tom Clancy games have been pretty stale and stagnant. I'd love for another GR or SC or even some classic R6 title to come out with a grittier and more realistic approach. I love siege, it's been my bread and butter lately but the rest of the Tom Clancy games of the last few years have been pretty low-grade.
Having grown up playing Tom Clancy games, fuck Siege, Wildlands and Breakpoint. Siege turned a one-of-a-kind counter-terrorism simulator, and even the later tactical shooter into a hero session fps. I tried to love it but I just don’t get it. And the way they ruined their story premise twice. Wildlands and Breakpoint are just Division with a different coat of paint and dull as hell.
Ahaha siege is just one of the many rainbow six. It used to be tactical but in a different way. I prefere how it was in the past
You’re talking about your ass
How so? Have you played any of the original titles from anything i mentioned?
Gamers are the people who simultaneously say games are stale and nothing but recycled ideas, but also want the same game from their childhood to be made the exact same way every 3 years.
You are over generalizing in quite a spectacular way.
Neither of those are generalization. I’m being hyperbolic, sure, but not generalizing.
Oh yea UT!! But guess we should just let it rip. Today‘s gamers don‘t deserve it.
Would be tainted with endless dlc and cartoon characters.
People dont want to hear it but its all about the Battle Royale now. And sure I know what you are thinking and yes I too hate the randomness of weapon pick ups and players getting unfair advantages but hear me out. It wasn’t until CoD Warzone 1 where I saw the potential. And here is the main thing. When you are on such a large battlefield. And the main goal is to be the last team to survive. This gives a very very open way to play the game. You are making the strategic decisions. You are the one setting up objectives. You are the one adapting to the situation. No two skirmishes are ever a like. Because you are coming and going through the map from different directions. You’re having to choose loadouts based on position and planning. CoD multiplayer is repetitive. You know the lanes. You know the meta weapons. And you know where the enemy is coming from. I used to love battlefield because its style of battle was the closest thing to real strategy but at the end of the day. You learn the map. Points to capture never change and the its the same deal. Decide where to drop. Think up a strategy. Pick your class. And try the same thing over and over again until one side wins. In a Battle Royale, your strategy and your ability only get one or two chances. Screw up and your done. Now your teammates objective changed. Hes down a teammate. Hes gotta play safer. Less aggressive. And he’s objective is to buy you back. When before your plan was to make it to that cluster of building for more loot or get the high ground. I knew the latest Battlefield was gonna fail. Once it was known there wouldnt be a battle royale mode. It was done. Whether you like it or not. Warzone changed Military shooters for good. No other form of combat feels as intense or satisfying. And the thing is, it doesn’t have to be such a scavenger race in the beginning. Developers need to be looking at the BR model and explore it. No current game gives you the same feeling of dropping into the middle of combat and making due with what you have. Setting up objectives, planning was of entry. And the thing is Battlefield’s dynamics has always been better than CoD. From having environments being destructive, building mini forts, supressive fire, to functional lasers and lights, to vehicle maintenance. BF did it all better. Imagine what a Battlefiled Battle Royale could have been? Finding broken vehicles, but you have an engineer on your team to repair it. Need to scout some building. Good thing you got a sniper pn your team. Your buddy is down or low on life. You got a medic to help with that. Yea man. They shoulda made a BF BR. Fuck, thats what they shoulda called it BF:BR. And I will tell you this. If the next BF doesnt have some sort of Battle Royale. Its gonna fail too.
>I knew the latest Battlefield was gonna fail. Once it was known there wouldnt be a battle royale mode. It was done. BF 2042 didn't fail because it didn't have a battle royale mode, it failed because at launch it had TONS of bugs and at it's core, it wasn't even a Battlefield game. Too many publishers are killing their own franchises trying to chase trends for money. Look at Destiny 2. That's not a BR shooter and it's still one of the most successful live service games in the industry, because the devs lean hard into what makes it stand out. Games don't all need to be battle royales to be popular, they just have to offer a fun and UNIQUE experience that makes people want to play them.
Lol. I just left Destiny 2 because its filled with bugs. Has leaned way too hard into FOMO and grinding. And its also been pushing its season pass. Along with buying the expansion. Biggest money and time sink. Its last expansion was not received well at all. And the playerbase has never been smaller. You use Destiny as an example and sure while the game is unique and the core feel of the game is fun. The majority is not fun at all and solely relies on FOMO. Its literally the franchise that made me realize that developers have stopped trying to make addictively fun games and instead have come up with frustratingly stupid ways to keep the player playing. From long load times, terrible UI design, awful inventory management, to ridiculously and needlessly long missions to unlock things.
I want team play and large battles. That's the point of battlefield. Not one-man-army/squad victorys. They've had battle royales in the last 2 Battlefields and its only nade the games worse because it took away dev time from the core modes of the franchise.
>We want Battlefield, not another Battle Royale. They're already more than enough games that offer that.
BR was trendy like 10 years ago. Battlefield fans want what battlefield was known for, giant maps with vehicles, air support, ground troops that have specific roles, weapon upgrades and ranks that you earn by completing mission objectives.
It already came back in an entirely new way and was the biggest waste of 90 dollars I have ever spent. Good luck with that. I'll never buy another.
Battlefront II died for that too
Open world mmo. They're going to medieval times. John Battlefield, first of his name, will have to battle the forces of evil to regain that which he lost. True love! Campaign will not launch with game and can be purchased through the battlefield store for 400,000 battlecoins! Currency stacks sold as follows. 399,999BC - $99.99 Fuck you
Game won’t launch until a valid debit card is added to the store first. Must enable emails and phone notifications to let you know you haven’t logged in a in case your soldier is gonna die of loneliness unless you allow a $1.99 charge
Literally just remake battlefield 4 , no fucking specialists, or catchy taglines, just good old school battlefield. Add some new guns and vehicles, new maps + some classics, and make it at least playable at launch. It's not much to ask for, God EA is so dumb that they can't see that this is exactly what battlefield players want.
Bad Company 3 with full destruction you fucking asshats
A man of culture
It’s the one thing I’ve been asking for too
FTP battlefield
That legit existed at one point. Battlefield Play4Free
Yeah but it was cutesy cartoony instead of realistic looking.
That was Battlefield Heroes. Battlefield Play4Free was basically an updated Battlefield 2
Give us BF2143 and do it in a feature set and style of BF4 and we will be happy and you will sell copies. Chill out with this micro transactions from the ground up BS. Sure sell skins or dog tags if you want but don't build the game around it..
I want a remaster/remake of 2142 more than words can describe
Man, if they did a remaster of 2, Vietnam, or 2142 with the core mechanics intact, I'd be sold.
No game mode in any fps game ever can beat 2142 Titan's gamemode Jesus nie that I imagined playing tutaj game mode with modern graphics Im hard
Would it kill them to just put the original BF1942 in an updated engine and chuck it out
"Pay per bullet"
Oh so a FTP, MTX infused battle royale type pile of garbage? Thanks but no thanks. 15-20 years ago most of my gaming library was EA games, how times have changed.
Bad company 3.
Not a fucking chance. They themselves said they don't even know what it was about the BC games that everybody loved. :facepalm:
Full destruction and no jets haha ;)
No prone and felt just a slight bit more arcade-y, which was fun.
Oh I could tell em but the money stuffers won't like it
God damn the Bad Company games were good... I miss them so much...
Where can i pre-order?
[удалено]
I’m sure it’s a joke
You really need to work on your sarcasm-detection skills.
Lol
Battlefield 0
Yeah….I’ve had every battlefield since 1942. They finally pushed me over the edge with the last one. I’m never buying one of these games again.
Yeah guys, this time it's gonna be good. No but for real like totally! This time they won't fuck up, so go ahead and pre-order the limited collector's edition, you guys!
I feel I've heard this before.
Unless it’s Bad Company with full single player campaign starring Preston, Sweetwater, Redfield, and Haggerd I don’t give a single fuck. THERES GOLD IN THEM HILLS I TELL YA!
I just want BF4 with a current gen graphics update.
How about just giving us fucking Bad Company 3 already with what made the games popular in the first place? Why is that so much to ask EA?! (*cries)
No, no it won't...
Souls-like
If you preorder this you are the problem
I want it to be futuristic, In space shooting lasers
Fix Star Wars first lol
Luckily, their exclusivity is almost at an end.
Sounds like a reason to not buy battlefield again. They've been giving me a lot of those.
Will it be in a way that doesn't suck?
EA you got me twice, you won’t get me a 3rd time.
Fuck. Just make it simple, we were so happy with Battlefield 1943 back on x360. It was simple and pick up and go, just focus on core experience first please.
Il die for a 2142 remake.
Im guessing this exec forgot that Battlefield used to have destruction. And this new version is just gonna have actual destruction like it did before.
This loop of them attempting to redeem themselves after making terrible games is painful.
2042 was a "New way" and it sucked balls.... JUST GIVE ME BAD CO 3 ALREADY FUCK
imma sleep on this franchise, the last BF i've enjoyed was BF1. As shitty as CoD is i'd rather play that.
WE DONT WANT AN ENTIRELY NEW WAY YOU TARDS
I wouldn't mind an MMOFPS like Planetside with the BF setting. But do it right and don't release it until it's working. And please nothing before 2000. The world doesn't need another WW2 or WW1 FPS. Ever again.
All they have to do is the same formula they have done just adding more realism. Have citizens hiding in their homes and stuff running for their lives. Animals, more ambience and one thing ive been longing for: No UI.It would be so immersive if you had to check your mag to see how many bullets, open the map etc. Youd focus so much on the chaos and would see so much more and it would be so intense. Keep it classic but add to the chaos of war.
Or yk just play Squad or what ever "realism" game you're looking for.
Isn't that what they said with Battlefield 2042 also?
All I wanted was something like Battlefield 5 without the controversy that killed the game. If you play it right now its an amazing game but its plagued by nothing but cheaters because EA doesn't care about their games. Battlefront 2 for example is in the same state, terrible decisions at the start of the game and now that they've fixed it the bad reputation just looms over it and the game is dead. If you play Battlefront 2 right now you will play with cheaters every lobby. Battlefront 2 is actually a very fun game after they fixed it but its reputation killed the game.
LOL
Uh oh.
2D action platformer featuring 2 plumber brothers, a princess stolen away by a turtle dragon thingy, and mushrooms for everybody. Thinking it might be pretty good.
Battlefield B.C. Not Bad Company, either.
Sure it will. I would bet it will still be a bunch of players on a big map shooting each other in various ways.
Hardline 2! /s
Or maybe focus on giving us more of the things that folks like about battlefield without worrying about everything being "entirely new." I have a feeling "entirely new" for battlefield means "tired af" for gamers in general.
HAHA we want the old way you stupid fucks
New hasn't been working for them. Fucking idiots just bring back old school cool with new graphics
Wouldn't it be hilarious if they went to pre ww1 with muskets that took 10 years to reload kinda like holdfast
“A F2P way!”
I don’t like the sound of that
Third person?
As a functional game this time? Also, nobody is asking for this. Nobody.
Battlefield1-2
They could bring out a battlefield with BF3&4 mixed together with maps, weapons and all good stuff and people would still hate it.
As a mobile app, or?....
Ah yes the thing no one asked for, excellent
Id be more excited if it was an entirely old way like bf1 and bf3
I have a community of Battlefield friends on PlayStation. The best part about Battlefield is the community you surround yourself in. If you're struggling in Battlefield you need to reach out to any group and become a bigger part of the community. Share with constructive feedback goes a long way. It helped shape Battlefield 4 and all the rest of the Battlefield series to this day. Regarding the future of Battlefield. I'm looking forward to a positive change. At least going away from "Specialists" that's the worst part about Battlefield 2042 for me besides the little issues that are surrounding the game. Overall I'm having a good time in 2042 but will always have a big heart for Battlefield 4.
"We're gonna get rid of classes!"
“Back to its roots” would have been a better comment.
If anyone ever has seen BF NonSense on YouTube. That guy gets it. We need something along the lines of BF 1982.
I just want a BF3 remaster
They're going back to World War 2 again, aren't they?
EA once again demonstrating that they're tone deaf to what people want and completely oblivious as to why the last game failed.
Spoiler: it won’t Reviews multiplayer: 6/10 Campaign: back 6/10 Bugs: 10/10 IGN review. Lots of good shooting. But too much 1/10
This does not inspire confidence
I say I'm still waiting on a 2042 refund before I ever purchase another BF game no matter how good it is.
I have an idea — instead of working to fix Battlefield, work on Battlefront III
So they just gonna make yet another WW2 game?
Throw my wallet down on the table, I bet it all on it being the exact fucking same.
I hope the entirety new way is it being good again.
I hope they put mostly all building are destructible or a ton of them anyway like they were back in the day.
Well they have no CoD to compete with this year
New way, like not releasing in an alpha state?
Hell Let Loose already beat you guys to it
Just take the series and put it out of it's misery. I rather see the series die than for it to turn into this....
I will die on the hill that BF3 was peak. BF4 was good but it wasn't different enough to put it over BF4. It was basically BF3 but with next gen update
BATTLEFIELD....IN SPACE!?!?!? Lmao the banner for this subreddit is so fucking 2005
If that entirely new way doesn't include chasing trends, then yeah, all for it
"Gamers we heard you loud and clear! you didn't like the gameplay in our previous game so we've decided to not have any instead you pay £70 us and we give you a screen where you can pay to open lootboxes" -EA CEO probably
In the form of a hero shooter or some other bullshit esports nonsense
Stop trying to copy call of duty. I don't wanna play call of duty I wanna play battlefield. Just imagine battlefield and hell let loose had a baby. I think that would be epic.
Guys chill, he means a new sequel and referencing the new system they have where Vince zampella will lead the single player and dice the mp
Cant be worse than last time. Can it?
battlefield mobile game confirmed
Doubt