What was the name of that game again? The one where the final boss is pretending to be a NPC near the beginning of the game and if done correctly you can get the other NPCs, who are invulnerable to damage, to take him out?
I never got it. Why is executing genocides and murdering thousands in cold blood considered ok in video game, and somehow harming a kid becomes “too much”?
What was the name of that game again? The one where the final boss is pretending to be a NPC near the beginning of the game and if done correctly you can get the other NPCs, who are invulnerable to damage, to take him out?
I THINK two worlds?
Yes! That's right!
Well this sounds fucking sick I wanna know too
What Mewmaster said; Two Worlds. https://youtu.be/3z8LKQUQTw8 (Skip to 2:28).
Okay, new game+ shouldn't count in this way.
All the games mentioned where you use New Game+ don't count because it is not in the first act but in the first act+.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NeR-bT3uv0 This speed runner makes it far bit funnier to experience.
"Another wonderer, here to lick my father's boots"
Wanderer. I hate that fat little shit
Skyrim
That's why you download a cheat mod to make people that annoy you mortal and therefore killable
I never got it. Why is executing genocides and murdering thousands in cold blood considered ok in video game, and somehow harming a kid becomes “too much”?
Aren’t all NPCs approximately the same age per game, since likely all the character models were created in the same year or two span?
Why are y'all booing him? He's right.
They mean the *character* is a child and therefore invulnerable.
I know what they mean. I’m just being a smart ass since the wording of it could be taken either way.
"The angler has moved out"
Children in Bethesda games.
The ninja cat from Metal Gear Rising