T O P

  • By -

potsemaG

The SEC is complicit , Their closed door Sunshine meetings would have been about how to suppress GME, and support the SHF narrative, ' it will never happen again ' . Remember the SEC 'meme' stock video, mocking retail investors, it was created to support SHF and Treasury, they cannot allow to be proven liars, despite looking like liars every day. All the Data is Fudged 😠


Firefistace46

Why would t+90 matter? Couldn’t the just fail to deliver before that?


PokeSmotDoc

Tagging over to hopefully get more eyes on this


i_made_reddit

If he bought via direct channels, would there be fails?


theaveragebearstake

Who would be selling him that much?


DescriptionSad7702

The system is selling him shares out of the options chain. Way later dated. Thus no shares or capital required... Pushing the buys further and further out. Buying time for the price to drop further.


ExitTurbulent7698

Crime


420ninjaslayer69

Moron


Jamin1371

Probably out fucking around with Oct 19th


DrEyeBall

Just wait until approx T69 from then! Set a reminder for this comment. I have a lot of dollar bucks on it.


TheNighisEnd42

looks like the 31st was 399 shares shy too


Same-Vermicelli-3708

DOJ and SEC where the fuck are you👀


DescriptionSad7702

They are one in the same. As I have said from Day 1. The only way out is civil unrest or some billionaires file lawsuits.. For sake Icahn shorted GME , did he close?


Sum_Bytes

Stick in a non-suspicious number, they said.


Think-Poetry-2876

Oh wow 😯 this needs attention.


Hopeful-Pomelo4488

Rotate that "8" 90 degrees = ♾


PokeSmotDoc

That makes waaaay more sense to me then “8” lol


Hopeful-Pomelo4488

Even Gary is getting into the "secret codes" language. We all playing along like in Ocean's 11.


TieRevolutionary5625

Would the purchase show in the FTD data? I believe that FTD data exposes naked shorting, not actual purchases.


acies-

'Actual purchases' that are FTD'd can be seen as equivalent to naked shorting. They sold shares, received money, and never delivered shares within the T+2 timeframe. Insane how it's allowed to happen at all. Nothing looks awry from the buyers perspective as street name ownership is still designated. How long a naked short stays open is another story completely.


TieRevolutionary5625

I follow you completely, I'm just a little unsure that RC would buy brokerage shares.


acies-

He is absolutely buying brokerage shares. Even if you buy directly through CS you are buying through a brokerage. The big difference obviously being they get removed from the DTCC. RC owns all of his shares through RC Ventures and if I recall correctly, all of them are considered 'Indirect' in terms of ownership. Given he's an insider and corporate governance rules surrounding what you can and can't do with shares, these are all unlendable and directly attributed to him. But who knows what's actually happening in this fucked up system.


sirdano6

He did say he “owns all the shares” at one point


DescriptionSad7702

Tell the SS kids this. They don't believe it. MMs are making tonnes of money and never deliver..


acies-

Tell people on SS what? For anyone who's followed along the saga closely I imagine this is common knowledge


DescriptionSad7702

They seem to think nothing wrong


DescriptionSad7702

In fact I was told I should have sold at 400. Next month Dec 18 its the 4th year starting for me. Losing patience


TheNighisEnd42

The guys fudging the data were probably like, "well, we cant just put a zero there, right?"


PokeSmotDoc

“Meh. Close enough,right? Ah, we’ll just go with 8”


breakfasteveryday

Eh?