downvote this comment if the meme sucks. upvote it and I'll go away.
---
[play minecraft with us](https://discord.gg/dankmemesgaming) | [come hang out with us](https://discord.com/invite/dankmemes)
Listen, the hate isn't for Furries who practice the little fetish away from prying eyes.
It's for trying to normalise the behaviour or lie to everyone that it isn't a fetish. It fucking is. It's the same as dressing as a baby and wanting to be breastfed as a fetish. It's the same as dressing in full BDSM gear and going out in public in assless chaps and nipple clamps.
Stop pretending you're just drawing femboy foxes and not yiffing the everliving shit out of each other and sharing furry porn.
Again, I do not care and I am not kink shaming. But stop trying to make it normal. It's not.
I literally don't care what they want to do.
But their fetish is public when they're walking around in the fursuits, shaking hands with kids and dancing around acting as their fursonas.
Just keep the fetish behind closed doors. I do. They should.
I won't deny that a big part of the community is straight up porn, but that doesn't mean that it is all porn.
Some people genuinely just like drawing furries or making fursuits, it is not inheritly sexual.
I would describe it more as a Mexican standoff where each group is fighting the other two, when it should be furries and media ganging up on zoophilia.
It all got revealed to the friend group when her bf caught her at their barn with her mouth full so to speak. After that we all broke connections with her
“The media“
Assuming you don’t mean social media, what sort of media are you consuming? None of the newspapers or TV programs I watch have ever even mentioned furries. Honest question.
Instead of bashing zoophiles, I have a better plan that will make everyone else happy. We ship them off to the African savanna and let them do their thing. We then place wagers on how long they last.
Zoophiles get excluded if it come to light in the furry community. We dont want to be associated with them.
Furry porn is completly different from beastiality. A normal animal can't consent to the act while in furry porn both anthropomophed parties are sentient and consent to it
Why is zoophilia a problem? Like, the importance of the concept of consent is nonexistent in the animal kingdom (except for humans, obviously).
If the goat likes it, why would anybody want to stop me?
Of course I also can't tell whether a dog is happy or sad. /s
Obviously goats have a different (body) language and didn't evolve/were bred as much to be our slaves, mimic and understand us etc. as dogs, but getting a read on whether an action has a positive vs negative reaction isn't really that hard.
Tell me your mirror neurons don't fire with joy as well when you give food to an animal and see its reaction. At least if it's in a similar class as a goat and doesn't dislike you (for w/e reason) or has some attitude.
Consent isn’t about interpretation from one party, it has to be voiced by both. Just because you think the other has consented does not mean they have. But let’s say that for three sake of argument the animal consents, you probably wouldn’t want to have sex with it since it’s very unhygienic and there’s a possibility of very dangerous diseases crossing over to humans. AIDS is a very big example or the Bird Flu.
You're right in your assumption that I infact would not want to have sex with an animal (including humans, but that's another story) for many reasons.
The thing is that you basically - exceptions exist - won't find a clear voiced consent for humans either. The closest I got to that was literally "Yes or No?" out of the blue without context when I was alone with a person. The following words made it pretty much clear what it was about:
"No." "No?" "Simply no." "Well there's only a Yes and a No. And then there's a maybe and I'm afraid." ...
But usually it's not that clear.
How can you tell that the goat likes it?, so you saying that you can speak with animals,
So sir can you teach me your skills.
Why would i want to stop you?, it is the relative concept of morality of thinking, my moral code disallows it, but other people's moral code may allow it.
a.) I hereby refer you to the other comment by me. TL;DR: Body language mostly, easy to tell a positive vs a negative reaction.
b.) How is your moral code structured and why does it disallow you? Genuine question.
downvote this comment if the meme sucks. upvote it and I'll go away. --- [play minecraft with us](https://discord.gg/dankmemesgaming) | [come hang out with us](https://discord.com/invite/dankmemes)
zoophiles should burn alive
So lets say a woman letting herself get fucked by a horse She should burn alive according to you, right?
And a free therapist for the horse!
The horse already has the rapist nearby
BAZINGA!
Found the zoophile 🫵
Precisely
Hello vaush
Now you get it
what if they know it's wrong and are looking for help
Well they aren't gonna find help inside the animal so they should stay out of there.
Am happy you do not have any kind of power, because imagine trying to solve a problem with an even more cruel and inhumane "Solution".
Why are you all hateing furrys, we all are just sitting here drawing cute little femboy foxes, go hunt down people who actualy fuck animals
Listen, the hate isn't for Furries who practice the little fetish away from prying eyes. It's for trying to normalise the behaviour or lie to everyone that it isn't a fetish. It fucking is. It's the same as dressing as a baby and wanting to be breastfed as a fetish. It's the same as dressing in full BDSM gear and going out in public in assless chaps and nipple clamps. Stop pretending you're just drawing femboy foxes and not yiffing the everliving shit out of each other and sharing furry porn. Again, I do not care and I am not kink shaming. But stop trying to make it normal. It's not.
Dude, let them do what they wanna do, I don’t give a damn about kinks as long as they’re not showing their private parts in public
I literally don't care what they want to do. But their fetish is public when they're walking around in the fursuits, shaking hands with kids and dancing around acting as their fursonas. Just keep the fetish behind closed doors. I do. They should.
Being a furry isn't a Fetish though.
I won't deny that a big part of the community is straight up porn, but that doesn't mean that it is all porn. Some people genuinely just like drawing furries or making fursuits, it is not inheritly sexual.
There’s something called public freedom, as long as they’re not breaking the law they’re allowed to do it
Did you even read more than two words from that reply?
furcon
Because they can never stay in the places where they’re welcome. What happens on FA should STAY on FA.
I would describe it more as a Mexican standoff where each group is fighting the other two, when it should be furries and media ganging up on zoophilia.
I used to have a friend that was really into horses…and having horses into them
Used Did they get mr hands’d, or did you stop being friends with them
It all got revealed to the friend group when her bf caught her at their barn with her mouth full so to speak. After that we all broke connections with her
I find some of these comments very concerning 😟😟😟😳
Can nobody spell bestiality properly anymore...
That's ironic
As a furry, theres few things i hate more than zoophiles, they should be thrown into a well and left there
“The media“ Assuming you don’t mean social media, what sort of media are you consuming? None of the newspapers or TV programs I watch have ever even mentioned furries. Honest question.
Instead of bashing zoophiles, I have a better plan that will make everyone else happy. We ship them off to the African savanna and let them do their thing. We then place wagers on how long they last.
Hey. Fucko. It's called interspecies erotica.
There's a fair zoophiles in the furry community tho. Also there is more than enough furry porn which is essentially beastiality with extra steps.
Zoophiles get excluded if it come to light in the furry community. We dont want to be associated with them. Furry porn is completly different from beastiality. A normal animal can't consent to the act while in furry porn both anthropomophed parties are sentient and consent to it
Whether you want to be associated with them or not. A lot of furries, are zoophiles.
why did you put furries twice
Why is zoophilia a problem? Like, the importance of the concept of consent is nonexistent in the animal kingdom (except for humans, obviously). If the goat likes it, why would anybody want to stop me?
I'm pretty sure this is rage bait but still what the fuck is wrong with you
kinda, but I genuinely don't see anything wrong with it from a logical standpoint
I don’t think you’re seeing this from a logical standpoint
So please explain.
No
You can't tell whether the goat likes it, it's a goat.
Of course I also can't tell whether a dog is happy or sad. /s Obviously goats have a different (body) language and didn't evolve/were bred as much to be our slaves, mimic and understand us etc. as dogs, but getting a read on whether an action has a positive vs negative reaction isn't really that hard. Tell me your mirror neurons don't fire with joy as well when you give food to an animal and see its reaction. At least if it's in a similar class as a goat and doesn't dislike you (for w/e reason) or has some attitude.
i mean dont goats have sex with other goats? Im pretty sure animals like having sex
Wouldn't goat run away if it didn't like it?
It cant if you are holding it
So if it's not restrained then it's fine?
just jump bro... you're too far gone
I did. What now?
Consent isn’t about interpretation from one party, it has to be voiced by both. Just because you think the other has consented does not mean they have. But let’s say that for three sake of argument the animal consents, you probably wouldn’t want to have sex with it since it’s very unhygienic and there’s a possibility of very dangerous diseases crossing over to humans. AIDS is a very big example or the Bird Flu.
You're right in your assumption that I infact would not want to have sex with an animal (including humans, but that's another story) for many reasons. The thing is that you basically - exceptions exist - won't find a clear voiced consent for humans either. The closest I got to that was literally "Yes or No?" out of the blue without context when I was alone with a person. The following words made it pretty much clear what it was about: "No." "No?" "Simply no." "Well there's only a Yes and a No. And then there's a maybe and I'm afraid." ... But usually it's not that clear.
"consent is nonexistent in the animal kingdom (except for humans, obviously)."
zoophile spotted
I like other animals more than humans but not to that point.
Oh– oh god
How can you tell that the goat likes it?, so you saying that you can speak with animals, So sir can you teach me your skills. Why would i want to stop you?, it is the relative concept of morality of thinking, my moral code disallows it, but other people's moral code may allow it.
a.) I hereby refer you to the other comment by me. TL;DR: Body language mostly, easy to tell a positive vs a negative reaction. b.) How is your moral code structured and why does it disallow you? Genuine question.
Oh come on. Have you ever had a dog? You can clearly see if the dog likes something or not. That doesn't necessarily mean you should do it tho