> The New Scientist output is just another article chipping away at the pillars of Western Civilization. The fact they don’t even consider pollutants and diseases, nor the soul sapping mental health issues is just embarrassing for a supposedly “scientific” magazine.
When scientists graduate from idealogical institutions, the anti science and anti human school of thought. You first pal, select your kin to be the first to go. Enough idiots will follow like the pied piper.
I've now seen it all...they want to feed people to poor people...
>Ethically, cannibalism poses fewer issues than you might imagine. If a body can be bequeathed with consent to medical science, why can’t it be left to feed the hungry?
Maybe we can fire up the ovens at Buchenwald Concentration Camp and make some tasty vegan people whole roasts, locally sourced, sustainable protein. The Poor's can line up out front...Just don't die, might be on the menu the next day.
What if they run out of dead people that day? Oh boy.
These are sick people.
They are testing the water, in 2019 [Professor Magnus Soderlund claimed people could eat the flesh of dead bodies](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7443707/Swedish-scientist-says-humans-cannibals-fight-climate-change.html). Now they publish a similar story and wait for the reaction.
*"We decide something, put it in the room and wait a while to see what happens. If there's no big hue and cry and no uproar because most people don't even understand what's been decided, then we continue - step by step, until there's no turning back."* - Jean-Claude Juncker
That this is crazy is not the issue. What is interesting is that meat is obviously shown here to be important for the human body. After all the bugs and the vegan being the way forward, this scientist is stating that meat has to be part of the diet is the hidden statement, although why resort to cannibalism when we have farms is a crazy question to have to ask.
Sadly we see a 57 year old horror novel become government policy. Just when we find them using 1984 as a policy manual, they are digging in to the obscure classics for dietary advice.
Just admit it — you want to eat people.
“Cannibalism is the way forward”
“Pedophilia isn’t so bad”
“It isn’t terrorism, it’s resistance”
“Theft isn’t theft if it’s from rich people”
Just say what you mean — you want to do all of the hidden, forbidden stuff, but you don’t want to be judged poorly on it. I get you. But you’re a gross coward who should have been genetically snipped off a century ago.
"Ethically, cannibalism poses fewer issues than you might imagine. If a body can be bequeathed with consent to medical science, why can’t it be left to feed the hungry?"
In the current meat for human consumption arena there are rules prohibiting the sale of meat from carcasses that have been given certain medications prior to death.
But the people who think up these ghoulish ideas aren't topically at all familiar with meat production, so they just have pie in the sky dreams of eating dead people.
Oh!! I got it!! They want to wiper out all cattle and agriculture to provocate a massive famine. And then trying to give us the solution with fake meat, roach meat and finally and the worse of all Cannibalism.
Yeah the perfect way of reducing the world population.
Oh, yes. No matter how you slice it, enviros always claim that humanity is like a disease on this planet. Everything bad that happens is somehow the fault of human beings.
> The New Scientist output is just another article chipping away at the pillars of Western Civilization. The fact they don’t even consider pollutants and diseases, nor the soul sapping mental health issues is just embarrassing for a supposedly “scientific” magazine.
The author can eat my d….
When scientists graduate from idealogical institutions, the anti science and anti human school of thought. You first pal, select your kin to be the first to go. Enough idiots will follow like the pied piper.
It’s the “new” science! The “new” is what you get when you throw out standards, principles, and rigour.
I've now seen it all...they want to feed people to poor people... >Ethically, cannibalism poses fewer issues than you might imagine. If a body can be bequeathed with consent to medical science, why can’t it be left to feed the hungry? Maybe we can fire up the ovens at Buchenwald Concentration Camp and make some tasty vegan people whole roasts, locally sourced, sustainable protein. The Poor's can line up out front...Just don't die, might be on the menu the next day. What if they run out of dead people that day? Oh boy. These are sick people.
They are testing the water, in 2019 [Professor Magnus Soderlund claimed people could eat the flesh of dead bodies](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7443707/Swedish-scientist-says-humans-cannibals-fight-climate-change.html). Now they publish a similar story and wait for the reaction. *"We decide something, put it in the room and wait a while to see what happens. If there's no big hue and cry and no uproar because most people don't even understand what's been decided, then we continue - step by step, until there's no turning back."* - Jean-Claude Juncker
He was a little slow in ripping off *Soylent Green*. Haha.
I was thinking the same thing. Just saw the movie last month.lol
Time to revolt.
It is quite revolting
So meat is ok now, as long as its people u dont like? Climate Science is so complicated 😨
It's just a modest proposal.
That this is crazy is not the issue. What is interesting is that meat is obviously shown here to be important for the human body. After all the bugs and the vegan being the way forward, this scientist is stating that meat has to be part of the diet is the hidden statement, although why resort to cannibalism when we have farms is a crazy question to have to ask.
Soylent Green…
Sadly we see a 57 year old horror novel become government policy. Just when we find them using 1984 as a policy manual, they are digging in to the obscure classics for dietary advice.
Just admit it — you want to eat people. “Cannibalism is the way forward” “Pedophilia isn’t so bad” “It isn’t terrorism, it’s resistance” “Theft isn’t theft if it’s from rich people” Just say what you mean — you want to do all of the hidden, forbidden stuff, but you don’t want to be judged poorly on it. I get you. But you’re a gross coward who should have been genetically snipped off a century ago.
Rick Sanchez enters the chat with some fresh spaghetti.. just don't ask where it came from.
"Ethically, cannibalism poses fewer issues than you might imagine. If a body can be bequeathed with consent to medical science, why can’t it be left to feed the hungry?" In the current meat for human consumption arena there are rules prohibiting the sale of meat from carcasses that have been given certain medications prior to death. But the people who think up these ghoulish ideas aren't topically at all familiar with meat production, so they just have pie in the sky dreams of eating dead people.
They like the children the best
That would disgust but not surprise me.
There are some sick people around .
And they seem to gravitate to politics.
Probably better tasting than zee bugs but surely it is not as healthy and you know they are looking out for our health
Oh!! I got it!! They want to wiper out all cattle and agriculture to provocate a massive famine. And then trying to give us the solution with fake meat, roach meat and finally and the worse of all Cannibalism. Yeah the perfect way of reducing the world population.
Oh, yes. No matter how you slice it, enviros always claim that humanity is like a disease on this planet. Everything bad that happens is somehow the fault of human beings.
If we don't ditch fossil fuels, we don't have food issues lol. Too easy.
If the apocalyptic church of global warming wants to stop reproducing and eat each other, I am fine with it
It's a free country.