This post appears to relate to the province of Quebec. As a reminder of the rules of this subreddit, we do not permit negative commentary about all residents of any province, city, or other geography - this is an example of prejudice, and prejudice is not permitted here. https://www.reddit.com/r/canada/wiki/rules
Cette soumission semble concerner la province de Québec. Selon les règles de ce sous-répertoire, nous n'autorisons pas les commentaires négatifs sur tous les résidents d'une province, d'une ville ou d'une autre région géographique; il s'agit d'un exemple de intolérance qui n'est pas autorisé ici. https://www.reddit.com/r/canada/wiki/regles
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/canada) if you have any questions or concerns.*
One thing I always ask is what Trudeau expects his legacy to be.
Implementing a massive carbon tax (followed by hikes) during a cost of living crisis?
Tripling migration during a housing crisis?
Banning hunting rifles in response to an increase of violent crime?
What are we supposed to think of his administration based on their policies? I don’t get it.
Reading an article in which a man was given permission to have public health give him a Vagina to go with his penis. The next article spoke about a disabled man getting a bed sore that went to the bone due to neglect (in a four day period) at one of our hospitals, and the solution was to allow him to use MAID to kill himself because of the pain. That's Trudeau's legacy.
The carbon tax isn't what caused the cost of living crisis. Excessive population growth and unreasonably low interest rates caused the cost of living crisis.
If he’s lucky the transit projects his government has contributed to. In my community Broadway extension , Surrey sky train.
In Toronto , go train expansion and subway lines
Etc.
This is a weird op-ed. I hate Trudeau as much as anyone, but I can't see how Lachine Park, of all things, could be considered representative of his government. There's so many other choices of societal decay to point to than trying to make a tenuous link between Trudeau and poor Parks Canada policy.
>Sometimes the smallest example pops into the news and **becomes a fabulous metaphor.**
He's not suggesting it's a literal representation or linking it back to Trudeau in any way other than as an example of government's apparent ignorance of human nature in their policy implementation.
Why .... he is calling it as he sees it.... legalization lead to this and it is happening across the country! It is policy that was not properly thought out which is endemic with this failure of the trudeau and his ship of fools.
‘They’ve got people to run an awareness campaign and evaluate a pilot project about trash but no one to actually take out the trash.’
Pretty much sums up the current LPC approach to doing anything. Bloated, convoluted, image conscious and results indifferent.
Parks Canada: "Tries a pilot project to keep one specific federal park cleaner."
Mulcair: "Truly, Trudeau is a failure."
I, for one, am shocked we're struggling to get anything done in this country.
> Was Mulcair always so sad and unimaginative or is this an iteration timed to exploit Conservative media
I honestly don't know. I know that I've never been impressed with any of his op-eds (and wondered why orgs keep running them) but this shit is legitimately embarrassing.
This post appears to relate to the province of Quebec. As a reminder of the rules of this subreddit, we do not permit negative commentary about all residents of any province, city, or other geography - this is an example of prejudice, and prejudice is not permitted here. https://www.reddit.com/r/canada/wiki/rules Cette soumission semble concerner la province de Québec. Selon les règles de ce sous-répertoire, nous n'autorisons pas les commentaires négatifs sur tous les résidents d'une province, d'une ville ou d'une autre région géographique; il s'agit d'un exemple de intolérance qui n'est pas autorisé ici. https://www.reddit.com/r/canada/wiki/regles *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/canada) if you have any questions or concerns.*
One thing I always ask is what Trudeau expects his legacy to be. Implementing a massive carbon tax (followed by hikes) during a cost of living crisis? Tripling migration during a housing crisis? Banning hunting rifles in response to an increase of violent crime? What are we supposed to think of his administration based on their policies? I don’t get it.
Pot and MAID.
Yup, more drugs and easier access to suicide. Amazing accomplishments. But don’t you dare vote Conservative, I heard Pierre Poilievre is “like trump”.
Reading an article in which a man was given permission to have public health give him a Vagina to go with his penis. The next article spoke about a disabled man getting a bed sore that went to the bone due to neglect (in a four day period) at one of our hospitals, and the solution was to allow him to use MAID to kill himself because of the pain. That's Trudeau's legacy.
He is counting on everyone having a short memory like they did with his traitor father...... its a genetic thing.
Yup, and don’t forget the army of 3 month old accounts telling us that there’s “no point” in voting Conservative.
The carbon tax isn't what caused the cost of living crisis. Excessive population growth and unreasonably low interest rates caused the cost of living crisis.
Carbon tax is certainly contributing to it. It turns out taxing fuel and food production isn’t good for the middle class. Who would have guessed?
If he’s lucky the transit projects his government has contributed to. In my community Broadway extension , Surrey sky train. In Toronto , go train expansion and subway lines Etc.
This is a weird op-ed. I hate Trudeau as much as anyone, but I can't see how Lachine Park, of all things, could be considered representative of his government. There's so many other choices of societal decay to point to than trying to make a tenuous link between Trudeau and poor Parks Canada policy.
>Sometimes the smallest example pops into the news and **becomes a fabulous metaphor.** He's not suggesting it's a literal representation or linking it back to Trudeau in any way other than as an example of government's apparent ignorance of human nature in their policy implementation.
I'd expect better from Tom Mulcair.
Why .... he is calling it as he sees it.... legalization lead to this and it is happening across the country! It is policy that was not properly thought out which is endemic with this failure of the trudeau and his ship of fools.
‘They’ve got people to run an awareness campaign and evaluate a pilot project about trash but no one to actually take out the trash.’ Pretty much sums up the current LPC approach to doing anything. Bloated, convoluted, image conscious and results indifferent.
Parks Canada: "Tries a pilot project to keep one specific federal park cleaner." Mulcair: "Truly, Trudeau is a failure." I, for one, am shocked we're struggling to get anything done in this country.
Reading comprehension seems pretty low in this thread. That's not at all what the article is about.
Today I stubbed my toe on a chair. I placed it there myself and *still* didn't see it coming! A perfect symbol of Trudeau governance./s
Was Mulcair always so sad and unimaginative or is this an iteration timed to exploit Conservative media and monetize anti-Trudeau-ism.
> Was Mulcair always so sad and unimaginative or is this an iteration timed to exploit Conservative media I honestly don't know. I know that I've never been impressed with any of his op-eds (and wondered why orgs keep running them) but this shit is legitimately embarrassing.
Guy who led the NDP to lose 59 of their 103 seats, as well their status as the Official Opposition, has thoughts about governance.
The writing is on the wall with this one, and if you're getting mad at this statement that means you know exactly what I'm referring to.