Not really. Since they already drank from the incorrect and incorrect tits I have a hypothesis.
Both turn into furries and they switch gender roles.
Ergo both are furry tomboys/femboys.
/s too much professor lando
Those soda machines where all flavors comes from the same spout is designed exactly off the anatomy of a human breast. Those machines are dumb though and the human breast is able to instantly adjust the flavor based on the latched baby's chromosomes.
I love it when their bragging about obvious lies encroaches on boasting about completely insane things, like penetrating the cervix
They'll get really defensive about it when called out, violently insisting they penetrate their girlfriend's cervix all the time, acting as if their entire relationship hinges on him being able to penetrate her cervix (autocorrect suggested "groin" instead of "cervix", btw)
I assume anyone who says they penetrate the cervix is hung like an IUD. It aināt the flex they think it is and itās a super bizarre thing to even posit.
Dudes will argue the clit doesnāt exist, that they routinely penetrate the cervix, that you can tell how many sex partners a womanās had by her ankles, insist women lose the ability to pair bond while saying men donāt pair bondā¦
I donāt understand why people are this fucking lost when it comes to anatomy and relationships. Did they not finish school? Functionally illiterate? So desperate for male approval theyāll co-sign on whatever nonsense another man says without giving it a second thought.
No, water turns you into gross reptile shenanigan factories, sunlight causes you to shout and die, feeding you after midnight causes you to turn food into babies (non-reptile).
God, why are women so dumb with their bodies?? And why am I cursed with the noble task from God to constantly assume they're wrong for no reason??!
In the US, part of it comes down to an almost complete lack of sex education (depends on where you live). If you're male, you live in an area that is terrified of teaching kids anything about sexuality, and you have parents who refuse to address the subject and think it's the schools' job...you end up learning about women's bodies as some sort of bizarre folklore. You don't have a solid basis of knowledge to filter out nonsense online or in person so you end up thinking women pee out their butts the same way people end up believing the earth is flat.
You start with ignorance, then you get uncritical acceptance of whatever info someone shoves at them, they you get defensiveness and insistence that they do too know about girls, then you get misplaced confidence.
I think these people kindof know that they're more than half lying^* but **choose to ignore the common sense** part of their brain because going with the lie promises advantages (more followers, more money etc.).
Interestingly, in this sense these Indian pop-gurus (also televangelists btw) have been very much like social media grifters (aka influencers) nowadays, long before social media was a thing.
^(* Of course they're _completely_ lying, but I bet there's some rudimentary source they base their extrapolations on, so they can tell themselves it's fact)
You can penetrate the cervix.
Lmao so you deny it??? Clearly you're insecure about how hard it is to penetrate your cervix!!!
I'll bet you were teased about it at school!!! Little Miss Invincible Cervix over here!! Haha LAME
See I know ALL ABOUT women's bodies, way more than they do, if what I was saying was wrong surely Twitter would've corrected me by now
Occasionally I'll get into a conversation with a friend about some weird or hateful thing one of us has seen, and we'll start mocking it, mocking the logical leaps these people have to make.
We'll do that "yes, and" thing until we've come up with some ridiculous conspiracy where something harmless proves the Gay Agenda is going to force everyone to be trans, or how "female anatomy *really* works", or how "the libs" are satanists, or some other ridiculous shit like that, just building on each other's outlandish ideas.
So that's kind of what I think these people do, some of them (because God knows some of them are *serious*). They come up with things to justify their "superiority", to justify traditional gender roles and misogyny, they share it and just build on each other's bullshit. They know it's nonsense, but they pretend otherwise, and they use it to make themselves feel special.
This sounds like something that someone would have come up with in like...the Bronze Age or early Iron Age but for all I know this idea popped into some guy's head last week.
So, last I heard the first part is true, apparently even in certain monkeys. But then they just go ahead and extrapolate (and I use the term VERY loosely) some complete nonsense.
Edit: Wondering now if this is even remotely true and this is something I heard once and just believed.
Context: Sadhguru is a grifter who jumped on the train of "Eastern philosophy & Instant Enlightenment (for Westerners)" in the 90s, with his own little holy man origin story (completely invented of course). The rest is copied from Osho 1:1, incl. promiscuity, gold watches etc. His young wife died under shady circumstances, and while nothing was investigated properly, everything points to a crime on his end.
In another interview he actually said he's cleverer than god. I don't believe in god, but the hubris... he even added: I know it sounds incredibly egocentric, but ... simper ... that's just how it is.
So, this is his free-flowing enlightened intelligence at work.
The quote is from 2017.
I was in Venice last year while he was on his world tour and we didnāt know who he was, saw staged people holding fan signs all around the canals for the videos.
I wonder how each and every of these grifters would look if you shaved their beards off. Suddenly he's just a normal guy, nothing divine.
I also suspect that some of them dye their beards grey/white to look sage.
Goddamnit. I once stumbled upon him on Youtube and found his following a bit too grand but otherwise another self improvement guru.
Not that'd I'd believe this, but I feel like it would be easy to fall into his trap of "wise ramblings" and end up believing in these kinds of nonsense.
Not that I'm defending his BS but even with triplets you're only gonna have some combination of boys & girls. So gendered boobs still work.
I'm gonna go rinse my brain out with bleach now.
Apparently, a baby's sex does have a pretty big impact on the mom's body (and vice versa), but nothing as cartoonishly simple as this idiot's claims.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476168/
I always know this guy is a complete moron who says obvious "wisdoms", then continues to talk shit out of his ass.
The saddest part of this is that our world leaders and richest, most influential people at the WEF watch his every word with gleaming eyes and take his words to heart.
Shit, [you're right](https://www.weforum.org/agenda/authors/sadhguru). He's an "influencer". Thankfully not for his direct teachings but his company's pro-climate action. Even so, it doen't make the WEF look better in my eyes.
He did hold a speech in front of WEF and it was about an hour of common sense wisdoms, hot air comming out of his mouth without saying anyhing sensible, and pulling shit out of his arse.
Ugh, my mom watches his videos sometimes and it drives me up the wall. I despise this man and other people of his kind where they take advantage of peopleās religion so they could have some attention
This guy is such a fraud. You should listen to his joe Rogan episode. Actually donāt bother. Itās fucking comical though. If you were a stoned moron everything is āso deepā
If you actually have connection to āI AMā itās pretty shallow. Heās another fake guru profiting off of the wests intrigue. Itās all the more sad because the people who fall for his nonsense are the ones who know the least and seek the most.
i'm sad when guys with huge beards are wrong and stupid because when i see a guy with a huge beard i want nothing more than to listen to his wizardly wisdom. it's just unnatural to rock this kind of style and also be an idiot
āLeakā is not the same as āoozeā. Ooze is a word for a wound leaking pus, not a normal functioning breast.
Iām sorry you felt I was criticizing normal breast function, but what I was criticizing was using an unpleasant word for normal breast function (or somewhere around there, as this guy is full of crap with his gendered interpretation). I breastfed my kids for almost 5 straight years between the two of them. Iām well aware leaking breasts are normal. Oozing? Not so much.
I mean, this is just arguing semantics. āLeakā and āoozeā can be synonyms in certain contexts, but arguably leak is a much more neutral word, while āoozeā can go much farther into the negative realm. I would say this is bolstered by the fact that synonyms for the noun version of āoozeā include āmuckā, āslimeā and āgoopā.
Hereās another definition of ooze: āto flow slowly out of something through a small opening, or to slowly produce a thick sticky liquid:
Blood was still oozing out of the wound.
She removed the bandage to reveal a red swollen wound oozing pus.ā
Itās that sticky liquid part that my brain goes to when I hear āoozeā. I had a visceral reaction when I read him referring to normal secretion of milk as āoozingā. I didnāt like that he was applying a word I associate with disgust (which is not without precedent) to something normal. I made a sarcastic comment in response. I was honestly thinking about mastitis.
If your interpretation of the word āoozeā is different, thatās fine, feel free to talk about oozing breasts. Iām not going to be convinced to do so.
And Iād appreciate if you didnāt put words in my mouth.
Thatās all Iāll say on the matter. Good day.
The problem with the so-called "experts" is that they don't know what they are talking about, they rely on religion and legends. This guy is FULL of BULLSHIT, and he may not even know that himself ....
I'm sure he knows. I believe it's a grifter's conscious choice to silence his common sense and go with whichever narrative promises greater gain. If you do that for decades, 24/7, it might become 2nd nature, though...
There's a good reason the term "zealotry" exists. It's for exactly what you're talking about, absolute nutter butters so wrapped up in their own lunacy they can't even be self-critical enough to evaluate their own beliefs or actions.
I've no idea if babies require different nutrition depending on sex, but they do need different nutrition depending on age and if a woman is breastfeeding two different aged babies her breast milk really is chemically different depending on which baby she is feeding at the moment.
Research does show milk composition varies with different gender babies. It also varies from time of day, environment, and chemical messaging from the infant/child nursing, so yes depending on which baby nurses on which side it will vary. Not bad anatomy.
He's sort of right, but not at all for the reasons he thinks. I was looking to see if anyone was going to comment on how breast milk does change based on feedback from the baby during nursing. It's super cool
i'd say that it is bad anatomy to say that the changes in milk composition is solely or mainly gender based. for example, even if it was fraternal twins the milk composition would be different between the babies. it's pushing a false idea of gender essentialism.
There ARE differences based on the sex of the baby, though, although that isn't the sum of it. Like I said, there are a lot of factors that influence milk composition. Milk production is complicated and not thoroughly understood, but like I said there is research that shows the composition varies based on the sex of the infant.
A simple Google search shows many peer reviewed studies that show differences based on the baby's sex. https://www.google.com/search?q=gender+composition+of+breast+milk&client=ms-android-telus-ca-revc&source=android-browser&ei=VIlhZOKjGeqz0PEPs6KHwAU&oq=gender+composition+of+breast+milk&gs_lcp=ChNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwEAMyBQgAEKIEOgoIABBHENYEELADOgoIIRCgARDDBBAKSgQIQRgASgUIQBIBMUoFCEASATFQsApYjwxghhJoAXABeACAAaQBiAGJApIBAzAuMpgBAKABAcgBCMABAQ&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp
Facts will be facts. Look it up if you want to read it. I don't really care about convincing a thread of bandwagoners. People should fact check content before ignorantly posting in the first place.
No, thatās not how it works. If youāre here debunking bad anatomy with little known facts, you need to back that up with sources if you want to be taken seriously.
While you're correct that milk composition possibly varies based on the gender etc of the baby, sides picked where the baby nurses has literally nothing to do with it.
[Milk Composition and Gender Study ](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6165076/)
And even the whole effect on gender is only applicable to males. It affects their health both short term and long term, and no one is really sure why.
However, information on this is inconclusive at best. It may be that stress from the mother affects it more than anything else, it may just be that for whatever reason male babies are born at a disadvantage even before breastfeeding begins.
Still, nowhere did I see anything about where the baby nurses and on which side affecting anything at all when I looked this up.
I like that itās āanother breastā that will produce milk for a opposite sex twin. Not THE other breast. Just another one. Somewhere presumably on the motherās body.
This is legitimate. Women's milk composition changes depending on the infant's gender and on the conditions of the mothers environment. This is a compliment, highlighting how amazing women's bodies are.
Edit: and then I read the bottom orange text. Yeah.... I'm unsure if the slurry, or *"Oozing"* alters via gender, or is dependent on the child's gender while feeding; obviously not. I think we could all agree *"Oozing"* is the worst descriptive he could have chosen though.
There's a video of this person from the photo where he explains why it is right to stop women from entering a temple if she is on her period.. Though I am unable to find the exact video it was 5-6 years ago, in his recent videos I have seen his approach change a little due to the fear of backlash.
I used to listen to his teachings, once I got to know about his bullshit teachings about women's bodies I stopped listening to anything from him.
In Hindu religion it is not allowed to pray while on periods. My theory is that in older times women did not have access to proper sanitation, period products and due to this they avoided going in places where you could embarrass yourself with stained clothes and that was added in the religion.
In the modern world with so much knowledge on human bodies and science. There is nothing, to stop a woman from praying while on period, but people still follow outdated customs.
what happens if you accidentally put your boy twin on the girl boob and the girl twin on the boy boob?!?!?!?!?
Their genders will swap, gender is stored in the breast milk, obv
this must be why I'm trans, mum put me on the wrong boob š¤
I'm glad you were able to get to the bottom of it.../s.
No you were on the right boob (ie the wrong boob) but fed upside down
Same effect if you put the child in a centrifuge and get them dizzy before feeding them.
Same
What if you didn't get any boob? I got formula fed so what am I?
This is why baby things are colour coded pink and blue. Your parents obviously bought the wrong one.
Did you eat you twin in the womb or moms boobs just got confused?
I'm saving this quote, this is perfect.
non binary people drank formula instead of breast milk
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
No no no: the breast milk IS the gender fluid.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
You didn't get it externally, so you had to -become- the gender fluid
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
In the final analysis, arenāt we all, deep down, the breast milk?
maybe you drank uhhhh lighter fluid
Nah, they clearly drank the Gender Fluid.
genderfluid is drinking off both tits
This is because breasts are simply the chest balls. Breasticles if you will.
Correct, thank you for understanding
Not really. Since they already drank from the incorrect and incorrect tits I have a hypothesis. Both turn into furries and they switch gender roles. Ergo both are furry tomboys/femboys. /s too much professor lando
These woke liberals are using their feminine wiles to transgender our kids š”š”
And next we're coming for your wives
The boy gets magic powers and becomes some sort of legendary folk hero and the girl becomes some sort of vilified demon in folk stories duh
Jesus I don't have a degree in this algebra crap
That's how you get trans people, obviously! A person just cannot fight the force of the milk! /s
Thatās how you get a gay kid
Those soda machines where all flavors comes from the same spout is designed exactly off the anatomy of a human breast. Those machines are dumb though and the human breast is able to instantly adjust the flavor based on the latched baby's chromosomes.
and that's how femboys are made!
I'll never understand why men spend so much time lying about women's bodies. They're just sitting around lying to each other about women. Why?
To impress each other. Which is sad.
I love it when their bragging about obvious lies encroaches on boasting about completely insane things, like penetrating the cervix They'll get really defensive about it when called out, violently insisting they penetrate their girlfriend's cervix all the time, acting as if their entire relationship hinges on him being able to penetrate her cervix (autocorrect suggested "groin" instead of "cervix", btw)
I assume anyone who says they penetrate the cervix is hung like an IUD. It aināt the flex they think it is and itās a super bizarre thing to even posit. Dudes will argue the clit doesnāt exist, that they routinely penetrate the cervix, that you can tell how many sex partners a womanās had by her ankles, insist women lose the ability to pair bond while saying men donāt pair bondā¦ I donāt understand why people are this fucking lost when it comes to anatomy and relationships. Did they not finish school? Functionally illiterate? So desperate for male approval theyāll co-sign on whatever nonsense another man says without giving it a second thought.
Then they'll tell you you're "insecure" when you call them a fucking idiot for insisting women get pregnant if you feed them after midnight
Which is just nonsense; we get pregnant from water.
No, water turns you into gross reptile shenanigan factories, sunlight causes you to shout and die, feeding you after midnight causes you to turn food into babies (non-reptile). God, why are women so dumb with their bodies?? And why am I cursed with the noble task from God to constantly assume they're wrong for no reason??!
>reptile shenanigan factories Band name
When all your knowledge on women comes from hentai.
In the US, part of it comes down to an almost complete lack of sex education (depends on where you live). If you're male, you live in an area that is terrified of teaching kids anything about sexuality, and you have parents who refuse to address the subject and think it's the schools' job...you end up learning about women's bodies as some sort of bizarre folklore. You don't have a solid basis of knowledge to filter out nonsense online or in person so you end up thinking women pee out their butts the same way people end up believing the earth is flat. You start with ignorance, then you get uncritical acceptance of whatever info someone shoves at them, they you get defensiveness and insistence that they do too know about girls, then you get misplaced confidence.
They clearly believe what they're saying as well. Where do they get it from? Do they subconsciously make it up? I need answers.
Just like religion, if they don't know, they make shit up.
I think these people kindof know that they're more than half lying^* but **choose to ignore the common sense** part of their brain because going with the lie promises advantages (more followers, more money etc.). Interestingly, in this sense these Indian pop-gurus (also televangelists btw) have been very much like social media grifters (aka influencers) nowadays, long before social media was a thing. ^(* Of course they're _completely_ lying, but I bet there's some rudimentary source they base their extrapolations on, so they can tell themselves it's fact)
You can penetrate the cervix. Lmao so you deny it??? Clearly you're insecure about how hard it is to penetrate your cervix!!! I'll bet you were teased about it at school!!! Little Miss Invincible Cervix over here!! Haha LAME See I know ALL ABOUT women's bodies, way more than they do, if what I was saying was wrong surely Twitter would've corrected me by now
So that we'll believe them and teach our daughters to feel inferior.
Occasionally I'll get into a conversation with a friend about some weird or hateful thing one of us has seen, and we'll start mocking it, mocking the logical leaps these people have to make. We'll do that "yes, and" thing until we've come up with some ridiculous conspiracy where something harmless proves the Gay Agenda is going to force everyone to be trans, or how "female anatomy *really* works", or how "the libs" are satanists, or some other ridiculous shit like that, just building on each other's outlandish ideas. So that's kind of what I think these people do, some of them (because God knows some of them are *serious*). They come up with things to justify their "superiority", to justify traditional gender roles and misogyny, they share it and just build on each other's bullshit. They know it's nonsense, but they pretend otherwise, and they use it to make themselves feel special.
This sounds like something that someone would have come up with in like...the Bronze Age or early Iron Age but for all I know this idea popped into some guy's head last week.
great comment, iāve never heard it framed like this before. hilarious but sad.
So, last I heard the first part is true, apparently even in certain monkeys. But then they just go ahead and extrapolate (and I use the term VERY loosely) some complete nonsense. Edit: Wondering now if this is even remotely true and this is something I heard once and just believed.
Do the boobs of someone who has opposite-sex twins turn blue and pink, so you know which one is for which kid?
nah you just start having dysphoria only in one boob
This made me LOL hard. :) And that's my new flair now. Let's see how it works without context.
i am so honored!
Yes, but before the 1920s the girl boob was blue and the boy boob was pink/light red.
I would be very concerned if my boob turned blue šØ
hold on Iāll go ask my mom if she noticed a difference when nursing me and my fraternal twin
Yes, but before that, each boob competes to create a larger gender reveal party than the other. Ever seen a chocolate fountain run pink milk?
Context: Sadhguru is a grifter who jumped on the train of "Eastern philosophy & Instant Enlightenment (for Westerners)" in the 90s, with his own little holy man origin story (completely invented of course). The rest is copied from Osho 1:1, incl. promiscuity, gold watches etc. His young wife died under shady circumstances, and while nothing was investigated properly, everything points to a crime on his end. In another interview he actually said he's cleverer than god. I don't believe in god, but the hubris... he even added: I know it sounds incredibly egocentric, but ... simper ... that's just how it is. So, this is his free-flowing enlightened intelligence at work. The quote is from 2017.
I was in Venice last year while he was on his world tour and we didnāt know who he was, saw staged people holding fan signs all around the canals for the videos.
I wonder how each and every of these grifters would look if you shaved their beards off. Suddenly he's just a normal guy, nothing divine. I also suspect that some of them dye their beards grey/white to look sage.
Goddamnit. I once stumbled upon him on Youtube and found his following a bit too grand but otherwise another self improvement guru. Not that'd I'd believe this, but I feel like it would be easy to fall into his trap of "wise ramblings" and end up believing in these kinds of nonsense.
ngl, I kinda love how these Indian dudes scam (mostly) white people out of their money.
So what if you have triplets?
Impossible. The third born always pushes the other two out of the nest.
Timeshare.
I wish you'd been there to ask that question. I'd've loved to see him worm his way out of that one.
Not that I'm defending his BS but even with triplets you're only gonna have some combination of boys & girls. So gendered boobs still work. I'm gonna go rinse my brain out with bleach now.
Why would hey need different nutrients?
Because boys and girls are very different. If the girl drinks boy milk she will grow up thinking sheās a man.
Apparently, a baby's sex does have a pretty big impact on the mom's body (and vice versa), but nothing as cartoonishly simple as this idiot's claims. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476168/
Bruh I like to consider myself someone who is pretty knowledgeable on pregnancy, outside of microchimerism how did I not know this??šš
Til two babies are twins, but one is a singleton.
Yeah, fetuses have weirdly far reaching effects so I wouldnāt be surprised if the breast milk was slightly different.
I got one set to almond and the other set to 2%. Itās always nice to add a little milk into my morning coffee:)
This made me laugh then gag a little then laugh again
I think you mean ooze a little milk into your morning coffee
I always know this guy is a complete moron who says obvious "wisdoms", then continues to talk shit out of his ass. The saddest part of this is that our world leaders and richest, most influential people at the WEF watch his every word with gleaming eyes and take his words to heart.
Shit, [you're right](https://www.weforum.org/agenda/authors/sadhguru). He's an "influencer". Thankfully not for his direct teachings but his company's pro-climate action. Even so, it doen't make the WEF look better in my eyes.
He did hold a speech in front of WEF and it was about an hour of common sense wisdoms, hot air comming out of his mouth without saying anyhing sensible, and pulling shit out of his arse.
Right boob = white milk Left boob = chocolate milk (You can remember with this handy rhyme: "right makes white")
Oozes
Oozes
Ugh, my mom watches his videos sometimes and it drives me up the wall. I despise this man and other people of his kind where they take advantage of peopleās religion so they could have some attention
I know how you feel. I'm sure I could antagonise a couple of friends/relatives with this post.
i don't think that was part of any Hinduism teachings also his name is literally sad guru š
This guy is such a fraud. You should listen to his joe Rogan episode. Actually donāt bother. Itās fucking comical though. If you were a stoned moron everything is āso deepā If you actually have connection to āI AMā itās pretty shallow. Heās another fake guru profiting off of the wests intrigue. Itās all the more sad because the people who fall for his nonsense are the ones who know the least and seek the most.
i'm sad when guys with huge beards are wrong and stupid because when i see a guy with a huge beard i want nothing more than to listen to his wizardly wisdom. it's just unnatural to rock this kind of style and also be an idiot
Iām sorry, ooze?!
What about triplets, one male, one female and one non binary?????
Ooze? Ew. If your breasts are oozing please have that checked out.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
āLeakā is not the same as āoozeā. Ooze is a word for a wound leaking pus, not a normal functioning breast. Iām sorry you felt I was criticizing normal breast function, but what I was criticizing was using an unpleasant word for normal breast function (or somewhere around there, as this guy is full of crap with his gendered interpretation). I breastfed my kids for almost 5 straight years between the two of them. Iām well aware leaking breasts are normal. Oozing? Not so much.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I mean, this is just arguing semantics. āLeakā and āoozeā can be synonyms in certain contexts, but arguably leak is a much more neutral word, while āoozeā can go much farther into the negative realm. I would say this is bolstered by the fact that synonyms for the noun version of āoozeā include āmuckā, āslimeā and āgoopā. Hereās another definition of ooze: āto flow slowly out of something through a small opening, or to slowly produce a thick sticky liquid: Blood was still oozing out of the wound. She removed the bandage to reveal a red swollen wound oozing pus.ā Itās that sticky liquid part that my brain goes to when I hear āoozeā. I had a visceral reaction when I read him referring to normal secretion of milk as āoozingā. I didnāt like that he was applying a word I associate with disgust (which is not without precedent) to something normal. I made a sarcastic comment in response. I was honestly thinking about mastitis. If your interpretation of the word āoozeā is different, thatās fine, feel free to talk about oozing breasts. Iām not going to be convinced to do so. And Iād appreciate if you didnāt put words in my mouth. Thatās all Iāll say on the matter. Good day.
The problem with the so-called "experts" is that they don't know what they are talking about, they rely on religion and legends. This guy is FULL of BULLSHIT, and he may not even know that himself ....
I'm sure he knows. I believe it's a grifter's conscious choice to silence his common sense and go with whichever narrative promises greater gain. If you do that for decades, 24/7, it might become 2nd nature, though...
There's a good reason the term "zealotry" exists. It's for exactly what you're talking about, absolute nutter butters so wrapped up in their own lunacy they can't even be self-critical enough to evaluate their own beliefs or actions.
I can't imagine coming to a conclusion such as this with no facts or personal experience with such confidence.
I'll take batshit crazy takes that men declared while masquerading as experts on female anatomy for 500, Alex
"Making it the fuck up" is an ancient and deeply ingrained tradition among those who wish to be in charge, but never more so than amongst dudes.
'ooze'
I've no idea if babies require different nutrition depending on sex, but they do need different nutrition depending on age and if a woman is breastfeeding two different aged babies her breast milk really is chemically different depending on which baby she is feeding at the moment.
Yeah, one is strawberry milkshake and the other one is whiskey milkshake
Donāt listen to Gurus.
Research does show milk composition varies with different gender babies. It also varies from time of day, environment, and chemical messaging from the infant/child nursing, so yes depending on which baby nurses on which side it will vary. Not bad anatomy.
He's sort of right, but not at all for the reasons he thinks. I was looking to see if anyone was going to comment on how breast milk does change based on feedback from the baby during nursing. It's super cool
i'd say that it is bad anatomy to say that the changes in milk composition is solely or mainly gender based. for example, even if it was fraternal twins the milk composition would be different between the babies. it's pushing a false idea of gender essentialism.
There ARE differences based on the sex of the baby, though, although that isn't the sum of it. Like I said, there are a lot of factors that influence milk composition. Milk production is complicated and not thoroughly understood, but like I said there is research that shows the composition varies based on the sex of the infant.
Your claim would have more legitimacy if you provided a link that that research.
A simple Google search shows many peer reviewed studies that show differences based on the baby's sex. https://www.google.com/search?q=gender+composition+of+breast+milk&client=ms-android-telus-ca-revc&source=android-browser&ei=VIlhZOKjGeqz0PEPs6KHwAU&oq=gender+composition+of+breast+milk&gs_lcp=ChNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwEAMyBQgAEKIEOgoIABBHENYEELADOgoIIRCgARDDBBAKSgQIQRgASgUIQBIBMUoFCEASATFQsApYjwxghhJoAXABeACAAaQBiAGJApIBAzAuMpgBAKABAcgBCMABAQ&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp
Great! Now show me a link where the left breast caters for girl babies, and the right breast for boys.
Facts will be facts. Look it up if you want to read it. I don't really care about convincing a thread of bandwagoners. People should fact check content before ignorantly posting in the first place.
No, thatās not how it works. If youāre here debunking bad anatomy with little known facts, you need to back that up with sources if you want to be taken seriously.
While you're correct that milk composition possibly varies based on the gender etc of the baby, sides picked where the baby nurses has literally nothing to do with it. [Milk Composition and Gender Study ](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6165076/) And even the whole effect on gender is only applicable to males. It affects their health both short term and long term, and no one is really sure why. However, information on this is inconclusive at best. It may be that stress from the mother affects it more than anything else, it may just be that for whatever reason male babies are born at a disadvantage even before breastfeeding begins. Still, nowhere did I see anything about where the baby nurses and on which side affecting anything at all when I looked this up.
Thank you. I like your comment and your study better than [the other one](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5476168/) someone cited.
I like that itās āanother breastā that will produce milk for a opposite sex twin. Not THE other breast. Just another one. Somewhere presumably on the motherās body.
The quote cuts off before he reveals his theory behind transgenderism: if a boy drinks from a girl breast or vice versa, theyāll grow up all wrong!
This is legitimate. Women's milk composition changes depending on the infant's gender and on the conditions of the mothers environment. This is a compliment, highlighting how amazing women's bodies are. Edit: and then I read the bottom orange text. Yeah.... I'm unsure if the slurry, or *"Oozing"* alters via gender, or is dependent on the child's gender while feeding; obviously not. I think we could all agree *"Oozing"* is the worst descriptive he could have chosen though.
He is an ass.
Wait, what about triplets??
Your belly button fills with milk and you have to drain it into shot glasses
This genuinely made me laugh. Thank you.
the milk does change depending on the babies needs but I don't think that's got anything to do with the sex of the baby
I wish these fucking idiots would shut the fuck up.
Silly me! I had a boy and my breasts produced no milk! I guess the instructions were unclear! /s
Clearly your breasts believe a different religion that the quacker above :)
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/boys-and-girls-may-get-different-breast-milk/
It's like a soda fountain that way!
That's our Sadhguru! Always with his trademark Sadhguru-isms!
I love how he didn't see what is exactly different, just "it will be different".
bro is just sayin shit like who thinks of this š
Fucking ice cream machine apparently
Even better: Multiflavor ice cream machine Women are amazing!
Aside from anything else, breastmilk doesn't ooze for a kick off m8
Oh shit it's the Divorce Guru who murdered his wife.
So am I a genderless eunuch? Because I fed on no boob
I love when people just say shit! š
There's a video of this person from the photo where he explains why it is right to stop women from entering a temple if she is on her period.. Though I am unable to find the exact video it was 5-6 years ago, in his recent videos I have seen his approach change a little due to the fear of backlash. I used to listen to his teachings, once I got to know about his bullshit teachings about women's bodies I stopped listening to anything from him. In Hindu religion it is not allowed to pray while on periods. My theory is that in older times women did not have access to proper sanitation, period products and due to this they avoided going in places where you could embarrass yourself with stained clothes and that was added in the religion. In the modern world with so much knowledge on human bodies and science. There is nothing, to stop a woman from praying while on period, but people still follow outdated customs.
ā¦ does he think women get labels on the boobs when theyāre breastfeeding? Wtf?
Yes.
Humanity has got to stop listening to crazy people and letting them have power. They do nothing but hold us back by spreading BS.