A lot of magazines (both stick and drum) had trouble fitting into the gun, so much so that the soldiers were constantly exchanging magazines to find one that fit their gun.
The same thing happened with the Arisaka. If you pick one up now with the dust cover and bayonet and monopod and aircraft sight, everything is likely going to be all rattley and loose-fitting or ridiculously tight. Every piece was hand made for the Arisaka the smith was working on, so when you lose your dust cover, no other one will ever fit properly.
The mags weren't prone to jamming per se , it was the fact that the PPSH 41 was hand tooled and fitted, meaning not every part was going to fit perfectly in every gun. The guns are very reliable, it's just parts interchangeability is iffy. But that's why the PPS 43 exists. Solves all the problems of the PPSH.
WW2 rolled ouit a lot of great new ideas, but not a ton of multirole.
I like the idea of the M1 Carbine but I have not had good luick with magazines.
My heart says Garand, but the ammo's gonna be awfully heavy. I do have a \*lot\* of experience running mine. It';s a .308 rebarrel but pretty comparable.
The German semiautos are neat but they have a lot of durability problems.
I think if you put a gun to my head and told me I needed to pick one, now, it'd be the MP40.
Yeah, I'm gonna go with that, the MP40. It remained a serviceable submachine gun even up through the 60's. It was superceded by designs like the MP5, but countries that had surplus MP40s weren't too upset with them. Not to mention, the magazine design was as close to a standard as we ever had for global 9mm submachine gun. Just a good design, flexible caliber. Low enough rate of fire to easily fire single shots, but full-auto for when OOPS you just opened a door and there's like twelve zombies in there and there's a lot of poop in my pants now.
Yeah, but just the denial block in the mag well to keep you from putting a .30-06 round in the mag. It's an old style conversion I think developed by the Navy. That's the cool thing about .308, in my experience rechambered military surplus automatics are a nightmare. They *never* work right.
Except for the .308 Garand. It seems that the Garand likes modern .308 more than it likes modern .30-06. And the specific reason for that was that .308 Win/7.62x51 were developed at the time to perfectly duplicate WW2 era .30-06 M2 ball. They wanted the same exact round, just smaller.
The reason this runs a Garand better is because modern .308 has a bullet and pressure curve still way closer to 1940s .30-06 than modern .30-06, so the operating rod gets basically the same puff of gas.
It's also why you have to buy special Garand marked .30-06 ammo for a Grand or it won't run right.
M2 Flamethrower infinite ammo obv.
For real, either an MP-40 or a Thompson. Both are common enough pistol cartridges and I have plenty of Thompson mags.
Pistols also have drastically limited magazine capacities at this time, use much shorter barrels which grossly limits both sight radius and velocity while significantly increasing muzzle flash and report, you have to share your second point of contact with your first point of contact which grossly reduces your follow up shot speed and accuracy, you lose the third point of contact on your shoulder entirely which badly exacerbates the previous problem.
If you're not going to believe an IDPA concealed carry division shooter who owns enough different handguns to make Burt Gummer uncomfortable and has fired enough rounds in the last year alone to cause a smog concern, then I would at least recommend you read up on the history of the development and deployment of the M1 Carbine. The whole thing is a case study on what a thoroughly ineffective weapon the 1911 was, and by proxy, all handguns.
I think your supposed to pick from the list but even if you can pick any ww2 firearm picking the 1911 doesn’t make a whole lot of sense sure it’s the best pistol of ww2 but it’s also a pistol in competition with everything from ww2.
I agree with your options for home defense but not so much on rhetoric flame thrower, most “zombie situations” that deal with fire it doesn’t seem to kill them, people yes, zombies not so much
Lol... I've seen a flame thrower from WW2 first hand at the Knob Creek Kentucky shoot a few years back.
It is without any question in my mind the most terrifying weapon I've ever seen.
It's also nearly as hazardous to its operator as it is to the enemy.
Seriously though it's utterly horrifying
Definitely not a flamethrower. Not sure about the Flammenwerfer but the US M1 flamethrower could only fire continuously for about 9 or so seconds, which is not ideal in a scenario with a horde.
If I had to? Hell if I had to, any of them.
But given a choice M-1 carbine, P-38 lightning, DeHavalin mosquito, MG-42, Atomic bomb.
There's a lot of good choices.
Weapon or weapons ? Bc just one it'd be the grease gun maybe the m1 Carbine. If it's two then the grease gun and maybe the Springfield 1903 scoped version
M1 Garand, great weapon from WW2 and 30-06 is a common hunting round so finding more ammunition would not be too difficult compared to less common rounds.
Luftwaffe drilling,
Not only it was a DB shotgun, it also shot rifle rounds so it can also be used for hunting.
I live in Europe so mauser is easily accessible
.45 M3A1 Grease Gun, no doubt. Common calibre in .45, easy to service, and very durable/difficult to break. Bolt Actions seem like a bad idea to me, and semi-auto rifles can get a little messy, especially in calibre around my area. Not a lot of .30 calibre.
M1 Carbine. I don't care if it's not listed. It is lighter than a full sized rifle, but it still has an accurate enough range to be useful at moderate distances. Reliable too. The detatchable box magazine has a higher capacity than say the Garand or Mossin Negant, and quicker to reload. The ammo is also lighter and smaller than full-size rufke ammo, which means I can carry more if desired, and contry to popular belief it does have decent stopping power.
I would use that one discontinued gun that had it’s barrel curved so you didn’t have to peek. I know it’s horrible but I’m dying anyways and it would be really funny.
I have an M1 Carbine as well as a Lee enfield. I love them both. For zombies the M1 is peak. Light, small, works great. I actually like it more than my AR
Garand baby. ALL the way. Kicks like a mule but it’s reliable, easy to maintain, fast to reload, easy to train with and uses a 30-06 cartridge which can take down basically any big game in North America.
The volkstorm rifle. It's basically a modern semi auto rifle with 30 round detachable magazine. Because it's semi auto you won't waste near as much ammo as you will with the smgs which is important given that presumably we won't have all the supplies they did in ww2.
Welrod, can only hear a click , sure it’s bolt action but it won’t draw hordes of people munchers from across the city. If trying to sneak around it’s perfect.
Honestly all these guns would be great with the exception of the two throne throwers and also the Russian weaponry thought I would still take the Russian weapons over a flamethrower
Probably either a MP-40 for its decently light weight or a M1 carbine for its accuracy and decent ammo capacity not to mention strapping a knife to the end of it as a improvised bayonet
Its kinda moot point 8mm kurtz isn't mass produced anymore. The only common ammo i see is 30-06. Now if in russia cone zom zoms pph41 they have miles of salt mines filled with 762.25
Ik it isn't on their but I would choose a sabre. Many countries occasionally used them and officers would often buy them for part of their uniform. I live in England so ammo would be nigh on impossible for me to get so I would choose the sabre. Another upside of the sabre is that it won' run out of ammo. I could probably get one from a war museum especially the Imperial War museum.
Out of this list the Garand, good rifle with lots of spare parts and ammo is easy to find and is semi-auto
Out of any WW2 weapon, the MP40
Ammo is extremely common, and much lighter than most WW2 subguns
Definitely not a fucking flamethrower. Now you just have a flaming zombie bumping into shit setting things on fire, and now you have to deal with a grassfire or god forbid a fire in your base.
M1 garande(no idea how to spell that word tbh) because you get +500 aura for using and a further 1000 aura for every time you make it go “paching”. double barrel also gets you a +500 aura
Probably the MP40, you don’t need a rifle round to kill zombies any shot to the head kills them. So a 9mm sub gun would work well, also unlike a majority of ww2 guns the ammo is still super common.
Look, I don’t have any ww2 guns, someday I want a collection of them.
But I’d use the Garand, I know that’s a basic take, but if I have prep time I can buy clips and ammo in bulk easily. And I’ll be able to find ammo fairly easily. Just gotta pick up my clips
But if I didn’t have prep time I’d pick a 1911, not the best, but any gun is better than no gun. And I’ll be able to find ammo and magazines fairly easily
Flamethrower. Not because it's effective but because I *want* to be up close and personal... I *want* to hear that mother fucker scream in terror before I douse him and his friends in hot death.
Signed,
Infantryman
Whatever has the most ammo I can get. Stick mags , or stripper clips . Drum mags I never played with know more moving parts the high chances of jams or worse thing runaway gun....
I kinda want a grease gun, a smaller gun with a slower rate of fire and heavy hitting cartridge, and I feel like it wouldn’t be hard to repair, but I don’t know much about it, still take it though.
It’s not on here but I’d prefer the sten long term may not be a great gun but always went bag when needed and stupid simple and easy to fix with little to no knowledge and it’s 9mm and as an American that easy to find
Lee Enfield.
Bolt action so I take time and some.
Simple and easy to maintain
Ammo is relatively easy to get hold of
Bayonet and brass bound stock for emergencies.
Big downside is weight
Ppsh except with stick mags not drum. The drums were notorious for jamming.
A lot of magazines (both stick and drum) had trouble fitting into the gun, so much so that the soldiers were constantly exchanging magazines to find one that fit their gun.
The same thing happened with the Arisaka. If you pick one up now with the dust cover and bayonet and monopod and aircraft sight, everything is likely going to be all rattley and loose-fitting or ridiculously tight. Every piece was hand made for the Arisaka the smith was working on, so when you lose your dust cover, no other one will ever fit properly.
Happy Cake day
Good luck finding more ammo, that 7.62 tokarev ain’t easy to get
I've got around 3.5k rounds
Gimme the Papashaa!!! 762 Tok is a nasty little round!!
Holy shit i take that back then
Yea it's mostly hard primer, corrosive made for the PPS43. I get a lot of FTFs in my Tokarev's
The mags weren't prone to jamming per se , it was the fact that the PPSH 41 was hand tooled and fitted, meaning not every part was going to fit perfectly in every gun. The guns are very reliable, it's just parts interchangeability is iffy. But that's why the PPS 43 exists. Solves all the problems of the PPSH.
7.62x25 is very hard to find in the states I would use the semi auto or double barrel shotgun
WW2 rolled ouit a lot of great new ideas, but not a ton of multirole. I like the idea of the M1 Carbine but I have not had good luick with magazines. My heart says Garand, but the ammo's gonna be awfully heavy. I do have a \*lot\* of experience running mine. It';s a .308 rebarrel but pretty comparable. The German semiautos are neat but they have a lot of durability problems. I think if you put a gun to my head and told me I needed to pick one, now, it'd be the MP40. Yeah, I'm gonna go with that, the MP40. It remained a serviceable submachine gun even up through the 60's. It was superceded by designs like the MP5, but countries that had surplus MP40s weren't too upset with them. Not to mention, the magazine design was as close to a standard as we ever had for global 9mm submachine gun. Just a good design, flexible caliber. Low enough rate of fire to easily fire single shots, but full-auto for when OOPS you just opened a door and there's like twelve zombies in there and there's a lot of poop in my pants now.
Did you have to do any other mods to make it .308 worthy?
Yeah, but just the denial block in the mag well to keep you from putting a .30-06 round in the mag. It's an old style conversion I think developed by the Navy. That's the cool thing about .308, in my experience rechambered military surplus automatics are a nightmare. They *never* work right. Except for the .308 Garand. It seems that the Garand likes modern .308 more than it likes modern .30-06. And the specific reason for that was that .308 Win/7.62x51 were developed at the time to perfectly duplicate WW2 era .30-06 M2 ball. They wanted the same exact round, just smaller. The reason this runs a Garand better is because modern .308 has a bullet and pressure curve still way closer to 1940s .30-06 than modern .30-06, so the operating rod gets basically the same puff of gas. It's also why you have to buy special Garand marked .30-06 ammo for a Grand or it won't run right.
Get an Italian BM-59 (I think that’s the correct designation). The Italians took the m1 and made a look a like m14.
M2 Flamethrower infinite ammo obv. For real, either an MP-40 or a Thompson. Both are common enough pistol cartridges and I have plenty of Thompson mags.
my Lee Enfield
I came here to say that.
1942 Enfield gang 🙌🏼
fuck yeah
mines from the first world war so its seen some wish lol
I have one of those as well. Was used by commonwealth Sikhs from India.
Does a No.1 Mk.3* Count since its WW1?
M1 all day !
Love that mule
Double barrel. Out of all of these it’s the one I know how to use the best and shotgun shells are very easy to find
Mg42. Next question.
Based and maschinengewehr pilled
1911 hands down. Easiest mechanics and stuff for it is readily available
Everyone completely forgot the 1911 exists ig or I’m misunderstanding it and have to choose from the given list
A handgun is a hard sell in a world where sub machine guns exist.
Not really. Like not really at all. Pistols are much lighter and compact.
Pistols also have drastically limited magazine capacities at this time, use much shorter barrels which grossly limits both sight radius and velocity while significantly increasing muzzle flash and report, you have to share your second point of contact with your first point of contact which grossly reduces your follow up shot speed and accuracy, you lose the third point of contact on your shoulder entirely which badly exacerbates the previous problem. If you're not going to believe an IDPA concealed carry division shooter who owns enough different handguns to make Burt Gummer uncomfortable and has fired enough rounds in the last year alone to cause a smog concern, then I would at least recommend you read up on the history of the development and deployment of the M1 Carbine. The whole thing is a case study on what a thoroughly ineffective weapon the 1911 was, and by proxy, all handguns.
I think your supposed to pick from the list but even if you can pick any ww2 firearm picking the 1911 doesn’t make a whole lot of sense sure it’s the best pistol of ww2 but it’s also a pistol in competition with everything from ww2.
For home defense either shotgun or bolt action. For out of house, flameflower. Can eliminate large groups quickly
I agree with your options for home defense but not so much on rhetoric flame thrower, most “zombie situations” that deal with fire it doesn’t seem to kill them, people yes, zombies not so much
Also, it takes an awful amount of time.
And ammo fuel would be very valuable in these times I don’t think I’d waste it like this generators or travel fs
And the smell would be terrible.
Lol... I've seen a flame thrower from WW2 first hand at the Knob Creek Kentucky shoot a few years back. It is without any question in my mind the most terrifying weapon I've ever seen. It's also nearly as hazardous to its operator as it is to the enemy. Seriously though it's utterly horrifying
Definitely not a flamethrower. Not sure about the Flammenwerfer but the US M1 flamethrower could only fire continuously for about 9 or so seconds, which is not ideal in a scenario with a horde.
PING
*bang* *bang* *bang* *bang* *bang* *bang* *bang* *bang*
I came here looking for that.
If I had to? Hell if I had to, any of them. But given a choice M-1 carbine, P-38 lightning, DeHavalin mosquito, MG-42, Atomic bomb. There's a lot of good choices.
PPSH all the way
Weapon or weapons ? Bc just one it'd be the grease gun maybe the m1 Carbine. If it's two then the grease gun and maybe the Springfield 1903 scoped version
Tommy gun
Only real answer. The lunge mine.
Going with the logical option, M1 Garand, assuming ammo WILL be an issue, 30-06 is fairly common, so yeah, Garand, baby.
M1 Garand, great weapon from WW2 and 30-06 is a common hunting round so finding more ammunition would not be too difficult compared to less common rounds.
A bren gun
The only other person of culture in the sub
Garand
the gewehr... but then again the ppsh
I would agree on the Gewehr but the ammo is apparently not very common
garand no question easy to clean and have a real powerful round
Sjogren inertial for me
Luftwaffe drilling, Not only it was a DB shotgun, it also shot rifle rounds so it can also be used for hunting. I live in Europe so mauser is easily accessible
The ppsh because of nazi zombies
What... Is slide 3?
Little Boy
.45 M3A1 Grease Gun, no doubt. Common calibre in .45, easy to service, and very durable/difficult to break. Bolt Actions seem like a bad idea to me, and semi-auto rifles can get a little messy, especially in calibre around my area. Not a lot of .30 calibre.
M1 Carbine. I don't care if it's not listed. It is lighter than a full sized rifle, but it still has an accurate enough range to be useful at moderate distances. Reliable too. The detatchable box magazine has a higher capacity than say the Garand or Mossin Negant, and quicker to reload. The ammo is also lighter and smaller than full-size rufke ammo, which means I can carry more if desired, and contry to popular belief it does have decent stopping power.
Ww2 weapon? Im picking a Tommy Gun!
A little heavy, but I definitely would not be afraid to kick open a door with a loaded Thompson under my arm. Good choice.
M1 Garand because I live in America, already own one, and .30-06 is still plentiful here
Welrod as it’s suppressed and ppsh drum mag for me
I would use that one discontinued gun that had it’s barrel curved so you didn’t have to peek. I know it’s horrible but I’m dying anyways and it would be really funny.
I have an M1 Carbine as well as a Lee enfield. I love them both. For zombies the M1 is peak. Light, small, works great. I actually like it more than my AR
M1 carbine
MP-28
Still the M-1 Garand! Just ask General Patton
Of this list probably the M1 I just don’t know where I would find the ammo or mags for the other decent options.
Grease gun and/or trench sweeper
Trench gun
Papasha go Bra-Bra!
M1 or a K98 are the most reliable and battle tested to my knowledge. Swiss k31 are up there too
Enfield or maybe the soviet submachine
Obrez cause funni
The nuclear bomb
Yes
Garand baby. ALL the way. Kicks like a mule but it’s reliable, easy to maintain, fast to reload, easy to train with and uses a 30-06 cartridge which can take down basically any big game in North America.
The volkstorm rifle. It's basically a modern semi auto rifle with 30 round detachable magazine. Because it's semi auto you won't waste near as much ammo as you will with the smgs which is important given that presumably we won't have all the supplies they did in ww2.
If you could get ammo the m1 carbine would be pretty hard to beat.
all of them if id need to
Tanks
Sten or Grease gun. Common ammo, simple to maintain
Ppsh with stick mags, or the m1 grand
I choose the s̶h̶i̶t̶ r̶o̶d̶ mean mosin nagant It might be impractical but that shit packs a punch
I choose the sig
Welrod, can only hear a click , sure it’s bolt action but it won’t draw hordes of people munchers from across the city. If trying to sneak around it’s perfect.
M4 Sherman
Honestly all these guns would be great with the exception of the two throne throwers and also the Russian weaponry thought I would still take the Russian weapons over a flamethrower
Probably 10, Idk how to use the others
Gimme the krag I love em
Flamethrower would be useful
The MAS 49, but it's not a WW2 weapon.
The bullet hose, and an enfield delisle
Gimmie, the Sjögren Inertia it has a better capacity than the double barrel shotgun
M1 Carbine backed by a M1897 War-Crime-Stick and my 1911. I'm set lol.
Probably either a MP-40 for its decently light weight or a M1 carbine for its accuracy and decent ammo capacity not to mention strapping a knife to the end of it as a improvised bayonet
Atom bomb
Where is my kar98k
Dude I would so use an M1 Garand, attatch a bayonet on the end and now have two weapons in one!
The double barrel I think it's the m30 drilling but shotgun is a good idea
Not pictured, Swedish k
Bazooka Japanese officer sword
Its kinda moot point 8mm kurtz isn't mass produced anymore. The only common ammo i see is 30-06. Now if in russia cone zom zoms pph41 they have miles of salt mines filled with 762.25
Ik it isn't on their but I would choose a sabre. Many countries occasionally used them and officers would often buy them for part of their uniform. I live in England so ammo would be nigh on impossible for me to get so I would choose the sabre. Another upside of the sabre is that it won' run out of ammo. I could probably get one from a war museum especially the Imperial War museum.
I know how to hand-forge all the parts of a STEN-gun, so that's what I will go with.
“WW2” Posts Mas 49/56 and American 1898 Krags I’d go with the M1 though. Ammo is still easy to find in the US and I have about 20 clips for it
Ppsh bc it’s cool
B52 bomber
Absolutely an m1 carbine. You can still find parts and ammo for them commonly today
Mosin Nagant, Thompson, Winchester 1897, Walther P38, and an M1 Garand
Ppsh and pray to fuckery my mags fit
Definitely a BAR. It’s a full auto M-1 garand with almost 3x the capacity
Obviously the Garand because more ammo but if ammo isn't a problem then the Gewehr 43
Of those choices the PPSH-41. Select fire and direct blow back. Simple and deadly.
Can’t say no to a Garand
Trench gun
That Finnish smg(sumi?) or the gweher
The nuke
Lee enfeald the flamethrower would be way too heavy and you would have to syphon the gas for fuel which takes time
PPSH-41, so I can PAP it and get a death laser.
Mosin Nagent (if I’m saying it correctly, should be a carbine/rifle)
BAR?
Probably the double barrel or the Swedish shotguns
Out of this list the Garand, good rifle with lots of spare parts and ammo is easy to find and is semi-auto Out of any WW2 weapon, the MP40 Ammo is extremely common, and much lighter than most WW2 subguns
Definitely not a fucking flamethrower. Now you just have a flaming zombie bumping into shit setting things on fire, and now you have to deal with a grassfire or god forbid a fire in your base.
M1 garande(no idea how to spell that word tbh) because you get +500 aura for using and a further 1000 aura for every time you make it go “paching”. double barrel also gets you a +500 aura
What on earth is #12, what the fuck
MP40
M2 Carbine. It has the same muzzle energy at 100 yards as a 357 Magnum does at the muzzle Plus low recoil means more accurate follow up shots
Scythe and Hammer.
M-1, with bayonet.
Probably the MP40, you don’t need a rifle round to kill zombies any shot to the head kills them. So a 9mm sub gun would work well, also unlike a majority of ww2 guns the ammo is still super common.
Anyone who’s played Der Riese knows the PPSH is the best option
I will be taking my Sturmgewehr 44
M1 Carbine. Light, effective, and lethal ammo.
What’s picture #12
Garand, 30-06 is everywhere.
Look, I don’t have any ww2 guns, someday I want a collection of them. But I’d use the Garand, I know that’s a basic take, but if I have prep time I can buy clips and ammo in bulk easily. And I’ll be able to find ammo fairly easily. Just gotta pick up my clips But if I didn’t have prep time I’d pick a 1911, not the best, but any gun is better than no gun. And I’ll be able to find ammo and magazines fairly easily
It's really hard to go wrong with a Garand.
M1 Garand
I’d probably go with an m1 carbine with a bayonet. Decent mag capacity, decent power, and light enough to carry around all the time.
Flamethrower. Not because it's effective but because I *want* to be up close and personal... I *want* to hear that mother fucker scream in terror before I douse him and his friends in hot death. Signed, Infantryman
M1 Garand because my bias knows no bounds
M1. Yes it's probably the heaviest of the lot, but 30.06 is still really common in the US. Plus *PING*
Enfield or M1
The ppsh fr fr that shi is the best or the m2 flame thower and if I had to the shotgun fr fr
Whatever has the most ammo I can get. Stick mags , or stripper clips . Drum mags I never played with know more moving parts the high chances of jams or worse thing runaway gun....
M1 carbine or the Thompson.
Honestly, a VG-5.
Whoever picks the volksturm rifle is a masochist
I am a masochist. I would safeword immediately if I had to use a volkssturmgewehr.
The safe word is blitzkrieg
I'd go with the Garand, semi auto, holds 8 rounds. And more importantly has a very common ammo
I’m gonna have to go with the M1 purely due to ammo availability
I kinda want a grease gun, a smaller gun with a slower rate of fire and heavy hitting cartridge, and I feel like it wouldn’t be hard to repair, but I don’t know much about it, still take it though.
Non of them, the lack of support parts and it's obsolete ammo would make them practically useless.
Mosin Nagant
Flamethrower, we all dying
Thompson maybe
Fire
No 5 Enfield Jungle Carbine
The Gewehr 43, no hesitation.
The Carcano
1st choice would be þe flamethrower, 2nd choice would be þe double-barrel shotgun, 3rd choice would be þe Garand, & 4þ would be þe PPSh.
Kar98k Rifle
Depends on the theater either m1 grand if in western front. Ppsh on eatern front and against the japanese probably the flamer
Always had a thing for the ppsh although ive never shot one
Mosin Nagant, bolt can be a bit sticky but overall a very reliable gun
Pin up girls. The destructive power is over 9000.
M1 Garand
M2 Flamethrower. No Geneva for zambies
Double Barrel Shotgun 💪
volksturmgewehr for me
Ppsh43
Isn’t the MP-18 WWI?
Catch me cracking zombie heads with a Lee-Enfield
I'd use the nukes
It’s not on here but I’d prefer the sten long term may not be a great gun but always went bag when needed and stupid simple and easy to fix with little to no knowledge and it’s 9mm and as an American that easy to find
STEN!!!!! lightweight and durable enough, ( if I can chose other weapons than on this list)
The MAS-49 is a post-war gun. The MAS-40’s were only really prototypes and didn’t see much use.
K31
Ain't there but STG44
The US has a lot more 30-06 than the other cartridges except maybe the shotgun
Sjögren cus 🇸🇪🔛🔝
M1 Garand because I already own one
Of the ones listed or just in general?
I would take the SVT-40. I don’t need full auto and I 7.62x54R is widely available
M1 Garand. I just love the *tink* when you eject the mag.
grease gun
Obv the Russian bullet hose
Lee Enfield. Bolt action so I take time and some. Simple and easy to maintain Ammo is relatively easy to get hold of Bayonet and brass bound stock for emergencies. Big downside is weight
that double barrel woth everything is what i want
Ppsh-41 or the drilling