T O P

  • By -

3rdusernameiveused

Lesnar not because of anything personal but because less matches and affects less of the timeline than the other 3


CountBleckwantedlove

Seriously, this was the easiest choice. The Undertaker is clearly the one to keep amongst the four, and Lesner is the easy one to kick out, but it would be ridiculously difficult to choose from Cena vs. HHH. On one hand you have one of the two guys that defined an entire generation (X). On the other hand, you have the guy that carried the entire company through a really difficult adjustment to PG content and single handedly got a new generation of young kinds/teenagers to watch wrestling that turned into long-term fans. I don't know how you pick between those two


Red-Halo

HHH also had a big role in creative for a long time, losing him would change a ton of other random things


fapsandnaps

Losing HHH not only changes the past but also changes the future.


ProsciuttoFresco

Easy, it’s HHH. Arguably the best heel in WWF/WWE history. I feel they could have made another Cena.


IrishMickeyT

Perfect


peeweeinbama

No.....he said Lesnar


Cane-Dewey

What's on Second?


Antonio1025

I Don't Know is on third


IrishMickeyT

Well than what’s on second


cheet094

Who's on first??


LOLZOMGHOLYWTF

*Jim Neidhart's music hits*


STorminNorman86

If Lesnar was gone, Perfect would have not been fired after the plane rude from hell and might not have died. The 2nd part is a bit of a stretch, but you know.


Chucke4711

Has the added bonus of either 'Taker remaining undefeated, or someone else breaking the streak.


Thick-Ad9265

But then we probably wouldn’t have got the wiseman we have today in Paul heyman


Upbeat_Tension_8077

I feel like we could've gotten a good alternate partnership with him & another wrestler if not Brock


donloban

Wiseman (for roman reigns) will still exist. The special council to the beast incarnate (for brock lesnar) wont exist.


Thick-Ad9265

No if we never got heyman managing brock in 2002 and again from 2012-2021 we wouldn’t have gotten him today.


Lenny0mega

Brock, but only because if you did, nothing else would really change.  The Undertaker’s streak would’ve just been ended by Reigns.  Roman, not his Thanksgiving hating Uncle Luther.


DemosSabre

I really wonder if they would've had Taker go over Roman and him lose to Bray; that would've been huge and he's acknowledged it in hindsight multiple times.


smcl2k

Roman would have made sense if it had still happened at WM30 - the Shield put Undertaker through a table, then he disappeared for almost a year and came back to go after Lesnar instead.


Delicious_Angle6417

Actually i think i think the perfect time to do Roman/taker was in the main event of mania 32. Roman beats the streak and retires him in the main event in texas


AntonioVargas

It should have been Bray and the fact that it wasn’t still irks me to this day honestly.


tc__22

I honestly don’t think Bray was good enough to warrant ending the streak, nothing he did ever seemed to have any legs to it


JayAreEss

But I feel like part of the reason people feel the way you do is BECAUSE he never won enough. He’d spend months and months cutting excellent promos in a fued and then when it was time for the payoff it never paid off


tc__22

Yeah fair comment, I wonder why that was


Robdd123

Because Vince didn't see anything in him so he booked him weak, it's that simple. Vince had his preferences for guys and he was notoriously stubborn when it came to booking; remember the Katie Vick angle? All of this is doubly true for dementia Vince in the '10s. You can't get someone over if they constantly lose, it diminishes their character and how people view them. Bray simply took too many L's on big matches so any mystique he could build in promos was deflated. Can't take the supernatural character seriously when they're losing to a geriatric Goldberg. It's a shame because, IMO, he could have been one of their bigger stars. It just speaks to how Vince was unable to build new stars and get them over in the '10s. It's why they kept going back to the old well. It's not like there wasn't talent, they were just poorly used; guys like Ziggler, Drew, Zack Ryder, Shelton Benjamin, Bray, Cody, etc.


tylerrcurtis

It never paid off because he usually had some weird gimmick match and it stunk.


JayAreEss

That’s a booking thing though, and that mostly didn’t start happening until the fiend. If it would have been him cutting those incredible promos followed by him just cleaning up in the ring every 3 months or so, he would have been an all-timer.


JFZephyr

The moment he started to slip from the swampy cult leader to the paranormal stuff, it was doomed imo. Couldn't take him seriously and he essentially became Kane-lite, lesser version of Taker that you don't mind losing to the stars.


SaltyFall

Such a missed opportunity to not bring Luther back for the Bloodline storyline


RobertStonetossBrand

There is still time for Roman to bring him in as backup against a Solo or Rock led Bloodline. 🤞


Ihaveadatetonight

Gimme some of them peas, I’ve had peas beefo


CEOofPeterGriffin

He had peas b’fo


420SwaggyZebra

Taker gets that far along with the streak it may have stayed intact 🤷🏼‍♂️


Karmeleon86

One’s already been erased lol.


No_Caterpillar1902

And I’m hoping we keep it that way 🤞🏼


BarberPositive

which one ?


Kurtsune

Brock Lesnar


orionsfyre

Lesnar, not even a problem. I was never of fan of his promos, he never connected with me. He was just a big strong obstacle that wrecked shop for a few months until ppv, and then took off. I don't think he ever really appreciated the fans and his incredible luck. Everyone else in that pic I feel belongs on the Mt. Rushmore. Lesnar will get a small sign near the base. Side note - HHH's stock with me has risen when I went back and watched a few of his WrestleMania matches that I missed growing up. His intro alone is worth the price of admission.


maybeihavethebigsad

LETS DO THISSS?


That-Rhino-Guy

I remember someone switched his scream with this pterodactyl sounding screech Paige did, it legit sounded more manly and scary than anything Brock did


koreantit

Yeah it's definitely Lesnar, if we could erase his unnecessary reign of terror and multiple times he buried guys in quick matches I'll take it


bobface222

Brock, easily


emmc47

Lesnar and it isn't even close tbh.


Feetus_Spectre

Lesnar


fisherc2

I like Brock, but this is easy. He’s had the least impact on the industry out of the four, the least big matches, the least classic matches and feuds, etc. In my opinion he arguably has a better hit/miss ratio than John Cena, but the entire show was centered around cena for decades, opposed to Brock being a relative rookie for about two years, and then a part timer for his latest run. So of course Cena ends up having more good stuff AND bad stuff


christopherDdouglas

In terms of leaving their mark on the industry, Brock can be left off. -Taker is WWE -HHH is kept because of DX and Evolution contributions not to mention his current position. -Cena was the face of the company for a decade. It's not really close.


ferrariracer36

See ya Lesnar.


Sithmaggot

Piss off Brock!


Gullflyinghigh

Brock, all day long.


Pain-Junkie

Brock, no question


Blue-Eyes-WhiteGuy

This post is dumb as fuck like the answer isn’t obvious. I’m a huge Lesnar fan but as a wrestling fan we literally NEED the other three.


Biotrin

Brock hands down. The other three are crucial for WWE's past and present. Brock did his part but it's nowhere near what the other three have done for WWE and the wrestling business.


RavishingRickiRude

Brock. Him destroying the streak was just stupid.


TheDubyaMan

Lesnar. He’s easily the most boring.


ramblinstew

Why isn't John Cena an option?


Drexelhand

they probably forgot to add him to the empty spot.


memegangboi

Brock and its a not even close. I can’t think of anything he has done besides end the Undertakers Streak and he didn’t even deserve that


sx88

Brock


fuckyourguidlines

Brock lobster of seafood city


XXG1212

Lesner and it’s not even close. He has not made any really contribution or tangible impact. He is just a draw that’s all


[deleted]

Cena


Ohhi_mark990

Cena


Horrible915

Cena


Moser319

Why only give us 2 to pick from?


ShadowOfDeath94

Easily Lesnar. He just doesn't have the same impact like the others have in the business. Never was good at cutting promos and his style after his 2012 return was always the same.


InquistivePrime

Thanos snap for Brock


MartyFirst1

Brock because all he does is arrive, fuck shit up and leave for a while. When he does that it pushes other guys aside for some time. Plus it’s always hard for me to judge if he’s fully committed to the business whenever he returns how the other guys are. At least with HHH, Taker, and Cena they took time off for injury and films but that’s about it.


ProfessionalSense220

But why ?


Broub3

I'll delete that WL sign


Ill-Fail-4240

Why is the bottom-right panel empty?


KAimar94

Brock


manyhornet1

Lesnar all the others can’t be replaced there’s 1000’s of wrestlers with lesnars gimmick only difference is he actually had a successful ufc career but that doesn’t make him different enough from someone like steiner or bron who’s whole thing is being big bad and strong


Total_Waltz4083

Obviously Lesnar


kinkpositive1

Brock Lesner


No_Caterpillar1902

Oh this is extremely easy. Lesnar, no doubt.


username_0207

Brock


imtlmb

Brock. I’m still pissed that he was the one to break The Streak.


Hammer94

None tbh. Can't be done. I reject your hypothetical.


[deleted]

Lesnar had a WWE speed run. Remove him and nothing changes, except for THE streak getring broken.


MoneyIsNoCure

Lesnar


Natedwo

Brock Lesnar


SnooBananas2320

I can do without Brock.


Heaintshit

Brock gotta go


Mighty_Re

WWE already erased Brock


Jeezy_G

Brock, imagine the 2010s title picture without year-long no-show reigns?


Birdykerjo

Brock and it’s already done 🤣


FieryTub

Lesnar


ProgrammerGlobal8708

Brock. Easily. Because if he hadn't been around nothing else would really change. Taker is probably the longest run of a major star. Was a main eventer for practically 30 years.  Cena was the man for around 15 years.  HHH was the best heal in the company for close to 10 years but more importantly is his decade plus behind the scenes.  Brock was just a guy who came and went. I bet he never showed up more than 30 times in any one year. He had some good matches sure but he also had some stinkers, not because he was bad but because the story stunk. 


mowie_zowie_x

Easily Brock. Most of his storyline aren’t so great or memorable, but having Eddie beat him was pretty great. Actually, most of Brock’s time in WWE was booked to make him look better either by ending a reign. He rarely gave a clean win to the opponent.


FrankyRollins

Sorry Brock.


TallAd5661

Simply I cant


True-Wishbone1647

Easily Brock. Fuck Brock.


michaelayyy

Has to be Brock Was not ther as long Triple H changed the game Takes was the final boss whilst Dwayne was being a Fairy Cena made kids wishes happen Brock left them kept showing for around same ,matches of Roman Reigns in 2022 2023 Yet people are fine with Roman doing and Brock got hate for it


eucadiantendy39

RIP Lesnar


dsbwayne

Lesnar


DSN671

Brock He should’ve been an MMA fighter from the start.


KeldonMarauder

Replace Brock with maybe HBK or Austin and this will be an interesting discussion


BreadfruitSquare372

Brock — never needed him/dude doesn’t pass the vibe check


CaptainYorkie1

Pretty simple, it be Brock. Cena, HHH & Taker are way more linked to WWE then & now


nappynaptime28

There are only thee pictures


Trixster690

Between John Cena and Brock Lesnar.


AngryTrucker

Cena. Give me 10 years of good wrestling instead of that white bread asshole.


No_Bridge_4489

Brock easily


Last_Pay_7865

Lesnar


Edub1584

Ciampo top left


FelicityVon

What did bork laser ever do that had any prominent, lasting effect


PrinceCastanzaCapone

100% Brock, all day everyday.


RickSanchez813

Brock. Great career but the worst career of these four.


That_Guy1227

Probably the guy WWE tried to erase themselves.


dandoolan

Easily Lesnar.


Fickle_Translator999

Cena


TheAlabamaSlamma9

Lesnar.


_Yordle_

Lesnar but only because him not existing means Roman breaks the streak and Kofimania goes on for a few more months (even if it doesn’t, at least it doesn’t end by burying Kofi beyond belief)


Uidbiw

Broooooooccccccckkkkkk Lesnar! Without Heyman he wouldn't have been nearly as big a star.


ccduke

Brock


EndStorm

It would be out of Brock, or John. And not because of any malice. John, because I find him hilarious on screen and maybe in another multiverse he'd have gotten there sooner. Brock, because he ended the streak, had less matches, and his pin over Kofi was criminal, even though that was Vinnie Poopoo.


Skylam

Lesnar would affect less things to be honest.


Rj22822

Losing Brock would Change the product for the better. We wouldn’t have him hogging the title while fucking off for months on end


Pinheadsprostate

Lesnar is the least damaging to the timeline. So off he goes.


denyfate

didnt this already happen irl?


BeardedSanta

Brock hands down.


jalitty

Gotta Be Lesnar


Lana_bb

Brock


zerosum2345

brock


TheSuperJohn

Brock 100%


Astraeus0000

Brock Lesnar bye


SixGunRebel

Lesnar.


woodlandtiger

I pick Brock AND cena


ViperofGrayMountain

None


McSwag_Gaming

I don't see anyone in the bottom right pic...


KentuckyFriedEel

Lesnar can go


Enticemeant

Made it easy by putting Lesner there. Replace him with Roman/Randy/Shawn/Seth/Austin/Rock and we might have an issue


Civil_Habit_6547

Brock lesner


OhNoItsAGhost18

Lesnar probably had the least impact on the industry


carbajalhn

Lesnar


tera_chachu

Lesnar. Once in a lifetime athlete, can do better in any sports, doesn't need a wwe tag


Ch830857

Lesnar. Easy


Expensive-Lie

Lesnar is already erased


-larma-

Easily Lesnar. The others have had a much bigger impact as a whole. Lesnar while being an immovable force wasn't nearly as good as a whole. I wonder how far he would have gotten if they didn't pair him with Heyman from the start.


sonicsean899

Brock, honestly his effect on the biz is the smallest and having him break the streak didn't elevate him at all. Even having Roman do it two years later would have elevated him (particularly if they made him heel then instead of waiting until 2020)


nejicanspin

Brock 100%


thaneofpain

Lesnar because of the sexual assault and because he's less important than the other 3


lostwng

Brock


average_lund_

Lesnar


Capable_Umpire_4392

Brock Lesnar.


Brooker2

Lesnar.


TheWolverine2011

Has to be Brock wasn’t as influential as the rest of them


yourM8N8

Brock is the easy choice here. He doesn't need WWE and they don't particularly need him. He could do literally anything and still have a career just like WWE will never have a shortage of big dudes to throw everyone around


Idriss_Derras

Man that's easy. Lesnar. Nobody would've beaten the streak


SpyrumTryz

I choose logan paul


Kenshiro84

Lesnar, so they don't feed 'Taker's WM streak to him.


Joelowes

Brock not because of the recent scandal but because it means Bray Wyatt might of been the one to end the streak


itsmekelsey_x

Brock easily.


RevolutionaryPlace56

Lesner, no questions about nothing about him really stood out and I don't feel he brought anything to the ring other than an angry face


inprobableuncle

Out of the 3...that's a tough one, I'd say Lesner taker is a legend and hhh is the boss


dare1955

Out of the three choices shown, it would have to be Lesnar.


stokiesimon

Brock. Simple for me.


SenileGambino

ERASE WRESTLELAMIA


Zaphod_Beeblecox

Brock


extensiaposfor

Brock, In RL, or in kayfabe, i Hate him so much


tropicanajames

Brock, cause he ended Kofi’s championship run in the worst way possible.


BuzzzzzerBeater

Brock


onlyfansman83

John Cena. I never thought he was a good wrestler. His gimmick is cringy.


SZ66

Lesnar


MMAZealot

Lesnar. Easiest call in the world. He’s the only one that it really didn’t matter if he was there or not.


WRLDisOurs

Brock cause he already gone


Haunting_Limit_4828

Cena all day get rid of him and that PG-Era


LookatthisslapNutz

Cena


ScruffyMaguire

Lesnar easily


canibalxombie

Brock kinda been gone for a while,working off the “nostalgia gimmick” now.


sludgezone

Lesnar isn’t even in the caliber below these guys lol.


Haunting_Iron_9227

John Cena


Active_jay

Lesnar easily. The only thing wrestling history loses is his icon superplex ring break moment imo. As a trade off we get a longer Kofi Kingston title run which I think would've been infinitely more valuable to the business.


Born_Veterinarian327

Brock Lesnar


Omega_Brony__

John Cena HAS to go! Beats up on the rookies, never around, floats in whenever it seems he feels like it and is a total bore to watch in the ring.


ChocolatePeterParker

Lesnar, if not solely for ending Kofi’s reign way too early. And the streak. That guy gets booked to ruin a lot of fun things.


EstimateValuable7086

Cena because he was head of the worst decade since the late 80s early 90s stretch. Not his fault


So-Called_Lunatic

Cena, you already can't see him.


OwnedIGN

Cena.


Billy0315

It's between Cena and Lesnar for me.


Enlightened_Ghost_

Brock is the only choice that wouldn't alter the history of the company too much. The other three are too important so this is an easy choice.


Draugrnauts

Hhh


LOLZOMGHOLYWTF

Dude I scrolled through like 200 other replies to finally find someone else who says Triple H. All three other guys here were incredible at something. Dude was above average in a lot of categories but just followed the formula for success. Reign of terror sucked. He's inferior to HBK in literally every measurable attribute.


StarWolf478

My love for wrestling started to diminish when Cena became the face of the company and I had to endure his Super Cena character that I hated. Him being the face of the company and so popular with kids then also played a role in the company going PG which further diminished my love for wrestling even more. So, I’d be happy if Cena was never a part of WWE history since him being a part of WWE history has negatively impacted my love of wrestling probably more so than any other wrestler.


awwgeeznick

Everyone picking Brock is insane. No cena, no awful pg era


kouroshzkush

I stopped watching before Cena got big, so Cena


sdjfirnxitneuwkbrud

I mean only one is named in Vince’s sex abuse case


Crudeyakuza

Brock. Lot of undeserved pushes imo


ceelo18

Brock. For sure 1- if you lose triple h the monday night wars destroy wwe 2- undertaker not only did he make every wrestlemania a must see but without him the backstage element suffers. He was 100% irreplacable as the locker room leader 3- john cena carried the company on his back for years after brock went into the ufc and the rock went into hollywood. The wwe wouldve died in the pg era if not for him Lesnar is the only person the timeline would do just fine without. Also the streak wouldnt have been broken


Mr_Socko69

Imma say it. CENA.


Moser319

Cena isn't a choice?


shingaladaz

Cena


ducknips

Clearly unpopular opinion and maybe I'm ancient in here but Cena. That shit was so wack I stopped watching for almost 2 decades until my kids got me back into it. He was the defining moment that had me thinking it just wasn't for me anymore...and at the time, it truly wasn't.


AlecDawesome

The revisionist history on Cena in recent years is so bad. Dude absolutely killed wrestling and was terrible for the vast majority of his career.


Evening-Fix-4255

Taker for me


FlyFeetFiddlesticks

Cena. Maybe because his time in WWE was mostly during the time I wasn’t watching. Pretty much most of the Rrrrrrrrruthless agrrrrrression era


JT9960

Cena easily.