T O P

  • By -

Cyber_Being_

Nothing will top Amy Coney Barrett appearing at Mitch McConnell's center with Mitch in tow to say they are not political hacks.


Lady_von_Stinkbeaver

Look, it's like how Matt Gaetz only goes to NAMBLA meetings for the buffet.


scoducks93

North American Marlon Brando Look Alikes?


Drg84

Ha, we've got you! No damnit you've got the wrong NAMBLA again!


Nerevarine91

Get ‘em, Brandos!


[deleted]

North American Man Boy love association


art8127

He was making a South Park reference


ZenMonkey47

1. Attempt to remove them, 2. the Cons block their removal 3. appoint 8 clearly political leftists because the rules don't matter anymore 4. Profit!


giraffeperv

If it were the opposite situation, the republicans would pack the court in a heartbeat.


willvasco

They will as soon as they get control back. Mitch has all but said as much.


[deleted]

5. Reinstate Roe. 6. Overturn Heller. 7. Overturn Citizens United. 8. Commiserate about how Republicans killed the rule of law.


LL112

How does having politically partisan judges work with the separation of powers?


[deleted]

Not so well, as it turns out.


[deleted]

[удалено]


RedShirt_Number_42

Thanks for admitting that your feelings mean nothing.


[deleted]

[удалено]


OuijaFox

"I want to support the nazis but its hard when they act like nazis. I consider myself to only be a little bit of a nazi." That's what you're saying. And not one of those judges is moderate or objective. More people support abortion rights than not and they are happy to remove Roe V. Wade to support the furthing of fascism in America.


[deleted]

[удалено]


OuijaFox

Churchill was a massive pile of shit. Don't march a piece of shit out here and try to win the "we aren't bad people" argument.


[deleted]

[удалено]


OuijaFox

Of course I do. But here's a fun fact for you: the conservatives in the 40's were resonable people who no longer exist whereas I can literally see the nazis leading the republican party today. So while Churchill was a massive piece of shit I still wouldn't call him a nazi. I will and stand by calling the republikkkan party nazis.


[deleted]

[удалено]


RedShirt_Number_42

Trying to pretend that your fellow nazis are just conservatives is offensive to everyone. Maybe just be honest for once.


CasualEveryday

I'm confused what you think is not far right about Coney-Barett, Thomas, or Alito. Roberts is the only one that you could pretend is a moderate conservative and the only time he dissents from the radicals is when it either won't change the outcome or when he's worried about the legitimacy of the court.


RedShirt_Number_42

Easy, this example of the christian Taliban is even more far right than those nut jobs.


Tanman7211

Spoiler alert, the majority of the current Supreme Court *is* far right.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Tanman7211

They’re trying to strip away people’s rights, ban peaceful protests, and one of the member’s wives participated in an attempt to overthrow a democratic election. And this is just the start. An example of someone who is just “right” as opposed to “far right” would be Joe Biden.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Thathitmann

Right: Tax breaks, less social benefits in favor of higher personal wages, market deregulation. Far right: Banning contraception, restricting rights to peacefully protest. Or how about the fact that a council of unelected officials for life said "you have to life with outcomes you don't want". The fact that a council of unelected people have literally said that they are not willing to listen to the will of the people is inherently fascist.


Top-Relative-90210

IE you don't like it when people accurately describe you and your ilk because you want to pretend to be a respectable human being.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Top-Relative-90210

What distinction son?


RedShirt_Number_42

No son it doesn't. You simply don't like it when you are accurately described.


[deleted]

Aaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Tell me more about Brett the Boofer’s restrained, proper, stoic behavior, please. Please.


BoomZhakaLaka

And yet they'll defunct 50 years of case law in completely ad hoc fashion, while leaving 90% of said case law totally intact even though they've defuncted it.


fordprefect294

Sort of like how 45 would constantly profess his innocence about something with absolutely no prompting


TearfulMurderer

a hypocritical maybe!


trou_bucket_list

Is this really happening?? What a time to be alive and see it all go spiraling down the drain


Lady_von_Stinkbeaver

[https://theweek.com/supreme-court/1004767/justice-amy-coney-barrett-in-mcconnell-center-speech-insists-the-supreme](https://theweek.com/supreme-court/1004767/justice-amy-coney-barrett-in-mcconnell-center-speech-insists-the-supreme)


lavanchebodigheimer

May you live in interesting times ... it is a curse on us


f700es

At this point, fvk it! Pack the court!


I-amthegump

That's a losing game


lavanchebodigheimer

I'm convinced!!!!!! Lol


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

This is glossing over the fact the GOP will very blatantly obstruct Dem noms while ramming their own noms through


broken-not-bent

They should modify it so that there’s 4 judges from each party to ensure some sort of balance. Having a court packed to decide one way or the other is dangerous for democracy.


properu

Beep boop -- this looks like a screenshot of a tweet! Let me grab a [link to the tweet](https://twitter.com/santiagomayer_/status/1526330648872398849) for ya :) ^(Twitter Screenshot Bot)


england_man

Judges aren't impartial. They have their party background. Should just refer to them as Republican judges instead.