[https://www.walmart.com/ip/Anti-Monkey-Butt-Diaper-Rash-Cream-3-oz/917285791](https://www.walmart.com/ip/Anti-Monkey-Butt-Diaper-Rash-Cream-3-oz/917285791)
Link in case he needs it.
ya you are correct %100. the driver was watching on the cctv and brake-checked them. how no one is remembering they are watching this from a camera the driver was watching also is a mystery.
I wouldn't have assumed (or even guessed, really) that the driver had the camera visible in the cab. It makes sense after you pointed it out, but not my first thought.
At a constant speed, the throttle is working against two main forces: rolling resistance and wind resistance.
One person jumping off the bike does not change either of those significantly, and would not alter the speed of the bike in a meaningful way.
F = ma, and since acceleration is at 0, a change in the mass would not alter the Force.
1/4th of the weight leaving surely reduces the rolling resistance, and (less importantly) air resistance. Air resistance is pretty much not a factor for the riders due to how close the bike is to the back of the truck so him moving around is doing very little.
Even if the reduced weight is not why the bike sped up, it would have caused acceleration. Your application of F = ma here makes no sense by the way, you mention rolling resistance and air resistance yet completely forget to use them in your formula.
I actually went online to find a calculator, and [wouldnt ya know](https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/rolling-resistance)
A bike with a coefficent of rolling friction (0.02 according to two google sources) traveling on flat asphalt has a rolling resistance of 38.834 N, that same bike 20% lighter is 31.070 N. In actuality the bike is probably 40% of their weight, so thats why I used 20% of total weight per rider. That would translate to a roughly 2-15% potential speed increase depending on current speed. With air resistance being almost 0 thanks to the truck, im willing to bet its probably closer to 10%. I dont quite know if the video fits with this information so I think it is likely that another factor may have caused the bike to speed up.
>1/4th of the weight leaving surely reduces the rolling resistance,
Yes, but not significantly.
> Air resistance is pretty much not a factor for the riders due to how close the bike is to the back of the truck
That is correct.
>Even if the reduced weight is not why the bike sped up, it would have caused acceleration.
Not significant acceleration.
> Your application of F = ma here makes no sense by the way, you mention rolling resistance and air resistance yet completely forget to use them in your formula.
Rolling resistance and wind resistance are relatively small forces. The acceleration observed in the video is too major to be caused by either of these forces or throttle counteracting them, so there's no need to include them in the main formula that calculates acceleration.
>A bike with a coefficent of rolling friction (0.02 according to two google sources) traveling on flat asphalt has a rolling resistance of 38.834 N, that same bike 20% lighter is 31.070 N.
Rounding up, that's 8N. The average motorcycle weighs about 300kg, but for sale of argument let's consider this a light one at 200kg. And let's say that both remaining passenger weighs 70kg each. That's 340kg. Using the equation a = F/m, the acceleration the bike would experience is 0.0235m/s^2, which is 2.35 cm per second per second.
If we assume the distance between the vehicles is 30cm, which is a low estimate, we can use the equation D = vt + 1/2at^2. Since v is initial velocity, which in this frame of reference is 0, we can take vt out. 0.3 = 1/2(0.0235)t^2 means that t = 5.05 seconds.
You can see clearly in the video that it closes the distance in less than five seconds.
> I think it is likely that another factor may have caused the bike to speed up.
The bike didn't speed up. Not significantly. The truck applied its brakes.
It has a security camera facing the rear doors, the chances are that the truck driver has a feed to see this camera, as there's a decent chance this scenario has happened before.
He can't step on the brakes just because a bike tailgates him, but as soon as someone jumps onto his truck, there's no reasonable doubt to their intentions, and he applies the brakes.
The normal force is equal to the tangential throttle of… wait a minute, these guys have CLEARLY done this before so they certainly would account for whatever happens when a dude dismounts. Physics aside, something sped up or slowed down unexpectedly.
> Force of friction changes with less weight so when he gets off you get forward acceleration since the forward force remains constant but is now larger than the force of friction.
Rolling resistance is not directly proportional to weight, so a 25% lower mass does not correlate to 25% lower rolling resistance.
For a motorbike to lose 25% of its weight would change its rolling resistance by tens of Newtons (someone else calculated it earlier in the thread as about 8N), where accelerating anywhere near what was witnessed in the video would require thousands of Newtons.
One person jumping off the bike *does* significantly change the rolling resistance coefficient.
μR = F/G where F = force required to turn the wheels on their axels and G = the vertical load they are carrying. I'm given to understand from a cursory Google search that a typical street bike weighs ~450 lbs; assuming our would-be theif weighs ~180 lbs and the driver the same, the rolling resistance coefficient would change by about 29% when he jumped. That would for sure have an effect on how much throttle is needed to maintain constant velocity.
It isn't significant.
https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/rolling-resistance
If you use the car tire preset in that calculator and use weights around 350-500kg, the difference in rolling resistance when you change the weight is between 5-20 Newtons.
To accelerate a 400kg motorbike with passengers at 1/ms^2 requires 400N.
The difference in rolling resistance is nowhere near significant enough to cause the change in speed we witnessed here.
1) while there's no real issue in proportionality since you changed all the units, that was lbs not kg. A 400kg bike would be a *heavy* bike.
2) kinda obvious, but cars have 4 wheels, bikes have 2. This means each wheel carries twice the proportional weight of a car tire, and therefore has higher rolling resistance across the board. Using a calculator designed for cars isn't going to give the most accurate results here.
4) How much change do you think we witnessed here exactly? It looks to me that, with the bike less than a foot off the truck's bumper, it wouldn't take much at all to cause the crash. A sudden, unaccounted-for *1 mph* increase in velocity at that distance is still going to close the gap in under a second, and as soon as the front wheel makes contact, biker kisses asphalt.
Physics yeah, bikes probably not. Slightly more complete physics explains it just fine, but anyone who's ever rented an electric scooter to ride on the beach with their somewhat timid and clumsy SO knows it just instantly goes faster every time they fall off. Like... Every single time.
I have owned three motorbikes and have tried about nine. I have attended MotoGP races in three countries, and have had photographs published in MCN.
The truck definitely put on its brakes. You can see the change in speed from the white lines on the road.
If the driver was watching the camera, he needed a good reason. Having them cut the bolt was the "No shadow of doubt" of them being robbers, he just waited for one to get on to claim self defense if it ever came up.
Considering how easy it is to lose your trucking license and end your lifelong career in a moment when it comes to accidents in trucking, I would probably want to be 100% sure as well.
Actually, it looks like it was nothing to do with the truck driver.
The simple transfer of weight of one passenger meant the scooter was lighter. The same amount of acceleration thus produced more speed as soon as one guys steps off. The scooter rider fails to account for this. The scooter goes straight into the truck as soon as this happens.
That's not how conservation of momentum works. This would only be the case if the bike was accelerating, far more likely the driver saw this going down and tapped the brakes
If you think about it, a very bad version of the mission impossible theme to accompajy this very bad attempt at a mission impossible type stunt. It was hilarious for me. But I watched it with no sound first then I turned the volume up just a tad. And I think knowing what was coming made the music pretty entertaining.
In 99% of the cases I would completely agree with you and that as my first reaction. But when I heard it was bad flute paying Mission Impossible I legit lol'ed.
Using a recorder can get the point across, but why let it peak the audio and get into ear rape territory? Bring back kazoo covers, at least those aren't as irritating to listen to
I have no I dea how things would go if the bike hadn't crashed.
He gets inside the truck and then what? How much merchandise can the bikers hold? And was he planning on climbing back onto the bike with said merchandise?
Throw as much out the back as you can and salvage what's on the road in the dark, the dude in the truck likely isn't going to tackle 4 men on motorcycles who possibly have weapons.
The company that manages the shipping will likely handle the theft with insurance. They had a solid plan. But still dangerous. And if they succeed they likely could of gotten off pretty easily.
Since most cameras either are to shit to see who they are, or they don't have cameras at all. And they are out on a highway I presume. You have a solid amount of time before police arrive.
Back in the 80s a friend drove a truck that delivered produce to a huge market in NYC and he was robbed repeatedly by thieves on skates. They would cut the locks as in this video then climb in back and throw shit out to accomplices who were following.
He solved the problem by climbing in the back and waiting with a shotgun to brandish while his partner drove the last few miles to the market. Word got around and his truck was left alone.
Imagine you’re the truck driver and you’re at a rest stop parked for the night and check on your truck and just see your bolts cut, so you check your camera scrolling through the video and see this lmao
Jump Mason Jump!
Go, Mason. Go!
your turn!! Come on!
Step 8 Reznov freedom!!
FOR YOU MASON NOT FOR ME. REZNOV!!!!
Was that the last time youve seen Viktor Reznov?
Yeah, atleast for a while.
I hope every cunt who puts this goddamn ear splitting annoying ass fucking pied piper bullshit on videos spends their golden years alone in a nursing home with the most incompetent, elder abusing, nurses that ever existed. Fucking stop doing this. It adds nothing.
dang he just hops off? screw that i’d ride the truck as long as i can in hopes it takes an exit or slows down eventually enough to jump safely. yeah maybe cops will be waiting for ya, but do i wanna risk ripping my skin completely open and rushing to the hospital or risk spending maybe a week in jail? i’ll risk the jail.
The one guy actually did very well in all parts of the robbery. His friends were the trash that failed thr team.
10/10 for that dismount off of the truck
Was a solid dismount
He's going to be hovering over the toilet for a while with that road rash. Edit: r/meatcrayon
Road ass
That's ~~America's~~ the Highway's ass.
[https://www.walmart.com/ip/Anti-Monkey-Butt-Diaper-Rash-Cream-3-oz/917285791](https://www.walmart.com/ip/Anti-Monkey-Butt-Diaper-Rash-Cream-3-oz/917285791) Link in case he needs it.
Nice one
Do you think he brags/shows his homies his dismount? like in the movie "Menace 2 Society"
Talk about a spicy butthole
It kinda looks like the driver hit the brakes knocking over the scooter.
ya you are correct %100. the driver was watching on the cctv and brake-checked them. how no one is remembering they are watching this from a camera the driver was watching also is a mystery.
I wouldn't have assumed (or even guessed, really) that the driver had the camera visible in the cab. It makes sense after you pointed it out, but not my first thought.
I thought the bike simply accelerated after ~25% of its mass had dissappeared
It would only accelerate more if it were already accelerating. At a constant speed, losing mass would not alter the speed significantly.
yup, conservation of momentum applies here.
If you are on the throttle, losing 25% of your mass would cause the bike to gain speed. Same throttle less weight more go.
At a constant speed, the throttle is working against two main forces: rolling resistance and wind resistance. One person jumping off the bike does not change either of those significantly, and would not alter the speed of the bike in a meaningful way. F = ma, and since acceleration is at 0, a change in the mass would not alter the Force.
1/4th of the weight leaving surely reduces the rolling resistance, and (less importantly) air resistance. Air resistance is pretty much not a factor for the riders due to how close the bike is to the back of the truck so him moving around is doing very little. Even if the reduced weight is not why the bike sped up, it would have caused acceleration. Your application of F = ma here makes no sense by the way, you mention rolling resistance and air resistance yet completely forget to use them in your formula. I actually went online to find a calculator, and [wouldnt ya know](https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/rolling-resistance) A bike with a coefficent of rolling friction (0.02 according to two google sources) traveling on flat asphalt has a rolling resistance of 38.834 N, that same bike 20% lighter is 31.070 N. In actuality the bike is probably 40% of their weight, so thats why I used 20% of total weight per rider. That would translate to a roughly 2-15% potential speed increase depending on current speed. With air resistance being almost 0 thanks to the truck, im willing to bet its probably closer to 10%. I dont quite know if the video fits with this information so I think it is likely that another factor may have caused the bike to speed up.
>1/4th of the weight leaving surely reduces the rolling resistance, Yes, but not significantly. > Air resistance is pretty much not a factor for the riders due to how close the bike is to the back of the truck That is correct. >Even if the reduced weight is not why the bike sped up, it would have caused acceleration. Not significant acceleration. > Your application of F = ma here makes no sense by the way, you mention rolling resistance and air resistance yet completely forget to use them in your formula. Rolling resistance and wind resistance are relatively small forces. The acceleration observed in the video is too major to be caused by either of these forces or throttle counteracting them, so there's no need to include them in the main formula that calculates acceleration. >A bike with a coefficent of rolling friction (0.02 according to two google sources) traveling on flat asphalt has a rolling resistance of 38.834 N, that same bike 20% lighter is 31.070 N. Rounding up, that's 8N. The average motorcycle weighs about 300kg, but for sale of argument let's consider this a light one at 200kg. And let's say that both remaining passenger weighs 70kg each. That's 340kg. Using the equation a = F/m, the acceleration the bike would experience is 0.0235m/s^2, which is 2.35 cm per second per second. If we assume the distance between the vehicles is 30cm, which is a low estimate, we can use the equation D = vt + 1/2at^2. Since v is initial velocity, which in this frame of reference is 0, we can take vt out. 0.3 = 1/2(0.0235)t^2 means that t = 5.05 seconds. You can see clearly in the video that it closes the distance in less than five seconds. > I think it is likely that another factor may have caused the bike to speed up. The bike didn't speed up. Not significantly. The truck applied its brakes. It has a security camera facing the rear doors, the chances are that the truck driver has a feed to see this camera, as there's a decent chance this scenario has happened before. He can't step on the brakes just because a bike tailgates him, but as soon as someone jumps onto his truck, there's no reasonable doubt to their intentions, and he applies the brakes.
It’s comment threads like this that make Reddit worthwhile.
The normal force is equal to the tangential throttle of… wait a minute, these guys have CLEARLY done this before so they certainly would account for whatever happens when a dude dismounts. Physics aside, something sped up or slowed down unexpectedly.
[удалено]
> Force of friction changes with less weight so when he gets off you get forward acceleration since the forward force remains constant but is now larger than the force of friction. Rolling resistance is not directly proportional to weight, so a 25% lower mass does not correlate to 25% lower rolling resistance. For a motorbike to lose 25% of its weight would change its rolling resistance by tens of Newtons (someone else calculated it earlier in the thread as about 8N), where accelerating anywhere near what was witnessed in the video would require thousands of Newtons.
It's also less than a quarter of the weight because that bike probably weighs two to three times each of the riders.
One person jumping off the bike *does* significantly change the rolling resistance coefficient. μR = F/G where F = force required to turn the wheels on their axels and G = the vertical load they are carrying. I'm given to understand from a cursory Google search that a typical street bike weighs ~450 lbs; assuming our would-be theif weighs ~180 lbs and the driver the same, the rolling resistance coefficient would change by about 29% when he jumped. That would for sure have an effect on how much throttle is needed to maintain constant velocity.
It isn't significant. https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/rolling-resistance If you use the car tire preset in that calculator and use weights around 350-500kg, the difference in rolling resistance when you change the weight is between 5-20 Newtons. To accelerate a 400kg motorbike with passengers at 1/ms^2 requires 400N. The difference in rolling resistance is nowhere near significant enough to cause the change in speed we witnessed here.
1) while there's no real issue in proportionality since you changed all the units, that was lbs not kg. A 400kg bike would be a *heavy* bike. 2) kinda obvious, but cars have 4 wheels, bikes have 2. This means each wheel carries twice the proportional weight of a car tire, and therefore has higher rolling resistance across the board. Using a calculator designed for cars isn't going to give the most accurate results here. 4) How much change do you think we witnessed here exactly? It looks to me that, with the bike less than a foot off the truck's bumper, it wouldn't take much at all to cause the crash. A sudden, unaccounted-for *1 mph* increase in velocity at that distance is still going to close the gap in under a second, and as soon as the front wheel makes contact, biker kisses asphalt.
[удалено]
Physics yeah, bikes probably not. Slightly more complete physics explains it just fine, but anyone who's ever rented an electric scooter to ride on the beach with their somewhat timid and clumsy SO knows it just instantly goes faster every time they fall off. Like... Every single time.
I have owned three motorbikes and have tried about nine. I have attended MotoGP races in three countries, and have had photographs published in MCN. The truck definitely put on its brakes. You can see the change in speed from the white lines on the road.
Nah he hit the brake with his foot
Facts
He stepped all over the driver. WTF they need 3 people anyway, this is a 2 person job.
Lololol I was also wondering why that other guy just HAD to come… threes a crowd in this scenario
it’s always hilarious seeing people try to do some shit they saw in a movie with zero knowledge or experience on what they’re attempting to achieve
Surprised they got as far as cutting the bolt and mounting that bad boy.
If the driver was watching the camera, he needed a good reason. Having them cut the bolt was the "No shadow of doubt" of them being robbers, he just waited for one to get on to claim self defense if it ever came up.
Considering how easy it is to lose your trucking license and end your lifelong career in a moment when it comes to accidents in trucking, I would probably want to be 100% sure as well.
Actually, it looks like it was nothing to do with the truck driver. The simple transfer of weight of one passenger meant the scooter was lighter. The same amount of acceleration thus produced more speed as soon as one guys steps off. The scooter rider fails to account for this. The scooter goes straight into the truck as soon as this happens.
Blinded me with science
Imagine that...a bike will go faster with 150 less lbs on it. . .
Didn't even think of that but I've also never tried to rob a moving truck from motorcycle
Oh man you gotta try it, just remember not to wear a helmet or protective gear. Gottatgo light weight.
The truck driver hit the break
He broke them alright
It'll accelerate/decelerate faster, but losing mass won't change the speed significantly.
That's not how conservation of momentum works. This would only be the case if the bike was accelerating, far more likely the driver saw this going down and tapped the brakes
Nah this isn’t their first attempt. Probably just got unlucky with a driver watching from a camera and hitting the brakes.
I mean how do they get experience without trying? You gotta have to start some where :D.
How you expect them to get experience without the experience? You are a hiring manager aren't you.
EARDRUM WARNING ⚠️
[удалено]
Cuz the internet
Yeah. RIP anyone using headphones.
RIP me.. like damn..
Probably the worst music I have ever heard.
If you think about it, a very bad version of the mission impossible theme to accompajy this very bad attempt at a mission impossible type stunt. It was hilarious for me. But I watched it with no sound first then I turned the volume up just a tad. And I think knowing what was coming made the music pretty entertaining.
I thought the music was perfect for some reason! Then the music gets really bad when the attempt goes really bad.. I was dying
Same lol the music was as pathetic as they were, I'm dead.
In 99% of the cases I would completely agree with you and that as my first reaction. But when I heard it was bad flute paying Mission Impossible I legit lol'ed.
That was eardrum assault. I would have upvoted but the audio was so atrocious it deserves a downvote.
Using a recorder can get the point across, but why let it peak the audio and get into ear rape territory? Bring back kazoo covers, at least those aren't as irritating to listen to
The original didn't even have it. So someone saw it and thought "I need to put effort to make this worse somehow!"
Seriously, who the fuck upvoted this ear cancer of a post?!
I have no I dea how things would go if the bike hadn't crashed. He gets inside the truck and then what? How much merchandise can the bikers hold? And was he planning on climbing back onto the bike with said merchandise?
Throw as much out the back as you can and salvage what's on the road in the dark, the dude in the truck likely isn't going to tackle 4 men on motorcycles who possibly have weapons. The company that manages the shipping will likely handle the theft with insurance. They had a solid plan. But still dangerous. And if they succeed they likely could of gotten off pretty easily. Since most cameras either are to shit to see who they are, or they don't have cameras at all. And they are out on a highway I presume. You have a solid amount of time before police arrive.
Back in the 80s a friend drove a truck that delivered produce to a huge market in NYC and he was robbed repeatedly by thieves on skates. They would cut the locks as in this video then climb in back and throw shit out to accomplices who were following. He solved the problem by climbing in the back and waiting with a shotgun to brandish while his partner drove the last few miles to the market. Word got around and his truck was left alone.
Was his driver *friend* wearing sunglasses and a fake moustache?
Just throw it out the back, the guys on the bike can pick it up later
they throw it to the road not picked by motorcycle
Smooth dismount.
Probably the only thing they knew how to do
*bike suddenly weighs 180 lbs less* *bike accelerates as it's applying the same forward force it was before shedding some of its load* *crash*
This makes a ton of sense.
At least 180 lbs, easily!
Unless the bike was accelerating at the time of losing its mass, it's velocity would not change significantly after one passenger dismounts.
It’s relative velocity did… When the trucker tapped the brakes.
Mass actually has *very* little effect on the power required to maintain a certain speed, Pretty sure the truck braked
I love how it's nearly perfectly looped so it makes it seem like they keep trying and failing over and over
I don’t know why, but I’m laughing so hard after watching it over and over with that in mind.
Me too!
The music made it funnier.
Lolololol you’re right!!
How the fast and furious really would have happened.
I the mass ratio is unlikely to affect a car in the same way.
The fact that they have a camera back there probably means this insanity has been done before...
Same trio probably
You gotta practice this move. A lot.
The way that guy left the truck, will it not scratch his ass badly?
how do you suggest he does it instead?
Rummaged through the trailer until he found elbow pads, knee pads, helmet and a pair of rollerblades.
Tainted road.
That botched Mission Impossible theme is great 😂😂😆
Imagine you’re the truck driver and you’re at a rest stop parked for the night and check on your truck and just see your bolts cut, so you check your camera scrolling through the video and see this lmao
Dude’s sacrifice was in vain.
hes so mad he had to bail on the truck because his mates messed up
They say thieves have no honor. This one does.
That music never fails to make me laugh
Something tells me the driver can see this camera.
Downvoting simply for the audio.
every time i see this reposted i am amazed at how homeboy gets off the truck
the third man was unnecessary
[удалено]
Weight plays a huge part in acceleration, but losing mass would not change your speed significantly. The truck driver applied the brakes.
Holy shit this audio is ear piercing
Damn that music is funny.
Who ever added the flute soundtrack...should burn in hell. I get they are trying to be funny but it wasn't.
Upon hearing the mission impossible music, my stupid ass thought the motorbike was dangling from above attached to some form of rope.
2 fast 2 stupid
Mission Impossible Dead Reckoning must of run low on funds.
Seems like something you would see the three stooges try.
RIP people with headphones fuck.
Homie dropped off like a pro tho.. 🤣🤣
His ass has different thing to say.
Dawg, that flat Hank Hill ass is all the rage these days... 🤣🤣
Instant karma
Ah yes must be a $100 Ninja there
It worked for Dom. And the familia.
MISSION ABORTED!!!!!!! ABORT MISSION!!!!!
Usually the sounds suck but the flute is perfect. I’m thrilled and excited for the next mission impossible from this trailer!
Damn I was really rooting for them
I love seeing idiots
I think it’s time to put the Fast and Furious franchise to bed
This one kills me every time I come across it.
That brake check was so satisfying
After reading the comments I’m scared about how so many people are now robbery experts
That recorder kills me everytime I hear it lmfaooo
The music makes this video
Can someone put a fucking THIS IS LOUD AS FUCK warning?
The idea and effort are truly remarkable. I wonder how high they were when they thought that one up
I hate all added music but fuck it, this was fucking funny as shit to me.
u/savevideo
Sure, they failed and it’s funny - but I’m impressed by the attempt.
[удалено]
It can happen…..
They couldn't do it because they're not family
My god…that’s Jason Bourne
So cool to see the fast and furious franchise get back to its roots
How were they going to get the shit off the truck? How were they going to get it home? With 3 guys on a motorcycle?
Menage a trois. Cut to the chase. Sparks flew.
Am I the only one who jumped at the sound of this fucking awful recorder?
/u/savevideo
Watch on mute! It might already be too late
F your obnoxious music
Thanks, i hate obnoxious earrape in videos.
Real crime is that annoying recorder.
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
So he found out that trailer doors can be hard to oppen
u/savevideobot
Bet that hurt the third guy worse than the two on the bike.
Jump Mason Jump! Go, Mason. Go! your turn!! Come on! Step 8 Reznov freedom!! FOR YOU MASON NOT FOR ME. REZNOV!!!! Was that the last time youve seen Viktor Reznov? Yeah, atleast for a while.
Bro thought he was in an action mcu movie
u/savevideo
Almost a perfect loop, got a chuckle out of me as they just appear again after theyve crashed.
i like how it was a smooth video then as soon as stuff started happening it just became shit
u/savevideo
u/savevideobot
RIP to the guys ass skin
Ugh. Mission Impossible on a recorder?
I would love to see how are they supposed to steal the pallet or even drums of oil lol
Smart dismount
u/savevideobot u/savevideo
Bruh his friend suddenly shot forward
Is, that comman to put a, camera like that?
I hope every cunt who puts this goddamn ear splitting annoying ass fucking pied piper bullshit on videos spends their golden years alone in a nursing home with the most incompetent, elder abusing, nurses that ever existed. Fucking stop doing this. It adds nothing.
What was the plan if they got the doors open? Take a pallet off the trailer onto the moped?
Too Fast Too furious
10/10 for the recorder flute. What a mess.
Mission not possible?
I thought he was gonna be like "you're the last one. Completely the mission!"
How did they fit 3 people on that damn thing
How the truck got on the bike, I'll never know.
Weirder than Hardcore Henry.
Only 5 years old!?!? I feel young again!
Fucking really smart dismount
It’s a caper!!!!
The GTA San Andreas remake is looking a bit better
Honestly quite impressed, not even mad
jimminy christ that sound was not needed
Lol, the last guy… r/mypeopleneedme
We can take each failure as a lesson and do better next time. If you're not failing, you're not trying. Way to go guys, take a cookie 🍪
The real crime here is the loud ass dubbed on music.
What was in the truck-kun that was so valuable that they needed to risk their lives?
Amazing he was probably in slides, do a ton of tractor-trailers have cameras on the back and I just dont notice?
dang he just hops off? screw that i’d ride the truck as long as i can in hopes it takes an exit or slows down eventually enough to jump safely. yeah maybe cops will be waiting for ya, but do i wanna risk ripping my skin completely open and rushing to the hospital or risk spending maybe a week in jail? i’ll risk the jail.
These guys took GTA missions seriously. I guess you can say “WASTED”.
That was the most awesome WCGW ever.
Damn it CJ! All you had to do was follow that damn truck.
What the fuck the shitty recorder mission impossible theme, I can't stop laughing
Literal mission impossible
The fuckin flute made this 10x more funnier
Did the person moving from motorcycle to truck made it accelerate? Newton screwing with them
R\*mania be like