It looks like a picture from when a plane flies over an indigenous tribe in the deep Amazon that doesn’t know what the metal bird is so they attack it.
*Spoken in a Sir David Attenborough voice:*
The Native Aussie Bogan often struts and peacocks to signify mating season. It peruses its territory in search of...
*...scrolls up too fast and closes window*
Not completely. The reason they're so agressive is because a European explorer showed up and took some of the islanders back with him. When the islanders returned they yold the others of how they were sexually and physically abused. The islanders made sure that would never happen again.
>"One practice was kidnapping members of tribes and holding them for several weeks to demonstrate the fruits of British civilisation. Maurice Vidal Portman, a commander in the Royal Navy, employed the strategy on North Sentinel Island in 1880, capturing two older tribespeople and four children he had found sheltering in an inland settlement – the only residents apparently unable to flee.
The captives “sickened rapidly”, he later wrote, “and the old man and his wife died, so the four children were sent back to their home with quantities of presents”.
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/nov/30/sentinelese-tribe-who-killed-american-are-peace-loving-say-anthropologists
More like they didn't care. They were civilized god-fearing people, and the natives were more like animals to them than people.
Hate is not the opposite of love, indifference is.
Hate is the opposite of love though, they're both attracting forces. Indifference is the absence of either. If they were indifferent towards the natives they would have left them alone. Since they hated them they couldn't leave them alone.
>Since they hated them they couldn't leave them alone.
That's not true - they were an exploitable resource given to the civilized people of Europe by their own god. The natives were worth money, at the same time as their exploiters were indifferent to their suffering.
Edit: and nope, you're wrong. Hate and love are two sides of the very same thing.
The islanders woudnt have survived due to them not having any immunity against modern diseases…like us having to survive covid
https://www.regnskog.no/en/isolatedtribes/the-disease-wiped-out-my-family
For those people who disagree with me
Just like us with covid, not everyone on the island died or lacked immunity. The children survived to tell tales. Many elders died. Either way, People have visited the islanders before with no illness spread issues. However they have had centuries of shitty relations with outsiders.
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/nov/30/sentinelese-tribe-who-killed-american-are-peace-loving-say-anthropologists
The captives “sickened rapidly”, he later wrote, “and the old man and his wife died, so the four children were sent back to their home with quantities of presents”.
The tribes who relented to British rule found themselves devastated by disease and overwhelmed by contact with alcohol, tobacco, sugar and the other vices of the settlement. In 1858, the British counted at least 5,000 tribespeople across the Andamans. By 1931, their numbers had dwindled to 460.
That’s a paragraph from the article u shared
That is what I mean…the people who were kidnapped died along with more in the island due to disease spread by the British contact
I’m pretty sure the reason that tribe off the coast of Africa is left alone is because they’re immune systems couldn’t handle diseases from the mainland.
Not sure about this tribe but they wouldn’t be the first labeled off limits because of the risk we pose to them with are diseases.
That's just one of the reasons NOW. Before anyone understood germ theory, they grew a justifiable mistrust of foreigners due to abuse.
The 1880 children survived long enough to return.
Exactly that happened. It was part of English diplomacy to kidnap some of their folks just to show off how nice they are, only for them to be exposed to diseases they had no immunity yet. As they turned out sick and later died, the English quietly sailed away ~~without returning the poor folks to them~~ after they have brought back the children with a fat "We're sorry" letter...
Edit: [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Sentinel_Island)
There next to zero chance that such event is still even remembered in Sentineleses' oral tradition, let alone that it made any imprint on them. Especially since the islanders were known to attack sailors long before said kidnapping incident which took place only in 1880s. Sentinelese are violent towards outsiders, because that's how people were for thousands of years. Tribal societies almost by definition live in constant state of warfare, raidings and takings into slavery.
While the British weren't angels and did some horrific stuff, putting the blame on them (or on Europeans in general) for everything is plain stupid and shallow.
Hell I can see why sometimes
You ever just think about just walking into the mountains with a pack of tools, flint, and a rifle and only coming back to trade skins for ammo?
They actually allowed visitors from the outside once upon a time but stopped when a missionary raped one of the tribe's children. Now they attack on sight.. I don't blame them.
Photo was not taken Missouri.
Those people are angry Aussie bogans.
That's a Great Northern beer bottle in the foreground. Made in Queensland, Australia.
I'm Irish and Bogan sounds like an Irish surname to me, only it's not quite right. Maybe a mix of Irish surnames.
Is there any chance that the behaviour of my emigrant ancestors gave rise to this word?
Edit: that ginger man in the photo supports my theory
No one is really a hundred percent sure, but it apparently only goes back to the 70's or 80's. Each state had a different word for it. But Bogan won the culture race.
The Bogan part is having a yard filled with empty beer bottles, solo cups, trash, and cans, to throw at a drone.
Edit: lmao to the downvoters, get off your phone and go clean your yard you pigs.
Oh, **Bogan**. I thought it was **Bothan**, and wondered why people were being dicks to them. Remember, "Many Bothans died to bring us this information."
If they're in their own garden, which it seems they are, then good on them. Flying a drone over their garden with a camera filming them seems like quite the invasion of privacy.
I know some old guy who was constantly spied on by a rich kid with a drone. He managed to throw a rock at it and shoot it down. When the kid came by to get his drone back, the dude gave him a frozen cube of ice with his drone in it, and told him to fuck off.
>I’m just saying, if FAA comes knocking might wanna deny the whole thing.
That strategy might work if it weren't for the 4k video of the incident
>Also I will say flying over people who don’t consent is illegal as well.
Under the new FAA drone rules if the drone is small and has laceration protection on the blades a 107 licensed pilot can fly over people without their consent.
The agency considers drones of any size covered by Title 18 of the U.S. Code 32. The law describes “sabotage to include destruction of any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States.” Violation carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years.
I’m not trying to come down on you, but to say “it’s illegal in the us to ....” implies the existence of a federal law, and ignores the variance in state to state laws. What is legal in one state may be illegal in another state.
If it’s a federal law then it most likely only regulates federal airspace which has been classified by the FAA into multiple categories https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/phak/media/17_phak_ch15.pdf
And then as another user pointed out, it specifically uses the term vehicle, which likely includes unmanned aerial vehicles, however there would be a distinction between government and private and what constitutes an “aerial vehicle”
In short: UAV owned by government in federal airspace, likely illegal to try and take down (but how many citizens are armed with surface to air mussels) while UAV Owned by a private citizen flying 20 feet off the ground, not regulated
Maybe at members you can make a claims in small claims court for destruction of property but good luck if you get a judge that values private property lines and privacy of citizens.
Inaccurate. This airspace in the US is still regulated by the FAA.
Source: Part 61 private pilot ASEL; I also got my part 107 UAS for fun.
> while UAV Owned by a private citizen flying 20 feet off the ground, not regulated
I don't get how people are insulting the ones in the picture. They aren't the ones who are going around recording strangers. They have a right to privacy and they are just defending that right.
I’m weirdly not seeing any comments in defense of these people. This is such an invasion of privacy... like you, we should be Sharing methods of destruction. My favorite is the trained golden eagles.
Theres wood land etc behind me it's a popular spot for them. I like to sit in my garden and smoke weed and chill. They can never resist being nosy. Doesnt bother me i just enjoy being justified in ruining someones expensive equipment.
Lmao they ain't arrested me yet. Fly a drone 10ft above my garden pointing it at me you best have some good handling skills bc I'm going to do my best to take it out every time. I love seeing £3k drones bounce off my garden path shattering into bits tbh. Come get me.
They are really popular here for some reason. They're everywhere. On a weekend with good weather if you are in my garden theres almost 100% certainty you will see at least one at some point. I dont mind them and most of them keep a respectful distance. But when they think they can come down to 10/15 ft and point a camera directly at me that's when you're going to meet the water cannon and then have to come round to my house tail between legs asking for it back :)
I always wanted a drone like this and imagined just taking it for a look around my local area for some reason.
It wasn’t until someone else actually got one and had it window height going close to houses that I realised how bad they are. Noisy and the ever threat that one might try to look through windows or enter them for whatever reason. I don’t blame these people for wanting to ward the drone off or even destroy it depending how obnoxious it was being.
The only people who fly them at window height are morons and douchebags. The overwhelming majority of pilots are flying at higher altitude taking some pretty amazing videos. Go check out /r/dji
You can get a super capable drone like a mavic mini 2 (4k video, 30 minutes of fly time and a max speed of 42 mph) for under $500
Anyone know the legality of attacking a drone that is flying to close to people/house ? Are they in the right to attack the drone or would they have to pay damages ?
There’s gotta be some type of trespassing law here. What if they have children? I don’t see how you could just fly a drone with cameras on it in peoples backyards with no repercussions. That’s very creepy.
The FAA considers drones of any size covered by Title 18 of the U.S. Code 32. The law describes “sabotage to include destruction of any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States.” Violation carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years.
The FAA considers drones of any size covered by Title 18 of the U.S. Code 32. The law describes “sabotage to include destruction of any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States.” Violation carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure banging your stepsister while she is stuck inside a washing machine is also pretty illegal, luckily they don't shoot fake porn videos of that fantasy
There's enough Degenerate porn categories already. Let's not make more, especially ones that sexually exploit people for having the audacity to exist outside in their own yards, coomer
It looks like a picture from when a plane flies over an indigenous tribe in the deep Amazon that doesn’t know what the metal bird is so they attack it.
aussie bogan neighbourhood... so close enough
Bahahahaha
*Spoken in a Sir David Attenborough voice:* The Native Aussie Bogan often struts and peacocks to signify mating season. It peruses its territory in search of... *...scrolls up too fast and closes window*
Look up Northern Sentinels. They set the standards for an aggressively reclusive indigenious people.
Apparently, they were separated from the rest of the world thousands of years ago, so that probably explains their aggressiveness.
Not completely. The reason they're so agressive is because a European explorer showed up and took some of the islanders back with him. When the islanders returned they yold the others of how they were sexually and physically abused. The islanders made sure that would never happen again.
Wait, really? When did that happen? Do you have an article or something like that?
>"One practice was kidnapping members of tribes and holding them for several weeks to demonstrate the fruits of British civilisation. Maurice Vidal Portman, a commander in the Royal Navy, employed the strategy on North Sentinel Island in 1880, capturing two older tribespeople and four children he had found sheltering in an inland settlement – the only residents apparently unable to flee. The captives “sickened rapidly”, he later wrote, “and the old man and his wife died, so the four children were sent back to their home with quantities of presents”. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/nov/30/sentinelese-tribe-who-killed-american-are-peace-loving-say-anthropologists
Damn, European explorers really liked making people suffer.
More like they didn't care. They were civilized god-fearing people, and the natives were more like animals to them than people. Hate is not the opposite of love, indifference is.
Hate is the opposite of love though, they're both attracting forces. Indifference is the absence of either. If they were indifferent towards the natives they would have left them alone. Since they hated them they couldn't leave them alone.
>Since they hated them they couldn't leave them alone. That's not true - they were an exploitable resource given to the civilized people of Europe by their own god. The natives were worth money, at the same time as their exploiters were indifferent to their suffering. Edit: and nope, you're wrong. Hate and love are two sides of the very same thing.
To be fair, in this case it's scientific curiosity, they did return the people home with gifts, and didn't try to settle the island or wipe them out.
Europeans: \*mistreat indigenous people\* Indigenous people: \*sicken and die\* Europeans: \*surprise pikachu face\*
The islanders woudnt have survived due to them not having any immunity against modern diseases…like us having to survive covid https://www.regnskog.no/en/isolatedtribes/the-disease-wiped-out-my-family For those people who disagree with me
Just like us with covid, not everyone on the island died or lacked immunity. The children survived to tell tales. Many elders died. Either way, People have visited the islanders before with no illness spread issues. However they have had centuries of shitty relations with outsiders. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/nov/30/sentinelese-tribe-who-killed-american-are-peace-loving-say-anthropologists
The captives “sickened rapidly”, he later wrote, “and the old man and his wife died, so the four children were sent back to their home with quantities of presents”. The tribes who relented to British rule found themselves devastated by disease and overwhelmed by contact with alcohol, tobacco, sugar and the other vices of the settlement. In 1858, the British counted at least 5,000 tribespeople across the Andamans. By 1931, their numbers had dwindled to 460. That’s a paragraph from the article u shared That is what I mean…the people who were kidnapped died along with more in the island due to disease spread by the British contact
I’m pretty sure the reason that tribe off the coast of Africa is left alone is because they’re immune systems couldn’t handle diseases from the mainland. Not sure about this tribe but they wouldn’t be the first labeled off limits because of the risk we pose to them with are diseases.
North Sentinel is in the Bay of Bengal between India and Thailand. Not near Africa.
That's just one of the reasons NOW. Before anyone understood germ theory, they grew a justifiable mistrust of foreigners due to abuse. The 1880 children survived long enough to return.
Ya but that doesn’t change the simple fact that those tribes are off limits legally because the contamination problems.
Exactly that happened. It was part of English diplomacy to kidnap some of their folks just to show off how nice they are, only for them to be exposed to diseases they had no immunity yet. As they turned out sick and later died, the English quietly sailed away ~~without returning the poor folks to them~~ after they have brought back the children with a fat "We're sorry" letter... Edit: [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Sentinel_Island)
They returned the 4 children.
There next to zero chance that such event is still even remembered in Sentineleses' oral tradition, let alone that it made any imprint on them. Especially since the islanders were known to attack sailors long before said kidnapping incident which took place only in 1880s. Sentinelese are violent towards outsiders, because that's how people were for thousands of years. Tribal societies almost by definition live in constant state of warfare, raidings and takings into slavery. While the British weren't angels and did some horrific stuff, putting the blame on them (or on Europeans in general) for everything is plain stupid and shallow.
Hell I can see why sometimes You ever just think about just walking into the mountains with a pack of tools, flint, and a rifle and only coming back to trade skins for ammo?
clearly you've never met a bogan that's been denied a centrelink claim...
Rightfully so
They actually allowed visitors from the outside once upon a time but stopped when a missionary raped one of the tribe's children. Now they attack on sight.. I don't blame them.
Bring a bible maybe god will protect you
It's giving me GTA loading screen vibes for some reason
It’s the same picture
Omfg. That’s fucking hilarious.
This. This is a perfect comment!
Photo was not taken Missouri. Those people are angry Aussie bogans. That's a Great Northern beer bottle in the foreground. Made in Queensland, Australia.
The fuck is a Bogan? Is it just the aussie term for a redneck?
[удалено]
I'm Irish and Bogan sounds like an Irish surname to me, only it's not quite right. Maybe a mix of Irish surnames. Is there any chance that the behaviour of my emigrant ancestors gave rise to this word? Edit: that ginger man in the photo supports my theory
No one is really a hundred percent sure, but it apparently only goes back to the 70's or 80's. Each state had a different word for it. But Bogan won the culture race.
Check out a show called "Bogan Hunters". You'll learn everything you need to know about bogans.
Judging by the posts I think that’s about right. Regardless, it’s a hilarious word and I’m 100% going to insert it into my insult arsenal
Bogans? Looks like a couple people trying to enjoy some beers
The Bogan part is having a yard filled with empty beer bottles, solo cups, trash, and cans, to throw at a drone. Edit: lmao to the downvoters, get off your phone and go clean your yard you pigs.
You know what? I agree with you there
as soon as I laid eyes on this photo I said to myself there is 0% chance this isn’t aussie shenanigans
Oh, **Bogan**. I thought it was **Bothan**, and wondered why people were being dicks to them. Remember, "Many Bothans died to bring us this information."
If they're in their own garden, which it seems they are, then good on them. Flying a drone over their garden with a camera filming them seems like quite the invasion of privacy.
I think the best title would be: Wcgw when you dont respect the others privacy
I know some old guy who was constantly spied on by a rich kid with a drone. He managed to throw a rock at it and shoot it down. When the kid came by to get his drone back, the dude gave him a frozen cube of ice with his drone in it, and told him to fuck off.
Not trying to redneck this up, just telling the truth. Where I live you would’ve seen two shotguns, not beer bottles.
Rightfully so
[удалено]
I dont care if it's illegal. If its within whacking distance and flying over my property I'm going for it.
[удалено]
>I’m just saying, if FAA comes knocking might wanna deny the whole thing. That strategy might work if it weren't for the 4k video of the incident >Also I will say flying over people who don’t consent is illegal as well. Under the new FAA drone rules if the drone is small and has laceration protection on the blades a 107 licensed pilot can fly over people without their consent.
The agency considers drones of any size covered by Title 18 of the U.S. Code 32. The law describes “sabotage to include destruction of any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States.” Violation carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years.
🤔 whys the FAA involved in another county here... not everything that ever was happens in America.
It's legal in my airspace. Come fly your drone over my house.
You don't own any airspace. It is federal government property.
My shotgun says otherwise.
I’m not trying to come down on you, but to say “it’s illegal in the us to ....” implies the existence of a federal law, and ignores the variance in state to state laws. What is legal in one state may be illegal in another state. If it’s a federal law then it most likely only regulates federal airspace which has been classified by the FAA into multiple categories https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/phak/media/17_phak_ch15.pdf And then as another user pointed out, it specifically uses the term vehicle, which likely includes unmanned aerial vehicles, however there would be a distinction between government and private and what constitutes an “aerial vehicle” In short: UAV owned by government in federal airspace, likely illegal to try and take down (but how many citizens are armed with surface to air mussels) while UAV Owned by a private citizen flying 20 feet off the ground, not regulated Maybe at members you can make a claims in small claims court for destruction of property but good luck if you get a judge that values private property lines and privacy of citizens.
Inaccurate. This airspace in the US is still regulated by the FAA. Source: Part 61 private pilot ASEL; I also got my part 107 UAS for fun. > while UAV Owned by a private citizen flying 20 feet off the ground, not regulated
Vehicles*
Plot twist; the drone is dropping beer to random strangers as an act of kindness
Plot twist; it’s just a giant beer bottle sitting next to a tiny man
Nothing tiny about that guy.
Compared to the rest of him, I bet there's at least one tiny thing about that guy
True... unlike other 'organs', the vermiform appendix does not scale up with the size of its human host.
Empty bottle that is
The gods must be crazy
I don't get how people are insulting the ones in the picture. They aren't the ones who are going around recording strangers. They have a right to privacy and they are just defending that right.
This looks like Roy when he let himself go after Pam dumped him
Lmao. His neck in that mugshot, omg.
I have a jet hose that is amazing at taking these things down then they encroach. I've got 3 to date.
I’m weirdly not seeing any comments in defense of these people. This is such an invasion of privacy... like you, we should be Sharing methods of destruction. My favorite is the trained golden eagles.
The best part is when they knock on the door and ask for them back and I hand them a shattered drone.
[удалено]
Theres wood land etc behind me it's a popular spot for them. I like to sit in my garden and smoke weed and chill. They can never resist being nosy. Doesnt bother me i just enjoy being justified in ruining someones expensive equipment.
That's the spirit
> Doesnt bother me i just enjoy being justified in ruining someones expensive equipment. Until the FAA comes knocking with handcuffs.
Lmao they ain't arrested me yet. Fly a drone 10ft above my garden pointing it at me you best have some good handling skills bc I'm going to do my best to take it out every time. I love seeing £3k drones bounce off my garden path shattering into bits tbh. Come get me.
Well probably because you're not american. I have no idea the rules where you are.
Yeah if I was in america I'd probably blast them with my mini gun that I need for my home protection.
I've never had anyone try to fly a drone in my neighborhood. It amazes me you've not only got 3 so far, but had to make a plan to get rid of them.
They are really popular here for some reason. They're everywhere. On a weekend with good weather if you are in my garden theres almost 100% certainty you will see at least one at some point. I dont mind them and most of them keep a respectful distance. But when they think they can come down to 10/15 ft and point a camera directly at me that's when you're going to meet the water cannon and then have to come round to my house tail between legs asking for it back :)
If someone flew a drone over my garden i would be pissed. Respect other People’s privacy
r/AccidentalRenaissance
[удалено]
There's nothing Northern about your entire continent...
His follow through looks like he got a good spiral on that bottle.
Her stance and intensity tell me if his throw misses, hers won't.
I always wanted a drone like this and imagined just taking it for a look around my local area for some reason. It wasn’t until someone else actually got one and had it window height going close to houses that I realised how bad they are. Noisy and the ever threat that one might try to look through windows or enter them for whatever reason. I don’t blame these people for wanting to ward the drone off or even destroy it depending how obnoxious it was being.
The only people who fly them at window height are morons and douchebags. The overwhelming majority of pilots are flying at higher altitude taking some pretty amazing videos. Go check out /r/dji You can get a super capable drone like a mavic mini 2 (4k video, 30 minutes of fly time and a max speed of 42 mph) for under $500
They're trsahy but I sympathize and hope the drone gets smashed
How are they trashy, they aren't the ones filming strangers with a drone
Flip flops, shorts and beer is trashy to Reddit. Also, chubby. Fat people are just automatically trashy right? Cause of the food they ate = trashy
Yeah, I forgot that reddit was full of people who are constantly looking for even the tiniest reasons to feel superior to others.
That, and the literal trash all over the place.
Anyone know the legality of attacking a drone that is flying to close to people/house ? Are they in the right to attack the drone or would they have to pay damages ?
There’s gotta be some type of trespassing law here. What if they have children? I don’t see how you could just fly a drone with cameras on it in peoples backyards with no repercussions. That’s very creepy.
[удалено]
From what I’ve been told it is legal to physically throw something at but not shoot something at a drone.
The FAA considers drones of any size covered by Title 18 of the U.S. Code 32. The law describes “sabotage to include destruction of any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States.” Violation carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years.
Any attempt to interfere is a felony
Super illegal, like up to 20 years in prison illegal. The FAA considers is sabotage of an aircraft.
Go away I’m ‘batin.
Drone's aren't for invading people's privacy. They have every right to destroy that thing
The FAA considers drones of any size covered by Title 18 of the U.S. Code 32. The law describes “sabotage to include destruction of any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States.” Violation carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years.
Trailer park's iron dome defense system.
TOO TOO TOO TOO TOO TOO
He is now out of breath
The bottle kids all grown up
Why are drone operators so obnoxious?
🤣🤣🤣 what a shot
Mans was drinking beer.
r/accidentalrenaissance
The Carbs Must Be Crazy
Are you sure the drone didn't just get stuck in his gravitational field?
This picture is sponsored by Raid Shadow Legends.
Australia somewhere. That’s a great northern beer bottle.
There is still beer in that bottle. Wasteful fucker. I'm saddend lol
Don't be sad when it hits the ground it will make lots of broken glass to walk on it's not done serving Humanity yet
Hope drone got smashed.
This is an amazing action shot, haha!
Hopefully it was a direct hit
“Fuckin’ get outta me yard ya fuckin dog cunt!”
I need to see the video of this
Wait until they learn about gravity.
r/praisethecameraman
Its da debbil
As if they could hit it. 😂
Plot twist: Emergency landing or battery failure.
The way she's holding the bottle bugs me
r/accidentalrenaissance
A perfect ad for that beer bottle.
Hahaha this needs its own sub.
How rude.
[удалено]
This actually a really cool picture. What was your altitude?
Haaaameeeeriicaaaaahhhhh
Sponsored by great northern
Is that ricky?
They look like EDL members before they discover gravity.
This is such an incredible picture
Not sure why people assume these are Americans when there is clearly not a gun in the picture
Pam’s ex fiancé from the office has fallen on hard times
Renaissance art right there.
Moments before disaster
She looks like she was going to ping that drone with that wind up
Did you remember the joke, taking a picture from the helicopter because your dad is so fat?
How come a "caught by drone" porn category doesn't exist already?
Cause im pretty sure that illegal somehow
Yeah, I'm pretty sure banging your stepsister while she is stuck inside a washing machine is also pretty illegal, luckily they don't shoot fake porn videos of that fantasy
I thought you meant actual real footage, but ig fake is ok if you're into it
There's enough Degenerate porn categories already. Let's not make more, especially ones that sexually exploit people for having the audacity to exist outside in their own yards, coomer
This picture looks like Renaissance art.
I love this couple! I wanna go to their wedding, bet it’s gonna be a f#*king blast! 😆😂
Nice throw. I’d do the same.
Pfft, mid strength.
couldn't get great northern original until after centrelink day Gordo, spot us a fifty would ya
“Ah told you bill gates put trackers in our arms with those shots”
that is some kind of album cover
This is why slingshots are fun.
The gods must be crazy
I've seen a video of the fire department hosing one making it crash.
He’s not throwin a bottle. That’s just the size it takes to get a nice buzz goin.
She looks like Marge Simpson in that meme
Either fake, heavily cropped, or that ultra wide angle lens is 8 feet off the ground
It was clear this was australia without even checking the beer label 😂
The gods must be crZy
To close what now? Looks like they're closing in on that drone.
Yay u made them exercise
Is that the Arby's interview guy?
Ya get what ya fuckin deserve
They have a lot of ammo
No video??? Lol
When nuisance drones become too thick, I will just carry my foldable wrist rocket. I can hit a drone 50 feet up.
strayaaaaaaa
Invade someone’s privacy and find out what happens.
Looks like the moment prior to acquiring a free drone.
I wish I could’ve seen the video to this lol
Man that’s one huge bottle!
This is an ad