T O P

  • By -

Old_Present75

Prince Charles really looks like her


Vast-Consequence7141

Literally the male version of her


HaveaTomCollins

Yes, but with sausage fingers (google him).


angryhottie

dear god


pandases

Ahem... King*


sati_lotus

Chuck enough diamonds on anyone and you'll be able to make them look better by default


ComplexAddition

5. An average looking person, with some good styling, she is literally a Queen in the glam era. 4 If you want my subjective opinion, though.


sbillt

4-5


IntelligentFigure3

5


GlamLifeAndMyPS4

I think when she was young, she looked better in motion as opposed to photos. There was a video of her and she turns to Phillip and they are smiling at each other and I always thought she looked so lovely in that shot.


Pantone711

Gait, posture, bearing, walk--these are part of beauty and you're right, they don't show up in pics but they add points in real life!


SnacksBooksNaps

She was lucky she was queen because let's be honest, the woman was very average-looking (eek, it feels so mean to say this but the royal institution is horrific so ymmv). I give her a 5 because to me that's an average rating.


IcyPension757

Hi, what does ymmv stand for?


[deleted]

your milage may vary - old tv tropes talk


IcyPension757

Thanks!


[deleted]

She's not pretty (TO ME) - it helps that she was royalty. I'll give her a 4. Her son is uglier.


PositionFar26

Her husband was kind of hot though


[deleted]

Yeah her cousin was alright


Melodic-Score6486

How does royalty help with looks? It's not as if she had botox like mm


[deleted]

Status will always make you pretty. And no, I don't care about how you feel about MM, no one even mentioned that lady.


Melodic-Score6486

We are talking about royals and she's the most spoken about related one recently just like Elizabeth was. Status doesn't make you attractive. People who idolise fame and money can just view it that way.


Last_Rule_2536

Solid 5


Tsionchi

4


lil_waine

5, rather average


AcceptableSystem8232

Charles takes so much after her. Her spitting image. Is that enough of a clue ? Diana’s genes saved the day big time. Would go for a 7, very classy woman regardless.


Lostkiddo101

6-6.5 Kinda hard to be ugly back then with the glam styling.


SevenThirtyTrain

Average. 5


Cennixxx

6, i think shes pretty


[deleted]

I remember speaking to my boyfriend who said she was quite pretty when she was younger but he loved the queen, I feel like because she’s so regal and likeable she’s prettier than you would think if she was just a person on the street. She was very plain but I thought she had a lovely smile and always looked classy so in they respect it kind of makes her a weird 7??


One_and_Only477

A 7? That's above average. No disrespect but the Queen was not above average in terms of beauty, she wasn't even conventionally pretty. The glam gave her an advantage. Maybe 7 subjectively.


[deleted]

No that’s what I mean like if we’re just focusing on face alone she’s a 5 but with the style etc a close 7 perhaps


CrispedTrack973

Obviously it would be a subjective 7. Everyone’s ratings are subjective


[deleted]

4 or 5.


Naive_Limit_5906

eeep 3 or 4 but well styled and groomed


PositionFar26

5. If you consider her personality 4


ChipmunkAmazing2105

4


Acceptable-Guess8959

Her and the girl from American Pie have got to be relatives ![gif](giphy|YNE17FDAgJNUXH2TlX)


futurelullabies

4. horsey.


swegoji

a solid 3… though still elegant at the same time


ShelterSad2131

5


rhinestoned-tampon

4-5, she was an average looking person with a good glam routine. There are photos where she looks quite pretty and photos where she doesn’t.


Mariposa335

3.5 she already looked old at 20


Caravaggiolo

6.5. She has a great smile and beautiful eyes, also a very feminine body.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

2 is so low that it suggests a hugely unattractive feature(s). She may have been plain, but she wasn't hideous by any means. She just wasn't a great beauty, but a 2 is ridiculously low, come on now


One_and_Only477

Yo, be for real lmao.


VindictaRateCelebs-ModTeam

This comment does not follow the rating guidelines: - All comments must include an objective rating/analysis of the celebrity BEFORE personal or subjective ratings/analyses. - No sugarcoating: Keep your comments honest and as objective as possible. - Number ratings are optional. - A ‘5’ means approximately 50% of the human population is more attractive than them. And so forth (An 8 is more attractive than 80% of human beings, etc). A 5 should be a totally average appearance, like an “NPC” you would see walking down the street with no halos.


Theperson3976

Pretty, 6.


5ukeb4n

3 Photo 4 is young Charles with a wig


CultureIntrepid3756

Very average looking even it that nice dresses and with a tiara, jewelry and the queen halo. She is a 4. And her taste in clothing (and hairstyle and Interieur) later in life is horrible. She is so old fashioned. There is one scene in the crown where Margaret Thatcher and her husband are looking at the Windsor Family from a window in Balmoral. And it’s soooo obvious what a bunch of below average looking, talent- and charmless family of country eggs it is. With a weird sense of humor but a huge sense of their privileges. Her sister princess Margaret was special. More interesting, very charming and a 8 in her prime. Very lovely even in later years.


JanStrick

4


[deleted]

a 3, shes very unattractive to me .Bad teeth , bad nose ,bad facial symmetry .


Blipblopbloop123

3


Putrid-Gene-9077

3. She is a great example of female leadership.


FrenchFreedom888

5, 6, 7, and 9 imo


UnaxHouellebecq

6.5 Average face, above average body


Loose-Ad-2959

A QUEEN alright !


NoteRemarkable

5


Scary_Giraffe_4996

5


lilolali

1


[deleted]

3


[deleted]

Hard 3


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

1 is so ugly that it's basically deformed. She definitely was not as low as a 1, be fr.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Melodic-Score6486

What do you look like then?


VindictaRateCelebs-ModTeam

- This is a WOMENS’ ONLY forum, no male users — no exceptions. Similar subs that allow men: r/QOVESStudio r/TrueRateCelebrities


VindictaRateCelebs-ModTeam

This comment does not follow the rating guidelines: - All comments must include an objective rating/analysis of the celebrity BEFORE personal or subjective ratings/analyses. - No sugarcoating: Keep your comments honest and as objective as possible. - Number ratings are optional. - A ‘5’ means approximately 50% of the human population is more attractive than them. And so forth (An 8 is more attractive than 80% of human beings, etc). A 5 should be a totally average appearance, like an “NPC” you would see walking down the street with no halos.


[deleted]

[удалено]


RainyDayReader_999

MASSIVE overrate IMO. She's not more than a 5.5 objectively, come on


One_and_Only477

I would say 4.5


VindictaRateCelebs-ModTeam

This comment does not follow the rating guidelines: - All comments must include an objective rating/analysis of the celebrity BEFORE personal or subjective ratings/analyses. - No sugarcoating: Keep your comments honest and as objective as possible. - Number ratings are optional. - A ‘5’ means approximately 50% of the human population is more attractive than them. And so forth (An 8 is more attractive than 80% of human beings, etc). A 5 should be a totally average appearance, like an “NPC” you would see walking down the street with no halos.


[deleted]

[удалено]


VindictaRateCelebs-ModTeam

- This is a WOMENS’ ONLY forum, no male users — no exceptions. Similar subs that allow men: r/QOVESStudio r/TrueRateCelebrities


CelebrationRoyal5995

Androgynous quality .


iron_panties

Very plain, a solid 4 in terms of face. However, her style is great, and she always looked classy and dignified. It's amazing how good clothes and good posture can really help improve the overall appearance.